House Decriminalizes Marijuana

Holy fuckin shit....(D)'s do something liberal for a change.


How totally the fuck out of character for them. shocked they didn't move to make CA and CO the exclusive producers....or some other such "For rich elites only" legislation.

I'll be expecting that move sometime in the near future.
 
Last edited:
Holy fuckin shit....(D)'s do something liberal for a change.


How totally the fuck out of character for them. shocked they didn't move to make CA and CO the exclusive producers....or some other such "For rich elites only" legislation.

I'll be expecting that move sometime in the near future.

I bet your brain did a serious double-clutch reading the OP.

You've convinced yourself that Democrats are "fascist" and Republicans are *snicker* "liberal", but your love for weed is one of the few things that transcends your political name-calling. Uh oh!

....and now you have to rationalize why it's the House Democrats' fault when their pro-pot legislation dies on arrival in the Senate.


I'm sure you're up to the challenge....I have every confidence that you can rationalize this.
 
I bet your brain did a serious double-clutch reading the OP.

Why?? Because you're stupid??

You've convinced yourself that Democrats are "fascist" and Republicans are *snicker* "liberal", but your love for weed is one of the few things that transcends your political name-calling. Uh oh!

Yup...you're a tard.

I never accused the Democrats of being fascist, I just laugh at them for accusing liberals of being fascist.

And Republicans are the more liberal party.....if abortion and sometimes (but usually not) weed were the ONLY issues of liberty at hand, yea (D)'s would be super liberal, but they aren't. In almost every other case they are the party of authoritarianism, totalitarianism and as much centralized federal control as the control freak (D) Karens can get.

....and now you have to rationalize why it's the House Democrats' fault when their pro-pot legislation dies on arrival in the Senate.


Why?? Because you want to fantasizes that's what I have to do??

Dear Rob, your mind reading skills are shit, don't quit your dayjob mmkay cupcake?? ;)

And I'm not even so sure it will, quite a few anti-war on drugs/state issue Republicans in the senate who would LOVE to federally decriminalize and leave it up to the states.

I believe even some of the most tightwad conservatives including Ted Cruz while not pro pot personally ARE in favor of kicking it's regulation back to the states.

And it won't take very many of them to send it to the WH, you know Trump will sign it :D

I'm sure you're up to the challenge....I have every confidence that you can rationalize this.

Rationalize about what YOU fantasies is going to happen??

LOL sure buddy.

Why don't we wait and see what happens first there Nostradumbass.
 
Last edited:
How many US prisons will that empty?

Uhhh nobody....nobody goes to federal prison on a pot possession charge. Feds don't waste resources prosecuting misdemeanors. Shit they don't even bother with minor or moderate pot felonies. If the feds are after you? You done fucked up biggy.

And the Feds can decriminalize but the states can and will still prohibit and throw folks in prison ALL DAY LONG for it.

Hell even counties in some states, yessir alcohol prohibition is still alive n the US, there are a few remaining dry counties ya best not get caught with a bottle in.

US Federal government =/= State government.
 
Last edited:
Oh look! Ogg specified "US prisons" and BoBo moooooooooved teh goalposts to focus on federal prisons, as opposed to all prisons. :rolleyes:

#HeThinkHeWinning
 
Oh look! Ogg specified "US prisons" and BoBo moooooooooved teh goalposts to focus on federal prisons, as opposed to all prisons. :rolleyes:

#HeThinkHeWinning

Creeping Charlie(aka BoBo) is just an ignorant argumentative child. I think he/she purposefully ignores the context of others comments just so he/she can engage in a circular argument. It's the closest thing to attention he/she gets in his/her life.

SAD!!!
 
Aww, look at the US trying to be more like their superior neighbours to the north. How cute.
 
Creeping Charlie(aka BoBo) is just an ignorant argumentative child. I think he/she purposefully ignores the context of others comments just so he/she can engage in a circular argument. It's the closest thing to attention he/she gets in his/her life.

SAD!!!

Yep..
 
Oh look! Ogg specified "US prisons" and BoBo moooooooooved teh goalposts to focus on federal prisons, as opposed to all prisons. :rolleyes:

#HeThinkHeWinning

Because federal decriminalization would only effect federal cases LOL...federal =/= state...when are you leftist going to figure that shit out??

If this goes through? You'll STILL go to jail in Texas for pot possession. :)

Rob....go back to 5th grade, learn what the USA is and how it works and graduate this time. :D

Creeping Charlie(aka BoBo) is just an ignorant argumentative child. I think he/she purposefully ignores the context of others comments just so he/she can engage in a circular argument. It's the closest thing to attention he/she gets in his/her life.

SAD!!!

OH look Laz doesn't know how the US works either LOL :D

Aww, look at the US trying to be more like their superior neighbours to the north. How cute.

Superior? LOL now that's funny. :D
 
Last edited:
"Holy fuckin shit....(D)'s do something liberal for a change.

How totally the fuck out of character for them. shocked they didn't move to make CA and CO the exclusive producers....or some other such "For rich elites only" legislation.

I'll be expecting that move sometime in the near future.[/QUOTE]

I thought I'd seen enough of his posts to know how out of touch he is...well, this one tops them all."

...Imagine... somehow thinking Dems/liberals don't want legal marijuana and what....

...only Repubs do?!?!

...laughable!

Ps- by liberal I mean the actual definition of it that they teach at Stanford that is in actual textbooks(well the don't really use text books for classes like this at Stanford or most other high level Universities...it would be another sort of book...I didn't have the heart to dash him all over the rocks with this tid-bit of info. last time)
 
"Uhhh nobody....nobody goes to federal prison on a pot possession charge"

Wait, I stand corrected, I read a few post down a new low in being out of touch.

It would be laughable if the federal prisons were not full of(tens of thousands)black and brown men and women serving time for marijuana possession.
 
I thought I'd seen enough of his posts to know how out of touch he is...well, this one tops them all."

...Imagine... somehow thinking Dems/liberals don't want legal marijuana and what....

...only Repubs do?!?!

Imagine, being so illiterate you think I posted anything of the sort.

YOU don't have to imagine, you really are that illiterate, but the folks reading....;)

Ps- by liberal I mean the actual definition of it that they teach at Stanford that is in actual textbooks

Which would be???

You don't have the ability to dash me over the rocks or you would have during your day and a half of flailing about unable to admit you were wrong about what socialism is and unable to admit it despite 5 world renown academic references cited....vs. your total lack of anything, not even a lame argument, to support your bullshit.
 
Last edited:
And you have the temerity to misquote my post. I said US prisons, NOT federal - so just fuck off!
 
And you have the temerity to misquote my post. I said US prisons, NOT federal - so just fuck off!

Again, it doesn't matter what you said because this decriminalization could only MAYBE effect federal prisons....of which nobody goes for possession.

This will do NOTHING for the vast majority of US prisons, which are controlled by the states, not the feds.

Federal =/= state....how do you STILL not understand that??
 
Last edited:
"... 5 world renown academic references..."

You referenced Webster's dictionary and an encyclopedia....I've got no words for how funny you are!

Your a half- assed Neo-liberal which actually means something and I could recite to you all that it means(I've asked you many times to explain your position to no avail), however, you are also insane and come from the Jeffrey Dahmer/Jim Jones school of thought so...

...I really won't waste my breath and have no responsibility to educate you!

...there is a little town in Wisconsin that is suffering greatly...I feel for your community.
 
"... 5 world renown academic references..."

You referenced Webster's dictionary and an encyclopedia....I've got no words for how funny you are!

And a few universities including Stanford and Oxford that supported what pretty much if not ALL dictionaries and encyclopedias say/describe socialism as being.

You were wrong...and you're not adult enough to own it despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.


Your a half- assed Neo-liberal which actually means something and I could recite to you all that it means(I've asked you many times to explain your position to no avail), however, you are also insane and come from the Jeffrey Dahmer/Jim Jones school of thought so...

No I'm not a neo-liberal either....and you can't explain shit or you would have, all you've got so far is hot air.

Explain my position on what?

You've never asked that, all you do is dance around trying to avoid responsibility for the dumb shit you said.

You still haven't owned up to the fact that academic consensus might not be wrong about what socialism...and that you might be.

...I really won't waste my breath and have no responsibility to educate you!


You educate me LOL

You can't even BEGIN to make a case for your assertion that socialism and liberalism are the same thing.

Because they aren't. ;) you're wrong.


...there is a little town in Wisconsin that is suffering greatly...I feel for your community.

Don't care, not my community....LOL that fucker is HOURS away.

Poor WIllJ, ignorant as ever. :)
 
*chuckles*

500 shit posts since the middle of November...talk about a meaningless life...:rolleyes:
 
"Poor WIllJ, ignorant as ever. "

....and why would one keep responding to someone you believe is ignorant? Why keep posting?

Yep, 500 shit posts of crazy, compulsive and incomprehensible
Nonsense

Oh well
 
"Poor WIllJ, ignorant as ever. "

....and why would one keep responding to someone you believe is ignorant? Why keep posting?

Yep, 500 shit posts of crazy, compulsive and incomprehensible
Nonsense

Oh well

all behind the screen of ignore, except when he is quoted...:)
 
Back
Top