Is The Giant Orange Toddler Trying To Start WWIII?

Didn't see anything implying that Trump did this.

And how would this start WWIII??

Calm down Karen. :cool:
 
All we can say for sure is that Someone did not like him.

Oh, and it wasn't a bullet proof car.
 
The thing I like about the Israelis is that you don't fuck with them. They are the Honey Badgers of the Mid East.
 
If the assasination was done by suicide bomber (as initial reports claimed), then Bonesaw bin Saud was behind it. If it was a sniper attack (and later photos show bullet holes) then Bibi in Israel was behind it.

The main impact of attacks of this kind will NOT be to set back Iran’s program but to render diplomacy for Biden more difficult. Trump will not push back against these attacks - he may even be encouraging and aiding them

Good analysis HERE by the guy who literally wrote the book on the campaign to target Iranian nuclear scientists......the guy they got this time was the "biggest fish".
 
It could only be one of two. The Orange Don or Benny The NuttyYahoo.

Somebody needs to be prosecuted.
 
It could only be one of two. The Orange Don or Benny The NuttyYahoo.

Somebody needs to be prosecuted.


That's as maybe.

Prob's best the Iranian regime is denied a viable weapon programme though all the same, eh ?
 
That's as maybe.

Prob's best the Iranian regime is denied a viable weapon programme though all the same, eh ?

'Cause only sovereign nations like the United States are allowed to have a weapons program . . . but . . . wait . . .
 
No Second Amendment rights for them!


There's something about giving theocratic, terrorist dabbling fascist mullahs access to functioning nuclear weapons that strikes me as.............inadvisable ?

Once the "kids" take over and set about re-establishing their neck of the woods as a place where science and progress flourish you could probably review the position - but then they'd no longer want a nuclear programme in that case anyway.
 
'Cause only sovereign nations like the United States are allowed to have a weapons program . . . but . . . wait . . .

Are you making some sort of ludicrous attempt at drawing equivalence between the US and Iran in terms of their suitability as holders of a nuclear arsenal ?

I'm English, and don't have a dog in the fight as such - but I'd be offended on behalf of Americans if that's what you were trying to do.
 
There's something about giving theocratic, terrorist dabbling fascist mullahs access to functioning nuclear weapons that strikes me as.............inadvisable ?

Once the "kids" take over and set about re-establishing their neck of the woods as a place where science and progress flourish you could probably review the position - but then they'd no longer want a nuclear programme in that case anyway.
Muslims don’t like nukes.
 
All the lefties come out to defend Iran yet again.

Just a post or two away from some more teeth gnashing over the loss of their great hero and icon General Salami. :rolleyes:
 
Are you making some sort of ludicrous attempt at drawing equivalence between the US and Iran in terms of their suitability as holders of a nuclear arsenal ?

I'm English, and don't have a dog in the fight as such - but I'd be offended on behalf of Americans if that's what you were trying to do.

No, I'm making a comparison in the sovereign right to acquire weapon technology if they want to. That the United States has a right to develop nuclear weapons and Iran doesn't is a "that dog don't bark" assertion in international law. Nor, in terms of the law of sovereignty, is it just dandy to pop off Iranians inside Iran and then go apoplectic if foreign countries pop off Americans inside the United States.

Not in favor of Iran having nuclear weapons, but destroying their stuff and people isn't justified on a stance that some countries can have them and other countries are open season for assassinations if they want to have them too. There is no country more sovereign than any other country is.

We had a perfectly good "carrot" program going with Iran on this and the Trumpers tossed it out of the window.

And if you are English, you do have an iron in this fire. The UK is as interested as the United States or any of the other nuclear power in having them themselves and trying to keep any other country not in that club from having them. But the UK doesn't have any more of a sovereign right to develop them than Iran or the United States do. The UK has as much at stake as the United States to find other ways of nonproliferation than the nonargument that some countries can have them by right and others can't (probably more, as one nuclear bomb could wipe out more of your small island country than the damage it could to the United States).
 
Last edited:
Are you making some sort of ludicrous attempt at drawing equivalence between the US and Iran in terms of their suitability as holders of a nuclear arsenal ?

Which is the only country in the history of the world to have used nuclear weapons in war?


Hint, not Iran.
 
The Iranian government is constituted of some very unpleasant people. But it is a very stable government (like Castro's Cuba). Pakistan on the other hand is highly unstable and already has nuclear capability. In my view they are far more dangerous than Iran.

Biden will not allow US foreign policy to be dictated from Jerusalem as Trump has. Biden's US will still be a firm ally of Israel but this murder was only carried out now because Biden, unlike Trump will not give Bibi an automatic nod of approval after 20th January.
 
The Mossad needs to be declared a terrorist group.

I've said for many years that the most dangerous tinderbox is the India/Pakistan mess. Donny has been letting Modi run unchecked.
 
No, I'm making a comparison in the sovereign right to acquire weapon technology if they want to. That the United States has a right to develop nuclear weapons and Iran doesn't is a "that dog don't bark" assertion in international law.
Most international law is merely the application of widely ratified treaties.

The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty absolutely does say that some countries, including the US, can have and continue to develop nuclear weapons while other countries cannot. Iran accepted that they cannot have nuclear weapons by signing the treaty in 1968. They have never withdrawn. There is even an independent international organization that as part of its mandate monitors nuclear programs to ensure they are not supporting weapons development. The International Atomic Energy Association reports its findings to the UN.

That dog definitely does bark.
 
The Mossad needs to be declared a terrorist group.

I've said for many years that the most dangerous tinderbox is the India/Pakistan mess. Donny has been letting Modi run unchecked.

Since when was it POTUS's job to "check" Modi???

LOL what a fucking psycho....
 
Back
Top