White Kid With a Gun

coulda just kept his ass in Illinois playing Call Of Duty and jerking off to internet porn while mom and pop are asleep like other froggy 17-year-olds.

say bye bye to the quality of the rest of your fucking life, Kylie boy.



Wait, has he been convicted already?
 
By all reports I read, and videos they did just let him leave. He approached officers with his hands up after the shootings and they let let him go.


That really raises a lot of questions, the biggest one being if the police actually intended to give him a pass for shooting someone (assuming he'd get away and no one would ever discover who he was) because they don't like the people who were shot.


But he will have my sincerest thoughts and prayers once he's in prison.
 
This is the GB. Conviction by poster is all that is required.

Dam; no trial, no defense, no law and order?


It's like the GB is BLM and Antifa poutrage all rolled up into one sorry assed baloney sausage or something.
 
That really raises a lot of questions, the biggest one being if the police actually intended to give him a pass for shooting someone (assuming he'd get away and no one would ever discover who he was) because they don't like the people who were shot.


But he will have my sincerest thoughts and prayers once he's in prison.


OR PERHAPS; the officers on the scene understand what "Self Defense" means and, after observing the events, knew that it would apply in the kid's case.


Remember, it wasn't the COPS who issued the warrant, it was the DA. Who wasn't there and has no actual knowledge of the events in question. Especially since there hasn't been a police investigation or report on it recommending action against anyone.


Which leads me to wonder (again) what the POLITICAL AFFILIATION of the DA is, and what's his "motive" for bringing charges.
 
It's pretty difficult to burn down someone's castle when you don't even get to the front door with your torches and pitchforks.

The "rooftop Koreans" in LA showed us that much. Wisconsin vigilantes are taking that lesson to heart as they take back their streets.

Someone doesn't understand the concept of covert asymmetrical warfare.

They won't attack at specified times on specified targets.

The attacks will be random, and could happen anywhere. at any time.

The effects of those unpredictable arson or bombing attacks will affect the functioning of society on a greater scale than a few predictable isolated riots in response to police misconduct.

Riots and unrest usually run their course and are mitigated by official action that addresses the concerns of the offended parties.

Expanding the conflict via vigilantism is like throwing gasoline on the fire.

Enjoy.
 
OR PERHAPS; the officers on the scene understand what "Self Defense" means and, after observing the events, knew that it would apply in the kid's case.


Remember, it wasn't the COPS who issued the warrant, it was the DA. Who wasn't there and has no actual knowledge of the events in question. Especially since there hasn't been a police investigation or report on it recommending action against anyone.


Which leads me to wonder (again) what the POLITICAL AFFILIATION of the DA is, and what's his "motive" for bringing charges.

What could be his motivation for charging someone who shot 3 people?

It's like you try to be a dumbass. At least if I lose my job I know I can be a lawyer in whatever shit town you live. Brains dont matter down there.
 
Oh, look who's concerned with due process all of a sudden.

He'll get his rights. But as you presumably already knew, the GB isn't a courtroom.


What's this "all of a sudden" BULLSHIT that just fell from your lips?

I support the law. I stand for the law. "Due process" is the law and yet, for some reason YOU FUCKWITS seem to forget that part in your zeal to vilify ANYONE who doesn't agree with your insane views of the world. You know, the view where YOU get to do whateverthefuck you want while anyone who opposes you is automatically a "criminal" even when the law protects them.


Seriously dudly, GET A FUCKING CLUE that whatever the hell is wrong with you needs medical attention ASAP.
 
Someone doesn't understand the concept of covert asymmetrical warfare.

They won't attack at specified times on specified targets.

The attacks will be random, and could happen anywhere. at any time.

The effects of those unpredictable arson or bombing attacks will affect the functioning of society on a greater scale than a few predictable isolated riots in response to police misconduct.

Riots and unrest usually run their course and are mitigated by official action that addresses the concerns of the offended parties.

Expanding the conflict via vigilantism is like throwing gasoline on the fire.

Enjoy.


So, basically, you're advocating TERRORISM against innocent people? Like the Boston Marathon Bombers? The Twin Towers? The Olympic Games Bomber? Tim McVey?

ARE THEY whom you support with your bullshit ideology that you now profess to allow Antifa and BLM to engage in under cover of darkness like the coward they, and you, are?


What a GODDAMNED PIECE OF SHIT YOU TURNED OUT TO BE.
 
OR PERHAPS; the officers on the scene understand what "Self Defense" means and, after observing the events, knew that it would apply in the kid's case.


Remember, it wasn't the COPS who issued the warrant, it was the DA. Who wasn't there and has no actual knowledge of the events in question. Especially since there hasn't been a police investigation or report on it recommending action against anyone.


Which leads me to wonder (again) what the POLITICAL AFFILIATION of the DA is, and what's his "motive" for bringing charges.


Seriously? You think they made this considered judgment in the heat of the moment? The police shouldn't be making these calls (let's leave aside that the kid was at the very least in violation of the curfew along with everyone else). You apprehend the shooter (which is better treatment than Jacob Blake received), and then if it turns out to be a justified shooting, then no harm done.


I don't know about the politics of the area, although Kenosha is within the old Paul Ryan congressional district.
 
Lol, TALK ABOUT DISTORTED FACTS!!!


Nearly everyone remembers that Zimmerman was found NOT GUILTY in a court of law.


So, apparently the people in Florida are of a different mindset than FUCKWITS like you.

But that's ok, go ahead and continue to show everyone in the world that YOU'RE GODDAMNED STUPID. I don't mind at all.


So jury's aren't biased and never get it wrong???

Talk to the Goldman family, or the Central Park five.
 
Tim rapey just can't stop looking and sounding like a babbling boomer. What a complete dipshit he is. Lmao.
 
Seriously? You think they made this considered judgment in the heat of the moment? The police shouldn't be making these calls (let's leave aside that the kid was at the very least in violation of the curfew along with everyone else). You apprehend the shooter (which is better treatment than Jacob Blake received), and then if it turns out to be a justified shooting, then no harm done.


I don't know about the politics of the area, although Kenosha is within the old Paul Ryan congressional district.

dudly, twist in the wind all you want THE FACTS prove everything you're trying to say here wrong.


The guy wasn't "in violation of a curfew". According to the FACTS, he was "protecting the property of his friend." Which, under the law, is "allowed."

Cops tend to arrest EVERYONE they even suspect committed a crime with a gun. No arrest in this case - ergo, THE COPS ON THE SCENE saw no "crime" being committed. You trying to say so, is offset by the facts.

What you're trying to do here is FABRICATE A LIE to support your ideology and and narrative. Which makes me wonder if you did the same thing for Nicholas Sandman. Which, as we all now know, wasn't even close to the crap that you progressives were spewing at the time.

I'm wondering if this is just more of the same kind of BULLSHIT.
 
So jury's aren't biased and never get it wrong???

Talk to the Goldman family, or the Central Park five.

Not Guilty is NOT GUILTY.

There are no do-overs or appeals. If you don't like it, tough nuts LITTLE FUCKWAD.
 
Seriously? You think they made this considered judgment in the heat of the moment? The police shouldn't be making these calls (let's leave aside that the kid was at the very least in violation of the curfew along with everyone else). You apprehend the shooter (which is better treatment than Jacob Blake received), and then if it turns out to be a justified shooting, then no harm done.


I don't know about the politics of the area, although Kenosha is within the old Paul Ryan congressional district.


The kid's a typical school shooter who premeditated his actions and targeted a group, that in his mind, was the enemy.

With schools closed due to Covid these sick fucks have to find another way to play out their dark fantasies
 
Not Guilty is NOT GUILTY.

There are no do-overs or appeals. If you don't like it, tough nuts LITTLE FUCKWAD.

Sometimes I wish other administrations had the Scottish jury verdict of 'not proven' - i.e. we think he did it but the prosecution hasn't made a believable case.
 
That really raises a lot of questions, the biggest one being if the police actually intended to give him a pass for shooting someone (assuming he'd get away and no one would ever discover who he was) because they don't like the people who were shot.


But he will have my sincerest thoughts and prayers once he's in prison.

It's possible the officers exercised poor judgment. There seems to be some of that going around lately.
 
Not Guilty is NOT GUILTY.

There are no do-overs or appeals. If you don't like it, tough nuts LITTLE FUCKWAD.



I never said how I felt about it; I just pointed out the fact that juries get it wrong, and often racial bias is involved.
 
Sometimes I wish other administrations had the Scottish jury verdict of 'not proven' - i.e. we think he did it but the prosecution hasn't made a believable case.

We have legal opinions that "not guilty doesn't mean "innocent".

That and your "Scottish verdict" is nothing but an attempt to BS the system through disgruntlement. Either the State can prove you did it, or they can't.

If they can, off to gaol you go.

If they can't, then there shouldn't EVER be any shadow of any type hanging over you.

Trying to infer "well, we THINK he did it but can't prove it" is nothing but defamation under color of law no matter what it's called.
 
I never said how I felt about it; I just pointed out the fact that juries get it wrong, and often racial bias is involved.


IOW, you interjected YOUR BULLSHIT into the conversation, attempted to deflect from the facts, and now are FABRICATING YET ANOTHER BULLSHIT STATEMENT that the reason that juries (which we don't HAVE in this case yet) "get it wrong" is because jurors are "racially biased".


Meanwhile the kid in Kenowsha is "white". I wonder if, under YOUR FUCKWAD THEORY OF RACIAL BIAS, he'll be convicted. Or if his verdict of "not guilty" will set off another "race riot" from ASSHOLES LIKE YOU who have no fucking clue about anything.
 
Back
Top