White Kid With a Gun

[Rightguide]

No one said it was. It’s illegal for him to own or even possess a gun. He wasn’t in his home, or even his home state. There’s a warrant out for his arrest.

You say that but what is the law in Wisconsin? There is no assault weapon ban in Wisconsin, open carry is lawful. This from the state law:

(Ages)14-17 is the same as 12-13, except Hunter Safety graduates can hunt and possess firearms (rifles/shotguns) without adult supervision.

 

[Aglaopheme]

You say that but what is the law in Wisconsin? There is no assault weapon ban in Wisconsin, open carry is lawful. This from the state law:

(Ages)14-17 is the same as 12-13, except Hunter Safety graduates can hunt and possess firearms (rifles/shotguns) without adult supervision.

A You have to be 18 to open carry

B He is not a Wisconsin resident.

 

[LLCox]

Anyone know FOR SURE if he is affiliated with the Right.

 

[Lazaran]

As more and more of these incidents happen perhaps it's going to dawn on the BL(don't mean shit to us)M that no one is buying their bullshit anymore and that antifa means even less.

Those idiots were well aware of the risk they were running in that the citizens armed themselves and turned out when this all started. So now we have two candidates for this years Darwin Awards. I predict there's going to be a LOT more before this is all over.

If vigilantism is tolerated, and extrajudicial killings are accepted, the violence is going to get worse, but it's going to be more covert. People seldom see an arsonist starting a fire, or a bomber planting a bomb. Anarchy is not the answer, but it was inevitable once Trump was elected. His governing style is unprincipled and chaotic, and the country is modeling his example.

If society supports non deputized people killing other people under the pretense of enforcing the law, the families and friends of the victims will respond asymmetrically, because they feel they can't get redress under the law. That principle is the motivating force behind the current unrest. It will only get worse if certain members of the public are allowed to kill with impunity like the police seem to do. You may remember that the way Derek Chauvin killed George Floyd was the catalyst for the explosion of protests and rioting.

Cause and effect. The riots are the "effect" but police misconduct was the "cause".

Unprosecuted extrajudicial killings will be the next "cause" and the "effect" will predictably be more violence.

Enjoy.

 

[Aglaopheme]

You say that but what is the law in Wisconsin? There is no assault weapon ban in Wisconsin, open carry is lawful. This from the state law:

(Ages)14-17 is the same as 12-13, except Hunter Safety graduates can hunt and possess firearms (rifles/shotguns) without adult supervision.

Care to link that? I think you missed a bit of info there.


Wisconsin generally prohibits the intentional transfer of any firearm to an individual under age 18.1

The state also generally prohibits the possession of a firearm by any person under age 18.2


https://lawcenter.giffords.org/minimum-age-to-purchase-possess-in-wisconsin/

 

[rae121452]

hey, maybe those rioters threw a water bottle at him. so, it's justified, right? and i do mean right.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Not that I'm saying he did or didn't, but your right to defend yourself isn't limited to your home or your state.

I understand that, and didn’t mean to imply it did.

 

[Rightguide]

A You have to be 18 to open carry

B He is not a Wisconsin resident.

Open carry for the most part refers to handguns which you do have to be 18 to possess or carry. In most states one does not have to be a resident to be protected by state law. For instance in AZ anyone 18 or older in the state, resident or not, without criminal intent, can carry a concealed weapon without a permit.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Wisconsin

 

[Rightguide]

Care to link that? I think you missed a bit of info there.


Wisconsin generally prohibits the intentional transfer of any firearm to an individual under age 18.1

The state also generally prohibits the possession of a firearm by any person under age 18.2


https://lawcenter.giffords.org/minimum-age-to-purchase-possess-in-wisconsin/

That statement is false.

 

[Lazaran]

There's the text of the Second Amendment, and there's the implicit Second Amendment adhered to by gun nuts from the NRA on down, which reads, "This only applies to white people, understand?"

Note the complete lack of wingnut outrage here regarding the armed thugs storming the Idaho legislature on Monday.

Reminder: the most prolific murderer in Wisconsin history, Jeffrey Dahmer, was taken alive.

Yeah, but they're NOT racist.

Your comment reminds me of how little national outrage there is for the Oklahoma City bombing of the Murrah federal building.

I'm guessing if a minority group had committed the bombing, there would be a national day of mourning and travel bans enacted against whichever ethnicity was involved.

Then again, in some white militant enclaves around the country I'm guessing it IS recognized as a national holiday, but for a very different reason.

Of course those militants are real American patriots so.......

 

[Rightguide]

Care to link that? I think you missed a bit of info there.


Wisconsin generally prohibits the intentional transfer of any firearm to an individual under age 18.1

The state also generally prohibits the possession of a firearm by any person under age 18.2


https://lawcenter.giffords.org/minimum-age-to-purchase-possess-in-wisconsin/

If you want to know what the law is, go to a source that isn't a left wing gun control outfit. Read the state law itself or a page dedicated to individual state gun laws.

 

[Aglaopheme]

948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/60/2/b

 

[HisArpy]

That statement is false.

Wisconsin general statutes:


939.45

939.47

939.48

 

[FescueFan]

If vigilantism is tolerated, and extrajudicial killings are accepted, the violence is going to get worse, but it's going to be more covert.

No, it will be more overt.

And as long as rioting, destruction, assault and murder are tolerated for the causes of the left??? Covered as "Peaceful protesting" and supported by (D)'s?

The vigilantism is just going to get more overtly violent.

 

[Aglaopheme]

If you want to know what the law is, go to a source that isn't a left wing gun control outfit. Read the state law itself or a page dedicated to individual state gun laws.

The law was cited in the article, sporto.

 

[DeluxAuto]

It also fails the smell test when the Bitch Queen says that minors don't have the right of self defense because that would require the use of a weapon they're not allowed to possess.

You're a lawyer who disagrees with the law?

 

[HisArpy]

You're a lawyer who disagrees with the law?

No FUCKWIT, the law allows EVERYONE the right to self defense. Even minors.

READ THE FUCKING STATUTES before you go showing everyone what a GODDAMNED ASSHOLE you are with your stupidity and desire to show off what you absolutely do not know ANYTHING about.

 

[HisArpy]

The law was cited in the article, sporto.

PART of the law was cited.

The part that exculpates the kid was (mysteriously) left out.

Imagine that...

 

[DeluxAuto]

No FUCKWIT, the law allows EVERYONE the right to self defense. Even minors.

READ THE FUCKING STATUTES before you go showing everyone what a GODDAMNED ASSHOLE you are with your stupidity and desire to show off what you absolutely do not know ANYTHING about.

Prove I'm wrong.

 

[Rightguide]

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/60/2/b

You forgot to mention paragraph 3, A, B, C.:

(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.
Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998 (1998).

 

[HisArpy]

No, it will be more overt.

And as long as rioting, destruction, assault and murder are tolerated for the causes of the left??? Covered as "Peaceful protesting" and supported by (D)'s?

The vigilantism is just going to get more overtly violent.

I'm surprised it hasn't escalated yet.


Interesting that on the scene the cops did nothing, but after the fact the DA has now issued a warrant.

I wonder what political affiliation the DA has and whether the DA supports BLM and ANTIFA.

 

[HisArpy]

Prove I'm wrong.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=92772805&postcount=38

 

[HisArpydo]

You support civil war.

I do.

Makes for good tv.

 

[HisArpydo]

No FUCKWIT, the law allows EVERYONE the right to self defense. Even minors.

READ THE FUCKING STATUTES before you go showing everyone what a GODDAMNED ASSHOLE you are with your stupidity and desire to show off what you absolutely do not know ANYTHING about.

Travelling with a gun to confront protesters isnt self defense. Its pre meditated assault.

Stop being such a dumb cat lady, C3D0

 

[Rightguide]

PART of the law was cited.

The part that exculpates the kid was (mysteriously) left out.

Imagine that...

She needs to read Section 939.48 of the state law as well.