Trump, Flynn, Cohen, Have A Bad Day.

[Bad_Egg]

Prima facie evidence of Kissboi tucking tail and running from me again.

Prima facie evidence of a Cheeto underwear huffing.

^^^

Click his quote, and scroll back through the conversation.

https://media.giphy.com/media/xUPGcEGxHYF82DIyBO/giphy.gif

https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

 

[Rightguide]

So in a 2 to 1 decision, the panel decided that Sullivan is required to dismiss Flynn's case and yet somehow it's Trump's fault?

Yeah, that is so TDS.


Oh, and at this time the full court isn't "going" to review the case. The petition hasn't been granted yet. So your gloating is not only based on pure fantasy, it's premature.

Looks like we're going to see an en banc hearing at the Court of Appeals:

Appeals court stays decision ordering judge to dismiss Michael Flynn case
by Daniel Chaitin
July 10, 2020 12:23 PM

An appeals court stayed a decision ordering a judge to accept the Justice Department’s motion to dismiss its criminal case against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued an order on Friday that gives the former Trump national security adviser and the DOJ 10 days to respond to Judge Emmet Sullivan's Thursday petition for a rehearing by the full appeals court.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-ordering-judge-to-dismiss-michael-flynn-case

 

[HisArpy]

It seems as though your mind is breaking.

Your gray matter is overheating due to all the effort you're putting into defending the indefensible.

If you aren't already on medication, you will be soon.

This last post was totally unhinged.

Seriously, what is wrong with you???

dudly...

It's not my fault you can't keep up with the rest of the class.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Which is why it is being cancelled...a bad showing.

Joy Reid for the win/ear worm said Trump pulled a Milli Vanilli this morning.


https://youtu.be/BI5IA8assfk

 

[HisArpy]

Looks like we're going to see an en banc hearing at the Court of Appeals:

Appeals court stays decision ordering judge to dismiss Michael Flynn case
by Daniel Chaitin
July 10, 2020 12:23 PM

An appeals court stayed a decision ordering a judge to accept the Justice Department’s motion to dismiss its criminal case against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued an order on Friday that gives the former Trump national security adviser and the DOJ 10 days to respond to Judge Emmet Sullivan's Thursday petition for a rehearing by the full appeals court.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-ordering-judge-to-dismiss-michael-flynn-case

Nothing to see here, it's procedural. They stayed the order pending a decision on whether or not they want to review the order. Flynn gets to respond and tell them why they shouldn't.

Flynn has an option to file an emergency writ with SCOTUS to force the lower courts to dismiss the case rather than let them delay further with an en banc review that isn't in the interests of justice and which causes irreparable harm to both the courts and the accused. I doubt that Flynn will, but it's an option.

 

[Rightguide]

Nothing to see here, it's procedural. They stayed the order pending a decision on whether or not they want to review the order. Flynn gets to respond and tell them why they shouldn't.

Flynn has an option to file an emergency writ with SCOTUS to force the lower courts to dismiss the case rather than let them delay further with an en banc review that isn't in the interests of justice and which causes irreparable harm to both the courts and the accused. I doubt that Flynn will, but it's an option.

Can Sullivan take his case to the SCOTUS?

 

[Lazaran]

Nothing to see here, it's procedural. They stayed the order pending a decision on whether or not they want to review the order. Flynn gets to respond and tell them why they shouldn't.

Flynn has an option to file an emergency writ with SCOTUS to force the lower courts to dismiss the case rather than let them delay further with an en banc review that isn't in the interests of justice and which causes irreparable harm to both the courts and the accused. I doubt that Flynn will, but it's an option.

Huh,...... Judge Sullivan refused to accept the DOJ's dropping of the Flynn case because it would cause irreparable harm to the public interest.

At this point, everything Flynn and his lawyers are doing is more about protecting Bill Barr's decision to drop the case from being scrutinized, and the obvious revelations that would result from such scrutiny: An AG who is being corruptly influenced by the criminal in chief. It all comes back to Trump's obstruction, and corruption.

You don't have to act as Trump/Flynn/Stone/Manafort/Gates/Papadopoulos/Giuliani/Parnas/Fruman/ etc, etc's defense attorney Herpy, they already have one. His name is William Barr.

 

[Rightguide]

Huh,...... Judge Sullivan refused to accept the DOJ's dropping of the Flynn case because it would cause irreparable harm to the public interest.

At this point, everything Flynn and his lawyers are doing is more about protecting Bill Barr's decision to drop the case from being scrutinized, and the obvious revelations that would result from such scrutiny: An AG who is being corruptly influenced by the criminal in chief. It all comes back to Trump's obstruction, and corruption.

You don't have to act as Trump/Flynn/Stone/Manafort/Gates/Papadopoulos/Giuliani/Parnas/Fruman/ etc, etc's defense attorney Herpy, they already have one. His name is William Barr.

Take a friggin' nap. You don't have a clue regarding reality.

 

[Adre]

Trump hasn’t had his BAD DAY yet. That will come November 3.

 

[Rightguide]

Trump hasn’t had his BAD DAY yet. That will come November 3.

Trump's had a bad day every day since his election. He just handles it with one hand tied behind his back. All of your bullshit conspiracies roll right off his back as he wrecks your shit daily with hardly an effort.

 

[Lazaran]

Trump hasn’t had his BAD DAY yet. That will come November 3.

And many, many more after that.

The rest of the Trump cabal is going to have a series of bad days once Trump is out of office as well.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

All of your bullshit conspiracies roll right off his back as he wrecks your shit daily with hardly an effort.

Guy...the only thing rolling off Cheeto's back is sweat.

https://media.giphy.com/media/xUPGcEGxHYF82DIyBO/giphy.gif

https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

 

[RobDownSouth]

Trump was supposed to have held a torchlight Nuremberg-style rally tonight in New Hampshire. It was suddenly cancelled today due to "inclement weather" (80 degrees, no rain, 18mph winds).

The fact that the rally sold less than half the tickets available had nothing to do with the sudden cancellation.

Nothing at all.

 

[Bad_Egg]

You forgot the mic drop. Come on! Everybody's doing it.

Trump was supposed to have held a torchlight Nuremberg-style rally tonight in New Hampshire. It was suddenly cancelled today due to "inclement weather" (80 degrees, no rain, 18mph winds).

The fact that the rally sold less than half the tickets available had nothing to do with the sudden cancellation.

Nothing at all.

https://media.giphy.com/media/xUPGcEGxHYF82DIyBO/giphy.gif

.....

 

[HisArpy]

Can Sullivan take his case to the SCOTUS?

It's an interesting issue.

Think about this; can a judge appeal a decision he makes in a case in place of the parties involved?

Or does a judge have little choice in dispensing the law as clarified and handed down to him by a higher court?


It's not really much of a question. Sullivan doesn't have to agree with the law, he just has to make his decisions based on it. At present, the law is that he is required to dismiss the case. That he has not merely indicates that he is unwilling to obey the directives given to him. Which is a signal that he has gone rogue and his decisions cannot be trusted.



I'm of the opinion that the en banc will be denied with the case remanded back to a different judge for the mandated dismissal. Sullivan will be "retired" within a year and will go on the "woke lecture circuit".

 

[Bad_Egg]

I've seen a couple of those....

"woke lecture circuit".

https://media.tenor.com/images/4f196afe70a250a945c632f7207a8ba4/tenor.gif

 

[RobDownSouth]

Regardless of the ultimate outcome of Flynn's case, it's clear that General Flynn committed treason against the United States of America at the behest of the Turkish dictatorship.

Of course, the Trump enablers here see no problem with that.

 

[Bad_Egg]

"What about Chicago" should be the only response you get from now on.

Regardless of the ultimate outcome of Flynn's case, it's clear that General Flynn committed treason against the United States of America at the behest of the Turkish dictatorship.

Of course, the Trump enablers here see no problem with that.

https://media.giphy.com/media/yug1BLxWo3EyY/giphy.gif

 

[phrodeau]

Regardless of the ultimate outcome of Flynn's case, it's clear that General Flynn committed treason against the United States of America at the behest of the Turkish dictatorship.

Of course, the Trump enablers here see no problem with that.

I don’t believe everything that Michael Flynn says, but I do believe the things that he swore was the truth in front of a judge.

 

[HisArpy]

Regardless of the ultimate outcome of Flynn's case, it's clear that General Flynn committed treason against the United States of America at the behest of the Turkish dictatorship.

Of course, the Trump enablers here see no problem with that.

Of COURSE I see a "problem" with what you wrote.

The "problem" is that treason has a specific definition and at least one of the required elements in that definition aren't present.

So, BY DEFINITION, no treason was committed no matter how much you want it to have happened. Which is kind of strange when you think about it; you WANT someone to commit treason against the US.

 

[phrodeau]

Of COURSE I see a "problem" with what you wrote.

The "problem" is that treason has a specific definition and at least one of the required elements in that definition aren't present.

So, BY DEFINITION, no treason was committed no matter how much you want it to have happened. Which is kind of strange when you think about it; you WANT someone to commit treason against the US.

I’ll believe Merriam-Webster.

Definition of treason
1 : the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family
2 : the betrayal of a trust : TREACHERY

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/treason

What dictionary are you using?

 

[HisArpy]

I’ll believe Merriam-Webster.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/treason

What dictionary are you using?

GOFUCKYOURSELF

 

[Rightguide]

Regardless of the ultimate outcome of Flynn's case, it's clear that General Flynn committed treason against the United States of America at the behest of the Turkish dictatorship.

Of course, the Trump enablers here see no problem with that.

The anti-Flynn prosecution team was either ignorant of his treason or inordinately compassionate enough not to charge him with it. Which was it?

 

[KeithD]

GOFUCKYOURSELF

Translation: Harpy lost (again).

 

[RobDownSouth]

The anti-Flynn prosecution team was either ignorant of his treason or inordinately compassionate enough not to charge him with it. Which was it?

I'm not surprised that YOU of all people stand up tall for treason.
You traded American supplies (cans of corn) to the Vietcong in exhange for VC pussy.