Anal play, instead of anal intercourse

[OldHideki]

I was thing about writing some stories about a couple about using an anal butt plug during vaginal intercourse. This story would stop at here at anal play.

I have noticed many plugs are small, and not even close to the size of a penis. It occurred to me that the smaller size is to cause more stimulation to the to the sphincter and G-spot, and that would be what the story would be about. With the help of the plug, The wife would achieve her first G-spot orgasm.

I have several questions.

Does the story line make sense?
Is it a reasonable outcome?
What category should the story be posted in?

Thank You, for any feedback that you can give me.
OldHideki.

 

[Carnevil9]

I've never reached a G-spot through anal stimulation, but that doesn't mean it can't be done. It is on the far forward part of the vagina, so you'd need a reasonably long probe, not just one for the sphincter.

Does the man in the story get to receive some anal play as well? The prostate is probably easier to reach than the G-spot.

I do like the idea of anal play but without actual anal intercourse. Mostly because it would be so tantalizing... the reader would keep wondering, when the fuck is he going to stick his cock in there? And he never does!

Category-wise, why would this go anywhere other than Anal?

 

[OldHideki]

I was thinking that the plug would form a pinch point when the penis was interred into the vagina. The G-spot would be on the anterior (front) wall of the vagina, the penis in the middle, and the plug would be pushing against the posterior (back) wall of the vagina. The idea is that this gives extra stimulation to the G-spot. The other point would be that the head of the penis is not involved at all in stimulating the G-spot, as it is deeper in the vagina. The idea is that simulation would be enhanced for the female only, leading to the male lasting longer before going to orgasm. I’ve also thought about using a vibrating plug in cowgirl position, where there is no actual thrusting. The vibrating plug through the shaft of the penis is the only stimulation, providing a female orgasm only. The husband is then rewarded by the wife to his own orgasm. I am not looking for a orgasm denial story, but might include edging the husband to a greater climax, after the wife enjoys multiple orgasms.

Besides Anal, I thought about putting it in Loving Wives, Fetish, and possibly First Time (first time to use a plug, have a vaginal orgasm, something like that).

 

[Enchantment_of_Nyx]

Sorry guys, but G-spot orgasms have been debunked. The debunking never got the hype that the "discovery" got. The discovery was by a quack and it was based on one woman with abnormal anatomy because of another medical condition. So, sadly...

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/interactive/a32037401/g-spot-not-real/

https://www.livescience.com/17977-spot-science-find-60-years-study.html

Doesn't mean it doesn't feel good, but it just doesn't work like Sex In the City says (or the sex toys advertise.)

 

[OldHideki]

Thank You, Enchantment_Of_Nyx!

The Cosmopolitan article was eye opening.

As you can see, I have no written a story in ten years. I value accuracy, and would no have wanted to publish a misleading story. If I do write this story, I will include the fact that the G-spot does not exist.

I am still thinking about writing this, but the reasoning for a orgasm would have to be from vagina and anal stimulation combining to produce results.

As for why other catalogues than Anal, I was thinking that the lack of actual anal intercourse in a category might not be well received.

 

[The_Falcon85]

For what it's worth, my wife came pretty hard with a butt plug in, whilst I ate her out. We left it in when we had PIV sex and I could definitely feel it, and she said she felt full.

 

[Enchantment_of_Nyx]

Thank You, Enchantment_Of_Nyx!

The Cosmopolitan article was eye opening.

As you can see, I have no written a story in ten years. I value accuracy, and would no have wanted to publish a misleading story. If I do write this story, I will include the fact that the G-spot does not exist.

I am still thinking about writing this, but the reasoning for a orgasm would have to be from vagina and anal stimulation combining to produce results.

As for why other catalogues than Anal, I was thinking that the lack of actual anal intercourse in a category might not be well received.

It makes me a little sad that so many women think they are somehow defective because too many shiny magazines told them their bodies should do something they don't do.

As far as category, I'm not sure what category would fit better than anal. If you decide to put it there, you could put something at the top, explaining that it includes anal play, but not anal sex. I would expect readers interested in one are probably interested in the other. You could put it in erotic couplings, but as I understand it, that doesn't get very many views, and it tends to be fairly vanilla. If it were me, I'd put it in anal.

 

[Carnevil9]

Sorry guys, but G-spot orgasms have been debunked. The debunking never got the hype that the "discovery" got. The discovery was by a quack and it was based on one woman with abnormal anatomy because of another medical condition. So, sadly...

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/interactive/a32037401/g-spot-not-real/

https://www.livescience.com/17977-spot-science-find-60-years-study.html

Doesn't mean it doesn't feel good, but it just doesn't work like Sex In the City says (or the sex toys advertise.)

I don't believe it for a minute. I have seen the power of the G-spot. I've peeled women off the ceiling because of it. If it's a myth, it's one that works very well.

 

[OldHideki]

According the Cosmopolitan article, the misnomer is that the G-spot is more a region than a spot. It’s more a concentration of nerves in a region. My original understanding was that the G-spot was a buildup of connective tissue that was between the vagina and the urethra to hold organs in place. Since the urethra is between the vagina and the clitoris. The urethra fills up with fluid during foreplay, and it is from the urethra that fluid squirts, and not from the vagina. During vaginal intercourse, the vagina/urethra/clitoris acts as a conduit for stimulation.

Apparently, my understanding is wrong.

Am I correct, that the woman squirts from the urethra, and not the vagina?

As for the category, Thank You, for suggesting Erotic Couplings. Loving Wife’s seem to have more adultery than stories about a couples exploring sexuality. The story is intended to invite anal play into relationships that might never actual include anal intercourse.

 

[Enchantment_of_Nyx]

I don't believe it for a minute. I have seen the power of the G-spot. I've peeled women off the ceiling because of it. If it's a myth, it's one that works very well.

You don't seem to have understood quite what the article was saying. OldHideki explained it correctly.

If you actually peel women off ceilings because of your amazing prowess, it's not because you're stimulating some magic button there. It has no more nerve endings than any other spot in the vagina. (Scientists did cadaver studies on this, if you really want to know. The nerves are exactly the same in type and in quantity.) The fantastic sexual exploits you claim would be the result of stimulating the parts of the clitoris that are inside the body. Most of the clitoris is internal, not external. Pressure in the region can stimulate the internal arms of the clitoris. The area where the G-spot was described is not necessarily the best place to use that pressure. But, since magazines and the internet said so, people started stimulating that spot. Of course it feels good. But not because of a specific magic spot. When you go about your fabulous conquests leaving awe-struck women in your wake, just imagine how impressed they will be with a little attention to the actual anatomy.

If you insist on expertise on anatomy you don't have, you'll have plenty of company.

This is a life-size 3D model of the entire organ that is the clitoris:

https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/bf7Ar1QlAsNyzzq7tTxDlrtSX0Y=/0x50:960x590/720x405/filters:format(png)/media/img/mt/2017/03/Clitoris.jpg/original.png

Here's a labeled version that shows it in its anatomical context:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0a/Clitoris_Anatomy.svg/280px-Clitoris_Anatomy.svg.png

Here's an article that explains a bit about the anatomy:

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2017/03/3d-clitoris/518991/

According the Cosmopolitan article, the misnomer is that the G-spot is more a region than a spot. It’s more a concentration of nerves in a region. My original understanding was that the G-spot was a buildup of connective tissue that was between the vagina and the urethra to hold organs in place. Since the urethra is between the vagina and the clitoris. The urethra fills up with fluid during foreplay, and it is from the urethra that fluid squirts, and not from the vagina. During vaginal intercourse, the vagina/urethra/clitoris acts as a conduit for stimulation.

Apparently, my understanding is wrong.

Am I correct, that the woman squirts from the urethra, and not the vagina?

As for the category, Thank You, for suggesting Erotic Couplings. Loving Wife’s seem to have more adultery than stories about a couples exploring sexuality. The story is intended to invite anal play into relationships that might never actual include anal intercourse.

Correct. If women squirt, it is from the urethra. While there's obviously plenty of fluid in the vagina, it's not narrow enough to have the kind of pressure necessary to squirt anything. I do think that squirting is very over-represented in erotica, which is fine, of course. It's dramatic. Erotica is supposed to be dramatic. But, it's not a bad thing to know the reality. According to the article below, studies of squirting have been inconsistent. Different studies had different results. The highest percentage any of the studies found was 54 percent of women squirting. The study with the lowest percentage was 10 percent.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/544c5686-e3bc-4ac2-b4ca-f91eccefe441#:~:text=But%20it's%20still%20unclear%20how,ml%20to%20more%20than%20150ml.

When I write, I try to keep things in the realm of the possible because I think that for many female readers, it's hard to see yourself in a character whose body does things yours can't, or that you know aren't possible. But that's just one style of writing. There are other styles of writing where the whole point is lavish excess. I'm not running down anyone's writing style. I just saw this thread and thought it might be a good place to dispel a myth that's been drilled into our collective skull. I think it's just good to know, and then you as a writer can decide in an informed way how you want to handle it. There are hundreds of beloved stories on here that are in no way, shape or form physically possible. Your post sounded like you were going for realism and even a bit of teaching or suggestion, so I thought I'd mention it.

I think you're wise to avoid Loving Wives. The title is a bit of a misnomer. The stories seem to be primarily divided between voluntary cuckholds and retaliation against women having affairs. Monogamous relationships aren't really the preferred subject matter there. I've heard from other writers that the readership there can be rather harsh.