Under what authority was Lafayette Square cleared for Trump's bible holding photo op?

The authority of William Barr to fuck the first amendment up the arse with a rusty chainsaw.
 
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
 
The Park Service had given protesters permission to protest until 7 pm. President Trump wanted to be on Fox News at 7 so he decided to stage his little PR stunt at 6:36 pm.
 
The Park Service had given protesters permission to protest until 7 pm. President Trump wanted to be on Fox News at 7 so he decided to stage his little PR stunt at 6:36 pm.

NEW: Smoke canisters and pepper balls, but United States Park Police acting Chief Gregory T. Monahan says “No tear gas was used by USPP officers or other assisting law enforcement partners to close the area at Lafayette Park.

https://twitter.com/AugensteinWTOP
 
The Park Service had given protesters permission to protest until 7 pm. President Trump wanted to be on Fox News at 7 so he decided to stage his little PR stunt at 6:36 pm.

And sometime after permission was given, events changed the circumstances and their protest time was cut short.

Sorry about that. Move along, nothing to see here.
 
And sometime after permission was given, events changed the circumstances and their protest time was cut short.

Sorry about that. Move along, nothing to see here.

So you are saying the the Constitutional right to peaceful assembly is revocable by the US Park Service?

I am going to go ahead and disagree with you.
 
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

LMFAO!! BoyNextDoor was condemning such things as selfish and tantamount to murder when Covid was relevant and people to the right of Mao were protesting.

Now all of a sudden when LEFTIES want to violate social distancing policy he's all "buh mah civil rights!" .

Jesus Christ the partisan hackery and hypocrisy of these totally unaware leftist JUST KEEPS COMING.

So you are saying the the Constitutional right to peaceful assembly is revocable by the US Park Service?

I am going to go ahead and disagree with you.

Are you saying civil rights can't be regulated? LOL....

I'll remember that next time you start screeching autistically for the government to take everyone's steel penis substitutes from them.

Thank you for supporting the right right of every law abiding citizen to own whatever weapons they want without any oversight or interference from the Government, that is the only civil right after all that should clearly "shall not be infringed" upon after all.

Love how over night the left goes from iron fisted, jack booted socialist to libertarians once it's THEIR rights getting some 'sensible' and 'common sense' regulation.

Funny how that works.
 
Last edited:
So you are saying the the Constitutional right to peaceful assembly is revocable by the US Park Service?

I am going to go ahead and disagree with you.

Now do free exercise of religion on the parishioner's church-owned prooerty.
 
LMFAO!! BoyNextDoor was condemning such things as selfish and tantamount to murder when Covid was relevant and people to the right of Mao were protesting.

Now all of a sudden when LEFTIES want to violate social distancing policy he's all "buh mah civil rights!" .

Jesus Christ the partisan hackery and hypocrisy of these totally unaware leftist JUST KEEPS COMING.



Are you saying civil rights can't be regulated? LOL....I'll remember that next time you start screeching autistically for the government to take everyone's steel penis substitutes from them.

You do have to admire their ability to reconcile the conflict though. :rolleyes:

Washington DC is a Federal District under the thumb of congress. And as such the top administrator, in this case Trump, is in reality the "Top Cop." Police anywhere can secure an area for virtually any purpose. Go try to hold a "peaceful protest" inside an area marked with crime scene tape and see what happens.

While a crowd may assemble for the purposes of peaceful protest they are also obligated to disburse when given a lawful order to do so by the police or any other authority. If they do not disburse then reasonable force can be used to cause them to do so.

Wash. DC also happens to be a Federal Military District and as such Trump could order the Army in and wouldn't even have to declare Martial Law.
 
Now do free exercise of religion on the parishioner's church-owned prooerty.

There was a lockdown order in ace because of a pandemic. According to cat lady rapey, an order is law and can and will be met with force if not obeyed.
 
You do have to admire their ability to reconcile the conflict though. :rolleyes:

You would think at some point the cognitive dissonance would start to bother them enough to sort at least some of their self contradiction, but they continue to tie themselves in knots every chance they get.


Wash. DC also happens to be a Federal Military District and as such Trump could order the Army in and wouldn't even have to declare Martial Law.

Could you imagine the meltdown on that? Trump should just say he's doing it just to fuel their continued freak out.
 
Russian agent Trump (MSM told me so, every night, for the past 3 years) held the bible upside down as a signal to his godless minions, to continue the slaughter of black and brown people! Plus, he's stupid and lies constantly.
 
There was a lockdown order in ace because of a pandemic.

So you agree then, under special conditions 1A rights can be suspended right??

So there is no fucking problem with Trump doing the same right??

Or is suspending civil rights during tough times only for (D)'s????


According to cat lady rapey, an order is law and can and will be met with force if not obeyed.

Most certainly in the jackbooted authoritarian shit hole states/cities run by (D)eez.

Video proof is all over the internet, there are a few threads on this very board crying about how (D)'s are sending the cops into infringe on AntiFa's right to riot freely!!!
 
Most certainly in the jackbooted authoritarian shit hole states/cities run by (D)eez.

BoBoFoFu, for a guy who spends so much time complaining about jackbooted "(D)" authoritarians, you sure do spend a lot of time licking Trump's jackboots.
 
So you agree then, under special conditions 1A rights can be suspended right??

So there is no fucking problem with Trump doing the same right??

Or is suspending civil rights during tough times only for (D)'s????




Most certainly in the jackbooted authoritarian shit hole states/cities run by (D)eez.

Video proof is all over the internet, there are a few threads on this very board crying about how (D)'s are sending the cops into infringe on AntiFa's right to riot freely!!!

Does your mommy know you're on an adult website?
 
BoBoFoFu, for a guy who spends so much time complaining about jackbooted "(D)" authoritarians, you sure do spend a lot of time licking Trump's jackboots.

When she goes into her hysterical evil dems shtick I tune out and laugh. Every post is the same thing.
 
BoBoFoFu, for a guy who spends so much time complaining about jackbooted "(D)" authoritarians, you sure do spend a lot of time licking Trump's jackboots.

Pointing out (D) "regulation for thee but not for meeee!!" hypocrisy and self contradiction isn't licking anything of Trumps.

Doesn't have ANYTHING to do with Trump. I don't support his infringement upon civil rights any more than the infringements you were ALL ABOUT when it was team (D) doing the infringing.

Does your mommy know you're on an adult website?

Awww....look who doesn't like their blatant hypocrisy pointed out.

Stay mad. :kiss::kiss::D

When she goes into her hysterical evil dems shtick I tune out and laugh. Every post is the same thing.

And you willfully ignore your hypocrisy and self contradiction....lol what a good comrade.
 
Pointing out (D) "regulation for thee but not for meeee!!" hypocrisy and self contradiction isn't licking anything of Trumps.

Doesn't have ANYTHING to do with Trump. I don't support his infringement upon civil rights any more than the infringements you were ALL ABOUT when it was team (D) doing the infringing.

Sounds like a bunch of BS to me, Bootlicker. You spent a lot of time on several thread defending your cult leader's heavy-handed approach to clearing away peaceful protesters.

Face it, you're just partisan hack making excuses for your jackbooted cult leader.
 
Sounds like a bunch of BS to me, Bootlicker. You spent a lot of time on several thread defending your cult leader's heavy-handed approach to clearing away peaceful protesters.

Again, pointing out that flagrant violations of civil rights is totally good to go by your own rules and supported by you when (D)'s are doing it???

Isn't defending Trump.

I explicitly condemned his behavior.

Exactly the same as I condemned it when (D)'s were violating 1A rights galore and you were a HUGE fan of it, like the flaming partisan hypocrite you are.

Face it, you're just partisan hack making excuses for your jackbooted cult leader.

The only partisan hacks here are the "Regulations for (R)'s rights but (D)'s rights are untouchable and absolute" hypocrites such as yourself.

I've maintained my ideological consistency, you can't say the same.

Better luck next time :kiss::kiss::D
 
Last edited:
So you are saying the the Constitutional right to peaceful assembly is revocable by the US Park Service?

I am going to go ahead and disagree with you.


Lol, they had to get PERMISSION to use the park. Permit requirements as well as time/place/manner restrictions don't violate the 1st Amendment.

The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the First Amendment protects the right to conduct a peaceful public assembly.[3] The right to assemble is not, however, absolute. Government officials cannot simply prohibit a public assembly in their own discretion,[4] but the government can impose restrictions on the time, place, and manner of peaceful assembly, provided that constitutional safeguards are met.[5] Time, place, and manner restrictions are permissible so long as they “are justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech, . . . are narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest, and . . . leave open ample alternative channels for communication of the information.”[6]

Such time, place, and manner restrictions can take the form of requirements to obtain a permit for an assembly.

See: Thomas v. Chi. Park Dist., 534 U.S. 316, 322 (2002)

https://www.loc.gov/law/help/peaceful-assembly/us.php#_ftn7
 
Lol, they had to get PERMISSION to use the park. Permit requirements as well as time/place/manner restrictions don't violate the 1st Amendment.

This whole thread is a bunch of lefty (D)'s who were cheering the (D)'s flagrant violations of 1A rights for Covid, suddenly going civil rights absolutist libertarians because Orange Man BAD!!
 
Back
Top