BoyNextDoor
I hate liars
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2010
- Posts
- 14,158
Anyone have an answer for that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Park Service had given protesters permission to protest until 7 pm. President Trump wanted to be on Fox News at 7 so he decided to stage his little PR stunt at 6:36 pm.
The Park Service had given protesters permission to protest until 7 pm. President Trump wanted to be on Fox News at 7 so he decided to stage his little PR stunt at 6:36 pm.
And sometime after permission was given, events changed the circumstances and their protest time was cut short.
Sorry about that. Move along, nothing to see here.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
So you are saying the the Constitutional right to peaceful assembly is revocable by the US Park Service?
I am going to go ahead and disagree with you.
So you are saying the the Constitutional right to peaceful assembly is revocable by the US Park Service?
I am going to go ahead and disagree with you.
LMFAO!! BoyNextDoor was condemning such things as selfish and tantamount to murder when Covid was relevant and people to the right of Mao were protesting.
Now all of a sudden when LEFTIES want to violate social distancing policy he's all "buh mah civil rights!" .
Jesus Christ the partisan hackery and hypocrisy of these totally unaware leftist JUST KEEPS COMING.
Are you saying civil rights can't be regulated? LOL....I'll remember that next time you start screeching autistically for the government to take everyone's steel penis substitutes from them.
Now do free exercise of religion on the parishioner's church-owned prooerty.
You do have to admire their ability to reconcile the conflict though.![]()
Wash. DC also happens to be a Federal Military District and as such Trump could order the Army in and wouldn't even have to declare Martial Law.
There was a lockdown order in ace because of a pandemic.
According to cat lady rapey, an order is law and can and will be met with force if not obeyed.
Most certainly in the jackbooted authoritarian shit hole states/cities run by (D)eez.
So you agree then, under special conditions 1A rights can be suspended right??
So there is no fucking problem with Trump doing the same right??
Or is suspending civil rights during tough times only for (D)'s????
Most certainly in the jackbooted authoritarian shit hole states/cities run by (D)eez.
Video proof is all over the internet, there are a few threads on this very board crying about how (D)'s are sending the cops into infringe on AntiFa's right to riot freely!!!
Anyone have an answer for that?
BoBoFoFu, for a guy who spends so much time complaining about jackbooted "(D)" authoritarians, you sure do spend a lot of time licking Trump's jackboots.
BoBoFoFu, for a guy who spends so much time complaining about jackbooted "(D)" authoritarians, you sure do spend a lot of time licking Trump's jackboots.
Does your mommy know you're on an adult website?
When she goes into her hysterical evil dems shtick I tune out and laugh. Every post is the same thing.
Pointing out (D) "regulation for thee but not for meeee!!" hypocrisy and self contradiction isn't licking anything of Trumps.
Doesn't have ANYTHING to do with Trump. I don't support his infringement upon civil rights any more than the infringements you were ALL ABOUT when it was team (D) doing the infringing.
Sounds like a bunch of BS to me, Bootlicker. You spent a lot of time on several thread defending your cult leader's heavy-handed approach to clearing away peaceful protesters.
Face it, you're just partisan hack making excuses for your jackbooted cult leader.
So you are saying the the Constitutional right to peaceful assembly is revocable by the US Park Service?
I am going to go ahead and disagree with you.
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the First Amendment protects the right to conduct a peaceful public assembly.[3] The right to assemble is not, however, absolute. Government officials cannot simply prohibit a public assembly in their own discretion,[4] but the government can impose restrictions on the time, place, and manner of peaceful assembly, provided that constitutional safeguards are met.[5] Time, place, and manner restrictions are permissible so long as they “are justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech, . . . are narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest, and . . . leave open ample alternative channels for communication of the information.”[6]
Such time, place, and manner restrictions can take the form of requirements to obtain a permit for an assembly.
See: Thomas v. Chi. Park Dist., 534 U.S. 316, 322 (2002)
https://www.loc.gov/law/help/peaceful-assembly/us.php#_ftn7
Lol, they had to get PERMISSION to use the park. Permit requirements as well as time/place/manner restrictions don't violate the 1st Amendment.