Why do GB Deplorables who supposedly served, know so little about the military?

RoryN

You're screwed.
Joined
Apr 8, 2003
Posts
60,377
Logic says that, in all likelihood, the supposed-former Marine below was not one. This is a basic fact he got wrong:

**
Your premise depends on [the Marines] currently being at capacity. Is that the case?
Yes, within the normal limits of attrition.

https://www.heritage.org/military-strength/assessment-us-military-power/us-marine-corps

Capacity Score: Weak. Despite an increase in manpower, the Corps continues to operate with less than 67 percent of the number of battalions relative to the two-MRC benchmark. Marine Corps capacity is therefore again scored as “weak.”

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=91994902#post91994902
**

(It's not the first example of military ignorance from a Deplorable here who supposedly served.) :rolleyes:

My opinion: if you truly believe in respecting those who actually served in the United States armed forces, you also need to call out stolen valor when it's probable. :rose:
 
AJ lies about it. Vette lies about it. Bot lies about aspects of it altho he almost certainly served.
They do it to support whatever bullshit they're spouting. I don't see it as any different than google geniuses.
 
Logic says that, in all likelihood, the supposed-former Marine below was not one. This is a basic fact he got wrong:

**



https://www.heritage.org/military-strength/assessment-us-military-power/us-marine-corps



http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=91994902#post91994902
**

(It's not the first example of military ignorance from a Deplorable here who supposedly served.) :rolleyes:

My opinion: if you truly believe in respecting those who actually served in the United States armed forces, you also need to call out stolen valor when it's probable. :rose:

I got noting wrong. The current authorized strength of the Marine Corps through 2024 is 186,400, dipshit.

https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-military-forces-fy-2020-marine-corps
 
I got noting wrong. The current authorized strength of the Marine Corps through 2024 is 186,400, dipshit.

https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-military-forces-fy-2020-marine-corps

From your own source, above:

The Tension in Meeting Day-to-day Deployment Demands

The previous commandant, General Robert Neller, appeared to downplay the stress of deployments. In previous years, his posture statement listed all the many deployments and exercises the Marine Corps participated in. The FY 2020 posture statement skiped that. General Neller did note that the Marines remain at a 1:2 deployment-to-dwell ratio when the goal is 1:3. In previous posture statements, he called this level of operational tempo “unsustainable.” This year he called it “challenging.” Neller called maintaining this ratio “a conscious, short-term decision” that entailed risk in a major contingency. It could only be remedied by a large increase in end strength or a decrease in commitments, neither of which he foresaw.5 This is the first major tension about Marine Corps force structure: how to meet continuing high levels of day-to-day deployment requirements with limited forces.

:rolleyes:

The jig is up, liar. Stop digging your hole.
 
From your own source, above:



:rolleyes:

The jig is up, liar. Stop digging your hole.

Your jig is still up in the air, dipshit. How does an increase of females in the infantry ranks make the Corps more lethal?
 
Your jig is still up in the air, dipshit. How does an increase of females in the infantry ranks make the Corps more lethal?

...and now that he's been exposed, he's attempting to change the subject.

There's a pattern here.
 
Logic says that, in all likelihood, the supposed-former Marine below was not one. This is a basic fact he got wrong:

**



https://www.heritage.org/military-strength/assessment-us-military-power/us-marine-corps



http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=91994902#post91994902
**

(It's not the first example of military ignorance from a Deplorable here who supposedly served.) :rolleyes:

My opinion: if you truly believe in respecting those who actually served in the United States armed forces, you also need to call out stolen valor when it's probable. :rose:

The US military is not staffed to deal with Two Major conflicts simultaneously and hasn't been since 1945 when it was fighting in Europe and the Pacific.

It is a theoretical standard that cannot be afforded.
 
AJ lies about it. Vette lies about it. Bot lies about aspects of it altho he almost certainly served.
They do it to support whatever bullshit they're spouting. I don't see it as any different than google geniuses.

AJ has had quite a "colorful" career. (Note: resume is from 2016, before his most recent gigs as Walmart truck unloader and housesquaw). I couldn't find the pists where he claims to have been a Logic and Ethics adjunct professor, martial arts instructor and "scientist", but he's made those claims in the past as well.

NotVetteman spent ten years here regaling us with his USMC exploits (many of which were incorporated into.....or stolen from, depending on your point of view...) the movies "Full Metal Jacket" and "Heartbreak Ridge". Curiously, this new guy who shares virtually all of Vetteman's quirks (scat fetish, fixation over Communism, anger over the 1960 presidential vote, etc) gets very lawyerly when asked to swear on his personal honor that he was NEVER in the USMC or in Vietnam. The most he'll swear to is a mealy-mouthed "I am not the person you think I am".
 
NotVetteman spent ten years here regaling us with his USMC exploits (many of which were incorporated into.....or stolen from, depending on your point of view...) the movies "Full Metal Jacket"... [/I]

Reality
https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/529506867154982040/4B43B3047CDE7D805F6D0C7A4056113B224296B0/

In his mind
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/fullmetaljacket/images/7/7e/Animal_Mother.jpg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/340?cb=20090505125214
 
I doubt many of them have even served, that's why.
Like the typical, limp penis, Deplorable aging male, they love grandstanding and pretending to be virile alpha males, when they are really thin-skinned, weak ass buffoons like their leader.
 
Trump would have served and I'm certain the he would have insisted on a post in Nam but sadly he suffered from bone spurs which I hear is more serious and more painful than the head injuries suffered by personnel in Syria.
 
Back
Top