Trump Offered Assange Pardon if He Covered Up Russian Hack

Big sale at the Swamp

Pardons for sale! Pardons for sale! The corrupt and impeached President has an election coming up, so get yer red-hot pardons.
 
Pardons for sale! Pardons for sale! The corrupt and impeached President has an election coming up, so get yer red-hot pardons.

The Republicans in the U.S. Senate and the Trumpettes on the board must be so proud of him (and themselves).
 
Possible. But let us remember, Assange is a traitor...and most likely, will say anything to get off.
 
Anyone else ever notice than whenever Trump seems to be winning suddenly all kinds of things that are "said" or "reported" to be happening seem to ooze out from under the media baseboards? And that it's usually from "anonymous sources" or it's an entire hearsay chain of "he said, that she said, that someone else said..."?
 
Anyone else ever notice than whenever Trump seems to be winning suddenly all kinds of things that are "said" or "reported" to be happening seem to ooze out from under the media baseboards? And that it's usually from "anonymous sources" or it's an entire hearsay chain of "he said, that she said, that someone else said..."?

Is Assange legit or not?
 
It didn't happen. And even if it did there's nothing wrong with it. Just deal with it.

Right?
 
Is Assange legit or not?

READ what was reported in the article.

Assange said "he was offered a pardon". HE doesn't say (in the article) that it was Trump who made the offer. YOU "assumed" that's who he meant because of the hearsay chain.

Assange says he was offered the pardon by someone he plans to call as a witness at his trial.

(hearsay #1)

Al Jazeera says the witness is former Congressman Dana Rorbacher.

(hearsay #2)

Assange's lawyers say that Rorbacher says that he was acting under Trump's orders.

(hearsay #'s 3 and 4)


And like a good little anti-Trump lemming you swallowed the hearsay hook and blamed Trump about something for which you have no idea if it happened at all.

You people need to start learning how to THINK! You're being lied to, it's been PROVEN that you're being lied to, and yet you cannot seem to understand that the lies you're being fed are so that you can be USED against your own wishes. All someone needs to do is make a claim that Trump did something evil and you're on board the stupid train once again.
 
READ what was reported in the article.

Assange said "he was offered a pardon". HE doesn't say (in the article) that it was Trump who made the offer. YOU "assumed" that's who he meant because of the hearsay chain.

Assange says he was offered the pardon by someone he plans to call as a witness at his trial.

(hearsay #1)

Al Jazeera says the witness is former Congressman Dana Rorbacher.

(hearsay #2)

Assange's lawyers say that Rorbacher says that he was acting under Trump's orders.

(hearsay #'s 3 and 4)


And like a good little anti-Trump lemming you swallowed the hearsay hook and blamed Trump about something for which you have no idea if it happened at all.

You people need to start learning how to THINK! You're being lied to, it's been PROVEN that you're being lied to, and yet you cannot seem to understand that the lies you're being fed are so that you can be USED against your own wishes. All someone needs to do is make a claim that Trump did something evil and you're on board the stupid train once again.

Every time you do this. You have some decent points to make but it gets buried in bullshit. It's a legal response instead of a good one. I deduce that the person who did that makes his living in the legal profession but not at trial. He does more mundane work that requires a lot of writing. That writing carries over to his personal life.
I'm Sherlock Fucking Holmes, bitch.

I'm also high AF so there's that.
Anyway I don't disagree with some of what's in that bullshit but most of it is still bullshit.
 
Anyone else ever notice than whenever Trump seems to be winning suddenly all kinds of things that are "said" or "reported" to be happening seem to ooze out from under the media baseboards? And that it's usually from "anonymous sources" or it's an entire hearsay chain of "he said, that she said, that someone else said..."?


"People are saying..." "I've heard ..." "I have people ... you wouldn't believe what they're finding." Gee, where have I heard that before?
 
"People are saying..." "I've heard ..." "I have people ... you wouldn't believe what they're finding." Gee, where have I heard that before?

Yeah that shit always gets ignored.
I stopped giving a shit years ago and it's eye opening. You see how people really act with politics. Totally blind to their own party or politicians failings. It's funny and scary both but mostly funny.
I also say not giving a shit makes a person happier. Not an ignorance is bliss kind of thing but general feeling of acceptance. Things are how they are, roll with it and enjoy the humor in how we as a species insist on fucking up a good thing.
 
Pardons for sale! Pardons for sale!

Yes-sir-eee, we got yer tokenism pardons, to "prove" the impeached President is not a racist. We got yer security fraud pardons, so long as it's associated with a huge campaign contribution.

C'mon, especially all you white collar criminals! Let me know how you can help the impeached President win yet another election based on cheating and exploiting the hick-state electoral process.
 
Every time you do this. You have some decent points to make but it gets buried in bullshit. It's a legal response instead of a good one. I deduce that the person who did that makes his living in the legal profession but not at trial. He does more mundane work that requires a lot of writing. That writing carries over to his personal life.
I'm Sherlock Fucking Holmes, bitch.

I'm also high AF so there's that.
Anyway I don't disagree with some of what's in that bullshit but most of it is still bullshit.

Your problem with your lack of understanding is that you're trying to debate things while you're "high as fuck". To cover up your lack of understand you do what you and most other people do best - you blame the messenger instead of yourself and your habits for creating the conditions that cause your lack of understanding.

The gate for boarding the Express Train to Stupidville is that a way ----------------->
 
Your problem with your lack of understanding is that you're trying to debate things while you're "high as fuck". To cover up your lack of understand you do what you and most other people do best - you blame the messenger instead of yourself and your habits for creating the conditions that cause your lack of understanding.

MY lack of understanding? Dude, where the fuck in there did I ever address anything specific you said? How the hell would you know what I do or don't understand about your post? How would you know what parts I think are right and what parts are not? You don't because I WASN'T FUCKING DEBATING YOU FUCKSTICK.
Understand that, bitch.
 
MY lack of understanding? Dude, where the fuck in there did I ever address anything specific you said? How the hell would you know what I do or don't understand about your post? How would you know what parts I think are right and what parts are not? You don't because I WASN'T FUCKING DEBATING YOU FUCKSTICK.
Understand that, bitch.


Like I said, the gate is that a way -------------->
 
Last time I looked, Assange's statements were not being offered into evidence in a trial. Or do the Federal Rules of Evidence apply to news articles now?
 
READ what was reported in the article.

Assange said "he was offered a pardon". HE doesn't say (in the article) that it was Trump who made the offer. YOU "assumed" that's who he meant because of the hearsay chain.

Assange says he was offered the pardon by someone he plans to call as a witness at his trial.

(hearsay #1)

Al Jazeera says the witness is former Congressman Dana Rorbacher.

(hearsay #2)

Assange's lawyers say that Rorbacher says that he was acting under Trump's orders.

(hearsay #'s 3 and 4)


And like a good little anti-Trump lemming you swallowed the hearsay hook and blamed Trump about something for which you have no idea if it happened at all.

You people need to start learning how to THINK! You're being lied to, it's been PROVEN that you're being lied to, and yet you cannot seem to understand that the lies you're being fed are so that you can be USED against your own wishes. All someone needs to do is make a claim that Trump did something evil and you're on board the stupid train once again.

Where did I, or anyone, bring Trump into this thread? I suggest that you switch to decaf.
 
Last time I looked, Assange's statements were not being offered into evidence in a trial. Or do the Federal Rules of Evidence apply to news articles now?

Jeebus.

LEMMINGS believe whatever they're told. Intelligent beings sift through what they're told and determine if there are FACTS present.

There are NO FACTS in that article. Yet you instantly jumped to the conclusion, just like the author intended you to, that Trump offered Assange a pardon and that something nefarious is going on because of it.

Seriously, dudly, you need to take a seat on the train right next to Mr. High AF.
 
Oh, okay then.

The Daily Beast reported that lawyers for Assange said Rohrabacher told Assange he was acting on President Donald Trump's direct orders and offered a pardon if Assange said Russia had nothing to do with hacking the DNC.
 
Jeebus.

LEMMINGS believe whatever they're told. Intelligent beings sift through what they're told and determine if there are FACTS present.

There are NO FACTS in that article. Yet you instantly jumped to the conclusion, just like the author intended you to, that Trump offered Assange a pardon and that something nefarious is going on because of it.

Seriously, dudly, you need to take a seat on the train right next to Mr. High AF.

Now see you went and fucked up again by using the word intelligence in a manner that suggests you have it. Stop doing that.
 
Back
Top