███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

[jaF0]

That little whiney Ranny bastard needs to be indicted for obstruction and witness intimidation.

Rand Paul Threatens to Go Rambo on Republicans Who Allow Impeachment Witnesses
Vanity Fair|9 minutes ago
Paul is waging a fierce campaign to prevent the Senate from hearing witnesses in Donald Trump's impeachment trial, vowing to force tough votes on his fellow Republicans if they break with the president or back Democrats' demands for new evidence…Paul says if four or more of his GOP colleagues join with Democrats to entertain new witness ...

 

[Rightguide]

That little whiney Ranny bastard needs to be indicted for obstruction and witness intimidation.

Rand Paul Threatens to Go Rambo on Republicans Who Allow Impeachment Witnesses
Vanity Fair|9 minutes ago
Paul is waging a fierce campaign to prevent the Senate from hearing witnesses in Donald Trump's impeachment trial, vowing to force tough votes on his fellow Republicans if they break with the president or back Democrats' demands for new evidence…Paul says if four or more of his GOP colleagues join with Democrats to entertain new witness ...

Know the law. Paul can't be prosecuted for anything he says on the floor of the Senate.

 

[HisArpy]

Know the law. Paul can't be prosecuted for anything he says on the floor of the Senate.

It's also interesting that Jafo wants to "severely punish" anyone who disagrees with her worldview.

Then there's this:

Dude's been crooked most of his life, like most corporate toads are. You can't get ahead legally.

Dude transferred his corrupt practices into Government, breaking many laws along the way. They've been cited and quoted repeatedly, but the Orangies will never take their blinders off.

Which is strange since I think I've been doing alright. Cowslinger brags that he's doing the same and I'm almost positive that neither of us is "crooked". Well, I might be a little bit off straight up today, but that's because my back hurts.

 

[icanhelp1]

It's also interesting that Jafo wants to "severely punish" anyone who disagrees with her worldview.

Then there's this:



Which is strange since I think I've been doing alright. Cowslinger brags that he's doing the same and I'm almost positive that neither of us is "crooked". Well, I might be a little bit off straight up today, but that's because my back hurts.

Senators just took the oath of impartiality and the Dems just spent the last half hour pounding the shit out of Trump with innuendo and assumptions, they already played their hand. Schumer never walked by a camera he didn't like. Yah! fair and impartial, they are such hypocrites. This is going to be partisan all the way!!

 

[icanhelp1]

~Yawn~

This from left wing Vox:

The report may change the tenor of the Senate’s impeachment trial

The White House has already refuted the report’s conclusions, accusing the GAO of “overreach.” And OMB spokesperson Rachel Semmel said her agency “uses its apportionment authority to ensure taxpayer dollars are properly spent consistent with the President’s priorities and with the law.”

The anger in these statements makes sense, especially since both the White House and OMB are being accused of something serious. But they also have the space to be indignant because they can be confident the report isn’t likely to change anything.

Importantly, nothing major will likely happen on the legal front. Some ethics group will probably sue the administration over this, and the GAO might even do so as it has before, but it’s unlikely to lead to much. It’s possible, though, that the White House will fire staff at OMB or even acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, who also heads that office.

The White House may still not change its procedures. Last November, an OMB lawyer said the executive branch didn’t have to abide by GAO rulings. “When an agency of the legislative branch interprets a law differently than the executive branch, the executive branch is not bound by its views,” Mark Paoletta, the OMB’s general counsel, wrote in a memo last November.

The most probable outcome, then, is that this report will serve as fodder for the president’s opponents who want to see him impeached. It bolsters the case against him that he did something illegal — for his own political gain — and therefore must be booted from office. But the Senate is controlled by Republicans, which means even this new information is unlikely to lead to the president’s conviction.

https://www.vox.com/2020/1/16/21068705/gao-report-ukraine-aid-impeachment-trum

Can anyone say Bowe Bergdahl?

 

[Rightguide]

Isn't the GAO in the same office building as the ACLU?

Remember the GOA is an arm of the Congress not the executive branch. Note as well, the Congress has no constitutional authority to write statutes that interfere with the Presidents plenary power to conduct foreign policy, none whatsoever, outside of declaring war.

 

[BotanyBoy]

That little whiney Ranny bastard needs to be indicted for obstruction and witness intimidation.

Awwwww....someone is upset because the impeachment circus isn't being run by (D)eez anymore.

 

[icanhelp1]

Remember the GOA is an arm of the Congress not the executive branch. Note as well, the Congress has no constitutional authority to write statutes that interfere with the Presidents plenary power to conduct foreign policy, none whatsoever, outside of declaring war.

I posted weeks ago that I expected the house democrats to play the Impoundment Control act of 1974 card. Well, it's finally happened, how convenient. Gao is part of the deep state. The Dems are playing the 'drip' 'drip' 'drip' ploy similar to the Mueller report. It's all about shaping the electorate for the 2020 elections and the pubs need to get that message out. It is unbelievable this sham has progressed to this point. Their sanctimonious procession to the senate the other day is the epitome of hypocrisy. Schiff and Nadler, two phonies. Nancy's gold pen joyous signing is a affront and an insult to law abiding citizens. Making a mockery of the whole impeachment process. They are sowing the seeds for further vindictiveness and retaliation to the next dem president, how dumb is that!

 

[zipman]

I posted weeks ago that I expected the house democrats to play the Impoundment Control act of 1974 card. Well, it's finally happened, how convenient. Gao is part of the deep state. The Dems are playing the 'drip' 'drip' 'drip' ploy similar to the Mueller report. It's all about shaping the electorate for the 2020 elections and the pubs need to get that message out. It is unbelievable this sham has progressed to this point. Their sanctimonious procession to the senate the other day is the epitome of hypocrisy. Schiff and Nadler, two phonies. Nancy's gold pen joyous signing is a affront and an insult to law abiding citizens. Making a mockery of the whole impeachment process. They are sowing the seeds for further vindictiveness and retaliation to the next dem president, how dumb is that!

LOL, so I guess anyone who does anything that goes against what your Glorious Leader wants is part of the deep state.

Talk about bullshit excuses.

 

[RocketLauncher]

 

[Boxlicker101]

Senators just took the oath of impartiality and the Dems just spent the last half hour pounding the shit out of Trump with innuendo and assumptions, they already played their hand. Schumer never walked by a camera he didn't like. Yah! fair and impartial, they are such hypocrites. This is going to be partisan all the way!!

It is going to be strictly partisan, which is why Trump will be acquitted.

 

[RocketLauncher]

 

[Rightguide]

I posted weeks ago that I expected the house democrats to play the Impoundment Control act of 1974 card. Well, it's finally happened, how convenient. Gao is part of the deep state. The Dems are playing the 'drip' 'drip' 'drip' ploy similar to the Mueller report. It's all about shaping the electorate for the 2020 elections and the pubs need to get that message out. It is unbelievable this sham has progressed to this point. Their sanctimonious procession to the senate the other day is the epitome of hypocrisy. Schiff and Nadler, two phonies. Nancy's gold pen joyous signing is a affront and an insult to law abiding citizens. Making a mockery of the whole impeachment process. They are sowing the seeds for further vindictiveness and retaliation to the next dem president, how dumb is that!

And the Parnas BS is just Cohen II.

 

[Rightguide]

Can anyone say Bowe Bergdahl?

Reminder:

Seven Times the GAO Found the Obama Administration Violated Federal Law


https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...he-obama-administration-violated-federal-law/

 

[jaF0]

Reminder

He ain't da' Prez no mo, da' Orangutan is.

 

[spacekowboy]

Breitbart, ya say?

It's sure to be legitimate then.

 

[zipman]

Breitbart, ya say?

It's sure to be legitimate then.

You should read through them. It's funny that he would think those equal the president ordering aide to be withheld.

Most of those were small process errors or done by departments, not by direct order of the President.

Kind of like how 12,000+ lies = "you can keep your doctor."

 

[Rightguide]

He ain't da' Prez no mo, da' Orangutan is.

The post was about the weight of the legal opinions of the GOA, not Obama. Go back to flicking your clit and pay it no mind.

 

[Rightguide]

You should read through them. It's funny that he would think those equal the president ordering aide to be withheld.

Most of those were small process errors or done by departments, not by direct order of the President.

Kind of like how 12,000+ lies = "you can keep your doctor."

It's all bullshit, you idiot. The DOJ has already debunked the GOA bullshit.

 

[jaF0]

The post was about the weight of the legal opinions of the GOA,

Nuh-uh, you're the doubledog doodie head!!!! MOM!!!!

 

[Rightguide]

Nuh-uh, you're the doubledog doodie head!!!! MOM!!!!

^^^
Thumb sucking snowflake.

 

[Heathergave]

Reminder:

Seven Times the GAO Found the Obama Administration Violated Federal Law


https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...he-obama-administration-violated-federal-law/

How many times was he impeached?

 

[RoryN]

How many times was he impeached?

Let me research that...

...wait, it says he never was. Is this a trick question?

 

[HisArpy]

How many times was he impeached?

Which ought to tell you something about the validity of the current impeachment basis. If prior Presidents weren't impeached for exactly the same things that Trump is alleged to have done, then the basis isn't valid.

Not that your TDS is going to let you understand that

 

[icanhelp1]

Reminder:

Seven Times the GAO Found the Obama Administration Violated Federal Law


https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...he-obama-administration-violated-federal-law/

Exactly! But then you get the " Obama not pres anymoe. The don't seem to get that the Dems are setting a precedence that can potentially cripple future presidents for the sake of instant gratification. I can see a day where inner counsel and presidents won't confide with each other for fear of future reprisals by a partisan house. Much like what happened with the Waterboarding charges from the left, wanted to throw CIA officials in jail for following lawful orders. Or find it difficult to get quality advisers for the same reasons. This is such an easy fix, LET THE PEOPLE VOTE HIM OUT but they know they have a weak hand. Our framers are rolling over in their graves.