Remember: it's no longer "President Trump" - it's "Impeached President Trump"

dudly, you're all over the map here.

The SENATE doesn't have to do squat if they don't want to. Continued ranting about how they "must" is just more or your TDS on display.

Further, I don't care if the Senate conducts a trial or if they dismiss - justice will be served either way.

What I DO care about is you continually pushing the lie that Trump has to defend himself. He doesn't. No one does under our justice system and Constitution.

As for the last bit of crap to fall from your lips...


PLEASE do your best, however inadequate we know that is, to try and keep up with the rest of the class.
Nobody has to defend themself?

So why are there defense lawyers? It's right there in their title.
 
Wow! you got both your brain cells working overtime today. He's protecting article II powers for future presidents, that concept isn't too far over your head! is it!! The trial proceedings are strictly for removal. Ahhh, there's that word again! EXONERATION!!

You can tell your mentor KeithD that obstruction of congress is not a crime or an impeachable offense. Article II powers afforded to the president give him legitimate power to resist congress.... Executive branch = co-equal branch of government. Now be serious! are you two going to stop peddling stupid, you're lowering everyone's IQ.

Mitch only protects republicans and their party's power. For you to think otherwise demonstrates that you have not been paying attention.
 
https://media1.tenor.com/images/d40f5d30bc9534a240f4da4842f48e5f/tenor.gif?itemid=5038159

The Deplorables' world is imploding in steady daily increments thanks to their Cheeto overlord...and all they can do is scream impotently into the internet void hoping that mere basic bitch yap will pivot the universe towards their direction.

https://media3.giphy.com/media/xUn3C3AHjERm9IXsEo/giphy.gif

"Imploding?"

Because the Dems finally got around to an entirely partisan impeachment that they were threatening from "jump" as you would cartoonishly say?

They wanted to impeach him for the Russia fantasy (which actually imploded) and grabbed this nonsense the very day after Mueller imploded their narrative.
 
Mitch only protects republicans and their party's power. For you to think otherwise demonstrates that you have not been paying attention.

Trump rails about "Do nothing Democrats" while Mitch has about 100 bills in his inbox to sign.
 
Nobody has to defend themself?

So why are there defense lawyers? It's right there in their title.

To ensure that the defendant is afforded all of his constitutionally protected rights including the right to offer no defense at all and move for summary dismissal.
 
Nobody has to defend themself?

So why are there defense lawyers? It's right there in their title.



Legal counsel cross examines the articles of impeachment and provides legal rebuttal to the allegations brought forward by the managers.
 
"Imploding?"

Because the Dems finally got around to an entirely partisan impeachment that they were threatening from "jump" as you would cartoonishly say?

They wanted to impeach him for the Russia fantasy (which actually imploded) and grabbed this nonsense the very day after Mueller imploded their narrative.

Your impotent scream into the internet void is acknowledged.
 
Trump rails about "Do nothing Democrats" while Mitch has about 100 bills in his inbox to sign.

The Senate majority leader does not "sign" bills. The President does. The Senate Majority Leader sets the calendar. He gets to decide which items of business are worthy of that august body's time. He is under no obligation to even consider time-wasting show-votes in the Senate He has every right to make those decisions on any basis he deems important for the aims and advantages of the majority party including scheduling show votes to embarrass the other side and declining them when it would politically disadvantage his caucus members.

This is no different than how Senate business has been conducted for as long as we've had a Senate. It's no different than how Harry Reid conducted himself when he was the majority leader.

Right now Cocaine Mitch feels that his time is best spent reshaping the various circuit courts more to the liking of conservatives using the read rule where Harry Reid went nuclear and packed the courts with Obama judges.

The House minority leader currently Chuck Schumer is also angling for whatever advantage he can get. He has openly admitted that although this trial is a foregone conclusion and that there is no chance at all that Trump will be removed from office that he hopes to force some votes over witnesses for no other reason than to attempt to diminish the election chances of certain Republican members. He's not doing it in search of Truth he's not doing it for any reason other than the idea that it might harm certain members of the opposition. Which is perfectly entitled to do.

Grow up.
 
Last edited:
Mitch only protects republicans and their party's power. For you to think otherwise demonstrates that you have not been paying attention.



And Nancy, Nadler and schiff only project falsehoods and would do anything legal or illegal to get the presidency back. Hillary cheated her ass off and still lost so Nancy brought in the best liars the american people can buy. You need to take care of your ADHD. Don't wander too far from your meds.
 
The Senate majority leader does not "sign" bulls. The President does. The Senate Majority Leader sets the calendar. He gets to decide which items of business are worthy of that august body's time. He is under no obligation to even consider time-wasting show-votes in the Senate He has every right to make those decisions on any basis he deems important for the aims and advantages of the majority party including scheduling show votes to embarrass the other side and declining them when it would politically disadvantage his caucus members.

This is no different than how Senate business has been conducted for as long as we've had a Senate. It's no different than how Harry Reid conducted himself when he was the majority leader.

Right now Cocaine Mitch feels that his time is best spent reshaping the various circuit courts more to the liking of conservatives using the read rule where Harry Reid went nuclear and packed the courts with Obama judges.

The House minority leader currently Chuck Schumer is also angling for whatever advantage he can get. He has openly admitted that although this trial is a foregone conclusion and that there is no chance at all that Trump will be removed from office that he hopes to force some votes over witnesses for no other reason than to attempt to diminish the election chances of certain Republican members. He's not doing it in search of Truth he's not doing it for any reason other than the idea that it might harm certain members of the opposition. Which is perfectly entitled to do.

Grow up.

Those are basically the same thing when the Leader is a racist republican serving a racist republican who he will protect at all costs. Grow the fuck up.
 
And Nancy, Nadler and schiff only project falsehoods and would do anything legal or illegal to get the presidency back. Hillary cheated her ass off and still lost so Nancy brought in the best liars the american people can buy. You need to take care of your ADHD. Don't wander too far from your meds.

I'm sure you have citations of these illegal activities and cheating from unbiased non-partisan sources for such claims. I'll wait. :)
 
You just write it?

Those be plural while yo thang is a singularity, ya diig?
 
Sorry. Too late. Simple typographical errors have to be called out within 30 minutes or no internet points can be awarded. Major grammatical errors count four-fold and can be called out for a full hour.

Better luck next time, champ.
 
And Nancy, Nadler and schiff only project falsehoods and would do anything legal or illegal to get the presidency back. Hillary cheated her ass off and still lost so Nancy brought in the best liars the american people can buy. You need to take care of your ADHD. Don't wander too far from your meds.
Neither Pelosi, Nadler nor Schiff have ever run for President.
 
Sorry. Too late. Simple typographical errors have to be called out within 30 minutes or no internet points can be awarded. Major grammatical errors count four-fold and can be called out for a full hour.

Better luck next time, champ.

Sorry, it's bulls that set the rules. Know your role.
 
I'm sure you have citations of these illegal activities and cheating from unbiased non-partisan sources for such claims. I'll wait. :)



How about Schiff's lying parody to congress. Or Schiff lying to congress concerning the whistleblower. Just watch it on TV.
 
The HOUSE impeaches. The SENATE trial of the articles of impeachment decides whether the articles of impeachment AS DRAWN UP BY THE HOUSE warrant removal from office, or not.

The Senate is not in a position to "cover up" anything. Everything the President is alleged to have done is contained in the articles of impeachment and any supporting documentation that the House sends over in support of THEIR impeachment.

If something is "covered up" at this point it is because the HOUSE failed to UNcover the necessary evidence of "treason, high crimes, or misdemeanos" that would warrant drawing up articles of impeachment in the first place.

Trump got impeached while obstructing justice by not seeing over requested documents and telling witnesses not to testify. You mean that evidence the house failed to uncover?

The senate can absolutely whitewash things, that’s why McConnell says he’s working in concert with the defendant and doesn’t want to call witnesses.
 
Wow! you got both your brain cells working overtime today. He's protecting article II powers for future presidents, that concept isn't too far over your head! is it!! The trial proceedings are strictly for removal. Ahhh, there's that word again! EXONERATION!!

You can tell your mentor KeithD that obstruction of congress is not a crime or an impeachable offense. Article II powers afforded to the president give him legitimate power to resist congress.... Executive branch = co-equal branch of government. Now be serious! are you two going to stop peddling stupid, you're lowering everyone's IQ.
reuters:

A similar charge, contempt of Congress, was one of the articles of impeachment against Nixon, who had defied subpoenas for incriminating tape recordings.

Contempt of Congress is a misdemeanor crime under U.S. law, which defines the offense as willfully failing to provide testimony or documents to Congress. A different crime, obstruction of justice, more broadly prohibits “interference with the orderly administration of law and justice.”
 
Back
Top