CandiCame
Rocket Grunt
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2011
- Posts
- 26,765
So you're just assuming that?
Going by how he was described, it doesn't sound like the sort of thing Jesus would give a shit about, as long as what was said was honest and not cruel. He was kinda known for not caring about the shallow things that got everyone else throwing judgement, and instead got pissed off by people being money grubbing, arrogant, judgemental and cruel.
If he'd have read the bible he'd have got to the part where it said "piss" and it would make his whole argument funny as hell.
And if he'd actually studied the way language developed as it relates to Christianity he'd have gotten way more pissed off if I'd have said something like, "God's wounds!" or "Jesus Christ!" than "fuck".
This is the kind of shit I'm talking about.
When the bible says not to curse, it's literally saying not to put curses on people, like was the style at the time, because the Christian god won't follow through with them. Straight up. He won't do it and you'll look like a dumbass. So you're not supposed to say shit like, "This is true or may god strike me dead," because the Christian god ain't got time for your petty bullshit. This was really, really common in places that would later become the middle east; it differs from English in that the curses tend to be actual curses, "May something bad happen to you" instead of like, comparisons to animals "you scurvy dog/ you bitch" like what happened in Europe. It's also the most common kind of cursing in the bible, because that's the culture it's from, so in the middle ages as Christianity became popular in Europe, it actually started to get more common but then it fell out of favor because it just doesn't work that well in English. Our language isn't particularly set up for it. Because for whatever reason, it's more obvious that it's petty bullshit in English. English is just more active than a lot of Asian languages, likely because it evolved in a more individualist (rather than collectivist) culture.
If y'all are actually interested in this I recommend "Holy Shit" which is a book that walks through the religious cursing linguistic progression all the way from old English to contemporary English at the time of it's publication; and it's written by a linguistic historian so it's a great jumping off point.
I wanna bring back "God's Wounds".
The only real curse that was straight up forbidden in the bible that survives into contemporary English is "God damn -blank-." To fit the biblical ban it can't be, "Goddamn it," you have to be ordering god to damn something, because that's what the ban on cursing actually was. It's actually about the fact that you, a mortal, can't tell god to do anything. He's not gonna deal with your petty bullshit. But I think, "damn you" has fallen out of fashion so I'm trying to think of a time where this would actually fit the definition because as language evolved we replaced it with "fuck you"- and that originally appeared specifically as a replacement; to avoid doing the biblical thing because a fucking was originally an asswhooping, so when it came into fashion people were basically saying, "I'm not gonna tell god to whoop your ass because that's forbidden, but I'll sure as hell do it myself."
It's really interesting to me that the turn-of-phrase that was created to be LESS offensive, because according to the bible it straight up is, is now the one that is culturally considered more offensive. But that's just because I think language evolution is neat.
I think all language evolution is neat, not just the religious stuff. Like the kids are bringing back 'clod'. I thought it was just Bitesize but other kids are saying 'clod'. The first time she called me a clod I had to take a minute because like... to bring a word out of retirement to insult me was just such a power move. But then I realized it was a common thing the kids are doing because a cartoon used it to skirt censors when I THINK they wanted to say 'cunt'.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxA1fbk4OS8