Transgender get sent to jail for raping pregnant woman.

[dominatrixjane]

Transgender get sent to jail for raping pregnant woman.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...-born-male-sexually-assaulted-female-inmates/

 

[dominatrixjane]

Transgender prisoner who sexually assaulted inmates jailed for life

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...ho-sexually-assaulted-inmates-jailed-for-life

 

[coati]

Where is coati to say it's okay because he's transgender?

^^^Still stinging from a rebuke of his sympathy for violence against a MtF transgender woman in southern California, related to an entirely different situation.

One of the characteristics of a Deplorable is that they dodge responsibility for deplorable behavior by ascribing extremism to their critics.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I see you're still delusional.

And that transgender man was a sexual predator. (You're still living in denial of what kind of person they were.) Victims took the law into their own hand. Justice? (Many would say yes, but not you, defender of rapist.)



Speaking of dodging ... I don't see you condemning this transgender for their rape of a pregnant woman. (I wonder why?)

We know why

 

[coati]

Retro and BotBo are two peas in a pod regarding an entirely different case than the one referenced in this thread.

In this different case, which took place in southern California, consensual sex took place between a transgender female and a homophobic man who murdered her when he discovered that she was transgender. Right before he murdered her, he muttered something along the lines of "I can't be fucking gay!"

Both Retro and BotBo said that the murderer was a victim of sexual assault, similar to when the BotBo got censored on this board for saying that a polyamorous woman was a perpetrator of sexual assault for having sex outside of her marriage, and thus deserved to be beaten to the point of being confined to an intensive care unit for a month.

So, these are the views of two Lit Deplorables who want to make America like Saudi Arabia, where women are stoned for disobeying sexual mores developed by extreme right-wing men. They hate America, and favor the same sort of violence against women and transgender people that extreme Muslims promote.

This is not complicated. Retro and BotBo are trying to use an entirely different and outlying situation to justify their attitudes about violence against women who do not meet their expectations for sexual behaviors. Tough shit. The world will not conform to sexually phobic incels.

 

[Fart_knocker]

^^^Still stinging from a rebuke of his sympathy for violence against a MtF transgender woman in southern California, related to an entirely different situation.

One of the characteristics of a Deplorable is that they dodge responsibility for deplorable behavior by ascribing extremism to their critics.

We already knew that retrogav is moron.

But thanks for sharing.

 

[heathergives]

We already knew that retrogav is moron.

But thanks for sharing.

^^^Whatever you say, luk.^^^

 

[BotanyBoy]

Both Retro and BotBo said that the murderer was a victim of sexual assault

Because duh...and by feminisms own standards, consent based upon a lie isn't consent!!!

It's sexual assault when a straight cisgender white male lies and deceives to get laid......it's sexual assault when anyone else does it. Being LGBT+ isn't a free pass on standards the rest are held to, no matter how hard you and the intersectional bigots stamp your feet otherwise.

similar to when the BotBo got censored on this board for saying that a polyamorous woman was a perpetrator of sexual assault for having sex outside of her marriage,

I never said that, you're either being dishonest or demonstrating your illiteracy.

So, these are the views of two Lit Deplorables who want to make America like Saudi Arabia, where women are stoned for disobeying sexual mores developed by extreme right-wing men. They hate America, and favor the same sort of violence against women and transgender people that extreme Muslims promote.

More lies from a hysterical liar.

Also the "hate America" part is pretty funny coming from a radical leftist who loathes civil rights and individual liberty.

This is not complicated. Retro and BotBo are trying to use an entirely different and outlying situation to justify their attitudes about violence against women who do not meet their expectations for sexual behaviors.

I don't have any female specific expectations for sexual behaviors.

Tough shit. The world will not conform to sexually phobic incels.

I'm not sexually phobic or an incel.

Why must you be so wildly dishonest?? We know why

Your hysterical and insane positions wouldn't stand up very long if you had a shred of honesty about you.

 

[coati]

In California, a man who wanted to be a woman, dressed up as a woman, and lied to two straight men about being a women and tricked them into sex. (Sexual assault.) Their traumatized minds could not handle this and they killed a sexual predator. That's it. Accept it coati.

Uhh, no. I don't accept this, and the legal system does not accept this.

As a matter of fact, several men were convicted related to the case in California, and laws were changed following their convictions to prevent future murder defendants from employing the so-called trans-panic defense. The law specifically prohibits defendants from claiming that they were provoked to murder by discovering a victim's sexual orientation or gender identity.

Here is a summary of the California case:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Gwen_Araujo

Both you and BotBo are deplorable pigs who continue to state, in defiance of the new law, that the defendants were justified in committing murder. You continue to state that murderers were the "victims". That says a lot about your lack of character and your open promotion of violating laws on Lit's GB forum.

And, BotBo indeed had his earlier post deleted by Lit, the post in which he told a polyamorous female poster that he hoped one of her lovers would beat her up so bad that she had to spend a month in an ICU. Others quoted that post in the same thread, but the cowardly pig BotBo continues to deny that his original post was removed because of its promotion of violence against another poster.

Both of you guys are pathetic, cowardly, and dishonest. It's no wonder that BotBo shuns just about any form of sexuality, and that both of you, just like extreme Muslims, claim that murder of trans women is justified if the murderer feels that he was "tricked" into having sex.

You both are cowards.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Uhh, no. I don't accept this, and the legal system does not accept this.

So you support consent through deception? LOL WOW.

The California legal system.

Here is a summary of the California case:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Gwen_Araujo

California is ok with consent through deception...coming from the state that made it legal to intentionally infect others with HIV, not really shocking.

Both you and BotBo are deplorable pigs who continue to state, in defiance of the new law,

That law doesn't apply to me, California ain't in my food chain and can go fuck itself.

And, BotBo indeed had his earlier post deleted by Lit, the post in which he told a polyamorous female poster that he hoped one of her lovers would beat her up so bad that she had to spend a month in an ICU.

Because she thought abusing them was CUTE GIRLPOWER!!!

And I hope all victims of abuse put their abusers in the ICU. No exceptions.

Others quoted that post in the same thread, but the cowardly pig BotBo continues to deny that his original post was removed because of its promotion of violence against another poster.

I didn't deny that, I denied what you tried to dishonestly ascribe.

I also deny the charge of making threats of violence, I did no such thing, the reason for removing the comment was bogus as fuck charge.

It was a feels based decision to virtue signal that treating men like shit for being men is cute and so much girl power!!!

Double standard female supremacy trash.

Both of you guys are pathetic, cowardly, and dishonest.

Nothing but dishonest, accuses me of being dishonest, then immediately goes back to lying.

It's no wonder that BotBo shuns just about any form of sexuality,

I don't shun any form of sexuality.

I just don't make exceptions to the law nor my own personal morality based on sexuality.

I believe consent through deception is wrong, being trans doesn't make it ok and if a state decides to take legal action against those who do engage in such behavior it should apply to trans people as well.

 

[coati]

My. oh, my. Look at the big-talking bullies dance around like wound-up toys trying to defend the indefensible.

Yet another example of why the Deplorable label is so fitting.

 

[BotanyBoy]

My. oh, my. Look at the big-talking bullies dance around like wound-up toys trying to defend the indefensible.

Yet another example of why the Deplorable label is so fitting.

Your wild ascription and lies you can't defend??? Pathetic projection is pathetic.

LOL the only one proving to be deplorable here is you, the liar liar with their pants on fire.

BTW being called on your lies doesn't make others bullies.

 

[where_is_RUTH]

A sociologists wet dream

A post in 2018 nothing
A repost 2019 and you girls get your knickers in a twist.








It's like poker. I don't need to see the cards (the individual posts) I can play the people!
Which means
If you're sat at the table and you can't spot the patsy...

P.s. I'm shit at poker

 

[Fart_knocker]

Was it kantranny?

That lowlife has been absent.

 

[heathergives]

Was it kantranny?

That lowlife has been absent.

^^^Whatever you say, luk.^^^

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/c3/bd/14/c3bd1476f40b6fe2b5d905f67eeadf1b.jpg