███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

[BotanyBoy]

LOLOLOLOL

Bot Boy pretends to be a fan of "academic articles."

Aside from academia being a left bastion thereby making you a hypocrite that's a blatant lie on your part.

How does that make me a hypocrite??

There was no lie....every time I dictionary/encyclopedia/academia a lefty they get PISSED.

Speaking of here is one of the most consistent complainers when I pull out the references, living proof I'm not lying, Mr.HasNoCLuE what liberalism is AuthoritarianDownSouth, hater of every variety of liberalism.

"blatant lies" are an integral part of glibertarian culture.
*nods*

Says a blatant liar who cowers from any challenges of his lies, never failing to show his distain for liberalism.

Ever figure out what liberalism is or are you still shaking like a the dishonest lil bitch we all know you are??

Let me know when you grow a spine and own up to your lies and admit the only person owned in your siggy is YOU??

 

[BotanyBoy]

https://media3.giphy.com/media/xT9IgpAIj7zdU9DF16/giphy.gif

HERE! HERE ARE MY ACADEMIC ARTICLES!!! LOOK AT THEM YOU AMERICA HATING INTERSECTIONAL COMMUNIST SOCIALIST SJWS!!!

And the uneducateds such as yourself ignore them all for dogmatic faith in your lord and savior, the government.

 

[HisArpy]

So with ^^^ post you are admitting you completely misunderstood what I was actually saying and went off the rails on something only you saw and accused me of something I wasn’t even doing.

I nominate you for GB Dunce of the week.

More deflection.

Seriously dudly, just quit.

 

[HisArpy]

Start with an easy one. Gordon Sondland.

GOFUCKYOURSELF

 

[jomar]

More deflection.

Seriously dudly, just quit.

Not even close. You made an incorrect assumption, went to town on it and showed the board what a dunce you are. Having said that, the pointy hat kinda suits you.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Another really bad day for the Trumpettes.
*nods*

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Last time I linked a whole bunch of academic articles you spat in contempt of socialist lefties in universities.

"I'm not reading that shit!"

Now you're all Bot Boy the University scholar Lolol

It makes you a hypocrite for the same reason Republiturds ranting about Fake News submit articles from the WaPo to "prove" their points.

How does that make me a hypocrite??

There was no lie....every time I dictionary/encyclopedia/academia a lefty they get PISSED.

Speaking of here is one of the most consistent complainers when I pull out the references, living proof I'm not lying, Mr.HasNoCLuE what liberalism is AuthoritarianDownSouth, hater of every variety of liberalism.



Says a blatant liar who cowers from any challenges of his lies, never failing to show his distain for liberalism.

Ever figure out what liberalism is or are you still shaking like a the dishonest lil bitch we all know you are??

Let me know when you grow a spine and own up to your lies and admit the only person owned in your siggy is YOU??

 

[RoryN]

Watching the proceedings this evening is awful.

These Republicans are traitors to our nation. *nod*

 

[bigsly]

These Republicans are traitors to our socialist nation. *nod*

Fyp and good for them.

 

[Emerson40]

Let's take it from the top - What "witnesses"?

Start with an easy one. Gordon Sondland.

GOFUCKYOURSELF

Timmeh's derpitude knows no bounds.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Last time I linked a whole bunch of academic articles you spat in contempt of socialist lefties in universities.

"I'm not reading that shit!"

Now you're all Bot Boy the University scholar Lolol

It makes you a hypocrite for the same reason Republiturds ranting about Fake News submit articles from the WaPo to "prove" their points.

Unless you linked something from Evergreen U. or some other bullshit school that have been so discredited they're struggling to keep their doors open, you're mistaken.

But not a state or one of the private U's that haven't totally destroyed themselves and their reputation.

So link it up!!

Now?? I've been in school almost perpetually since 2009.... U. Texas Austin, UC. Berkeley, Stanford and now U of Minnesota lol I'm a minority in the extreme who gets deeply discounted if not tuition free school in a lot of places.

Nope....I don't think your memory is serving you very well.

 

[RobDownSouth]

USA Today newspaper calls for the impeachment of President Donald J. Trump

 

[BotanyBoy]

USA Today newspaper calls for the impeachment of President Donald J. Trump

And water is wet.

You figure out what liberalism is yet or are you still taking pride in displaying your ignorance?? Oh look...it's shockingly not the former.

 

[RobDownSouth]

RWCJ-friendly print media per the AP

Safe spaces for snowflakes
(Newspapers that have downplayed or omitted most impeachment coverage)

• The Charlotte Observer
• Tampa Bay Times
• Indianapolis Star
• St. Louis Post-Dispatch
• Idaho Statesman

 

[Carnal_Flower]

No, I'm not. And I'm not going back three years to the Politics Board

BUt this is all good to know.

>>Spends his every waking moment attacking the degenerate anti-American "left"
while citing UC freakin' Berkeley (bastion of anti-free speech remember), Austin and Stanford as his bona fides.>>

=

Hypocritical, self-exploding, ridiculous joke

Oh right, I forgot. >>Lives off US Gov Socialized Health Care too>>

Unless you linked something from Evergreen U. or some other bullshit school that have been so discredited they're struggling to keep their doors open, you're mistaken.

But not a state or one of the private U's that haven't totally destroyed themselves and their reputation.

So link it up!!

Now?? I've been in school almost perpetually since 2009.... U. Texas Austin, UC. Berkeley, Stanford and now U of Minnesota lol I'm a minority in the extreme who gets deeply discounted if not tuition free school in a lot of places.

Nope....I don't think your memory is serving you very well.

 

[BotanyBoy]

No, I'm not. And I'm not going back three years to the Politics Board

So you got a whole lot of nothing but fantasies at best and lies at worst. Got it.

BUt this is all good to know.

>>Spends his every waking moment attacking the degenerate anti-American "left"

MAYBE like 5% of my time....Most of my time is spent caring for my family and making myself better at the things that I like doing.

while citing UC freakin' Berkeley (bastion of anti-free speech remember), Austin and Stanford as his bona fides.>>

=

Hypocritical, self-exploding, ridiculous joke

Remember?? No...point out where I ever claimed UCB was a basiton of anti-free speech.

Out of pure desperation your attempting to conflate the behavior of AntiFa and other degenerate leftist activities at those locations with the universities themselves.

This is the most pathetic attempt at dishonesty yet and arguably the biggest derp of the day so far.

Good job.

Oh right, I forgot. >>Lives off US Gov Socialized Health Care too>>

There's no such thing as socialized HC in the USA.

You're just making shit up.

 

[zipman]

The best summary I've read for the case for impeachment

"The case for Trump’s impeachment seemed quite strong more than two months ago, and the evidence provided to the House’s impeachment inquiry has strengthened it further. The president’s abuse of power is not in dispute. It is clear that he used the powers of his office in an attempt to extract a corrupt favor for his personal benefit, and this is precisely the sort of offense that impeachment was designed to keep in check. It doesn’t matter if the attempt succeeded. All that matters is that the attempt was made. It is also undeniable that he has sought to impede the investigation into his misconduct. The president has committed the offenses he is accused of committing, and the House should approve both articles of impeachment.

The president doesn’t have a credible line of defense left. That is why his apologists in Congress and elsewhere have been reduced to making increasingly absurd and desperate claims. The president’s defenders want to distract attention from the fact that the president abused his power, violated the public’s trust, and broke his oath of office, but these distractions are irrelevant."

 

[OldJourno]

It appears the impeachment vote will be bipartisan after all.
There are indications a number of House Democrats will call bullshit and vote with the Republicans.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

The president doesn’t have a credible line of defense left. That is why his apologists in Congress and elsewhere have been reduced to making increasingly absurd and desperate claims. The president’s defenders want to distract attention from the fact that the president abused his power, violated the public’s trust, and broke his oath of office, but these distractions are irrelevant."

I fail to see how people wish to blind themselves to this?

Why people cannot separate their political beliefs, look with an open mind and say, if this was not my candidate of choice, would I still support these actions?

I know I have supported my political party, yet not the leader at the same time.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

It appears the impeachment vote will be bipartisan after all.
There are indications a number of House Democrats will call bullshit and vote with the Republicans.

From what I read, the Republicans are whipping the vote, and the Democrats are not.

For those of you, who do not understand what a "whipped" vote is, perhaps you should read up on it.

 

[icanhelp1]

"The case for Trump’s impeachment seemed quite strong more than two months ago, and the evidence provided to the House’s impeachment inquiry has strengthened it further. The president’s abuse of power is not in dispute. It is clear that he used the powers of his office in an attempt to extract a corrupt favor for his personal benefit, and this is precisely the sort of offense that impeachment was designed to keep in check. It doesn’t matter if the attempt succeeded. All that matters is that the attempt was made. It is also undeniable that he has sought to impede the investigation into his misconduct. The president has committed the offenses he is accused of committing, and the House should approve both articles of impeachment.

The president doesn’t have a credible line of defense left. That is why his apologists in Congress and elsewhere have been reduced to making increasingly absurd and desperate claims. The president’s defenders want to distract attention from the fact that the president abused his power, violated the public’s trust, and broke his oath of office, but these distractions are irrelevant."

And who wrote that for you? COATI!!!

 

[Conager]

From what I read, the Republicans are whipping the vote, and the Democrats are not.

For those of you, who do not understand what a "whipped" vote is, perhaps you should read up on it.

You should probably find more accurate things to read. There's no chance that the Democrats would be anything less than delighted with a unanimous vote in their caucus.

"The case for Trump’s impeachment seemed quite strong more than two months ago, and the evidence provided to the House’s impeachment inquiry has strengthened it further. The president’s abuse of power is not in dispute. It is clear that he used the powers of his office in an attempt to extract a corrupt favor for his personal benefit, and this is precisely the sort of offense that impeachment was designed to keep in check. It doesn’t matter if the attempt succeeded. All that matters is that the attempt was made. It is also undeniable that he has sought to impede the investigation into his misconduct. The president has committed the offenses he is accused of committing, and the House should approve both articles of impeachment.

The president doesn’t have a credible line of defense left. That is why his apologists in Congress and elsewhere have been reduced to making increasingly absurd and desperate claims. The president’s defenders want to distract attention from the fact that the president abused his power, violated the public’s trust, and broke his oath of office, but these distractions are irrelevant."

Hahahahahaha!

 

[BotanyBoy]

You should probably find more accurate things to read. There's no chance that the Democrats would be anything less than delighted with a unanimous vote in their caucus.

I'm wondering where he got that......surely a bastion of journalistic integrity like Vox, RAW, BuzzFeed, Slate, Salon, LA/NY Ttimes op-eds???

 

[icanhelp1]

I fail to see how people wish to blind themselves to this?


WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

 

[OldJourno]

From what I read, the Republicans are whipping the vote, and the Democrats are not.

For those of you, who do not understand what a "whipped" vote is, perhaps you should read up on it.

More helpful reading might include the latest Time magazine. Reporters have blown up the last real shred of evidence in Ukraine.
I'm shocked Time ran the story.