Impeachment not going so well?

What, Hillary's e-mails and Benghazi not retaining your attention as much as usual?
 
Impeachment is going great! Only a month ago, they were talking bribery, extortion, and obstruction of justice. My how the narrative has changed! And by sheer coincidence, the an hour after announcing the diluted articles of impeachment, the House announced that they’re finally moving forward with USMCA. Three cheers for Nancy’s impeachment focus groups.
 
They still are talking bribery, extortion, and obstruction of justice (the later of which can come up in the second round of impeachment. There's no double jeopardy connected with impeachment) and Trump just continues his bribery, extortion, and obstruction of justice.

And, yes, the Democratic House has moved forward on a compromise USMCA (you might want to check out what Pelosi said about that deal) and it's gone to the Republican Senate, where McConnell says he's going to sit on it. So, what party, again, is trying to do the nation's business?
 
They still are talking bribery, extortion, and obstruction of justice (the later of which can come up in the second round of impeachment. There's no double jeopardy connected with impeachment) and Trump just continues his bribery, extortion, and obstruction of justice.

And, yes, the Democratic House has moved forward on a compromise USMCA (you might want to check out what Pelosi said about that deal) and it's gone to the Republican Senate, where McConnell says he's going to sit on it. So, what party, again, is trying to do the nation's business?

Second round? They’ve spent three years getting to this round. But hey, 2022 will be here before we know it, right? Maybe they’ll find a Republican next time. After all, Speaker Pelosi did say bipartisan support was essential. McConnell said he’ll take USMCA up after the trial. Fear not, the acquittal and exoneration are expected to come quickly. Couple weeks or so. 👍👍
 
Out of curiosity, has anyone on the left stopped to consider what happens when the whole country is fed up with this circus and Y'all forgot to put forward an electable 2020 candidate ?

and thats not to support trump, it's just to point out how stupid and arrogant your puppeteers are .
 
They still are talking bribery, extortion, and obstruction of justice (the later of which can come up in the second round of impeachment. There's no double jeopardy connected with impeachment) and Trump just continues his bribery, extortion, and obstruction of justice.

And, yes, the Democratic House has moved forward on a compromise USMCA (you might want to check out what Pelosi said about that deal) and it's gone to the Republican Senate, where McConnell says he's going to sit on it. So, what party, again, is trying to do the nation's business?

It's none of those. They had to give up on quid pro quo and bribery and have settled on "abuse of power" and obstruction of Congress, not justice, Congress. The latter is just the regular tension between two coequal branches that has been going on for 230 years.
The problem is you picked the wrong issue. You think most Americans are going to go research Ukraine? Most Americans are wondering why are we even giving those corrupt assholes any money to begin with?
 
From my reading of the document I think congress has a strong case and I agree with Nadler that if it were a criminal case any jury would come up with a guilty verdict within 3 minutes.
However, it is not a criminal matter and it seems to me that congress have accepted that the senate will not convict and they, (congress), hope to be able to use the articles of impeachment as a campaign tool for the election.
Trump will definitely win the election. Democrats will keep their majority in congress and they will make a very strong showing in the senate.
Reality TV is going to a new level over the next 5 years.
 
JayCuck writes: "Senate looks like it will vote to dismiss....without even a hearing..."

The House Democrats have basically embarrassed themselves by not even making a serious case! Their witnesses are a bunch of anti-Trump malcontents who never saw or heard anything directly, except what they were TOLD by others. And the law scholars they called in to testify ALSO have no direct knowledge of anything impeachable happening. Adam Schiff made some great promises, but then completely failed to deliver.

magicalmoments writes: "From my reading of the document I think congress has a strong case and I agree with Nadler that if it were a criminal case any jury would come up with a guilty verdict within 3 minutes."

Perhaps you'd get your guilty verdict if your jury were a bunch of hysterical Trump-haters who admired Antifa and were huge supporters of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - but if they're normal Americans they'd immediately vote to acquit on all charges. Adam Schiff still wants to impeach Trump for Russia collusion, despite the Mueller Report's saying there was no evidence there!

"However, it is not a criminal matter and it seems to me that congress have accepted that the senate will not convict and they, (congress), hope to be able to use the articles of impeachment as a campaign tool for the election."

No, the U.S. Senate is going to laugh-off these charges, and Trump's booming economy (which Obama is STILL trying to take credit for) will guarnatee that this president defeats whatever sad loser emerges on top in the Democratic Party's 2020 race. Kamala Harris said, in quitting the race, that the modern Democratic Party is still filled with racists, and more & more black voters seemingly agree.

"Trump will definitely win the election."

Absolutely! And this impeachment fiasco will seriously damage Nancy Pelosi & her House Democrats, possibly even returning control to the G.O.P.
 
From my reading of the document I think congress has a strong case and I agree with Nadler that if it were a criminal case any jury would come up with a guilty verdict within 3 minutes.

Nadler is a lawyer. He knows that's not true. This is all political theater. You're trying to convict Trump based on subjective intent. In other words, what was in his head based when he made that call and there isn't enough evidence to know what he was thinking at the time. Each side just denies what the other side says. No D.A. would even take the case.
 
Out of curiosity, has anyone on the left stopped to consider what happens when the whole country is fed up with this circus and Y'all forgot to put forward an electable 2020 candidate ?

and thats not to support trump, it's just to point out how stupid and arrogant your puppeteers are .

All of them are a vast improvement over who you and his Russian controllers are trying to protect.

And don't even try the "not supporting Trump" ploy. You wouldn't have posted this if you didn't.
 
Second round? They’ve spent three years getting to this round. But hey, 2022 will be here before we know it, right? Maybe they’ll find a Republican next time. After all, Speaker Pelosi did say bipartisan support was essential. McConnell said he’ll take USMCA up after the trial. Fear not, the acquittal and exoneration are expected to come quickly. Couple weeks or so. 👍👍

McConnell said he was taking it up next year, not after the "quick" trial was over.

McConnell is swamped with the pile of work the House has handed him that he hasn't done.
 
YDB95 writes: "Since the polls indicate the exact opposite, no."

Both the polls and the low television ratings show that these impeachment inquiries have been INCREDIBLY BORING! Adam Schiff promised an exciting show but has completely failed to deliver, and Nancy Pelosi is kicking herself for ever allowing him to run this witchhunt/fiasco!

Furthermore, the JURY in this case (e.g. the U.S. Senate) remains totally UNSYMPATHETIC to Schiff and his clown show. Chief Justice John Roberts will NOT allow an impeachment case built entirely on hearsay evidence and the opinions of Trump-hating academics.

End result: and embarrasing FLOP for the House Democrats as they LOSE this historic impeachment trial, resulting in a backlash that re-elects President Trump and very likely ends the Pelosi speakership, as well! Nancy should NEVER have put her faith & trust in Adam Schiff!
 
Yes he is. No he doesn't. No it isn't. You've been bamboozled and aren't too bright.

Congrats on your ability to jump to conclusions. I noticed you did not attempt to provide facts that would prove Trump's subjective intent. I guess when you don't have facts, you jump to the ad hominem. You might want to let this one to the lawyers. It's evident you've never even sat through one day of law school.
 
Second round? They’ve spent three years getting to this round. But hey, 2022 will be here before we know it, right? Maybe they’ll find a Republican next time. After all, Speaker Pelosi did say bipartisan support was essential. McConnell said he’ll take USMCA up after the trial. Fear not, the acquittal and exoneration are expected to come quickly. Couple weeks or so. 👍👍

Dems didn't have control of the House until after the 2018 elections so there is no way they have been trying to impeach Trump for 3 years. That is just more Republican BS.
 
Congrats on your ability to jump to conclusions. I noticed you did not attempt to provide facts that would prove Trump's subjective intent. I guess when you don't have facts, you jump to the ad hominem. You might want to let this one to the lawyers. It's evident you've never even sat through one day of law school.
Abuse of power and obstruction of Congress are not determined by Trump’s feelings, but by his actions.
 
#11 above.
Dump, you mention antifa again. I've still been trying to find this, a website, a postal address, an email address, their manifesto, their president/chairman, anyone on their executive committee. I can't find anything, they're a ghost.
The only reference is in media reports where the word antifa is used as a simple abbreviation of the words anti fascist to describe the loosely organised groups of people who turn up at right wing fascist and racist groups rallies to harass them.
Antifa only exists in your overactive imagination its not real.
 
All of them are a vast improvement over who you and his Russian controllers are trying to protect.

And don't even try the "not supporting Trump" ploy. You wouldn't have posted this if you didn't.

I support an investigation without teams, no left no right and perusing any and all evidence that comes up.
This circus is far from that, these clowns pursue only anti Trump and you all follow blindly. It's really sad to watch.
 
Second round? They’ve spent three years getting to this round. But hey, 2022 will be here before we know it, right? Maybe they’ll find a Republican next time. After all, Speaker Pelosi did say bipartisan support was essential. McConnell said he’ll take USMCA up after the trial. Fear not, the acquittal and exoneration are expected to come quickly. Couple weeks or so. 👍👍




You have to humor KeithD, he's laden with TDS, he has a problem with completing sentences, like, Mitch will sit on USMAC; but leaves out " TILL AFTER THE TRIAL". Take it easy on him he's depressed from Hillary's loss to Trump and suffers from acute TDS.
 
Senate looks like it will vote to dismiss....without even a hearing...

Awesome!

The Democrats are Disgusting!!!



I'm not so sure that Mitch will dismiss it outright. I'm sure he'll take a vote count and may have enough repubs willing to go through the trial phase just for the sake of getting testimony from Hunter Biden, Adam Schiff, Sleepy JOE, Clapper, Brennan and Rosenstein.
 
Back
Top