TalkRadio_
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2019
- Posts
- 466
Source“OK, boomer.” The refrain — withering or ironic, depending on whom you ask — has spread like wildfire on social media, even making an appearance in a parliamentary debate in New Zealand. It’s a jab from the young to the old, a collective eye-roll at the out-of-touch judgments baby boomers pass on the tastes, values and lived experiences of millennials and Gen Zers.
Moral panic about youth, and youth’s resentment of that panic, often emerges in times of rapid change, like we’re experiencing today. Ironically, today’s youths inherited a hyper-focus on generations from the 1960s, when the very boomer targets of today’s meme were themselves the younger generation under attack. But framing such conflicts in generational terms can be dangerous. Then, as now, rallying around generational identity created solidarity — but it also distracted from more fruitful conversations. In the 1960s, the real divides were about power — who had it and who did not — not about young vs. old. Getting bogged down in generation clashes ensured these problems went unresolved — and we run that risk again today if we distill our divisions into a generation gap.
We run that risk again today — something that has already garnered attention. As soon as “OK, boomer” hit the mainstream, productive conversations emerged about the dangers of focusing too much on generational divides. And, as some embracing the meme have noted, “boomer” isn’t always meant literally. It can mean anyone resisting change. We now use boomer two ways: as a term for someone born in a certain era, but increasingly as a stand-in for power, selfishness or comfortable cluelessness — traits found in people of all ages.
And it’s this usage — not simply one tied to age — that must guide our conversations. It may be cathartic to roll one’s eyes and utter “OK, boomer” over everything from telephone calls to retirement accounts, but it’s likely to end in the same place: distracting us from deeper conversations about what really divides us and the coalitions that might truly bring change. To paraphrase another ‘60s anthem, let’s hope that this time we won’t get fooled again.