Story rejected because of tongue-in-cheek "real name"?

soulhouse

Experienced
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Posts
79
I have just had the 2nd part of my story "Fucked Stupid" (https://www.literotica.com/s/fucked-stupid - under Mind Control) rejected with the note:

Please remove email addresses, home addresses, phone numbers, usernames, real names, or other identifying information from story, or change them to pseudonyms or obviously fake information.

Since there are no real names, email addresses etc in the submission, it seems that they have misunderstood my tongue-in-cheek "author's note" at the beginning. To explain, while writing the second part, I decided I was unhappy with the original name I had chosen for the antagonist, and, since I'd like to write more about her in future, I would change it to one that worked for me. I submitted an edited version of the first part with some improvements and her new name, which has already been published. Since it's an odd thing to go doing and I was concerned about readers of the original first part coming to the second instalment and wondering where she had gone, I decided I'd write a jokey author's note explaining it as follows:

Author’s Note:

For those of you who read the first chapter prior to its resubmission and are wondering where Nikita has gone, let me explain that it became clear to me after publishing the first part of my report that not only had she attempted to seduce me, but she had also deceived me as to her real name. At some personal risk, I have decided to reveal that her name is in fact Valeria. From here on, she will be referred to by her real name. She has warned me that, by revealing her modus operandi, not only am I likely to become another victim, but that she may go after those readers who choose to post comments. I urge you to be wary: use a VPN and keep a gun or male chastity belt close at hand. After reading, should a beautiful young woman knock on your door unexpectedly late at night, or invite you into one of the other changing rooms for a quick fuck while you wait for your wife/girlfriend, question if it might just be too good to be true.


I assume that the rejection means the Literotica staff have taken it seriously. I'd like to keep things as is, rather than go about trying a further edit. Pointing out it's a joke rather spoils the effect. I find it hard to believe that any Literotica reader is going to have any way of identifying a real person based on the name Valeria, particularly considering she is a fictional character. What are my options?
 
I assume that the rejection means the Literotica staff have taken it seriously. I'd like to keep things as is, rather than go about trying a further edit. Pointing out it's a joke rather spoils the effect. I find it hard to believe that any Literotica reader is going to have any way of identifying a real person based on the name Valeria, particularly considering she is a fictional character. What are my options?
Resubmit with a short note explaining as you have here; or get rid of the note and explain something in the story; or change the name back to the first protagonist, get rid of the note and stop being clever :).

You have to resubmit, so they're your choices, I reckon.
 
Resubmit with a short note explaining as you have here; or get rid of the note and explain something in the story; or change the name back to the first protagonist, get rid of the note and stop being clever :)

Thanks. I think I'll try no.1. Failing that, maybe I should take your advice and stop trying to be clever :eek:
 
Personally, I think if I ran into that "note" of yours I'd go WTF? and move on.

Readers are only focused on your story for a brief time and the "guess what" approach doesn't go down well. What I got read ch1 all over again to understand this?

Sometimes I think what goes on in an author's head doesn't translate all the easily to the readers and this is an example of that. I think Laurel recognized that.
 
Personally, I think if I ran into that "note" of yours I'd go WTF? and move on.

Readers are only focused on your story for a brief time and the "guess what" approach doesn't go down well. What I got read ch1 all over again to understand this?

Sometimes I think what goes on in an author's head doesn't translate all the easily to the readers and this is an example of that. I think Laurel recognized that.

Yes, I thought better of it, particularly after LesDesirable's description of it as silly. It wasn't meant to imply that it was necessary to read part 1 over again, just to explain the renaming of a main character for those who might wonder, but the feedback made me realise I'd probably just annoy readers and had created something out of character with the ensuing story. I've re-submitted it with a very brief note that hopefully simply forewarns any reader looking for the original name.
 
I had a story rejected twice recently - the first time was for quoting "too much of a lyric". They were my own words, attributed to the guy in the story, thanking someone for what she had done for him. It was made clear in the story he had written the song. I explained this in my response and it was rejected again for incorrect formatting.

Utterly bewildered, I tried a third time putting extra lines in the song and it was accepted.

It was frustrating and I have no idea why it happened but it made me wonder if some sort of automated check is in place given the high volume of submissions on the site?
 
It was frustrating and I have no idea why it happened but it made me wonder if some sort of automated check is in place given the high volume of submissions on the site?
Probably - it wouldn't be hard to compile a basic script to identify the most common errors - a key word search for content, a basic format scan, and a basic spell/grammar check. If it was me, I'd be using an automated first pass, for sure.
 
Probably - it wouldn't be hard to compile a basic script to identify the most common errors - a key word search for content, a basic format scan, and a basic spell/grammar check. If it was me, I'd be using an automated first pass, for sure.

I don't think anything would get rejected without at least a glance from Laurel (or approved for that matter), but it wouldn't surprise me if there was some sort of automated pre-selection that already filters out stuff that should probably be rejected. Then she just might glance at those briefly to confirm, but probably with less attention than the ones that weren't picked out. And I agree, basic formatting checks aren't very hard to do, and with the sheer amount of stories submitted every single day I definitely would have some digital assistance by now if I were Laurel.
 
Personally, I think if I ran into that "note" of yours I'd go WTF? and move on.

Readers are only focused on your story for a brief time and the "guess what" approach doesn't go down well. What I got read ch1 all over again to understand this?

Sometimes I think what goes on in an author's head doesn't translate all the easily to the readers and this is an example of that. I think Laurel recognized that.

I agree!
 
Is the term "rejection" still being used in stories not immediately accepted into the file? I haven't had one for some time to check that out. The wording seems to have been changed to "sent back," which is less corrosive and more correct in what the process is. The author is given means to justify it, clean it up, or clarify it for posting (nearly all of mine were posted as is by pointing out that the answer to the "Does it?" question was no, it doesn't). Works don't just fly through to published in the mainstream publishing process. There are several rounds of "sent back" for more work or justification.

If writers can think of this as a "sent back for clarification or rectification" process rather than "rejected," that should take the grief out of the process. I rather thought the Web site had made that change. I'd been suggesting for years that they do.
 
Is the term "rejection" still being used in stories not immediately accepted into the file?

I can't remember how it was worded, to be honest. While the tabs under Works are Published, Drafts, Pending and Sent Back, under Works Activity the event itself is recorded as "Moderator has rejected your story".
 
"Moderator has rejected your story".

That's sort of weird, as moderators here aren't part of the submissions process, but, yes, perhaps the problem just remains that the Web site is unnecessarily characterizing this as "rejection."
 
Back
Top