███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

Three law professors testified before the House committee this morning.

In essence, they said that Trump's behavior more than satisfies the criteria for "high crimes" in the Constitution, as Trump has repeatedly put his own personal profits ahead of the national interest.

I'm surprised the RWCJ Sealion Brigade hasn't shown up yet, they've had quite a bit of practice defendin' the indefensible of late, with their "Party Before Country" mansplainin'.
 
Three law professors testified before the House committee this morning.

In essence, they said that Trump's behavior more than satisfies the criteria for "high crimes" in the Constitution, as Trump has repeatedly put his own personal profits ahead of the national interest.

I'm surprised the RWCJ Sealion Brigade hasn't shown up yet, they've had quite a bit of practice defendin' the indefensible of late, with their "Party Before Country" mansplainin'.

Cool story bro...
 



by Robert Bradley, Jr.


"...Does anyone anywhere have information regarding R. Hunter Biden, pre- or post-Burisma Holdings, having experience or expertise regarding…



It's just amazing to see how much expertise a mere three million dollars ($3,000,000) will buy these days.




What's your point? Nobody thinks he was hired for expertise. He was hired to help "legitimize" a sketchy company like they do over there. And maybe hoped for a little leeway from the US on something.
 
Three law professors testified before the House committee this morning.

In essence, they said that Trump's behavior more than satisfies the criteria for "high crimes" in the Constitution, as Trump has repeatedly put his own personal profits ahead of the national interest.

I'm surprised the RWCJ Sealion Brigade hasn't shown up yet, they've had quite a bit of practice defendin' the indefensible of late, with their "Party Before Country" mansplainin'.



The magic sentence !!! LEGAL LEGITIMACY, both the Clinton and Nixon impeachments had LEGAL LEGITIMACY by way of the courts, SCOTUS with Nixon and the tapes, Clinton with perjury to a grand jury, in both cases provided legal (constitutional process) and statutory standing to congress and not just conjecture.
 
Three law professors testified before the House committee this morning.

In essence, they said that Trump's behavior more than satisfies the criteria for "high crimes" in the Constitution, as Trump has repeatedly put his own personal profits ahead of the national interest.

I'm surprised the RWCJ Sealion Brigade hasn't shown up yet, they've had quite a bit of practice defendin' the indefensible of late, with their "Party Before Country" mansplainin'.

It's going to be an extra special Christmas this year. :D
 
That may also be true...but history has a way of writing itself. And Republicans will end up very similar to the holocaust deniers of today. Their "written" history will be forever mocked

Your Godwin[ned) idiocy aside, the only holocaust enthusist in Congress that I am aware of is a Democrat.
 
What's your point? Nobody thinks he was hired for expertise. He was hired to help "legitimize" a sketchy company like they do over there. And maybe hoped for a little leeway from the US on something.


Does it occur to anyone that the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees might have investigated the wrong people?

 


Does it occur to anyone that the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees might have investigated the wrong people?


Seems like I read, from a credible source sorry can’t remember where and don’t feel like googling right now, that that that’s been looked into like three times now with no wrongdoing found. But hey, if they’re dirty let the chips fall.
 
All other issues aside, I believe Donnie is at least borderline senile, or some what beyond. He's clearly not capable of the office.
 
All other issues aside, I believe Donnie is at least borderline senile, or some what beyond. He's clearly not capable of the office.

Speaking of senility, have you ever noticed that even those that tend to share your point of view ignore your doddering ramblings under all three of your identites?
 
^This, folks, is someone who does not understand the concept of irony, yet is aptly named.
 
It shouldn't be so easy. You can do better que...come on boy...jump...jump...
Such a good boy...
 
Back
Top