███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

[Dribble]

Article 1 Section 2 Clause 5

 

[Conager]

Sounds like you are winning. Desperately winning, in a thread where there is no winning on the actual subject of impeachment.

Step outside, get some fresh air. Live life.

 

[jaF0]

Eight GOP Senators Who Will Vote On Donald Trump Impeachment Spent July 4 Holding Secret Meetings In Moscow
Inquisitr | Sun Dec 01, 2019 19:11 UTC

With the House of Representatives expected to draw up articles of impeachment against Donald Trump in the next few weeks, the process would then likely move to the Senate, which holds a trial to decide whether or not to convict Trump and remove him from ...

When a Juror is compromised, they are removed from the pool and unable to vote on a verdict. If this story is true, these 8 should face the same exclusion.

 

[Rightguide]

If it was Obama's henchmen getting subpoenaed the loones on GB would throw their hands up in protest.

They just refuse to understand how important each article and separation of power is in effectively conducting government business, especially in today's environment where nobody can keep their mouth shut i.e Schiff thinks he runs foreign policy.

Then we have have the hapless Schism who mistakenly thinks she understands American history, the Federalist Papers, and the Constitution. So sad.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Sounds like you are winning. Desperately winning, in a thread where there is no winning on the actual subject of impeachment.

Step outside, get some fresh air. Live life.

Sounds like you are whining. Desperately whining, in a thread where there is no lack of whining on the actual subject of impeachment.

I'd urge you to step outside, get some fresh air. Live life, etc, but you were encamped here on Thanksgiving day (25+ pists) so I don't think anyone really expects today is going to be any different for you.

Happy holidays to the rest of us!

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Que's saying Eric Holder should be strung up for refusing to hand over subpoena'd docs, while RG is saying the Exec owes nothing to Congress. All in the same thread!

Translation: Deplorables caught in the act being hypocrites, plus, if the NEGRO did it

 

[Rightguide]

Que's saying Eric Holder should be strung up for refusing to hand over subpoena'd docs, while RG is saying the Exec owes nothing to Congress. All in the same thread!

Translation: Deplorables caught in the act being hypocrites, plus, if the NEGRO did it

That's not what I said. What do you think would happen if Donald Trump asked for the private communications of the Congress or the SCOTUS, or if the SCOTUS demanded the same? Separate but equal.

 

[RobDownSouth]

That's not what I said. What do you think would happen if Donald Trump asked for the private communications of the Congress or the SCOTUS, or if the SCOTUS demanded the same? Separate but equal.

The executive branch does not oversee the actions of the Legislative branch or the Judicial branch. The Executive branch has the power to sign or veto legislation from the Legislative branch, and the power to nominate judges and justices to the courts.

It's called "checks and balances", not "separate but equal".

"Separate but equal" was the policy you supported way back in the 1950s to prevent race mixing. Oh wait, you're "less than 50" now...

 

[BotanyBoy]

It is fucking sad how the Republicans here have no clue as to how the Constitution works. Pretty much make any argument they have mute. Like arguing w a five yr old....except the 5 yr old has a purpose.

Says the guy who's demonstrated numerous times he has no idea how the Constitution works.

Oh look at this.....perhaps another demonstration of your civic ignorance??

Let's see.

Article 1 Section 2 Clause 5

What about it??

 

[icanhelp1]

The executive branch does not oversee the actions of the Legislative branch or the Judicial branch. The Executive branch has the power to sign or veto legislation from the Legislative branch, and the power to nominate judges and justices to the courts.

It's called "checks and balances", not "separate but equal".

"Separate but equal" was the policy you supported way back in the 1950s to prevent race mixing. Oh wait, you're "less than 50" now...

Can you give me the thread # where somebody said the executive branch oversees the legislative, I missed that! The exec branch runs the country.

 

[icanhelp1]

Says the guy who's demonstrated numerous times he has no idea how the Constitution works.

Oh look at this.....perhaps another demonstration of your civic ignorance??

Let's see.



What about it??

Looks impressive I guess!

 

[Carnal_Flower]

WHat's "private" about WH meetings, memos, and official state business? What's "private" about the official acts of Mick Mulvaney and Pompeo and anyone who works the WH as a gov't employee?

Nothing Trump does AS PRESIDENT is "private"

That's not what I said. What do you think would happen if Donald Trump asked for the private communications of the Congress or the SCOTUS, or if the SCOTUS demanded the same? Separate but equal.

 

[icanhelp1]

WHat's "private" about WH meetings, memos, and official state business? What's "private" about the official acts of Mick Mulvaney and Pompeo and anyone who works the WH as a gov't employee?

Nothing Trump does AS PRESIDENT is "private"

How bout discussions on national security. I may be on your IGGY, just curious, do you ever read what you post. If you do, then if I were you I'd stop posting and hide in shame, your stuff is so ridiculous and about as nonsensical as anything dribble spews.

 

[RoryN]

nonsensical dribble

You've made 114 posts of this stuff in my thread.

Excellent - maximum triggered level, for all to see. Keep going and beat Rightguide!

 

[phrodeau]

We have four branches of government now, and the fourth is not subject to any laws.

https://newrepublic.com/article/42511/dick-cheney-the-fourth-branch-government

 

[Rightguide]

We have four branches of government now, and the fourth is not subject to any laws.

https://newrepublic.com/article/42511/dick-cheney-the-fourth-branch-government

11 year old bullshit.

 

[icanhelp1]

You've made 114 posts of this stuff in my thread.

Excellent - maximum triggered level, for all to see. Keep going and beat Rightguide!

There's about 30 or so of you looney leftards that don't have a clue on how the constitution works. Just trying to help! I'm glad you finally reached your apex 'BEAN COUNTER', you'll have only one more promotion left to reach your highest level of incompetence ( doctorate in stupidity ). Keep up the good work!

 

[Rightguide]

WHat's "private" about WH meetings, memos, and official state business? What's "private" about the official acts of Mick Mulvaney and Pompeo and anyone who works the WH as a gov't employee?

Nothing Trump does AS PRESIDENT is "private"

YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT, SO GIVE IT UP, YOUR EXISTENCE IS AN EMBARRASSMENT TO THE NATION!

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE, STUDY IT.

 

[RoryN]

YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT, SO GIVE IT UP

^^^
lol, triggered!

lol lol lol

 

[heathergives]

^^^
lol, triggered!

lol lol lol

Seems to me that you're the triggered one here.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

National security discussions may involve CLASSIFIED material. It's not "private". Dumb shit

How bout discussions on national security. I may be on your IGGY, just curious, do you ever read what you post. If you do, then if I were you I'd stop posting and hide in shame, your stuff is so ridiculous and about as nonsensical as anything dribble spews.

 

[coati]

Sounds like you are winning. Desperately winning, in a thread where there is no winning on the actual subject of impeachment.

This thread don't mean shit. The impeachment battle is being won in real life.

Yes, Fox News and Mitch will probably get your cult leader off the hook in the subsequent Senate trial, but this bastard will be impeached, no matter how much armchair legalism takes place on the porn board.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Lol, no I'm not.

As I said, NOTHING the Prez says or does as Prez is inherently "private." Just the opposite, it is subject to Congressional oversight and transparency until argued otherwise. Trump has to give a good reason what it is "not in the public interest" to know. HE has to make the case.

Sorry, but "I'm above the law" is not a good reason.

YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT, SO GIVE IT UP, YOUR EXISTENCE IS AN EMBARRASSMENT TO THE NATION!

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE, STUDY IT.

 

[icanhelp1]

National security discussions may involve CLASSIFIED material. It's not "private". Dumb shit

If it’s not for public consumption then it’s private! Conversations in the WH are privileged and confidential. It may be governed by the Presidential record’s act of 1978 but still private. Private, for the use of one or group only!

 

[icanhelp1]

This thread don't mean shit. The impeachment battle is being won in real life.

Yes, Fox News and Mitch will probably get your cult leader off the hook in the subsequent Senate trial, but this bastard will be impeached, no matter how much armchair legalism takes place on the porn board.

Better check in with RORBAGS, you have to get your “I’m triggered” badge so you can be counted by the official bean counter. LMAO