███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

[LincolnDuncan]

What would Putin do?

 

[HisArpy]

Your article was gossip. i t was based off of someone's opinion which in turn was delete for inaccuracy

What would your law school consider an opinion based of inacurrate information?

My source was a list of compiled names that the author(s) of the list stated were Republicans. The article is STILL available via search on Bing and if you copy/past the link it will take you directly to the article without the need to do an internet search.

BTW, Big G CENSORS it's search results. Which may be why sum dumfuks can't seem to find the article via a search through them. And citing to Wiki to say that Wiki removed the reference to the article is a bogus deflection without ANY value because ANYONE, including an internet troll, can edit Wiki and do that at any time.

Anyway, back to the topic; since the article CAN be found via search or copy/paste, it was not "deleted". (As if anything on the internet is actually ever "deleted" anyway. )

In the final analysis, if you wish to defeat my source as incorrect, then you need to GET OFF YOUR ASS and find a source that refutes mine.

Otherwise all you're doing is pumping out hot air because jumping up and down while screaming "I don't believe you" isn't proof of anything.

 

[HisArpy]

What would Putin do?

Probably annex Crimea when no one was paying attention. Oh wait...

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Probably annex Crimea when no one was paying attention. Oh wait...

Do you think that the proper response from the current US president is to throw the Intelligence agencies and the military under the bus then bend over to grab is ankles while on stage with Putin in front of the entire world?

 

[KeithD]

Do you think that the proper response from the current US president is to throw the Intelligence agencies and the military under the bus then bend over to grab is ankles while on stage with Putin in front of the entire world?

Yes, as long as "liberals" don't like something, Harpy is ecstatic about it. That's his only motivator.

 

[HisArpy]

Do you think that the proper response from the current US president is to throw the Intelligence agencies and the military under the bus then bend over to grab is ankles while on stage with Putin in front of the entire world?

I think, if I were in Trump's shoes, that termination with prejudice is an appropriate response to the agencies which have continually devoted taxpayer dollars and effort to overthrowing his administration since the day he announced his candidacy.

Think about it - the same intel agencies which touted a dossier claiming Trump hired Russian hookers to pee on him was 'confirmed", are the SAME AGENCIES which are telling him Russia was behind the attempts to rig the 2016 election.

Trump knows the Intel agencies claims about the Pee tapes are absolutely false. If that's the case, why would he believe them about anything else involving Russia?

It's just mind boggling that you can't seem to understand that.

 

[adrina]

Timmeh is sealioning now.
BotanyBoomer has found his soul mate.

https://blackathlete.net/artman2/uploads/1/hitnail.jpg

 

[HisArpy]

Yes, as long as "liberals" don't like something, Harpy is ecstatic about it. That's his only motivator.

HisArpy..........CowpietoughguyinDetroit..........Mr.StolenValor

....1........................nada............................Less than nada

 

[HisArpy]

https://blackathlete.net/artman2/uploads/1/hitnail.jpg

Threats of violence? What did that nail ever do to you?

 

[Dribble]

Awwwww...poor Republicans. A Federal judge ruled McGahn must testify to Congress. He has agreed he will unless the WH gets a stay. What are you afraid of Republicans?

 

[RoryN]

.....

Awwwww...poor Republicans. A Federal judge ruled McGahn must testify to Congress.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

I think, if I were in Trump's shoes, that termination with prejudice is an appropriate response to the agencies which have continually devoted taxpayer dollars and effort to overthrowing his administration since the day he announced his candidacy.

Think about it - the same intel agencies which touted a dossier claiming Trump hired Russian hookers to pee on him was 'confirmed", are the SAME AGENCIES which are telling him Russia was behind the attempts to rig the 2016 election.

Trump knows the Intel agencies claims about the Pee tapes are absolutely false. If that's the case, why would he believe them about anything else involving Russia?

It's just mind boggling that you can't seem to understand that.

I can see that you actual believe what you post. I often wonder if you and others believe what you say. I'm astonished that you and they are so brainwashed by what is obvious to so many of us is that Trump a totally bogus fool.

 

[HisArpy]

I can see that you actual believe what you post. I often wonder if you and others believe what you say. I'm astonished that you and they are so brainwashed by what is obvious to so many of us is that Trump a totally bogus fool.

I don't get it, it's right there in front of you and you refuse to see it.

The intel communities LIED TO TRUMP and tried to get him ousted under false charges. WHY THE FUCK would ANYONE believe ANYTHING those same people tell them after that?

It doesn't matter if Trump is what you say he is, he isn't going to take the word of the people lying to him. Worse, if he WAS, as you say, a "fool" then instead of not listening to the Intel Community, he'd just be the fool you claim he is and believe the ones trying to keel haul him.

But, that's not what happened is it. Instead he did the unexpected and didn't listen to those lying bastards. To your chagrin.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

I don't get it, it's right there in front of you and you refuse to see it.

The intel communities LIED TO TRUMP and tried to get him ousted under false charges. WHY THE FUCK would ANYONE believe ANYTHING those same people tell them after that?

It doesn't matter if Trump is what you say he is, he isn't going to take the word of the people lying to him. Worse, if he WAS, as you say, a "fool" then instead of not listening to the Intel Community, he'd just be the fool you claim he is and believe the ones trying to keel haul him.

But, that's not what happened is it. Instead he did the unexpected and didn't listen to those lying bastards. To your chagrin.

I'm certain that you have posted the evidence to document you're assertion that the Intelligence agencies lied to Trump, but I've never seen it.

While you're at it, I'd appreciate a link to the evidence that Hillary committed crimes.

 

[HisArpy]

I'm certain that you have posted the evidence to document you're assertion that the Intelligence agencies lied to Trump, but I've never seen it.

Jesus fucking christ.

The Mueller report stated that "No American" knowingly assisted the Russians in any attempts to interfere with the 2016 election.

What exactly do you think the Steele Dossier is all about? That Trump WASN'T a "Russian asset"? And of course in your world the Steele Dossier wasn't ever used to get a FISA warrant on the basis that it was "verified". Right? And then Comey himself never told Trump that he wasn't the subject of an investigation at the same time Trump WAS IN FACT the subject of the investigation.

The Intel agencies lied to him repeatedly. It's ALL public record and knowledge so I don't need to "post a link" to any of it. Any request by you to do so is a deflection attempt designed to use my limited time and resources for no purpose. Therefore I decline. AFter that, the following applies:

It's RIGHT FUCKING THERE in front of you. And you refuse to allow yourself to see it.

*Edited here to respond to your edit*

I don't fucking care about Hillary and her crimes. She'll never be prosecuted for it and it has NOTHING to do with whether Trump believed the Intel agencies when they tried to lie to him for the second time.

 

[Rightguide]

Mar-a-Lago, DC Hotel, his golf courses he plays at, soldiers bivouacked in out of the way hotel of his... (Not to mention family members, such as Ivanka's China trademarks...)

Do these not qualify as personal financial gain?

No, not in any illegal manner or the Insurgency and Comandante Schiff would have brought it up in the Impeachment Hearings.

 

[Dribble]

Weird...all that anyone has seen is a heavily redacted report. I wonder what is behind those redactions? I wonder why Mueller felt compelled to come out and say that Barr misrepresented his report?

 

[cowslinger64]

I didn't say it was. Don't project.

No, not in any illegal manner or the Insurgency and Comandante Schiff would have brought it up in the Impeachment Hearings.

Dumbass....


Emoluments Clause
President Trump is defying warnings from Republican and Democratic ethics experts and refusing to do what every previous president has done for decades — divest himself of his ownership interests, liquidate his business assets, and place them in a truly blind trust operated by an independent entity. As a result, Chairman Cummings is conducting oversight to protect against violations of the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits the President from obtaining any benefit of any kind from foreign governments or affiliated entities “without the consent of Congress.” Potential Emoluments Clause violations could include foreign government officials who buy up entire floors of hotel rooms, pay higher rents at Trump Tower, lower interest rates on loans, speed up permits for development projects, or take all kinds of other inappropriate actions to ingratiate themselves with the new Administration.


NUMEROUS violations..

 

[HisArpy]

Weird...all that anyone has seen is a heavily redacted report. I wonder what is behind those redactions? I wonder why Mueller felt compelled to come out and say that Barr misrepresented his report?

The Mueller report has (IIRC) 7 partial sentences and 1 full sentence redacted. That's hardly "heavily redacted".

Claiming such is beneath even you.

 

[HisArpy]

Dumbass....


Emoluments Clause
President Trump is defying warnings from Republican and Democratic ethics experts and refusing to do what every previous president has done for decades — divest himself of his ownership interests, liquidate his business assets, and place them in a truly blind trust operated by an independent entity. As a result, Chairman Cummings is conducting oversight to protect against violations of the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits the President from obtaining any benefit of any kind from foreign governments or affiliated entities “without the consent of Congress.” Potential Emoluments Clause violations could include foreign government officials who buy up entire floors of hotel rooms, pay higher rents at Trump Tower, lower interest rates on loans, speed up permits for development projects, or take all kinds of other inappropriate actions to ingratiate themselves with the new Administration.


NUMEROUS violations..

The SCOTUS has given their official opinion on this issue. It ISN'T what you want to believe or are trying to say here so beating that dead horse doesn't win you any points at all except to prove you're trying to be an idjit in public again.

 

[cowslinger64]

Weird...all that anyone has seen is a heavily redacted report. I wonder what is behind those redactions? I wonder why Mueller felt compelled to come out and say that Barr misrepresented his report?

The Wall Street Journal's reading said that of the 16,500 lines of the Mueller report, 2,050 lines, or approximately 12.4% of the document, are redacted.

Attorney General William Barr selected the redactions, most of which contain information that is either pertinent to ongoing criminal investigations, details examined by a grand jury that were not pursued further, and information that could compromise the privacy or reputation of third parties.

Read more: Read full, redacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller

The Mueller report found the Trump campaign engaged in multiple contacts with Russian operatives during the 2016 US presidential election and that Russia did interfere in the 2016 election, but it did not find enough evidence of conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia to bring charges. Mueller's team also found that Trump exerted effort to hinder the special counsel's investigation. Ultimately, Mueller and his prosecutors chose not to pursue obstruction of justice charges against Trump, citing a number of legal hurdles.


A HUGE legal hurdle is Barr.. what a shocker.

 

[Dribble]

Exactly....1/8....one out of every 8 words. Except it isnt words....but sentences providing context. Choosen by Barr...to protect not the Country...but Donald.

 

[cowslinger64]

The SCOTUS has given their official opinion on this issue. It ISN'T what you want to believe or are trying to say here so beating that dead horse doesn't win you any points at all except to prove you're trying to be an idjit in public again.

Please, feel free to show a link to that.


What I found was this:

The emoluments clause is a provision in the U.S. Constitution. .... alleged violation of the emoluments clause has never come before the Supreme Court.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Jesus fucking christ.

The Mueller report stated that "No American" knowingly assisted the Russians in any attempts to interfere with the 2016 election.

What exactly do you think the Steele Dossier is all about? That Trump WASN'T a "Russian asset"? And of course in your world the Steele Dossier wasn't ever used to get a FISA warrant on the basis that it was "verified". Right? And then Comey himself never told Trump that he wasn't the subject of an investigation at the same time Trump WAS IN FACT the subject of the investigation.

The Intel agencies lied to him repeatedly. It's ALL public record and knowledge so I don't need to "post a link" to any of it. Any request by you to do so is a deflection attempt designed to use my limited time and resources for no purpose. Therefore I decline. AFter that, the following applies:

It's RIGHT FUCKING THERE in front of you. And you refuse to allow yourself to see it.

*Edited here to respond to your edit*

I don't fucking care about Hillary and her crimes. She'll never be prosecuted for it and it has NOTHING to do with whether Trump believed the Intel agencies when they tried to lie to him for the second time.

I read the Mueller report. What page is that on? As far as the Russian collusion question, it’s clear that Mueller never found any quid pro quo, but there’s no question that the Trump campaign publicly invited Russian interference and that the Russians were already engaged in the act of influencing US voters in favor of Trump. I just can’t imagine any legitimate reason for Manafort to share polling data with the Russians, got any ideas?

What is also clear is that Trump obstructed justice by ordering McGann and Lewandowsky to fire Mueller. McGann is the one guy I’ve wanted to see testify. It will be interesting to hear his answer when they ask him if Trump ever ordered him to do something illegal. We already know that Lewandowsky is a lying sack of shit who feels no moral responsibility to speak the truth.

I’m going to assume that you watched the recent testimony of Trump administration staff to congress. Do you believe that those people perjured themselves?

 

[cowslinger64]

The SCOTUS has given their official opinion on this issue. It ISN'T what you want to believe or are trying to say here so beating that dead horse doesn't win you any points at all except to prove you're trying to be an idjit in public again.

Still waiting on that link.