███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

When all you have is "Nuh, UHHH!" Say so. Don't dress it up with you gratuitous "debunked" assertion.

Well, you know how they are. When they cannot debunk something they simply say somebody else already did. Bunch of Huggy wearing, catastrophically uninformed, zeros.;):D
 
Well, you know how they are. When they cannot debunk something they simply say somebody else already did. Bunch of Huggy wearing, catastrophically uninformed, zeros.;):D

Quit posting outright bullshit and paranoid conspiracy theories and we can move on to discussing facts and real occurrences.
 
Says the full on Russiagate believer. :D

It 's AMAZING how stupid they are.

Sondland FLAT OUT SAID "there was no quid pro quo", yet these miniscule mental morons somehow still believe that there was.

You also cannot have "attempted" quid pro quo/bribery/extortion/fruity flavor of the day if the ONLY direct witness testifies that Trump told him "I want nothing" when it comes to Ukraine.

To insist that there's a crime here, in spite of the direct evidence showing otherwise, is unbecoming of a normal functional brain.
 
It 's AMAZING how stupid they are.

Sondland FLAT OUT SAID "there was no quid pro quo", yet these miniscule mental morons somehow still believe that there was.

You also cannot have "attempted" quid pro quo/bribery/extortion/fruity flavor of the day if the ONLY direct witness testifies that Trump told him "I want nothing" when it comes to Ukraine.

To insist that there's a crime here, in spite of the direct evidence showing otherwise, is unbecoming of a normal functional brain.
Still spouting tosh I see ,where do you get it from Breitbart or straight from the Kremlin .
 
Quit posting outright bullshit and paranoid conspiracy theories and we can move on to discussing facts and real occurrences.

You haven't discussed "facts and real occurrences" since I've been here. This is why I can count on you being consistently in error or mired in face planting ignorance.
 
It 's AMAZING how stupid they are.

Sondland FLAT OUT SAID "there was no quid pro quo", yet these miniscule mental morons somehow still believe that there was.

You also cannot have "attempted" quid pro quo/bribery/extortion/fruity flavor of the day if the ONLY direct witness testifies that Trump told him "I want nothing" when it comes to Ukraine.

To insist that there's a crime here, in spite of the direct evidence showing otherwise, is unbecoming of a normal functional brain.

The whole impeachment things is about how (D)'s FEEL.

As always....
 
Meanwhile, back in the Reality-based world, the Washington Post has a headline that conveys an altogether different story...
https://i.imgur.com/BSyZS0R.jpg
LINK :rolleyes:


Oh lordy be....

You do realize that what you posted was yesterday morning's headline and that yesterday AFTERNOON Sondland specifically said that his statements in his 45 minute opening remarks were HIS PRESUMPTION and that Trump specifically and expressly told him DIRECTLY that he "wants nothing" from Ukraine, and Trump expressly told Sondlund that there wasn't going to be ANY quid pro quo, AND that "not one single person on the planet" told him (Sondland) to tie the aid to Ukraine to any investigation of the Bidens.

Now, since your BS has been debunked in toto, please try to keep up with the rest of the class.
 
Meanwhile, back in the Reality-based world, the Washington Post has a headline that conveys an altogether different story...

The great state of Texas has been diminished by your residency. You are always a grade behind when it comes to these hearings.
 
Oh lordy be....

You do realize that what you posted was yesterday morning's headline and that yesterday AFTERNOON Sondland specifically said that his statements in his 45 minute opening remarks were HIS PRESUMPTION and that Trump specifically and expressly told him DIRECTLY that he "wants nothing" from Ukraine, and Trump expressly told Sondlund that there wasn't going to be ANY quid pro quo, AND that "not one single person on the planet" told him (Sondland) to tie the aid to Ukraine to any investigation of the Bidens.

Now, since your BS has been debunked in toto, please try to keep up with the rest of the class.

Trump made that false self serving bullshit statement months after the Oval Office meeting/Biden investigation quid pro quo had already been set in motion. Your gullibility is exceeded only by your partisan hackery.
 
Oh lordy be....

You do realize that what you posted was yesterday morning's headline and that yesterday AFTERNOON Sondland specifically said that his statements in his 45 minute opening remarks were HIS PRESUMPTION and that Trump specifically and expressly told him DIRECTLY that he "wants nothing" from Ukraine, and Trump expressly told Sondlund that there wasn't going to be ANY quid pro quo, AND that "not one single person on the planet" told him (Sondland) to tie the aid to Ukraine to any investigation of the Bidens.

Now, since your BS has been debunked in toto, please try to keep up with the rest of the class.

Let's go to the actual video. It's only one minute and 8 seconds long, beyond the mental capacity of a goldfish, but it should be able to keep your attention.

Spin that, counselor.
 
Trump made that false self serving bullshit statement months after the Oval Office meeting/Biden investigation quid pro quo had already been set in motion. Your gullibility is exceeded only by your partisan hackery.

Umm, no.

SONDLAND made those statements YESTERDAY AFTERNOON. Under oath.
 
Let's go to the actual video. It's only one minute and 8 seconds long, beyond the mental capacity of a goldfish, but it should be able to keep your attention.

Spin that, counselor.

Excuse me Mr. Goldenphish, but could you try to link to the ACTUAL VIDEO you're talking about instead of some twitter feed by Hayes Brown?

As for me, I stand by what I said. IF you want to get all hypertechnical, then please dispute my prior post by saying that Sondland didn't "actually say" those things and instead I must "be lying" when I said he did.

Except - paraphrase.
 
Oh lordy be....

You do realize that what you posted was yesterday morning's headline and that yesterday AFTERNOON Sondland specifically said that his statements in his 45 minute opening remarks were HIS PRESUMPTION and that Trump specifically and expressly told him DIRECTLY that he "wants nothing" from Ukraine, and Trump expressly told Sondlund that there wasn't going to be ANY quid pro quo, AND that "not one single person on the planet" told him (Sondland) to tie the aid to Ukraine to any investigation of the Bidens.

Now, since your BS has been debunked in toto, please try to keep up with the rest of the class.

https://i.imgflip.com/3boxd7.jpg
 
Let's go to the actual video. It's only one minute and 8 seconds long, beyond the mental capacity of a goldfish, but it should be able to keep your attention.

Spin that, counselor.
while i don't appreciate the tone he took with a witness, i do get where he's coming from and isn't about to let sondland slip off the hook as a great patriot just doing what his boss told him to do. his own less than exemplary position is noted.
 
while i don't appreciate the tone he took with a witness, i do get where he's coming from and isn't about to let sondland slip off the hook as a great patriot just doing what his boss told him to do. his own less than exemplary position is noted.

Sondland is a sleaze who will end up in the dustbin of history. Nobody admires him at this point.

Hmmm. Maybe this is something everyone "on both sides" can agree on at Thanksgiving dinner?
 
Fiona Hill was a superb witness - a professional cutting through the crap pouring out from the White House.

And she showed that Hoteliers don't have the qualities to make good Ambassadors - or Presidents. :D
 
Excuse me Mr. Goldenphish, but could you try to link to the ACTUAL VIDEO you're talking about instead of some twitter feed by Hayes Brown?

As for me, I stand by what I said. IF you want to get all hypertechnical, then please dispute my prior post by saying that Sondland didn't "actually say" those things and instead I must "be lying" when I said he did.

Except - paraphrase.

Parse THIS, counselor.
https://i.imgur.com/HUHxaDM.jpg

LINK
 
:rolleyes:

When "The President of the US" says "us", do you REALLY believe he ONLY MEANS "me"?

Especially after all that early on Democrat shit talk about him thinking he's some kind of emperor in chief using the "royal we"?

:rolleyes:

So we're now in agreement that the president wanted something.
 
Back
Top