███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

[coati]

Pyscho pig man has the entire GOP intimidated

Really.

What a bunch of servile wimps. It's like none of them can think for themselves any more. Brainwashing and mass psychosis. Someday it may be given a clinical name, like Fox Syndrome.

 

[KeithD]

Really.

What a bunch of servile wimps. It's like none of them can think for themselves any more. Brainwashing and mass psychosis. Someday it may be given a clinical name, like Fox Syndrome.

In the meantime we'll just call them Trumpettes.

 

[jomar]

Did he not announce the Tweet during the hearing for political gain with out regard to whether or not it might "intimidate" the witness and make her uncomfortable? Why would he do that if he gave a shit about her feelings?

As an example of ongoing witness intimidation in the actual live moment during the hearings? Would that not support a contention of prior intimidation?

 

[KeithD]

As an example of ongoing witness intimidation in the actual live moment during the hearings? Would that not support a contention of prior intimidation?

You're asking Rightguard to give a reasoned response to anything?

 

[jomar]

Pyscho pig man has the entire GOP intimidated

In America. That’s going to be studied up and down for a long time.

 

[jomar]

You're asking Rightguard to give a reasoned response to anything?

Ah, a slip up.

 

[Rightguide]

As an example of ongoing witness intimidation in the actual live moment during the hearings? Would that not support a contention of prior intimidation?

If she felt intimidated it's too bad, the fault lies with Schiff. Trump did not commit a crime when he tweeted.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

If she felt intimidated it's too bad, the fault lies with Schiff. Trump did not commit a crime when he tweeted.

LOL! It's illegal to tamper with a witness.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

We have president in the US who wants to prosecute the press for saying bad things about him (very unfair) but thinks that being publicly critical of a witness testifying against him is just exercising his right to free speech.

 

[jomar]

If she felt intimidated it's too bad, the fault lies with Schiff. Trump did not commit a crime when he tweeted.

I’m losing hope in you.

 

[jaF0]

Seems like the war crimes pardons should be a separate Article. And grounds to limit the scope of pardons.

 

[KeithD]

Seems like the war crimes pardons should be a separate Article. And grounds to limit the scope of pardons.

He's just practicing his pardon procedures. Happily, pardons are based on confirmation of/acknowledgment of guilt for the crime.

 

[Conager]

We have president in the US who wants to prosecute the press for saying bad things about him (very unfair) but thinks that being publicly critical of a witness testifying against him is just exercising his right to free speech.

Sounds very concerning. Fortunately, he is all talk.

Fir a man of action (when he wasn't endlessly dithering) hard ti beat the past president:

https://theblacksphere.net/2017/02/media-silence-obama-stunning-record-prosecution-journalists/

 

[Publius1990]

LOL! It's illegal to tamper with a witness.

Lol. Research the statutes before you make absurd claims. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512

Trump’s ridiculous tweets about anyone amount to his opinion, which he has the constitutional right to do.

If the Dems think he committed witness tampering they should add it to the list of impeachable offenses. Good luck with that.

 

[KeithD]

If the Dems think he committed witness tampering they should add it to the list of impeachable offenses. Good luck with that.

Annnnnd, wait for it . . .

 

[Dribble]

We dont need to add more offenses...we have the votes as is. Donald will be the third president to be formally impeached by the House. Will he be removed by the Senate? Doubtful...but what great campaign adds it will make.

 

[Rightguide]

Seems like the war crimes pardons should be a separate Article. And grounds to limit the scope of pardons.

Amend the Constitution, or shut up.

 

[schism666]

Amend the Constitution, or shut up.

^^big government honk

 

[LincolnDuncan]

These GOP deplorable are such a bunch of nasty women. They must feel that things are not going well for hump

 

[Adre]

Timothy Morrison, deputy assistant to Trump, told impeachment investigators late last month that Ukrainian officials were informed that both a coveted White House meeting and U.S. military aid were contingent on a public announcement about investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter. Morrison’s assertion backs up the public testimony given this week by acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor.

-HuffPost

Ouch, Trump’s assistant. Wonder when he’ll be fired.

 

[Rightguide]

Timothy Morrison, deputy assistant to Trump, told impeachment investigators late last month that Ukrainian officials were informed that both a coveted White House meeting and U.S. military aid were contingent on a public announcement about investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter. Morrison’s assertion backs up the public testimony given this week by acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor.

-HuffPost

Ouch, Trump’s assistant. Wonder when he’ll be fired.

He testified, he's decided on his own to change careers. No he isn't being fired. He also said this in his opening statement:

I would also like to clarify that I did not meet with the Ukrainian National Security Advisor in his hotel room, as Ambassador Taylor indicated on page 11 of his statement. Instead, an NSC aide and I met with Mr. Danylyuk in the hotel's business center.I also reviewed the memorandum of conversation of the July 25 phone call that was released by the White House. I listened to the call as it occurred from the Situation Room. To the best of my recollection, the MEMCON accurately and completely reflects the substance of the call.

 

[Rightguide]

Morrison said this as well:

I want to be clear: I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed.

 

[Adre]

Morrison said this as well:

I want to be clear: I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed.

It remains to be seen what qualifies him to determine legality, and other testimony will likely show a few things are missing from the “transcript.”

 

[Conager]

It remains to be seen what qualifies him to determine legality, and other testimony will likely show a few things are missing from the “transcript.”

Out: he is HIDING the contemporaneous memo of that conversation on a seperate, actually secure server inaccessible to the leakers in the State Department. It would show he strong-armed the Ukrainians.

In: the contemporaneous memo is bullshit. Trump has a time-machine and went back and omitted the things that Vidman, the Leakerblower, and Schiff decided must have been in the call.

 

[Conager]

We dont need to add more offenses...we have the votes as is. Donald will be the third president to be formally impeached by the House. Will he be removed by the Senate? Doubtful...but what great campaign adds it will make.

Maybe, for a party-line partisan action. If that is actually so, why is Pelosi distancing herself from this Schiff-show, then?