███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

Just put him on iggy unless you enjoy baiting him .

Lincoln said he enjoys baiting him, and BotBoy craves any form of on-line attention that will keep him just above the Busybody standard of ignore.

So, it appears to be a mutual thing.


Oh look....a couple of snow flakes shit talking past me in cowardice, how very typical.

At least Duncan has a spine and some semblance of honesty and integrity....things coati wouldn't know shit about.
 
I don't understand ButtWiperBoi's obsession with getting into the 75-100 post range per day so often. And very few of them ever add any real context to a thread.
 
OKAY. I KNOW THAT THE LEFT HAS COMPLETELY CORRUPTED THE LANGUAGE, BUT WHAT EXACTLY DOES WITNESS MEAN IN THIS CASE? Testimony Transcript Shows William Taylor Never Talked To Trump, Wasn’t Even On July 25 Phone Call.
 
OKAY. I KNOW THAT THE LEFT HAS COMPLETELY CORRUPTED THE LANGUAGE, BUT WHAT EXACTLY DOES WITNESS MEAN IN THIS CASE? Testimony Transcript Shows William Taylor Never Talked To Trump, Wasn’t Even On July 25 Phone Call.

And the fact that Ambassador Sondland "presumed" there was a quid pro quo, means nothing. We have the transcript.
 
the boi

I don't understand ButtWiperBoi's obsession with getting into the 75-100 post range per day so often. And very few of them ever add any real context to a thread.


It's an ego thing. The boi is so inadequate in all areas that he feels an ever increasing number of posts will, somehow, make him appear as less than insignificant.
 
He is being compensated?

I don't understand ButtWiperBoi's obsession with getting into the 75-100 post range per day so often. And very few of them ever add any real context to a thread.

A good explanation is that he is probably receiving compensation.
 
House Intelligence Committee subpoenas Mick Mulvaney for impeachment inquiry testimony

(CNN) - Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney has been subpoenaed to appear Friday morning before the House Intelligence Committee as part of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, an official working on the inquiry told CNN.

"Mr. Mulvaney has the opportunity to uphold his oath to the nation and Constitution by testifying tomorrow under oath about matters of keen national importance," the official told CNN. "We hope Mr. Mulvaney does not hide behind the President's ongoing efforts to conceal the truth and obstruct our investigation."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/07/politics/mick-mulvaney-subpoena/index.html
 
In related news, the House Ways and Means Committee has allocated 16 million dollars to reopen the Salem Witch Trials. ;):):D
 
It's all pretty darn consistent, isn't it? :)

NSC official: 'No ambiguity' Ukrainians had to start an investigation for Trump meeting

(CNN) — The National Security Council's top Ukraine expert told lawmakers there was "no ambiguity" ahead of President Donald Trump's July call with his Ukrainian counterpart that the Ukrainians would have to start an investigation into Trump's political rival in order to secure a meeting between the two, according to a transcript of his testimony released Friday.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/11/08/po...man/index.html?r=https**A**F**Fwww.cnn.com**F
 
It's all pretty darn consistent, isn't it? :)

NSC official: 'No ambiguity' Ukrainians had to start an investigation for Trump meeting

(CNN) — The National Security Council's top Ukraine expert told lawmakers there was "no ambiguity" ahead of President Donald Trump's July call with his Ukrainian counterpart that the Ukrainians would have to start an investigation into Trump's political rival in order to secure a meeting between the two, according to a transcript of his testimony released Friday.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/11/08/po...man/index.html?r=https**A**F**Fwww.cnn.com**F

CNN isn't a credible source, after all they are part of the coup according to the Whistleblower's lawyer who is himself a leading seditionist in the effort.
 
It's all pretty darn consistent, isn't it? :)

NSC official: 'No ambiguity' Ukrainians had to start an investigation for Trump meeting

(CNN) — The National Security Council's top Ukraine expert told lawmakers there was "no ambiguity" ahead of President Donald Trump's July call with his Ukrainian counterpart that the Ukrainians would have to start an investigation into Trump's political rival in order to secure a meeting between the two, according to a transcript of his testimony released Friday.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/11/08/po...man/index.html?r=https**A**F**Fwww.cnn.com**F

so what?

if THEY dont investigate CORRUPTION we wont meet....GOOD!

assuming that CNN reports is accurate....cause so far, the reprts have been WRONG
 
Another "Devastating testimony" that is a damn joke.

"I thought"

"I Felt"

"POTUS didn't follow past protocol. Does he have to? Well no he's POTUS!"

This clown needs to be brought up on an UCMJ Article 88 and court martialed.
 
this wasn't an oped piece and you didn't read it.

I read it

They SKIPPED some stuff, like this


Another "Devastating testimony" that is a damn joke.

"I thought"

"I Felt"

"POTUS didn't follow past protocol. Does he have to? Well no he's POTUS!"

This clown needs to be brought up on an UCMJ Article 88 and court martialed.


In other words

NADA
 
In reading throught the testimony of Alexander Vindman, I'm struck by how evasive and argumentative Vindman and his criminal defense attorney are during questioning. And how desperate Schiff and his staff are to prevent witnesses from answering certain questions.
 
Vindman's criminal defense attorney was at his most obstructive regarding two key questions: did Vindman deliberately work to undermine the policy of the Commander-in-Chief, and did he have any conversations about Trump's classified phone call outside the chain of command?
 
Back
Top