███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

[coati]

Let’s see, they can’t call him a Deep State Never Trumper, so what will it be?

Maybe they will say Sondland was not authorized by the President to tell the truth to the Ukrainians about Trump's attempt at extortion.

 

[cowslinger64]

You are correct. 100% irrelevant.

We don't elect or retain presidents based on a national popularity contest. There's no such thing as a no-confidence vote in American politics.

"Well Pete, I figured it should be the one with the capacity for abstract thought. But if that ain't the consensus view, then hell, let's put it to a vote." - Ulysses Everett McGill

Did you really just say that? WTF do you think an election is?


And spare me any lip about the Electoral College.

 

[beezzz]

Brutal impeachment numbers for Dems in new Monmouth poll: 73% have little/no trust in process, 60% say Dems are more interested in destroying Trump than finding facts, 51% oppose impeachment, only 37% say Trump's actions are clear grounds for impeachment.

 

[butters]

Indeed. Bad news for Deplorables - this is a big development!

Sondland changes testimony, acknowledges delivering quid pro quo message to Ukraine

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/tr...ivering-quid-pro-quo-message-ukraine-n1076736

was just reading this

seems he just 'remembered' a conversation. how awfully inconvenient of him, for trump "NO QUID PRO QUO!"

these top guys are starting to read the writing on the wall; impeachment hearings are fucking serious shit and you'd better start telling the damned truth.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/05/poli...quiry/index.html?cid=web-alerts&nsid=17191441

(CNN)In a significant reversal, a top US diplomat has changed his testimony in the impeachment inquiry to now admit there was a quid pro quo linking US aid to Ukraine with an investigation into President Donald Trump's political rival.

Attorney for US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland's sent the committee a three-page addition to his testimony on Monday, in which Sondland said he had remembered a September 1 conversation that occurred on the sidelines of a meeting between Vice President Mike Pence and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in which he told a top aide to Zelensky that the security aid and investigations were linked.

"I now recall speaking individually with Mr. (Andriy) Yermak, where I said resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks," Sondland said.
Sondland's new testimony, which was included in the public release of his closed-door deposition transcript on Tuesday, adds to Democrats' evidence that the President connected the freezing of US security aid to Ukraine to investigations into the 2016 election and former Vice President Joe Biden, which cuts to the heart of their impeachment case against Trump.

 

[butters]

giuliani's in this up to his ears, but looks to me like the new strategy will be to make him the scapegoat in an attempt to distance trump from the charges

 

[RoryN]

giuliani's in this up to his ears, but looks to me like the new strategy will be to make him the scapegoat in an attempt to distance trump from the charges

Make him Oliver North, then praise him years later when it all dies down.

If that's the only play they have, I'm looking forward to watching it fail.

 

[von_Bismarck]

Let’s see, they can’t call him a Deep State Never Trumper, so what will it be?

Human scum.

 

[phrodeau]

Let’s see, they can’t call him a Deep State Never Trumper, so what will it be?

Sondland is now a "flipper" like Michael Cohen.

Trump said that flipping almost ought to be illegal, which is a weird way of saying that it is absolutely legal.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Oh, you mean bullshit

and you know it's bullshit, don't you?

No....you can pretend (D)'s weren't upset about the idea of Trump leaving Syria but we all know you'd be a fucking liar, not that it's ever stopped you before.

 

[Gypsytag]

You are correct. 100% irrelevant.

We don't elect or retain presidents based on a national popularity contest. There's no such thing as a no-confidence vote in American politics.

"Well Pete, I figured it should be the one with the capacity for abstract thought. But if that ain't the consensus view, then hell, let's put it to a vote." - Ulysses Everett McGill

Ahahahahaha!

What a stupid little tranny.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

No....you can pretend (D)'s weren't upset about the idea of Trump leaving Syria but we all know you'd be a fucking liar, not that it's ever stopped you before.

I can'r speak for the Ds but some of us US citizens were concerned by the reason Troops were withdrawn in view of Trump's perverse relationship with Vlad. Being concerned about the reason for a troop withdrawal is not that same as wanting war, but you already know that don't you?

 

[KeithD]

With Trump, every path and every action lead to the Kremlin.

 

[jaF0]

When you know you're about to have your ass handed to you, change the rules:

"GOP Leader Eyes Intel Committee Shake-Up To Boost President Trump's Defenders
NPR|2 hours ago
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., is considering changing the line-up of the House Intelligence Committee to include some of President Trump's most vocal defenders in Congress. "If Democrats are going to turn Intel into the impeachment committee, I am going to make adjustments to that committee accordingly, for a short period of ..."

 

[icanhelp1]

was just reading this

seems he just 'remembered' a conversation. how awfully inconvenient of him, for trump "NO QUID PRO QUO!"

these top guys are starting to read the writing on the wall; impeachment hearings are fucking serious shit and you'd better start telling the damned truth.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/05/poli...quiry/index.html?cid=web-alerts&nsid=17191441

Please cite the statute that makes it a crime to eradicate corruption or at least set a standard before aid money is released. This is more about end of fiscal year spending then Quid Pro Quo. Just more wishing and a hoping.

 

[Conager]

Did you really just say that? WTF do you think an election is?


And spare me any lip about the Electoral College.

You seem unaware that the electoral college chooses our president. Ask Americans whose votes were negated by the (5?) faithless electors during the last presidential election cycle if the selection of our president is the product of tallying our individual votes.

Let me guess: you probably also assume that the candidate with the highest vote tally in the primary election automatically advances to the general election?

 

[RoryN]

And spare me any lip about the Electoral College.

You seem unaware that the electoral college

lol. #fail

 

[cowslinger64]

You seem unaware that the electoral college chooses our president. Ask Americans whose votes were negated by the (5?) faithless electors during the last presidential election cycle if the selection of our president is the product of tallying our individual votes.

Let me guess: you probably also assume that the candidate with the highest vote tally in the primary election automatically advances to the general election?

Completely unable to follow even the simplest of direction.

Even still, he had to be popular with the electoral college, dummy


Your post was idiotic, it's certainly not the first time.

 

[butters]

Please cite the statute that makes it a crime to eradicate corruption or at least set a standard before aid money is released. This is more about end of fiscal year spending then Quid Pro Quo. Just more wishing and a hoping.

please cite why you are so desperate to ignore the fact YOUR president said NO QUID PRO QUO, overnadovernadoverandoveragain

 

[BotanyBoy]

I can'r speak for the Ds but some of us US citizens were concerned by the reason Troops were withdrawn in view of Trump's perverse relationship with Vlad.

Concern? LOL livid outrage is more like it.

The idea of pulling troops out of a conflict zone we have no bidnizz in caused a mass triggering among the left.

Being concerned about the reason for a troop withdrawal is not that same as wanting war, but you already know that don't you?

When the only other option is continued warfare it is the same.

Not even "orange man bad" makes it possible to desire a continued military operations in a conflict zone and also claim you do not support war at the same time. You can't have it both ways, despite popular "progressive" opinion.

But you already knew that didn't you???

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Concern? LOL livid outrage is more like it.

The idea of pulling troops out of a conflict zone we have no bidnizz in caused a mass triggering among the left.



When the only other option is continued warfare it is the same.

Not even "orange man bad" makes it possible to desire a continued military operations in a conflict zone and also claim you do not support war at the same time. You can't have it both ways, despite popular "progressive" opinion.

But you already knew that didn't you???

I've come to the conclusion that the reason you make these ridiculous posts is that you're desperate for attention.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I've come to the conclusion that the reason you make these ridiculous posts is that you're desperate for attention.

Me not buying the "We want troops in Syria fighting to protect the left wing terrorist we love so much!!! But we totally don't support war." buuushit isn't desperation for attention.

It's good old fashioned calling leftist on their self contradicting derp they can't defend.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Me not buying the "We want troops in Syria fighting to protect the left wing terrorist we love so much!!! But we totally don't support war." buuushit isn't desperation for attention.

It's good old fashioned calling leftist on their self contradicting derp they can't defend.

I don't need to defend anything, junior, You are the one who made the stupid statement that "leftists" want war. You attempted to support your ridiculous claim by citing our hatred of Trump. Many of us do hate the big buffoon and the cultists like yourself who enable him, but that doesn't mean we want war as anything other than the last resort.

You should go find a girlfriend or a boyfriend or a tranny instead of posting all day and night on lit as if fox fake news volunteer.

 

[phrodeau]

Me not buying the "We want troops in Syria fighting to protect the left wing terrorist we love so much!!! But we totally don't support war." buuushit isn't desperation for attention.

It's good old fashioned calling leftist on their self contradicting derp they can't defend.

Are you becoming used to surrendering? I ask, because it looks like there’s more surrendering to be done.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I don't need to defend anything, junior,

No....you can just keep contradicting yourself and pretend you're not.

You are the one who made the stupid statement that "leftists" want war.

They very obviously want continued military action in Syria...from this GB all the way to the HoR. The action was widely condemned by the left as a disastrous mistake.

That's not a stupid statement, that's a verifiable FACT you can't refute.

You attempted to support your ridiculous claim by citing our hatred of Trump. Many of us do hate the big buffoon and the cultists like yourself who enable him, but that doesn't mean we want war as anything other than the last resort.

So then you're good with him pulling out and letting the Turks hose the socialist degenerate Kurds!!!

WONDERFUL!!!

Glad you on team Trump....I could have sword you were one of those warmongering progressives who came un-fucking glued at the idea of pulling our troops back.

You should go find a girlfriend or a boyfriend or a tranny instead of posting all day and night on lit as if fox fake news volunteer.

You should figure out that you can't advocate continued military action in Syria because "Orange man BAD!!" and then say you don't support war.

Gotta pick one or the other....can't have it both ways smart stuff.


Are you also one of those "Abolish ICE/CBP, decriminalize undocumented entry into the USA and end all deportations" progressives who also claims not to support open borders???

 

[BotanyBoy]

Are you becoming used to surrendering?

No I'm used to being wishy washy and not making up our minds.

I ask, because it looks like there’s more surrendering to be done.

Such as??

Kinda hard to surrender when you don't have any objectives or stated mission.