Lolita Slut in search of her Daddy

[Lolita_Slut]

.................................

…………………………..

 

[Rradmax]

Wanna play with Daddy?

Looking for younger female who wants to fulfill online or offline fantasies. If interested please let me know. Im a MWM 50 very open minded and well endowed.

 

[Lolita_Slut]

I found him... the Daddy I've been searching for, all my life...

and I found him here on Lit.

 

[DaddysTastyTreat]

I found him... the Daddy I've been searching for, all my life...

Honey, he's not 'THE one' … he's "THIS one" lol

Daddies cum and go.

but sisters are forever XXX

 

[Lolita_Slut]

Honey, he's not 'THE one' … he's "THIS one" lol

Daddies cum and go.

but sisters are forever XXX

GIRL, BYE

delete your account already

btw this was your 666th post, please don't post any more, that's perfect for you, because YOU'RE the DE-VIL

 

[Chris_Michael]

You’re both fucking morons.

 

[AlliaPotestas]

Are you even allowed a user name like that here? Kinda creepy to pick the name of a underage sex victim when you are looking for daddies...

 

[Specula]

I found him... the Daddy I've been searching for, all my life...

and I found him here on Lit.

You lucky girl!

Hold on to him!

 

[AlliaPotestas]

You lucky girl!

Hold on to him!

Seriously? No one here has a problem with a daddies little girl using a name synonymous with a 12 year old child sex victim?

I fucking hate this place at times...

 

[TheDarksiders]

I certainly understand the squeamishness about the OP's username--should it be allowed? I don't know--but let's be clear that Lolita was not a 12 year old child sex victim. She was a fictional character in a novel and, for what it's worth, one of the greatest novels of the twentieth century. (Nabokov wrote that he was interested in aesthetic bliss, not "so-called sex.")

If we're looking for a victim, perhaps it's the book itself, subjected to usernames like the OP's.

 

[AlliaPotestas]

I certainly understand the squeamishness about the OP's username--should it be allowed? I don't know--but let's be clear that Lolita was not a 12 year old child sex victim. She was a fictional character in a novel and, for what it's worth, one of the greatest novels of the twentieth century. (Nabokov wrote that he was interested in aesthetic bliss, not "so-called sex.")

If we're looking for a victim, perhaps it's the book itself, subjected to usernames like the OP's.

Very well - fictional 12 year old abuse victim...

Less squeamish?

I still think it’s a sinister choice of name on a site like this... especially when looking for a daddy...

 

[TheDarksiders]

Very well - fictional 12 year old abuse victim...

Less squeamish?

I still think it’s a sinister choice of name on a site like this... especially when looking for a daddy...

No argument there.

 

[mrdiscreetshh]

daddy's here

 

[Booboobear84]

You’re both fucking morons.

How do you know who they are fucking;-)