Damn, she Justa did it again. Still nothing to see.

[19jimbo99]

Nice..and I do know where this mysterious g spot is located...

x 100...

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

Nice..and I do know where this mysterious g spot is located...

x 100...

Good, that is a very important feature in a man in my opinion.

 

[19jimbo99]

Good, that is a very important feature in a man in my opinion.

Yes it does come in handy...just saying lol..

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

Yes it does come in handy...just saying lol..

Hahaha. I would be bringing up videos and making a man watch him he didn't.

 

[Mtnmike]

So, I will share yet another pointless irrational rant. This happens when reading or talking with men and just makes me irrationally stabby. Men, if you are going to invent imaginary boobies, learn about boobies first. If someone writes about a slender petite blond about five foot and 100lbs with 46DDD breasts, the first thought is not that she is attractive, the first thought is how has that osteochondroma not been fatal yet, or does she have neurofibromatosis. I must know.

For the umpteenth time, the number is the measurement of the rib cage below the breasts in inches, and the letter is the difference between the measurement around the rib cage and the measurement around the breasts. The circumference of the typical female homo sapiens’ rib cage is 29 to 30 inches. This of course varies, more petite women may come in at 27in, and taller big boned women may hit 32. Now, of course, across the back, there are the trapezius and rhomboid muscles, there is also the latissimus dorsi, come around the front and we have the external abdominal oblique. Then finally, they may or may not be topped with a significant layer of fat depending on the body fat of the person. A slender woman of 100lbs is neither very muscular nor very fat, and would likely have a band measurement of 28 to 32. So yes, I need to know what 14in tumor is growing and what limb was lost to account for the weight of the tumor. How dare you start with this disfiguring information, and then not tell me, and not even discuss the further, at all.

Bra bands sold in average stores are 28 to 38, average stores stock for women who are at the lower end of plus size. Plus size stores carry 38 to 56. 38 is lower end of plus sized and 56 is the high end for the extremely obese. A 56 is probable coming in around a 40 dress size and I don’t know, maybe 500lbs. That is not slender. Pretty much, 36 is generally the cut off for slender to even be mentioned. After that, a chick is either curvy or very strong, because she is carrying 8 inches of fat or muscle around her rib cage. Anyway, lets go back to 5ft and 46DDD. She is wearing a dress size of 24, at least, assuming her boobs are the biggest part of her body. But with a rib cage of 46 which is 10 inches above the average american woman, but only slightly above average sized boobs (yes DD is average american cup size, so just one cup size above average), I would bet she is storing a lot of weight in her belly and is probably closer to a size 28/30 and probably 300 to 350lbs given she is quite short. That is not slender.

It is very disconcerting when the first thing you share tells me I will be hearing or reading about the drama of a horribly disfigured woman, or a science fiction piece about an alien race, then I decide it could be cool, and continue on, just to find it is a typical everyday porn shared by someone who has never seen boobies and knows nothing about a woman’s body. That is time I will never get back. So please, do me a favor, and share the horrible disfigurement backstory or look at some boobies and learn. Thank you.

yes, I admit, irrationally annoyed, but come on, this is not difficult, it is just boobies, not like it is the mysterious G-spot.

What, you mean that they are men out there there don't know what or where the G-Spot is ? Well I'd like to find their ladies and give them the experience of a lifetime

 

[EctoJohn]

That rant is probably the first time I had any clue about how bra sizes are measured.

Granted, I still don't know dick about bra sizes, even including that new rant info.

I mean, yeah, I knew enough that 46DDD would be huge tits, but only in a general sense.

No wonder there are women who are professionals at sizing bras properly.
If I was a chick, I couldn't figure out my own tit size without massive trial and error.

 

[TheLM]

So, I will share yet another pointless irrational rant. This happens when reading or talking with men and just makes me irrationally stabby. Men, if you are going to invent imaginary boobies, learn about boobies first. If someone writes about a slender petite blond about five foot and 100lbs with 46DDD breasts, the first thought is not that she is attractive, the first thought is how has that osteochondroma not been fatal yet, or does she have neurofibromatosis. I must know.

For the umpteenth time, the number is the measurement of the rib cage below the breasts in inches, and the letter is the difference between the measurement around the rib cage and the measurement around the breasts. The circumference of the typical female homo sapiens’ rib cage is 29 to 30 inches. This of course varies, more petite women may come in at 27in, and taller big boned women may hit 32. Now, of course, across the back, there are the trapezius and rhomboid muscles, there is also the latissimus dorsi, come around the front and we have the external abdominal oblique. Then finally, they may or may not be topped with a significant layer of fat depending on the body fat of the person. A slender woman of 100lbs is neither very muscular nor very fat, and would likely have a band measurement of 28 to 32. So yes, I need to know what 14in tumor is growing and what limb was lost to account for the weight of the tumor. How dare you start with this disfiguring information, and then not tell me, and not even discuss the further, at all.

Bra bands sold in average stores are 28 to 38, average stores stock for women who are at the lower end of plus size. Plus size stores carry 38 to 56. 38 is lower end of plus sized and 56 is the high end for the extremely obese. A 56 is probable coming in around a 40 dress size and I don’t know, maybe 500lbs. That is not slender. Pretty much, 36 is generally the cut off for slender to even be mentioned. After that, a chick is either curvy or very strong, because she is carrying 8 inches of fat or muscle around her rib cage. Anyway, lets go back to 5ft and 46DDD. She is wearing a dress size of 24, at least, assuming her boobs are the biggest part of her body. But with a rib cage of 46 which is 10 inches above the average american woman, but only slightly above average sized boobs (yes DD is average american cup size, so just one cup size above average), I would bet she is storing a lot of weight in her belly and is probably closer to a size 28/30 and probably 300 to 350lbs given she is quite short. That is not slender.

It is very disconcerting when the first thing you share tells me I will be hearing or reading about the drama of a horribly disfigured woman, or a science fiction piece about an alien race, then I decide it could be cool, and continue on, just to find it is a typical everyday porn shared by someone who has never seen boobies and knows nothing about a woman’s body. That is time I will never get back. So please, do me a favor, and share the horrible disfigurement backstory or look at some boobies and learn. Thank you.

yes, I admit, irrationally annoyed, but come on, this is not difficult, it is just boobies, not like it is the mysterious G-spot.

I came for your titties, but I’m staying for your robust pathophysiological vocabulary. <3

 

[Paul_Chance]

Most excellent rant!

 

[TANSTAAFL58]

So, I will share yet another pointless irrational rant. This happens when reading or talking with men and just makes me irrationally stabby. Men, if you are going to invent imaginary boobies, learn about boobies first. If someone writes about a slender petite blond about five foot and 100lbs with 46DDD breasts, the first thought is not that she is attractive, the first thought is how has that osteochondroma not been fatal yet, or does she have neurofibromatosis. I must know.

For the umpteenth time, the number is the measurement of the rib cage below the breasts in inches, and the letter is the difference between the measurement around the rib cage and the measurement around the breasts. The circumference of the typical female homo sapiens’ rib cage is 29 to 30 inches. This of course varies, more petite women may come in at 27in, and taller big boned women may hit 32. Now, of course, across the back, there are the trapezius and rhomboid muscles, there is also the latissimus dorsi, come around the front and we have the external abdominal oblique. Then finally, they may or may not be topped with a significant layer of fat depending on the body fat of the person. A slender woman of 100lbs is neither very muscular nor very fat, and would likely have a band measurement of 28 to 32. So yes, I need to know what 14in tumor is growing and what limb was lost to account for the weight of the tumor. How dare you start with this disfiguring information, and then not tell me, and not even discuss the further, at all.

Bra bands sold in average stores are 28 to 38, average stores stock for women who are at the lower end of plus size. Plus size stores carry 38 to 56. 38 is lower end of plus sized and 56 is the high end for the extremely obese. A 56 is probable coming in around a 40 dress size and I don’t know, maybe 500lbs. That is not slender. Pretty much, 36 is generally the cut off for slender to even be mentioned. After that, a chick is either curvy or very strong, because she is carrying 8 inches of fat or muscle around her rib cage. Anyway, lets go back to 5ft and 46DDD. She is wearing a dress size of 24, at least, assuming her boobs are the biggest part of her body. But with a rib cage of 46 which is 10 inches above the average american woman, but only slightly above average sized boobs (yes DD is average american cup size, so just one cup size above average), I would bet she is storing a lot of weight in her belly and is probably closer to a size 28/30 and probably 300 to 350lbs given she is quite short. That is not slender.

It is very disconcerting when the first thing you share tells me I will be hearing or reading about the drama of a horribly disfigured woman, or a science fiction piece about an alien race, then I decide it could be cool, and continue on, just to find it is a typical everyday porn shared by someone who has never seen boobies and knows nothing about a woman’s body. That is time I will never get back. So please, do me a favor, and share the horrible disfigurement backstory or look at some boobies and learn. Thank you.

yes, I admit, irrationally annoyed, but come on, this is not difficult, it is just boobies, not like it is the mysterious G-spot.

Great post. It should be required reading for budding authors. To me calling out a bra size is lazy writing anyways. Show some creativity ffs! If you're here, you should learn how to use a fucking creative adjective! You don't have to be Shakespeare or Stephen King

Ample is an overworked word. Besides, ample barely described the glorious mass of her tits. Her breasts strained at the cups, stretching the strands of the fabric beyond their limit. The engineering marvel that is the modern corset was about to meet its match as she started into a slow, gentle jog. Her round tits overflowed the cups and pounded the support with every step, threatening to bounce right out. She began to run a little faster, desperate to keep up, but still wary of her predicament. Her globes jiggled to the appreciation of the men watching. She could feel the cup inching down, her areolas exposed. Finally gravity won. The fabric failed, releasing the heavy weight of her marvelous boobs, which swung gently as they were finally freed.

"China hates boobs!" she said in exasperation.​

Now, about those eleven inch cocks...

By the way, finding the G-spot is a nice outcome, but searching for the G-spot is half the fun.

 

[frmtutanota]

So, I will share yet another pointless irrational rant. This happens when reading or talking with men and just makes me irrationally stabby. Men, if you are going to invent imaginary boobies, learn about boobies first. If someone writes about a slender petite blond about five foot and 100lbs with 46DDD breasts, the first thought is not that she is attractive, the first thought is how has that osteochondroma not been fatal yet, or does she have neurofibromatosis. I must know.

For the umpteenth time, the number is the measurement of the rib cage below the breasts in inches, and the letter is the difference between the measurement around the rib cage and the measurement around the breasts. The circumference of the typical female homo sapiens’ rib cage is 29 to 30 inches. This of course varies, more petite women may come in at 27in, and taller big boned women may hit 32. Now, of course, across the back, there are the trapezius and rhomboid muscles, there is also the latissimus dorsi, come around the front and we have the external abdominal oblique. Then finally, they may or may not be topped with a significant layer of fat depending on the body fat of the person. A slender woman of 100lbs is neither very muscular nor very fat, and would likely have a band measurement of 28 to 32. So yes, I need to know what 14in tumor is growing and what limb was lost to account for the weight of the tumor. How dare you start with this disfiguring information, and then not tell me, and not even discuss the further, at all.

Bra bands sold in average stores are 28 to 38, average stores stock for women who are at the lower end of plus size. Plus size stores carry 38 to 56. 38 is lower end of plus sized and 56 is the high end for the extremely obese. A 56 is probable coming in around a 40 dress size and I don’t know, maybe 500lbs. That is not slender. Pretty much, 36 is generally the cut off for slender to even be mentioned. After that, a chick is either curvy or very strong, because she is carrying 8 inches of fat or muscle around her rib cage. Anyway, lets go back to 5ft and 46DDD. She is wearing a dress size of 24, at least, assuming her boobs are the biggest part of her body. But with a rib cage of 46 which is 10 inches above the average american woman, but only slightly above average sized boobs (yes DD is average american cup size, so just one cup size above average), I would bet she is storing a lot of weight in her belly and is probably closer to a size 28/30 and probably 300 to 350lbs given she is quite short. That is not slender.

It is very disconcerting when the first thing you share tells me I will be hearing or reading about the drama of a horribly disfigured woman, or a science fiction piece about an alien race, then I decide it could be cool, and continue on, just to find it is a typical everyday porn shared by someone who has never seen boobies and knows nothing about a woman’s body. That is time I will never get back. So please, do me a favor, and share the horrible disfigurement backstory or look at some boobies and learn. Thank you.

yes, I admit, irrationally annoyed, but come on, this is not difficult, it is just boobies, not like it is the mysterious G-spot.

great analysis.... Sexy, witty, fun, beautiful, intelligent and sexy

 

[CanadianM]

Lol. It felt good. And your friend is probably wearing too large a band and too small a cup. If the band is fitting correctly, snug against the rib cage, the weight of the breasts are distributed around the rib cage and all the straps do is help keep the titties in the cup. If the band is too large, too make up for a too small cup, the weight is no longer distributed around the rib cage, but instead. Is placed on the straps, which means the shoulders and back. Too big a band is harder on the back than no bra because of forcing it on the shoulders .

Thank you, will pass that along... I'll tell her a little birdie told me..

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

What, you mean that they are men out there there don't know what or where the G-Spot is ? Well I'd like to find their ladies and give them the experience of a lifetime

Maybe I need to do some educational ranting

That rant is probably the first time I had any clue about how bra sizes are measured.

Granted, I still don't know dick about bra sizes, even including that new rant info.

I mean, yeah, I knew enough that 46DDD would be huge tits, but only in a general sense.

No wonder there are women who are professionals at sizing bras properly.
If I was a chick, I couldn't figure out my own tit size without massive trial and error.

haha. I thought I explained it well.

and no 46DDD is not huge tits. well I guess for volume. 46DDD is average tits on a big girl

ok, this is a porn star who goes by ruby sinclaire. she is a 46DDD.

http://i.imgur.com/VBYxA6fm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/VInKgjTm.png


So, I think you can see my confusion when you tell me a 100lb women is wearing a bra sized for this woman. given this is 100lb woman with a DDD (30DDD)

http://i.imgur.com/ghJoZqDm.png


like how could a woman who is supposed to have a 30 inch rib cage actually have a 46 inch rib cage so that the bra of the first woman is touching her rib cage and back of the second. best I can come up with would be a very large 16 inch growth on the back due to neurofibromatosis. I mean that is a huge difference

the easy answer is basically a DDD means that the breast are 7 inches bigger in circumference than the rib cage. that is not really big, that is basically average. ok, average is 6 inches the number tells the story of the starting off point of the rib cage

I came for your titties, but I’m staying for your robust pathophysiological vocabulary. <3

Well thank you, my bullshit can be quite educational sometimes

Most excellent rant!

lol, thank you

Justadesperatewifeandmom: gorgeous thong panties picture regarding your rant about boobs. I love them very much especially yours.

thank you. and my boob rants are usually either insane or educational, depends on the beholder

 

[frmtutanota]

You explained things quite well....

Enjoyable educational topics ... by all means, explain away... visuals are always welcome

Because I'm a guy, I'm a visual learner pictures and vids are always welcome

 

[EctoJohn]

See, in my head, DDD size boobs are bigger than the porn star's you showed.
I would assume most breasts are Bs or Cs in reality.

That "Ruby Sinclair" I would have assumed to be about a big C or small D.

Once again, I'm glad I don't need to know for myself.

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

Great post. It should be required reading for budding authors. To me calling out a bra size is lazy writing anyways. Show some creativity ffs! If you're here, you should learn how to use a fucking creative adjective! You don't have to be Shakespeare or Stephen King

Ample is an overworked word. Besides, ample barely described the glorious mass of her tits. Her breasts strained at the cups, stretching the strands of the fabric beyond their limit. The engineering marvel that is the modern corset was about to meet its match as she started into a slow, gentle jog. Her round tits overflowed the cups and pounded the support with every step, threatening to bounce right out. She began to run a little faster, desperate to keep up, but still wary of her predicament. Her globes jiggled to the appreciation of the men watching. She could feel the cup inching down, her areolas exposed. Finally gravity won. The fabric failed, releasing the heavy weight of her marvelous boobs, which swung gently as they were finally freed.

"China hates boobs!" she said in exasperation.​

Now, about those eleven inch cocks...

By the way, finding the G-spot is a nice outcome, but searching for the G-spot is half the fun.

ok, maybe lazy, but still, I would accept it in hunchback porn. though yes, your way is much better. and haha, china, those bastards.

ok, yeah yeah, we should probably question those 11 inch cocks, but at least they exist, well unless it is an 11 inch cock in little person porn. pretty sure that doesn't exist. I mean the person would have to not only have a form of dwarfism, but also maybe long term untreated ischemic priapism. hum, thoughts to ponder

great analysis.... Sexy, witty, fun, beautiful, intelligent and sexy

thank you

Thank you, will pass that along... I'll tell her a little birdie told me..

good luck with that.

 

[clark_kent]

Anatomy lesson well taken and much more interesting than what I took in school.
The guy may have been trying to imagine someone with ridiculously large implants that will someday require the woman to appear on an episode of Botched because of her now severe disfigurement.
Was this from a Lit story? I should go back to those. I keeping making resolutions to read more quality literature.

 

[EctoJohn]

Was this from a Lit story?

Just makes me think of those Lit stories that spend the first few paragraphs giving me overly descriptive measurements for every girl.
I hate those.
My imagination starts drowning in figures.

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

You explained things quite well....

Enjoyable educational topics ... by all means, explain away... visuals are always welcome

Because I'm a guy, I'm a visual learner pictures and vids are always welcome

haha, you might end up with me over the ages, demonstrating many bra sizes

See, in my head, DDD size boobs are bigger than the porn star's you showed.
I would assume most breasts are Bs or Cs in reality.

That "Ruby Sinclair" I would have assumed to be about a big C or small D.

Once again, I'm glad I don't need to know for myself.

I could see that if you or your bra knowledge is old. bras used to be made of silk, with no stretch, so the band was upsized a few inches for comfort. this means a B cup then is a DD now. so, like the 46DDD above would have been put in a 50B or 50C. and the 30DDD above would have been put in a 34B probably. now while cups don't stretch, but bands do, the +4 rule doesn't usually hold true, well except with those who still make all silk bras. of course, until internet shopping US stuck to this measurement standard when it suited them, as they didn't have to make as many sizes. so when I really wore a 30DDD, they would use the +4 rule to get me into a bra, ie a 34D. when I wore a 32H, victoria's secret would size me a 38DDD, as it was the largest they carry. but someone who fell inside their sizes, they would have given them a correct sizing. however as we have learned, a 6 inch too big band, got my boobs covered, but simply meant all the weight was placed on my shoulders, thus pain. then internet shopping, and I learned I was lied to my whole life.

 

[EctoJohn]

I'm not sure how old my bra knowledge can be at only 37.

And that whole paragraph you typed totally lost me with all the +4 and +6 rules and bands and stretching and whatnot.

Nobody ever claimed I was smart. >_>

 

[clark_kent]

haha, you might end up with me over the ages, demonstrating many bra sizes



I could see that if you or your bra knowledge is old. bras used to be made of silk, with no stretch, so the band was upsized a few inches for comfort. this means a B cup then is a DD now. so, like the 46DDD above would have been put in a 50B or 50C. and the 30DDD above would have been put in a 34B probably. now while cups don't stretch, but bands do, the +4 rule doesn't usually hold true, well except with those who still make all silk bras. of course, until internet shopping US stuck to this measurement standard when it suited them, as they didn't have to make as many sizes. so when I really wore a 30DDD, they would use the +4 rule to get me into a bra, ie a 34D. when I wore a 32H, victoria's secret would size me a 38DDD, as it was the largest they carry. but someone who fell inside their sizes, they would have given them a correct sizing. however as we have learned, a 6 inch too big band, got my boobs covered, but simply meant all the weight was placed on my shoulders, thus pain. then internet shopping, and I learned I was lied to my whole life.

I’m going to need an instructional video and/or PowerPoint presentation to fully understand all of this!

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

Anatomy lesson well taken and much more interesting than what I took in school.
The guy may have been trying to imagine someone with ridiculously large implants that will someday require the woman to appear on an episode of Botched because of her now severe disfigurement.
Was this from a Lit story? I should go back to those. I keeping making resolutions to read more quality literature.

haha. I should be a teacher. oh wait, kids are whiny

yeah, that is more like a 32K,L,M,N,O type deal.

this wasn't from a lit story this time, but you see it a lot here

Just makes me think of those Lit stories that spend the first few paragraphs giving me overly descriptive measurements for every girl.
I hate those.
My imagination starts drowning in figures.

lol, they are painting a picture, or trying, I guess.

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

I'm not sure how old my bra knowledge can be at only 37.

And that whole paragraph you typed totally lost me with all the +4 and +6 rules and bands and stretching and whatnot.

Nobody ever claimed I was smart. >_>

lol, I must have really lost you during the boob volume lesson a few months back lol.

I’m going to need an instructional video and/or PowerPoint presentation to fully understand all of this!

oh, don't tempt me

 

[clark_kent]

lol, I must have really lost you during the boob volume lesson a few months back lol.



oh, don't tempt me

I guess we now know what’s in store for Movie Monday or Slide (presentation) Sunday.

 

[EctoJohn]

lol, they are painting a picture, or trying, I guess.

Painting a picture is one thing.
Stapling a book of numbers to my head is another.
Some people don't really get that part of the joy of reading is imagining these things.
It's like that concept of show, don't tell.
Not sure what the reading equivalent of that is, but you can say someone is tall or short without giving me an exact height.
You can say a woman is busty without giving me an exact boob size, and clearly giving me an exact size isn't helping anyway.

lol, I must have really lost you during the boob volume lesson a few months back lol.

I don't remember those lessons, but I was probably in the back of the class, looking at the illustrations in the book but not reading it.

 

[RjThoughts]

So, I will share yet another pointless irrational rant. This happens when reading or talking with men and just makes me irrationally stabby. Men, if you are going to invent imaginary boobies, learn about boobies first. If someone writes about a slender petite blond about five foot and 100lbs with 46DDD breasts, the first thought is not that she is attractive, the first thought is how has that osteochondroma not been fatal yet, or does she have neurofibromatosis. I must know.

For the umpteenth time, the number is the measurement of the rib cage below the breasts in inches, and the letter is the difference between the measurement around the rib cage and the measurement around the breasts. The circumference of the typical female homo sapiens’ rib cage is 29 to 30 inches. This of course varies, more petite women may come in at 27in, and taller big boned women may hit 32. Now, of course, across the back, there are the trapezius and rhomboid muscles, there is also the latissimus dorsi, come around the front and we have the external abdominal oblique. Then finally, they may or may not be topped with a significant layer of fat depending on the body fat of the person. A slender woman of 100lbs is neither very muscular nor very fat, and would likely have a band measurement of 28 to 32. So yes, I need to know what 14in tumor is growing and what limb was lost to account for the weight of the tumor. How dare you start with this disfiguring information, and then not tell me, and not even discuss the further, at all.

Bra bands sold in average stores are 28 to 38, average stores stock for women who are at the lower end of plus size. Plus size stores carry 38 to 56. 38 is lower end of plus sized and 56 is the high end for the extremely obese. A 56 is probable coming in around a 40 dress size and I don’t know, maybe 500lbs. That is not slender. Pretty much, 36 is generally the cut off for slender to even be mentioned. After that, a chick is either curvy or very strong, because she is carrying 8 inches of fat or muscle around her rib cage. Anyway, lets go back to 5ft and 46DDD. She is wearing a dress size of 24, at least, assuming her boobs are the biggest part of her body. But with a rib cage of 46 which is 10 inches above the average american woman, but only slightly above average sized boobs (yes DD is average american cup size, so just one cup size above average), I would bet she is storing a lot of weight in her belly and is probably closer to a size 28/30 and probably 300 to 350lbs given she is quite short. That is not slender.

It is very disconcerting when the first thing you share tells me I will be hearing or reading about the drama of a horribly disfigured woman, or a science fiction piece about an alien race, then I decide it could be cool, and continue on, just to find it is a typical everyday porn shared by someone who has never seen boobies and knows nothing about a woman’s body. That is time I will never get back. So please, do me a favor, and share the horrible disfigurement backstory or look at some boobies and learn. Thank you.

yes, I admit, irrationally annoyed, but come on, this is not difficult, it is just boobies, not like it is the mysterious G-spot.

Rant indeed!

Oh, and I was not allowed ANY candy this week