As I appear to have sparked a discussion in the Profile thread that really shouldn't continue there, I'll expound upon it here to my satisfaction. To be fair, I only started diverging from the topic in thread because some of the participants had PMs disabled (which is a choice I respect), and such a genuine plea for answers went out that I thought it shouldn't be ignore. This is likewise the reason I'm posting this in a general thread instead of bothering people to change their PM settings - Lord knows that privacy and peace of mind are things that are easy to let go, and difficult to reclaim.
Now, that said - to what answers I can give. While I am giving specific answers here, I welcome anyone that just wants to talk or shoot the shit, because frankly RP in general tends strongly towards insular little communities of two or three that don't talk to anyone else outside The Circle, due to the nature of the PM and thread system.
I say this with the prescient understanding that this is probably going to derail horribly into a traincrash, but hopefully I can muster something of merit in the meantime. To the answers!
Sexual roleplay is, at the realistic level, a series of one-night stands for the average writer. You pick someone up in Seeking or from PM, trade a handful of messages negotiating what it is you both want, and pitch out something generally agreeable. You write your way through one or two pages, and eventually schedule constraints or disagreements on tone and kink or plain disinterest split you up from that temporary partner.
Then you sit around and wonder what you did wrong, or could have done better, or could have offered.
Or you're the person that backed off, because you stopped caring or because you got too busy and didn't have the energy to invest in it anymore, or because your appetite got filled and your done with it for the moment. Maybe even you found something about the other person that alarmed you or filled you with personal distaste, and the vast majority of us respond by just backing off silently in that case rather than pick a fight. Whatever.
This is the searching phase of roleplay and it's where about 80% of the average roleplayer's time is spent, if I had to ballpark it, because it's very easy to care too much about your own fantasy and not enough about the other person's, or even the other person themself. There's a fine line to tread between self-satisfaction and being solicitous, and to be honest I'm not erudite enough to define that boundary in a majority of cases. It's a border that moves.
I will, however, say that I have had several friends that I have roleplayed with, and this makes the process tremendously easier because wanting to talk to the other person, and listen to them, makes anything you do with them a more rewarding pursuit in general.
Mind you, this is not a romantic attachment, which is a topic all its own and fabulously thorny amid. It's merely - finding someone whose writing, and thoughts, you find worth your time.
Lastly, Rosa, you are free to quote me if I manage to blurt out something intelligible in the middle of the word salad my brain frequently orders in the place of reasonable discourse.
Now, that said - to what answers I can give. While I am giving specific answers here, I welcome anyone that just wants to talk or shoot the shit, because frankly RP in general tends strongly towards insular little communities of two or three that don't talk to anyone else outside The Circle, due to the nature of the PM and thread system.
I say this with the prescient understanding that this is probably going to derail horribly into a traincrash, but hopefully I can muster something of merit in the meantime. To the answers!
I think Cliff is right that We shouldn't continue chatting in this thread. I am thinking about starting a new thread for discussions at SRP (or if anybody likes to do that please go ahead ). I am especially curious about
Obuzeti's statement : "no one wants to talk frankly about sex, or be friends with the people they're writing porn with."
Is it Ok to quote you for a discussion at SRP Obuzeti ?
Sexual roleplay is, at the realistic level, a series of one-night stands for the average writer. You pick someone up in Seeking or from PM, trade a handful of messages negotiating what it is you both want, and pitch out something generally agreeable. You write your way through one or two pages, and eventually schedule constraints or disagreements on tone and kink or plain disinterest split you up from that temporary partner.
Then you sit around and wonder what you did wrong, or could have done better, or could have offered.
Or you're the person that backed off, because you stopped caring or because you got too busy and didn't have the energy to invest in it anymore, or because your appetite got filled and your done with it for the moment. Maybe even you found something about the other person that alarmed you or filled you with personal distaste, and the vast majority of us respond by just backing off silently in that case rather than pick a fight. Whatever.
This is the searching phase of roleplay and it's where about 80% of the average roleplayer's time is spent, if I had to ballpark it, because it's very easy to care too much about your own fantasy and not enough about the other person's, or even the other person themself. There's a fine line to tread between self-satisfaction and being solicitous, and to be honest I'm not erudite enough to define that boundary in a majority of cases. It's a border that moves.
I will, however, say that I have had several friends that I have roleplayed with, and this makes the process tremendously easier because wanting to talk to the other person, and listen to them, makes anything you do with them a more rewarding pursuit in general.
Mind you, this is not a romantic attachment, which is a topic all its own and fabulously thorny amid. It's merely - finding someone whose writing, and thoughts, you find worth your time.
Lastly, Rosa, you are free to quote me if I manage to blurt out something intelligible in the middle of the word salad my brain frequently orders in the place of reasonable discourse.
Last edited: