Hillary Clinton suggests Russians are 'grooming' Tulsi Gabbard for third-party run

She never mentioned Tulsi Gabbard. If you think Tulsi Gabbard is under Russian influence, that's on you.
 
Wasn't this thread done yesterday?

Yes, but yesterday the left agreed with her; everyone who was not giving Hillary money in 2016 is a Russian asset. Just like in 2012 and 2014 when Libertarians or Tea Party candidates were Democrat Party assets taking Honest Republican votes away in order to elect democrats.
 
I never thought Hillary was particularly stable, but now, she's just off her rocker...

Earlier Ed wrote about Hillary Clinton’s claim that the Russians are preparing Tulsi Gabbard for a third-party run to ensure Trump is reelected. That was certainly a highlight of Hillary’s appearance on the podcast hosted by David Plouffe, but it wasn’t the only truly paranoid thing she said.

A bit earlier in the same interview, Hillary argued that Trump’s goal was to ensure he never has to leave office. She’s wasn’t talking about a 2nd term after a successful reelection campaign. Hillary believes Trump is seeking to become a permanent American dictator.

https://hotair.com/archives/john-s-2/2019/10/18/hillary-trumps-game-plan-never-leave-office/

Everything under the sun has become a conspiracy to her...
 
And then Hillary suggested Trump is a puppet of Putin: “Donald Trump is Vladimir Putin’s dream,” Hillary said. “He said that the biggest catastrophe in history was the collapse of the former Soviet Union. As a former KGB guy, he is intent upon undermining democracies and trying to lay the groundwork for a resurgence of Russian greatness as he posits. And Donald Trump is delivering that to him on a daily basis,” she said.

“I don’t know why exactly. I don’t know what Putin has on him, whether it’s both personal and financial, I assume it is,” Hillary added.

Same source


Russia, Russia, Russia

This is an unhealthy fixation.
It makes me glad that she's not the President.
 
Given Tulsi's fundraising and polling and the reaction in general I'd say a lot of people would like Hillary to STFU.
 
Given Tulsi's fundraising and polling and the reaction in general I'd say a lot of people would like Hillary to STFU.

Oh, what has she said about this topic in the last few days? Cite? Genuinely would like to see if she's gone as far as folks claimed she did.
 
Oh, what has she said about this topic in the last few days? Cite? Genuinely would like to see if she's gone as far as folks claimed she did.

KeithD, diehard Clinton fan boy to the end.
 
Not reading your post, BB, but it's good to know that Hillary still scares you shitless. :D
 

The question was is there anything from the last couple of days showing that Clinton is continuing this discussion and now suggesting that Gabbard is willfully involved with the Russians on it, which wasn't what Clinton claimed originally--Clinton was talking about Russian efforts, not that Gabbard was colluding with those efforts.

Clinton saying the Russians choosing someone to back and hack for is suggesting that what they did before they now show evidence of doing again. It doesn't say that Gabbard is being receptive to or colluding with the "grooming."
 
Last edited:
Hillary needs to STFU

Thing is, she's probably right.

And no she doesn't need to STFU. People need to get the hell over it.

If anything is over the top it's Gabbard's reaction. Sounds just like an over emotional reactive member of the RWCJ.
 
Hillary Clinton doesn't want to see a woman president in her lifetime now that she can't be the first. She's bitter. She's vindictive. She's pathetic. It would be best if she just stayed at home and cooked pastries that made her fingers fat.

She had her chance and the people didn't want her.

The end.

Although, anyone she attacks is going to benefit, because Republicans and Democrats hate her.
 
Thing is, she's probably right.

And no she doesn't need to STFU. People need to get the hell over it.

If anything is over the top it's Gabbard's reaction. Sounds just like an over emotional reactive member of the RWCJ.

So you think a decorated active member of the military, who is currently a sitting congresswoman and running for President on the Democratic party ticket, giving a strong denial as a response to Hillary Clinton, who, without any proof whatsoever, claims she's a Russian agent is "over the top"?

You need to wake the fuck up and see what's really going on around you.
 
So you think a decorated active member of the military, who is currently a sitting congresswoman and running for President on the Democratic party ticket, giving a strong denial as a response to Hillary Clinton, who, without any proof whatsoever, claims she's a Russian agent is "over the top"?

You need to wake the fuck up and see what's really going on around you.

That's not what HRC said but don't let facts get in the way of your over emotional reactive response. :rolleyes:
 
The question was is there anything from the last couple of days showing that Clinton is continuing this discussion and now suggesting that Gabbard is willfully involved with the Russians on it, which wasn't what Clinton claimed originally--Clinton was talking about Russian efforts, not that Gabbard was colluding with those efforts.

Clinton saying the Russians choosing someone to back and hack for is suggesting that what they did before they now show evidence of doing again. It doesn't say that Gabbard is being receptive to or colluding with the "grooming."

No. In other news, the sun is going to rise tomorrow. Hillary sets the blade deep and does not leave prints.

Tulsi was the rising star of the DNC. She was privy to the shenanigans pf Debbie Wasserman Schultz and cronies in the primary. Quit the DNC in disgust. Endorsed Bernie Sanders. Since then the smear campaign has been in gear. This is just another facet.

Insinuating that Gabbard would run as a third party candidate is an intent to damage her candidacy. It failed. By why would Clinton do it in the first place. She needs to just go away.
 
Back
Top