Whistleblower

This is how Nancy runs thing( no rhyme or reason ) If you use common sense (which tHe DUMMOS DON'T ) you would think the House Foreign Affairs committee would be doing all the behind the door sneaky testimonies. What does the intel committee have to do with it? Or maybe the House Armed Services committee. In past impeachment proceedings articles of impeachment are formulated and investigated in the Judicial Committee. Nadler must have fucked up the collusion case. Pretty soon they're going to run out of committees.
You aren’t really paying attention. Several committees are currently gathering evidence from several angles, including Judicial, Intelligence, Oversight and Reform, and Foreign Affairs.
 
con·tin·gent
/kənˈtinjənt/
adjective

occurring or existing only if (certain circumstances) are the case; dependent on.
"resolution of the conflict was contingent on the signing of a ceasefire agreement"

"Release of the allocated funding and a meeting at the White House is contingent on the Ukraine President announcing an investigation into the Bidens and Crowdstrike"
 
con·tin·gent
/kənˈtinjənt/
adjective

occurring or existing only if (certain circumstances) are the case; dependent on.
"resolution of the conflict was contingent on the signing of a ceasefire agreement"

"Release of the allocated funding and a meeting at the White House is contingent on the Ukraine President announcing an investigation into the Bidens and Crowdstrike"
The funniest part of this is that Crowdstrike is a completely discredited conspiracy theory.

I guess for Trump, it's a matter of live by the sword, die by the sword since he started his political career by promoting the false birtherism claim. :)
 
The funniest part of this is that Crowdstrike is a completely discredited conspiracy theory.

I guess for Trump, it's a matter of live by the sword, die by the sword since he started his political career by promoting the false birtherism claim. :)

Truth is anathema to Trump.
 
Do you think the Republicans on the Intel Comittee are unable to ask questions?

Do you think this would have happened had Barr done an investigation as he should have?

Republicans can ask questions on the Intel committee but only Democrats get a copy of the transcripts. Republicans can look at the transcripts but must be in the presence of a Democrat staffer when they do. Devin Nunes reported last night however it took John Ratcliffe less than two minutes to completely destroy William Taylor's credibility. Democrats do not want the American people to see that every one of their witnesses have completely dismantled the Democrat narrative on quid pro quo and withholding military aid. They have nothing.
 
Republicans can ask questions on the Intel committee but only Democrats get a copy of the transcripts. Republicans can look at the transcripts but must be in the presence of a Democrat staffer when they do. Devin Nunes reported last night however it took John Ratcliffe less than two minutes to completely destroy William Taylor's credibility. Democrats do not want the American people to see that every one of their witnesses have completely dismantled the Democrat narrative on quid pro quo and withholding military aid. They have nothing.

None of that matters to the rabid anti-Trump faction.

The House is going to vote to impeach. There's no if or maybe in that, they WILL vote to impeach.

Not because there's an impeachable offense, but because they NEED TO in order to try and hurt the President's reelection chances. It's the only shot they have of beating him.

What's funny is that they don't see what's going to happen. Trump is just the kind of guy who will go out there and tell his supporters he's been "impeached". And yet he's still standing there as their President. Despite the lying, cheating, stealing and dishonest efforts of the D's, he is still The President of the United States.

That's going to put some red in the cheeks of the D candidate(s). *spank!*

The one thing the D's aren't seeing is that the second they pass articles of impeachment, the economy is going to tank. Anyone who can't see that coming is insane.

Think about that. The DEMOCRATS ARE GOING TO FUCK OVER THE AMERICAN PEOPLE and yet somehow they think it's a good idea to SERIOUSLY hurt the citizenry financially. And what's worse, some people believe them when they tell everyone it's for the best.

And again, it's not going to work because Trump can easily point to the timing and show how it's the DEMOCRATS that fucked them over. The economy was running smoothly with jobs, income, stability, and a rosy outlook for the future. And then the D's voted to impeach and the economy instantly tanked. Oh, and don't forget to vote...

*spank!*
 
Harpy looks into his crystal ball, just before Halloween...

The economy did not tank when Bill Clinton was impeached. The economy tanked a decade later, when the Deplorables were in power.

If the economy tanks again, under another Deplorable President, it will have far more to do with his tariff wars than him being held accountable for trying to rig an election through extortion using Congressionally appropriated funds.

And, yeah, the Senate will probably let him off the hook, so we will have to deal with his sleazy behavior at least all through another election and possibly even another term, but if the economy tanks while he is in office, that will be on him, his deficit, and his tariff wars.
 
The economy did not tank when Bill Clinton was impeached. The economy tanked a decade later, when the Deplorables were in power.

If the economy tanks again, under another Deplorable President, it will have far more to do with his tariff wars than him being held accountable for trying to rig an election through extortion using Congressionally appropriated funds.

And, yeah, the Senate will probably let him off the hook, so we will have to deal with his sleazy behavior at least all through another election and possibly even another term, but if the economy tanks while he is in office, that will be on him, his deficit, and his tariff wars.


You think the people whose 401K's just evaporated will CARE ABOUT THAT?

Next, go back and look at the market the past few weeks and notice when it did an unexpected downturn - right when the D's announced the whistleblower had damning evidence. And when the next witness had damning evidence too. And the next one. And the next.

See a pattern?

The people will see the articles of impeachment and how the markets tanked when they were put forward. Trump will point out that the economy was doing fine, and then the FUCKING DEMOCRATS SCREWED THEM OVER.

The SAME democrats who want to ban fracking and the jobs that go with it, raise their taxes to give money and aid to ILLEGAL aliens, and who have been repeatedly caught scheming and manipulating the system to enrich themselves at the people's and nation's expense.

And you think after all of that, INDEPENDENTS are going to vote D?

http://giphygifs.s3.amazonaws.com/media/9you7hX7ZEUxO/giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
More conjecture by Harpy at his crystal ball...

I honestly don't know how the Independents will react. My advocacy all along has been for Congress not to triangulate about political ramifications when a lying President is spitting in their face.

So I and many others told our reps to stand up to the fucking bully and not worry about the political consequences.

Your crystal ball may be right or may be wrong, but the bastard is going to be held accountable by at least on branch of government.
 
I honestly don't know how the Independents will react. My advocacy all along has been for Congress not to triangulate about political ramifications when a lying President is spitting in their face.

So I and many others told our reps to stand up to the fucking bully and not worry about the political consequences.

Your crystal ball may be right or may be wrong, but the bastard is going to be held accountable by at least on branch of government.

Accountable for WHAT?

You have no actual evidence of anything "criminal" so why is Trump being "held accountable"?

Think about that. You're all in on punishing someone for NOT DOING ANYTHING WRONG. And yet, you think this is ok...
 
Republicans can ask questions on the Intel committee but only Democrats get a copy of the transcripts. Republicans can look at the transcripts but must be in the presence of a Democrat staffer when they do. Devin Nunes reported last night however it took John Ratcliffe less than two minutes to completely destroy William Taylor's credibility. Democrats do not want the American people to see that every one of their witnesses have completely dismantled the Democrat narrative on quid pro quo and withholding military aid. They have nothing.



They call us deplorable. What's happening now is, the dummocrats, by doing everything behinds the scenes, behind closed doors, are trying to shape the opinion of the American people before the facts are available. If the Senate doesn't give the DUMZ a taste of their own medicine it will be judicial travisty. And to think, this whole delima took place because of a well orchestrated coup by the Obama admin. What ever happened to the Horowitz report?
 
Republicans can ask questions on the Intel committee but only Democrats get a copy of the transcripts. Republicans can look at the transcripts but must be in the presence of a Democrat staffer when they do. Devin Nunes reported last night however it took John Ratcliffe less than two minutes to completely destroy William Taylor's credibility. Democrats do not want the American people to see that every one of their witnesses have completely dismantled the Democrat narrative on quid pro quo and withholding military aid. They have nothing.
The aid was withheld until they began a smear campaign. Who cares if Ukraine knew that or not?
 
They call us deplorable. What's happening now is, the dummocrats, by doing everything behinds the scenes, behind closed doors, are trying to shape the opinion of the American people before the facts are available. If the Senate doesn't give the DUMZ a taste of their own medicine it will be judicial travisty. And to think, this whole delima took place because of a well orchestrated coup by the Obama admin. What ever happened to the Horowitz report?

Lindsey Graham says he is going to introduce a resolution:



"This resolution puts the Senate on record condemning the House. ... Here's the point of the resolution: Any impeachment vote based on this process, to me, is illegitimate, is unconstitutional, and should be dismissed in the Senate without a trial,"



https://thehill.com/homenews/senate...solution-condemning-house-impeachment-inquiry
 
Lindsey Graham says he is going to introduce a resolution:



"This resolution puts the Senate on record condemning the House. ... Here's the point of the resolution: Any impeachment vote based on this process, to me, is illegitimate, is unconstitutional, and should be dismissed in the Senate without a trial,"


That's another one of those cute little Deplorable legal theories. If the Senate tries dismissing the case without the trial required by the Constitution, it will go to the Supreme Court.
 
Your second point is crucial and has been largely unexamined. That the DOJ abdicated its responsibility in that regard is more evidence of corruption.

Corruption, ironically, evidenced by Atty General Barr not pursuing corruption among the country's politicians. The Shokin Predicament.

Except for the literal fact that the DoJ currently has active investigations into not just politician corruption, but maybe even what'll eventually wash out to be outright sedition.

You're just showing again that your socialist partisan ass doesn't give a flying fuck about facts. Which is obviously hot for you as long as there're other partisan pukes who get off on your repugnant exhibitionism.
 
Accountable for WHAT?

You have no actual evidence of anything "criminal" so why is Trump being "held accountable"?

Think about that. You're all in on punishing someone for NOT DOING ANYTHING WRONG. And yet, you think this is ok...

Thanks for sharing your opinion...
 
The funniest part of this is that Crowdstrike is a completely discredited conspiracy theory.

Really? How so? Can you explain in your own words, or maybe just cite where you're mimicking that from?
 
The Usual Suspects have trotted out virtually every single Fox 'n Friends "Deny, Deflect, Distort" talking points in record time this morning.
 
The Usual Suspects have trotted out virtually every single Fox 'n Friends "Deny, Deflect, Distort" talking points in record time this morning.

I know, right??

It's hysterical.

Funny they aren't crying about "hearsay" anymore. ;)
 
I know, right??

It's hysterical.

Funny they aren't crying about "hearsay" anymore. ;)

They've done "no official transcript", "but but rule of law", "not open to the public", "radical bureaucrats with their own agendas", throwing stuff at the wall and praying something....ANYTHING...will stick.

Vetty, Connie, Arpy, Contrifag, and the "Permanently Disabled" malingerer....all singing from the same hymnal.
 
Back
Top