Whistleblower

[bigsly]

What happened to the object of this thread, the "Whistleblower" whose alleged inside info started it all? Any word on when he testifies? Anybody? Why are all these other folks not afraid to secretly air their laundry behind closed doors, off limits to both the public and the press, but the "Whistleblower" is so obviously reluctant to even do that? No news from the op?

Thank God we have leakers feeding The Democracy Dies in Darkness Post partisan snippets of all the secret shenanigans going on so we know what's really happening...

/sarcasm

 

[bigsly]

The House will partisanly impeach just as the Senate will partisanly refuse to convict.

Play stupid partisan games, get stupid partisan results.

 

[HisArpy]

What happened to the object of this thread, the "Whistleblower" whose alleged inside info started it all? Any word on when he testifies? Anybody? Why are all these other folks not afraid to secretly air their laundry behind closed doors, off limits to both the public and the press, but the "Whistleblower" is so obviously reluctant to even do that? No news from the op?

Thank God we have leakers feeding The Democracy Dies in Darkness Post partisan snippets of all the secret shenanigans going on so we know what's really happening...

/sarcasm

Schiff has said there's no need for the Whistleblower to testify.

 

[coati]

Schiff has said there's no need for the Whistleblower to testify.

Well, yeah, he already pointed out what the main issue is and who should be questioned. He gave an excellent road map for the Intelligence Committee to follow.

It is not necessary for him to put his life at further risk, just as it was not necessary for Deep Throat to reveal his identity. Do you understand why we have a Whistleblower law and why we protect their identity?

Trump has already labelled him a spy who deserves execution.

 

[coati]

What happened to the object of this thread, the "Whistleblower" whose alleged inside info started it all? Any word on when he testifies? Anybody? Why are all these other folks not afraid to secretly air their laundry behind closed doors, off limits to both the public and the press, but the "Whistleblower" is so obviously reluctant to even do that? No news from the op?

Thank God we have leakers feeding The Democracy Dies in Darkness Post partisan snippets of all the secret shenanigans going on so we know what's really happening...

/sarcasm

For the umpteenth time, impeachment is not a trial. The whistleblower is not required to testify, especially when the Deplorables are itching to out him and destroy his life. His testimony is not needed-- he simply provided the roadmap, just like Deep Throat did.

The Articles will include the underlying testimony. The Intelligence Committee sessions are not required to become another grandstanding event for Deplorables.

So dry your eyes and focus on the Senate consideration of whether to convict.

 

[Adre]

And there’s no record of Trump ever lying, right?


(I mean if you don’t count the 13,400 documented little fibs.)

So it's ok to ACTUALLY LIE about someone you believe is a liar?

What a wonderful human being you turned out to be...

It’s not unusual that you missed the point. Let me be more specific. How do you know Trump(a proven serial liar) is telling the truth to Sondland?

 

[Aglaopheme]

For the umpteenth time, impeachment is not a trial. The whistleblower is not required to testify, especially when the Deplorables are itching to out him and destroy his life. His testimony is not needed-- he simply provided the roadmap, just like Deep Throat did.

The Articles will include the underlying testimony. The Intelligence Committee sessions are not required to become another grandstanding event for Deplorables.

So dry your eyes and focus on the Senate consideration of whether to convict.

...with Chief Justice Roberts presiding.

 

[icanhelp1]

What happened to the object of this thread, the "Whistleblower" whose alleged inside info started it all? Any word on when he testifies? Anybody? Why are all these other folks not afraid to secretly air their laundry behind closed doors, off limits to both the public and the press, but the "Whistleblower" is so obviously reluctant to even do that? No news from the op?

Thank God we have leakers feeding The Democracy Dies in Darkness Post partisan snippets of all the secret shenanigans going on so we know what's really happening...

/sarcasm

I believe the whistleblower over embellished his/her statement, made up shit and slid it to the Schiff team. Now that the real narrative is out in memorandum form for all to see, Schiff is caught propagating and even embellishing a false narrative from the whistleblower and at all cost has to bury anything and everything to do with the whistleblower for fear of perjury. Schiff is caught between a rock and a hard place. If the impeachment goes forward to the trial phase that whistleblower will have to testify and the reality of how Schiff lied about the whole set up will come out. Schiff is still cleaning up the mess in his pants when Trump declassified the actual phone call. Now it's protect the identity of whistleblower at all cost but in reality it's about poor Adam's ass on the line. I hope it goes to the trial phase and a healthy cross examination of all these behind the door testimonies and every witness is brought before the senate. The Dummo's have too much to lose to continue pursuing impeachment.

 

[icanhelp1]

Well, yeah, he already pointed out what the main issue is and who should be questioned. He gave an excellent road map for the Intelligence Committee to follow.

It is not necessary for him to put his life at further risk, just as it was not necessary for Deep Throat to reveal his identity. Do you understand why we have a Whistleblower law and why we protect their identity?

Trump has already labelled him a spy who deserves execution.

Unless the witness ( whistleblower ) was found to have perjured him/herself, then all bets are off!

 

[Aglaopheme]

Ambassador Sondland tried to explain to me that President Trump is a businessman. When a businessman is about to sign a check to someone who owes him something, he said, the businessman asks that person to pay up before signing the check.”

From Taylor’s opening statement.


And, what’s this?

McConnell denied telling Mr. Trump his July phone call with the Ukrainian president was "innocent," as the president indicated earlier this month.

Asked on Tuesday whether he believes the president has handled the U.S. relationship with Ukraine "perfectly," McConnell told CBS News he had not spoken to the president about the July 25 call.

When CBS News asked on Tuesday if the president was lying about the supposed interaction, McConnell replied, "You'd have to ask him. I don't recall any conversations with the president about that phone call."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-...G1oN1ZGcF9rMVZYc0dQeUFfOFlTdl9Rb0hELXdKMVBDeg..

 

[icanhelp1]

...with Chief Justice Roberts presiding.

You forget, the Durham investigation and the Horowitz report are due out and it goes to the heart of the Ukraine scandal to include sleepy Joe and Hunter.

 

[Aglaopheme]

I believe the whistleblower over embellished his/her statement, made up shit and slid it to the Schiff team. Now that the real narrative is out in memorandum form for all to see, Schiff is caught propagating and even embellishing a false narrative from the whistleblower and at all cost has to bury anything and everything to do with the whistleblower for fear of perjury. Schiff is caught between a rock and a hard place. If the impeachment goes forward to the trial phase that whistleblower will have to testify and the reality of how Schiff lied about the whole set up will come out. Schiff is still cleaning up the mess in his pants when Trump declassified the actual phone call. Now it's protect the identity of whistleblower at all cost but in reality it's about poor Adam's ass on the line. I hope it goes to the trial phase and a healthy cross examination of all these behind the door testimonies and every witness is brought before the senate. The Dummo's have too much to lose to continue pursuing impeachment.

“There were 3 conditions.”

Keep dreaming, cupcake.

 

[Aglaopheme]

You forget, the Durham investigation and the Horowitz report are due out and it goes to the heart of the Ukraine scandal to include sleepy Joe and Hunter.

Three conditions.

 

[bigsly]

So dry your eyes and focus on the Senate consideration of whether to convict.

Already covered:

The House will partisanly impeach just as the Senate will partisanly refuse to convict.

Any other totally irrelevant tips to just as meaninglessly offer, wannabe?

 

[icanhelp1]

“There were 3 conditions.”

Keep dreaming, cupcake.

Unlike Schiff's kangaroo court, the Senate, along with Chief Justice Roberts presiding will have full court authority to subpoena and cross examine. It will be a much more orderly procedure than this fucktussel Schiff is running.

 

[Aglaopheme]

WHAT "witnesses"?

EVERY DAMN ONE OF THEM didn't "witness" ANY FUCKING THING.

Let’s start with these two, shall we?
Trump
&
Mulvaney

 

[Aglaopheme]

Unlike Schiff's kangaroo court, the Senate, along with Chief Justice Roberts presiding will have full court authority to subpoena and cross examine. It will be a much more orderly procedure than this fucktussel Schiff is running.

Do you think the Republicans on the Intel Comittee are unable to ask questions?

Do you think this would have happened had Barr done an investigation as he should have?

 

[RobDownSouth]

Timmeh is really struggling in this thread.
He needs some BroCavalry succoring STAT.

 

[Conager]

Do you think the Republicans on the Intel Comittee are unable to ask questions?

Do you think this would have happened had Barr done an investigation as he should have?

Since the issue at hand has nothing to do with intelligence, and Schiff has none, why is the faux impeachment inquiry being handled by the intelligence committee?

I mean, other than Schiff's proven facility for lying, fabricating, and falsely claiming he has seen secret evidence?

 

[Saint Peter]

faux impeachment

Blinders on. Full speed ahead.

 

[Conager]

Blinders on. Full speed ahead.

Not at all. The nation has no access to this pretend impeachment inquiry. It might very well develop into one and they can certainly impeach him for anything that they want to. . . but politically, it would be absolutely stupid to just announce: Ta Da! here are the articles of impeachment. Let's vote.

What are they going to do if they decide to have actual impeachment hearings? Have all these witnesses back and have them repeat whatever it was they said in secret? Selectively edited transcripts after the Dems howled about minor, meaningless redactions in the Mueller report?

 

[icanhelp1]

Since the issue at hand has nothing to do with intelligence, and Schiff has none, why is the faux impeachment inquiry being handled by the intelligence committee?

I mean, other than Schiff's proven facility for lying, fabricating, and falsely claiming he has seen secret evidence?

This is how Nancy runs thing( no rhyme or reason ) If you use common sense (which tHe DUMMOS DON'T ) you would think the House Foreign Affairs committee would be doing all the behind the door sneaky testimonies. What does the intel committee have to do with it? Or maybe the House Armed Services committee. In past impeachment proceedings articles of impeachment are formulated and investigated in the Judicial Committee. Nadler must have fucked up the collusion case. Pretty soon they're going to run out of committees.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Do you think the Republicans on the Intel Comittee are unable to ask questions?

Do you think this would have happened had Barr done an investigation as he should have?

Your second point is crucial and has been largely unexamined. That the DOJ abdicated its responsibility in that regard is more evidence of corruption.

Corruption, ironically, evidenced by Atty General Barr not pursuing corruption among the country's politicians. The Shokin Predicament.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Not at all. The nation has no access to this pretend impeachment inquiry. It might very well develop into one and they can certainly impeach him for anything that they want to. . . but politically, it would be absolutely stupid to just announce: Ta Da! here are the articles of impeachment. Let's vote.

What are they going to do if they decide to have actual impeachment hearings? Have all these witnesses back and have them repeat whatever it was they said in secret? Selectively edited transcripts after the Dems howled about minor, meaningless redactions in the Mueller report?

Elected officials are doing their jobs. Sorry you're not getting the public circus you wanted, but this is just the impeachment phase, not the trial itself.

But hai, don't stop believin'.....hold on to your fee-fees.

 

[coati]

Since the issue at hand has nothing to do with intelligence, and Schiff has none, why is the faux impeachment inquiry being handled by the intelligence committee?

I mean, other than Schiff's proven facility for lying, fabricating, and falsely claiming he has seen secret evidence?

Schiff is kicking Deplorable ass! Trump will be impeached, based upon credible verification of what took place by Trump appointees.

So what if the Senate wimps out on conviction? Schiff is doing the right thing, without regard to all the political hand-wringing.