LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Whistleblower

Rightguide said:
So when will the whistleblower testify? Oh wait, the Whistleblower wrote a memo saying, it was “standard practice” for the “White House situation room to produce a word-for-word transcript that memorializes the call.” Of course when he said this he didn't expect the President to release the transcript to the public. The memo goes on to say the transcript was being, “treated very sensitively.” It also included the statement, “The President did not raise security assistance” during the call.
Click to expand...



You have to wonder if the whistleblower embellished his take on Trump's phone call and shit his drawers when Trump released the actual transcript. Now schiff has to jump through hoops to hide the whistleblower's account. That could explain the second and third revised editions, maybe to tone it down a little and of course everything done behind closed doors.
 
bigsly said:
Like you expect crooked prosecutor Sackofschiff to act any differently? That's not news. News would be him conducting the interview in an objective, honest, forthright manner. My point was to your quoting "the secret interview" crap, because, obviously, it wasn't a "secret interview". Unless you actually fantasize any instance that includes Congresscritters and their staffs - minimum - possibly keeping"secret" anything. You simply and maliciously used "secret" to try to tilt slant more to your bias.

You do EXACTLY what you love to rip Sackofschiff a new butthole for. God's probably going to arrange for you and Sackofschiff to share a 10x12 in hell for eternity.

Remember: don't drop the soap!
Click to expand...
Loon A Tick
 
icanhelpQue said:
You have to wonder if the whistleblower embellished his take on Trump's phone call and shit his drawers when Trump released the actual transcript.
Click to expand...

Que can't be serious. Que should know there was no quote actual transcript unquote, merely a sanitized memorandum passed off as a "transcript" to gullible WatTwaffles like Que.
 
RobDownSouth said:
Que can't be serious. Que should know there was no quote actual transcript unquote, merely a sanitized memorandum passed off as a "transcript" to gullible WatTwaffles like Que.
Click to expand...
however it went down, the 'transcript' confirmed the points the whistleblower stated and which were corroborated by senior officials before the w.b's allegations were made public
 
butters said:
however it went down, the 'transcript' confirmed the points the whistleblower stated and which were corroborated by senior officials before the w.b's allegations were made public
Click to expand...

The transscript didn't confirm anything except Trump's version of events.:rolleyes:
 
zipman said:
LOL, he just denied there was a quid pro quo.

These morons can't even get their lies straight within a small group.

Bwahahahaha! :D
Click to expand...

the people who believe their lies are far more dangerous than the retards they're following :(
 
From Sonland’s opening statement.

attachment.php


attachment.php
 
Last edited:
In a terse statement issued Thursday evening, Trump's personal lawyer, Jay Sekulow, said, "The President's legal counsel was not involved in acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney's press briefing."
Click to expand...

source
 
Isn't it so partisanly convenient how socialists/progressives/Democrats always exalt how they won the 2016 election's popular vote and Hillary should be President, that the Constitution's electoral college dictate needs to be amended because, DEMOCRACY!?

Yet, when socialist/progressive/Democrat/$whore Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is asked wouldn't it be better to allow DEMOCRACY! to decide Trump's fate by letting the 2020 election rule, she cites the Constitution as to who it dictates who's responsible for impeachment, not the voters.

Truth depends on consistency.

While still she refuses to let the people's House vote on the impeacement issue, choosing instead to keep the socialist/progressive/Democrat "investigation" completely and partisanly in their house.

Democracy! good for me, not for thee.

Pelosi: 'The Voters Are Not Going to Decide' Impeachment Issue
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/articl...voters-are-not-going-decide-impeachment-issue
 
zipman said:
So Mulvaney told the truth, and then tried to walk it back.

This just keeps getting better. :D
Click to expand...

Mulvaney reminds me of a creepy ventriloquist dummy who can't help but tattle on the ventriloquist. There is something about Mulvaney's jaw and his posture that really completes that scenario.
 
Soland part of the Deep State? HA!

He's a crony capitalist privateer who ONLY holds his überprivileged position because he contributed more than $1 million to Trump's last campaign. You know, exactly like Obama and every President before has also repaid such pukes. It's nice, though, reading socialists/progressives/Democrats now holding this repugnant juicer up as somehow justifying their bigoted views, I guess.

Btw: the Deep State consists of career federal government employees whose repulsive political partisanship to the statist quo is more vital to them than simple, INDEPENDENT, INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY-loving duty to their country OVER ALL PARTISAN POLITICS.

Eg: Trump is not a Deep Stater simply by the fact he's only been part of the federal government for not even 3 years, yet. Joe Biden, otoh, is a ranking Deep Stater (by smell as well as status), corruptfully earned by well over half of his 77-year old life fully immersed in the statist quo of repugnantly partisan, Deep State politics.
 
Career federal employees work through changes in Administration under whatever President is elected, whatever party is in charge. That's not "partisan." That's "duty to country."

bigsly said:
Soland part of the Deep State? HA!

Btw: the Deep State consists of career federal government employees whose repulsive political partisanship to the statist quo is more vital to them than simple, INDEPENDENT, INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY-loving duty to their country OVER ALL PARTISAN POLITICS.

Eg: Trump is not a Deep Stater simply by the fact he's only been part of the federal government for not even 3 years, yet. Joe Biden, otoh, is a ranking Deep Stater (by smell as well as status), corruptfully earned by well over half of his 77-year old life fully immersed in the statist quo of repugnantly partisan, Deep State politics.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
ADD/ADHD And Writing
Replies
12
Views
209
Statius
S
R
Is there a demand for brutally honest advice on Literotica?
Replies
15
Views
361
LMWM321
L
A
Help find a story
Replies
0
Views
68
Anthony99218
A
CaseyBlack
Another rant
Replies
11
Views
679
live4thebj
live4thebj
D
Butterflies in stomach
Replies
0
Views
91
Draven_Crow13
D
Back
Top