dolf
Ex porn
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Posts
- 78,943
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is the same loser who’s whining Minneapolis charged half a million to protect his criminal ass when he was there recently. And yet, the con artist has no problem billing the taxpayers for his weekly golf games or charging the Secret Service to use golf carts.
This is the same loser who’s whining Minneapolis charged half a million to protect his criminal ass when he was there recently. And yet, the con artist has no problem billing the taxpayers for his weekly golf games or charging the Secret Service to use golf carts.
You mean the same socialist-ruled Minneapolis that's NEVER charged any other President for security coverage?
This is simply and plainly just another putrid partisan action supported by putrid partisan lemmings who have not a single care for honest, objective reporting.
The city has historically not charged for similar events in the past, although the scale of those events were “much smaller” than Thursday’s rally, Bergstrom said.
In February 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama held an election rally at Target Center that was attended by 20,000 supporters. The Star Tribune has requested but not yet received data about the city’s security expenses for that event, and who paid for them.
The message from City Hall to the candidate at the time was vastly different. Then-Mayor R.T. Rybak was Obama’s campaign chairman in Minnesota. In an e-mail Wednesday, Rybak, now the president and CEO of the Minneapolis Foundation, said he could not remember how the costs for the rally were handled.
Rybak said he had previously raised concern about city expenses related to political rallies, saying “the costs incurred by local communities are completely out of line.” He said he supported Frey’s comments on the issue.
Other cities have unsuccessfully tried to get the Trump campaign to pay for city costs after rallies, with at least 10 of them requesting reimbursements. Federal election rules don’t require campaigns to reimburse cities for security costs.
http://www.startribune.com/target-c...sts-would-be-campaign-contribution/562665222/
Fact is, the Trump campaign and the Target Center did reach a financial agreement, which the socialist Mayor partisanly PUBLICLY put himself in the middle of with a new, absurdly outlandish price, but which has now reverted back to the original agreement that the Trump campaign agreed to pay.
And since you obviously concern yourself so much with FEC rules (as long as they apply to the other repugnant political partisan side), don't pass up reading the last line, there.
Minnesotans are capitalists. Trump needs to cough up.You mean the same socialist-ruled Minneapolis that's NEVER charged any other President for security coverage?
This is simply and plainly just another putrid partisan action supported by putrid partisan lemmings who have not a single care for honest, objective reporting.
http://www.startribune.com/target-c...sts-would-be-campaign-contribution/562665222/
Fact is, the Trump campaign and the Target Center did reach a financial agreement, which the socialist Mayor partisanly PUBLICLY put himself in the middle of with a new, absurdly outlandish price, but which has now reverted back to the original agreement that the Trump campaign agreed to pay.
And since you obviously concern yourself so much with FEC rules (as long as they apply to the other repugnant political partisan side), don't pass up reading the last line, there.
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. The price hasn’t changed.
Trump will likely stiff Minneapolis and AEG as is his pattern.
For the record, not even Trump is claiming Obama paid nothing.
You’re really bad at this.
...You know the ONLY reason I do like you?
Socialist/progressive hack you naturally are has absolutely no modesty about eagerly exposing your obviously purebred, intentionally disingenuous and calculated deceitfulness.
It's truly the ONLY thing honest about you.