███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

[adrina]

Revisionist history so you can throw a hissy fit all while conveniently ignoring the very current very real issues with Eric and Ivanka.

You want me to jump aboard your hypocritical histrionics so you can carry forth the diversion from the reality that 45 used and is using the office of president for his personal gain. And actively tried and is trying to cover it up.

Grow up. This is real life we're talking about. Not some stupid glib propaganda talking points.

It's like you live in the Trump bubble.

You guys sure like to jack off wherever 45 leads you.

You are well trained.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Before you get emotionally carried away again and start promoting/counting on this latest bozo to assuage your pathetic Trump crush in any way, Charlie "Aglapheme" Brown, you should probably get to know him a bit so as not to embarrass yourself any more (if that's possible).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Sondland

She must have really hurt your feelings somewhere along the road. She posts a simple fact and you attack her then post a wiki link? You're a basic one.

 

[Klinkster]

You guys sure like to jack off wherever 45 leads you.

You are well trained.

I shall write you down as “incapable of answering a question?”
And note that you are still a ‘whiner’.

 

[jaF0]

Where the Hell was everybody during the 7 hours between posts 235 and 236?

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Investigate him for what? What's the predicate?

He was getting paid to sit on the Board and advise. Ever heard of it? Companies everywhere do it all the time. Biden has a law degree and lots of experience in finance. You want someone to advise you on your image? Pay Donnie Deutsch to be a Board member. You obviously know absolutely nothing about the business world. You can hire anyone you want from anywhere to be your brain trust. If the Company just wants to say "We pay Angelina Jolie" because they like her image, that's their prerogative. She doesn't have to do shit if they don't ask her to.

Maybe they just wanted a Biden. Look, we have the son of the US VP. Helps get investors or what not. It's called private companies doing whatever the fuck they want with their own business.

If you can't allege something criminal, then shut up.

I mean, it's not like Biden was working IN THE WHITE HOUSE having NO EXPERIENCE WHATSOEVER in government, then getting all kinds of perks from China to help with his own company.

You're an idiot.

Is investigating why a son of the VP of the USA was getting $50K per month, and some reports $83K per month, from a foreign company, in a business he knows nothing about, and in a country he knows nothing about, sufficient cause to investigate someone, whether he is a political opponent, or not?

_____YES
X
_____NO

This ain't rocket science.

 

[Klinkster]

Advise on what?
Again, he has NO experience with gas or oil.
He has NO experience with drilling or fracking.
He has NO experience with Ukraine, and does NOT speak the language.
He has quite an image....kicked out on the Navy, for drugs.
He DID have a daddy, that was the VP.
And daddy did say he got the AG fired in Ukraine that was investigating the company his little boy was working for. On video.

So....what did he do? Why did they hire him?
You seem to care about that Don Jr does, even though what he does or was possibly going to do in Russia....he builds building....he actually has experience.

Gee.....double standard here?

Fact is, I don’t know if there was something criminal....but I’d like to know one way or the other, in spite of the fact you don’t give a flying fuck because his name is Biden, not Trump.
That is the difference. I don’t need to allege shit, and no, I won’t shut up.

Get a fucking grip.

Investigate him for what? What's the predicate?

He was getting paid to sit on the Board and advise. Ever heard of it? Companies everywhere do it all the time. Biden has a law degree and lots of experience in finance. You want someone to advise you on your image? Pay Donnie Deutsch to be a Board member. You obviously know absolutely nothing about the business world. You can hire anyone you want from anywhere to be your brain trust. If the Company just wants to say "We pay Angelina Jolie" because they like her image, that's their prerogative. She doesn't have to do shit if they don't ask her to.

Maybe they just wanted a Biden. Look, we have the son of the US VP. Helps get investors or what not. It's called private companies doing whatever the fuck they want with their own business.

If you can't allege something criminal, then shut up.

 

[Hal9000_]

What about...BIDEN?!

Look over there!

Trump has effectively dealt with all our enemies.

He killed bin Laden! Well, his son.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

So what? He doesn't need to know shit about gas or oil. Maybe they want him to help with buying other companies. Maybe they want his input on office decor. Maybe they want him to sit there looking handsome with a bunch of Ukrainians. Is that a crime? He doesn't have to know shit or do shit.

It's called translators, stupid.

Yeah, his father was Joe Biden. Not a crime. You know, like Ivanka TRUMP working in the WH even though she had ZERO experience in gov't. But that's ok, right?

You have no idea what you're blathering about. His company was not under investigation. And you're obviously too braindead to understand the actual facts about Biden and the CORRUPT AG everyone wanted fired.

Please. You're just a weak-minded Deplorable

Advise on what?
Again, he has NO experience with gas or oil.
He has NO experience with drilling or fracking.
He has NO experience with Ukraine, and does NOT speak the language.
He has quite an image....kicked out on the Navy, for drugs.
He DID have a daddy, that was the VP.
And daddy did say he got the AG fired in Ukraine that was investigating the company his little boy was working for. On video.

So....what did he do? Why did they hire him?
You seem to care about that Don Jr does, even though what he does or was possibly going to do in Russia....he builds building....he actually has experience.

Gee.....double standard here?

Fact is, I don’t know if there was something criminal....but I’d like to know one way or the other, in spite of the fact you don’t give a flying fuck because his name is Biden, not Trump.
That is the difference. I don’t need to allege shit, and no, I won’t shut up.

Get a fucking grip.

 

[about_average]

If they don't come up with some DAMNING proof of high crimes?? Not a super majority worth.

Like soliciting a foreign government to interfere with a US election, which Trump did
- July 27, 2016 - Asked Russia to provide illegally obtained emails belonging to Clinton (wasn't president so couldn't be impeached, but shows part of a pattern of disregard for the law)
- June 12, 2019 - Says he's accept help in the election from a foreign government, demonstrating, again, his disregard for the law
- July 25, 2019 - Asks Ukraine to manufacture dirt on a political opponent, yet again demonstrating disdain for US law
- October 3, 2019 - Trump asks China to investigate a political opponent to help his campaign, ignoring US law

So, yeah, high crimes have already been established.
-

The point is to scream, "OBSTRUCTION! It's not the (non)crime, it's the coverup!!"

Except obstruction of justice is a crime. That's why Martha Stewart was in prison.

 

[about_average]

Presumably, you are referring to the impeachment of Bill Clinton. There is neither similarity nor connection. Everybody in the country knew Blow Job Bill had committed a felony, and the question was whether or not that crime constituted a "High crime or misdemeanor." Personally, I thought it did not, and the Senate also thought that way.

IMO perjury, if not for national security reasons, is a high crime. He deserved to be impeached. He should have said, "Fuck off, none of your business." when asked about sex.

In the case of Trump, there is doubt as to whether he even committed a crime, let alone a "High crime or misdemeanor."

There is only doubt among people who can't read The Constitution or who don't care about it it since it would interfere with their good standing in then Trump Cult.

 

[about_average]

As far as the complaint we already know what was actually said on the cal....

Do we? The call was 30 minutes long. Read it out loud twice (to allow for translation time) and see if it takes you 30 minutes.

Cummings can subpoena the WH till he’s blue in the face, it will end up in court with the rest of them. No vote no cooperation. Nancy can change precedent so can the WH. Trump will have already served his second term and retired.

It's cute you think Trump would cooperate even then. He did everything he could to obstruct the Mueller investigation that was set up following the actual law.

Because it’s not for legislative purposes.

When you get around to reading the actual relevant statute you'll see "legislative purpose" isn't a requirement when requested by the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

So, you don't care that our VP at the time, got a AG in the Ukraine fired, who was investigating his son?
You don't care, that he may, or may not have got a job, that he knows nothing about?
Nothing fishy here? Not collusion?

Would you say the same if it was Don Jr?
Another yes or no, but you kinda already answered that.
And there is a word for what you are, by your answers, which seem to be adjusted by part affiliation.

Still looking for the porn ring under the pizza parlor.

Did you find Obama's birth certificate yet?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Advise on what?
Again, he has NO experience with gas or oil.
He has NO experience with drilling or fracking.
He has NO experience with Ukraine, and does NOT speak the language.
He has quite an image....kicked out on the Navy, for drugs.
He DID have a daddy, that was the VP.
And daddy did say he got the AG fired in Ukraine that was investigating the company his little boy was working for. On video.

So....what did he do? Why did they hire him?
You seem to care about that Don Jr does, even though what he does or was possibly going to do in Russia....he builds building....he actually has experience.

Gee.....double standard here?

Fact is, I don’t know if there was something criminal....but I’d like to know one way or the other, in spite of the fact you don’t give a flying fuck because his name is Biden, not Trump.
That is the difference. I don’t need to allege shit, and no, I won’t shut up.

Get a fucking grip.

https://nfldraftdiamonds.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Bobby-bonilla.jpg

 

[about_average]

As far as the complaint we already know what was actually said on the cal....

Do we? The call was 30 minutes long. Read it out loud twice (to allow for translation time) and see if it takes you 30 minutes.

Cummings can subpoena the WH till he’s blue in the face, it will end up in court with the rest of them. No vote no cooperation. Nancy can change precedent so can the WH. Trump will have already served his second term and retired.

It's cute you think Trump would cooperate even then. He did everything he could to obstruct the Mueller investigation that was set up following the actual law.

Is investigating why a son of the VP of the USA was getting $50K per month, and some reports $83K per month, from a foreign company, in a business he knows nothing about, and in a country he knows nothing about, sufficient cause to investigate someone, whether he is a political opponent, or not?

_____YES

_____NO

This ain't rocket science.

No.
Of course that didn't stop Ukraine from looking in to it and no evidence was found that anything nefarious was going on.
It was just an appearance of conflict of interest, which is not a crime nor corrupt.
The only "evidence" is from the same organization that started the Pizzagate BS.

 

[about_average]

So, you don't care that our VP at the time, got a AG in the Ukraine fired, who was investigating his son?

The US VP, plus the EU, the IMF, Ukrainian anti-corruption forces and others got him fired for not investigating Burisma.

 

[about_average]

Better yet, what was his qualifications?

Now you care about qualifications? LMAO
That's as hilarious as Turmp saying Schiff should be impeached for lying.

 

[icanhelp1]

Do we? The call was 30 minutes long. Read it out loud twice (to allow for translation time) and see if it takes you 30 minutes.

It's cute you think Trump would cooperate even then. He did everything he could to obstruct the Mueller investigation that was set up following the actual law.

When you get around to reading the actual relevant statute you'll see "legislative purpose" isn't a requirement when requested by the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.

"LEGITIMATE LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE"

 

[icanhelp1]

Do we? The call was 30 minutes long. Read it out loud twice (to allow for translation time) and see if it takes you 30 minutes.

It's cute you think Trump would cooperate even then. He did everything he could to obstruct the Mueller investigation that was set up following the actual law.


No.
Of course that didn't stop Ukraine from looking in to it and no evidence was found that anything nefarious was going on.
It was just an appearance of conflict of interest, which is not a crime nor corrupt.
The only "evidence" is from the same organization that started the Pizzagate BS.

You can't impeach by committee. The people's house has to represent all americans. Adam Schiff is a proven liar. Nadler, Schiff, Cummings, Neal and Pelosi are not representative of all the American people. This is impeachment by committee and unconstitutional.

 

[icanhelp1]

Do we? The call was 30 minutes long. Read it out loud twice (to allow for translation time) and see if it takes you 30 minutes.

It's cute you think Trump would cooperate even then. He did everything he could to obstruct the Mueller investigation that was set up following the actual law.


No.
Of course that didn't stop Ukraine from looking in to it and no evidence was found that anything nefarious was going on.
It was just an appearance of conflict of interest, which is not a crime nor corrupt.
The only "evidence" is from the same organization that started the Pizzagate BS.

He did nothing to obstruct the Mueller report, in actuality he facilitated everything they asked for and Mueller found no conspiracy. The Mueller report was founded on fraud and false pretence. People will be going to jail. The only obstruction was Hillary Clinton.

 

[jaF0]

Nadler, Schiff, Cummings, Neal and Pelosi are not representative of all the American people.

Incorrect. They are all elected officials.

Mueller found no conspiracy.

Incorrect. He found that he as a prosecutor could not act, but that Congress could ... which they are.

 

[icanhelp1]

Incorrect. They are all elected officials.


THEY ARE NOT ALL THE ELECTED OFFICIALS



Incorrect. He found that he as a prosecutor could not act, but that Congress could ... which they are.

It was a DOJ document and was publicly released for reasons of transparency

 

[icanhelp1]

Incorrect. They are all elected officials.



Incorrect. He found that he as a prosecutor could not act, but that Congress could ... which they are.

As a prosecutor there is no such thing as a claim of 'exonerated' The Mueller report was unconstitutional.

 

[about_average]

You can't impeach by committee.

They are investigating in the committees to see if articles of impeachment are warranted, at which time they will be introduced and voted on by the house.

The people's house has to represent all americans. Adam Schiff is a proven liar. Nadler, Schiff, Cummings, Neal and Pelosi are not representative of all the American people. This is impeachment by committee and unconstitutional.

And Trump represents fewer than half the American people.
Not to mention that Pelosi was elected speaker by the people who represent the American people.
Then there's the fact that more American's support congress's investigation that are favorable of Trump.

 

[about_average]

He did nothing to obstruct the Mueller report

Quote where I said he obstructed the report?

 

[icanhelp1]

They are investigating in the committees to see if articles of impeachment are warranted, at which time they will be introduced and voted on by the house.
And Trump represents fewer than half the American people.
Not to mention that Pelosi was elected speaker by the people who represent the American people.
Then there's the fact that more American's support congress's investigation that are favorable of Trump.

Article I and article II separation of powers. What part of ALL the people don't you understand.

Trump is president!

Committees consist of two parties, only one is investigating, fair practice!

Nancy Pelosi is only acting in the interest of her base, unconstitutional!