Whistleblower

[RobDownSouth]

Comrade? I'm not a degenerate socialist like you.

YOU get your monthly welfare check from Uncle Sugar and you claim I am the "socialist", Comrade?

#CognitiveDissonance

 

[BotanyBoy]

YOU get your monthly welfare check from Uncle Sugar and you claim I am the "socialist", Comrade?

#CognitiveDissonance

Veterans benefits aren't socialism or welfare Rob

So no, no cognitive dissonance.

You still haven't looked up what the word socialism means have you??

 

[KeithD]

https://pics.me.me/michael-moore-mmflint-the-only-thing-left-to-decide-about-29452368.png

Yeah, I laughed when I first saw that.

It's interesting that he's called for his own execution--as a Russian spy.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Totally NOT Suspicious

Rudy Giuliani cancels paid appearance at Kremlin-backed summit in Armenia after report on him going

 

[Wrong Element]

I bet there are more than a few looking for the exit door right now in addition to Volker. It may free them up to be a little more forthcoming during their upcoming depositions.

I think this is where Trump's track record of "loyalty is a one-way street" is going to bite him in the ass. No one is going down with this ship voluntarily.

 

[HisArpy]

Did not concede that at all. ProudBoy and Harpy were nagging and demanding that other posters play their little word games, just so they could get the porn board attention they craved.

So, I boiled it down to the only thing they can comprehend, the exercise of raw power.

As Trump himself said, he could shoot somebody on 5th Avenue and his base would keep supporting him. That's what happens in these mass psychosis situations.

I believe that you need to do a little bit of thinking on this.

Put into context, Schiff's "parody" of the transcript was, in legal parlance, fabrication of evidence.

And you're good to go with impeachment based on fabricated evidence?

 

[KeithD]

I think this is where Trump's track record of "loyalty is a one-way street" is going to bite him in the ass. No one is going down with this ship voluntarily.

What's maddening is that a lot have journeyed far down this street already when they should have figured Trump out years ago.

 

[Kantarii]

I believe that you need to do a little bit of thinking on this.

Put into context, Schiff's "parody" of the transcript was, in legal parlance, fabrication of evidence.

And you're good to go with impeachment based on fabricated evidence?

Or second hand hearsay.

 

[Adre]

I believe that you need to do a little bit of thinking on this.

Put into context, Schiff's "parody" of the transcript was, in legal parlance, fabrication of evidence.

And you're good to go with impeachment based on fabricated evidence?

So you’re implying that the members (most of them lawyers) will base their impeachment vote on Schiff’s obvious attempt at parody.

 

[jaF0]

It'd be funny as Hell if this came from Mel.

 

[HisArpy]

So you’re implying that the members (most of them lawyers) will base their impeachment vote on Schiff’s obvious attempt at parody.

No, I"m saying that the desire to move forward on impeachment is based totally on fabricated evidence and emotion rather than the actual necessary basis for bringing impeachment.

In a nutshell, impeachment DEMANDS that the offenses committed are an abuse of the office for which no one can be allowed to remain in office after committing them.

A false or fabricated offense violates that requirement. ANYONE who supports such falsehoods violates the concept of both justice and impeachment. ANYONE who supports the chairman of the Intelligence committee fabricating evidence in order to move forward on impeachment doesn't support justice.

Regardless of the personal opinion of the worth of the individual in the office, or any other claimed offenses by that person, bearing false witness in order to pursue punishment is anathema to any civilized nation and it's citizens.

Think on that.

 

[Kantarii]

No, I"m saying that the desire to move forward on impeachment is based totally on fabricated evidence and emotion rather than the actual necessary basis for bringing impeachment.

In a nutshell, impeachment DEMANDS that the offenses committed are an abuse of the office for which no one can be allowed to remain in office after committing them.

A false or fabricated offense violates that requirement. ANYONE who supports such falsehoods violates the concept of both justice and impeachment. ANYONE who supports the chairman of the Intelligence committee fabricating evidence in order to move forward on impeachment doesn't support justice.

Regardless of the personal opinion of the worth of the individual in the office, or any other claimed offenses by that person, bearing false witness in order to pursue punishment is anathema to any civilized nation and it's citizens.

Think on that.

The Left is getting their hopes up that Trump will be removed from office. To date, no sitting president has been removed from office after being tried in the Senate.
There must be a reason why, right?

 

[doowdniw]

No, I"m saying that the desire to move forward on impeachment is based totally on fabricated evidence and emotion rather than the actual necessary basis for bringing impeachment.

In a nutshell, impeachment DEMANDS that the offenses committed are an abuse of the office for which no one can be allowed to remain in office after committing them.

A false or fabricated offense violates that requirement. ANYONE who supports such falsehoods violates the concept of both justice and impeachment. ANYONE who supports the chairman of the Intelligence committee fabricating evidence in order to move forward on impeachment doesn't support justice.

Regardless of the personal opinion of the worth of the individual in the office, or any other claimed offenses by that person, bearing false witness in order to pursue punishment is anathema to any civilized nation and it's citizens.

Think on that.

What's the purpose of an investigation?

 

[jaF0]

To date, no sitting president has been removed from office after being tried in the Senate.
There must be a reason why, right?

To date, no one has been as evil?

 

[Kantarii]

To date, no one has been as evil?

So what specific evils has Trump done to you?
Go on, regurgitate some of that CNN BS.

 

[Adre]

No, I"m saying that the desire to move forward on impeachment is based totally on fabricated evidence and emotion rather than the actual necessary basis for bringing impeachment.

In a nutshell, impeachment DEMANDS that the offenses committed are an abuse of the office for which no one can be allowed to remain in office after committing them.

A false or fabricated offense violates that requirement. ANYONE who supports such falsehoods violates the concept of both justice and impeachment. ANYONE who supports the chairman of the Intelligence committee fabricating evidence in order to move forward on impeachment doesn't support justice.

Regardless of the personal opinion of the worth of the individual in the office, or any other claimed offenses by that person, bearing false witness in order to pursue punishment is anathema to any civilized nation and it's citizens.

Think on that.

If Trump’s request of a personal political favor can be tied to the withholding of funds that the Congress allocated, that is extortion and rises to the level of impeachment. If others participated then it’s conspiracy to commit extortion.

Personally, I’d much prefer Trump be removed the old fashioned way next November. He is an embarrassment to the US. I’d rather not contemplate Pence as President.

 

[jaF0]

I want the T name so disgraced that none of his spawn will ever dare to run for office.

 

[HisArpy]

What's the purpose of an investigation?

What part of THEY'RE LYING TO YOU don't you understand?

Honestly, if you have to fabricate a lie in order to open an investigation so that you can find a crime to pin on someone you've got serious deficit in integrity and adherence to the rule of law.

And you appear to be good with that, because Trump, while also not understanding THAT is what 3rd world nations do when they stage political coups.

 

[HisArpy]

I want the T name so disgraced that none of his spawn will ever dare to run for office.

This is why the D's have to fabricate evidence and lie. It has nothing to do with law and order or truth, it's all about Hate.

 

[HisArpy]

If Trump’s request of a personal political favor can be tied to the withholding of funds that the Congress allocated, that is extortion and rises to the level of impeachment. If others participated then it’s conspiracy to commit extortion.

Personally, I’d much prefer Trump be removed the old fashioned way next November. He is an embarrassment to the US. I’d rather not contemplate Pence as President.

The transcript fails to show it was a "personal favor". The transcript is clear that Trump is requesting the Ukraine to assist the US DOJ in investigating Hunter Biden. Which Trump is ALLOWED TO DO under the US Ukraine treaty.

Again, enough with the lies. The whole damn D narrative for the past 3 years has been NOTHING BUT LIES. ON EVERYTHING.

 

[KeithD]

I want the T name so disgraced that none of his spawn will ever dare to run for office.

Yeah, but they're brain dead too. They don't even realize how much a pariah they all already are.

 

[Kantarii]

This is why the D's have to fabricate evidence and lie. It has nothing to do with law and order or truth, it's all about Hate.

Blind rage. Can’t beat him; gotta impeach him.
Sad thing is, impeachment is no guarantee of removing Trump from office.
I’m willing to bet this whistleblower thing comes back to bite them on the ass in 2020.

 

[Kantarii]

Again, enough with the lies. The whole damn D narrative for the past 3 years has been NOTHING BUT LIES. ON EVERYTHING.

Ain’t that the truth.

 

[PrincepsCyberius]

Money, trade and Javelin missiles.

Let's have Judge Andrew Napolitano explain why "What Trump Has Admitted to is a Crime"

https://www.facebook.com/StandWithMueller/videos/398930687435573/?t=0

You know, when I've cited Fox News, many Lit Lefties, including perhaps you, have claimed it's an illegitimate source due to bias.



Seriously, though, while I still don't see evidence of any quid quo pro, if Napolitano is right, then it's not necessary. Unfortunately, he does not cite the statute, and two issues remain in my mind:

1. Does the statute include an element of intent?

2. Would Biden be deemed a political opponent at the time of the call, given that he has not yet been nominated for anything?​

If intent is unnecessary, or if it is established, and if Biden would be in the statute's definition of political opponent under these circumstances, then it seems to me you're right.

Can someone please cite the applicable statute for me?

 

[KeithD]

Lame. You Trumpettes really need to take time off to look around at what your guy is doing.