Whistleblower

So, in your mind, Guliani is bad because he's Trump's lawyer but the whistleblower's lawyer is good because he's the lawyer for the guy who filed a false complaint against Trump?

And you say the 2 things have absolutely no connection to each other.


I think Giuliani is bad for a lot of reasons, but what is the president's personal lawyer doing involved in a foreign policy matter?
 
It’s the Barr summary all over again. They just keep lapping it up.

What’s even more amusing is they seem to think this is the only thing that is seen as an impeachable offense. 🙊 I’ll bet money that it is not despite the Republican’s best efforts to obstruct.

I hope you seek help. Seriously, seek help. You're confused on what's what and you can't even rationally articulate your thoughts.

The "transcript" is a creation of several listeners taking notes and then the notes are compared and compiled into a "transcript" of the call.

This is the procedure. It's why it's called the "official transcript". That you don't know that, or aren't willing to admit it because doing it shoots a GIGANTIC HOLE in your little anti-Trump narrative, merely illustrates how you fail at discussing anything when it comes to Trump.

Seek help. You will feel better once the therapy starts.
 
From Merriam Webster

transcript

1a : a written, printed, or typed copy
especially : a usually typed copy of dictated or recorded material



Note the words “dictated” and “recorded.” Nowhere is summary or recollection seen.
 
I think Giuliani is bad for a lot of reasons, but what is the president's personal lawyer doing involved in a foreign policy matter?

Once again, IGNORANCE raises it's ugly head.

Guiliani was specifically ASKED by the State Dept to take a call from the Ukraine. He did. The State Dept often asks ordinary US citizens to take calls from foreign sources to shield the call from "official scrutiny". There is a record of the call but the US citizen's name is withheld unless it is unmasked. This is protocol and policy and has been for decades.

Meanwhile you either didn't know that, which means you're talking about things you're too stupid to understand. Or you intentionally failed to mention it, which means you think (rightfully so) that other people are too stupid to know it too and will go along with your lies.
 
It's like these people haven't watched Trump and Rudy trip all over themselves, backtrack, and lie on national television about all of this.
 
It's like these people haven't watched Trump and Rudy trip all over themselves, backtrack, and lie on national television about all of this.

Being what you call "a klutz" has nothing to do with the truth. So far, just about everything the D's have been saying on this issue has been shown to be a big fat lie. So you resort to the Democrat/socialist playbook and start name calling in an attempt to smear reputations.
 
Being what you call "a klutz" has nothing to do with the truth. So far, just about everything the D's have been saying on this issue has been shown to be a big fat lie. So you resort to the Democrat/socialist playbook and start name calling in an attempt to smear reputations.

I didn't call anyone names although you did call them klutz's. :eek:
 
Also, remember how the Justice Department gave its completely unbiased opinion that the DNI should keep the whistleblower's statement under wraps? The not-a-transcript totally implicates Barr in the campaign to dig up dirt on a Trump political rival.

At the very least, he needs to recuse himself from this fuckery. At the very worst, he needs to be in federal prison.
 
The "whistle blower" is now worthless. No one is going to give a shit about what he/she has to say now that the transcript is out. The only thing that is of interest about the "whistle blower" now is their party affiliation.

It still looks like Trump set them up to me.
 
When you say “no one” I assume you mean you and Trump’s rabid base.
 
‘Shut up, moron. Shut up. Shut up’: Trump lawyer Giuliani abuses fellow TV guest live on air as impeachment rocks White House

#meltdown
 
The "whistle blower" is now worthless. No one is going to give a shit about what he/she has to say now that the transcript is out. The only thing that is of interest about the "whistle blower" now is their party affiliation.

It still looks like Trump set them up to me.

LMAO. You're such a worthless old man. 😂
 
When you say “no one” I assume you mean you and Trump’s rabid base.

Sorry, no one that has more than a few working brain cells. You see the "sucker's" testimony is all hearsay evidence. He/she, by their own admission, have NO first hand knowledge of what was or was not said. The release of the transcript renders the "sucker" worthless.
 
so all the stuff that was leaked from the ILLEGAL LEAKER

turned out to be a LIE
 
dont forget

what the IG said

THE WHISTLEBLOWER IS POLITCALLY MOTIVATED
 
Also, remember how the Justice Department gave its completely unbiased opinion that the DNI should keep the whistleblower's statement under wraps? The not-a-transcript totally implicates Barr in the campaign to dig up dirt on a Trump political rival.

At the very least, he needs to recuse himself from this fuckery. At the very worst, he needs to be in federal prison.

Wait, wait, wait; are you saying this is all AG Barr's fault?

Lolz.
 
It's fun to see the Trumpettes twist in the wind on this.

I'm sorry to see the telephone call transcript released to the public. Beyond the natural happening--it's not the complete phone call, so it's not acceptable as reliable in an administration that lies about everything--this is just not good in terms of international communications between nations. Now no foreign leader can assume that exchanges at the top with a U.S. president can be kept out of the public eye. Business between governments just can't work with that level of transparency. Transcripts going to congressional committees is one thing--releasing them to the public is quite another.

There's no question the whistleblower material should go to the Congress (and the Senate has now weighed in unanimously on that). It's the law. Everyone in the Trump regime--from the DNI to the president to Bill Barr--are engaging in criminal activity on this (and a host of other obstructionist activity) and deserve to be removed from office on this issue alone.
 
Also, remember how the Justice Department gave its completely unbiased opinion that the DNI should keep the whistleblower's statement under wraps? The not-a-transcript totally implicates Barr in the campaign to dig up dirt on a Trump political rival.

At the very least, he needs to recuse himself from this fuckery. At the very worst, he needs to be in federal prison.

too late with this BS

they are gonna release the LEAKERS shit and the IG stuff......

but remember what the IG said.....
 
It's fun to see the Trumpettes twist in the wind on this.

I'm sorry to see the telephone call transcript released to the public. Beyond the natural happening--it's not the complete phone call, so it's not acceptable as reliable in an administration that lies about everything--this is just not good in terms of international communications between nations. Now no foreign leader can assume that exchanges at the top with a U.S. president can be kept out of the public eye. Business between governments just can't work with that level of transparency. Transcripts going to congressional committees is one thing--releasing them to the public is quite another.

There's no question the whistleblower material should go to the Congress (and the Senate has now weighed in unanimously on that). It's the law. Everyone in the Trump regime--from the DNI to the president to Bill Barr--are engaging in criminal activity on this (and a host of other obstructionist activity) and deserve to be removed from office on this issue alone.

The director of the DNI is going to testify tomorrow am. Prior to that point I expect the complaint to be sent to Congress. I'm waiting to hear if the DNI is going to say they're considering prosecuting the person who made the false complaint. I suspect he will not and the liar will walk.

What you're bitching about is essentially that the complaint wasn't released IMMEDIATELY and prior to the IG investigating it.

Which has me wondering how you feel about protecting sources, methods, and ongoing investigations?
 
The director of the DNI is going to testify tomorrow am. Prior to that point I expect the complaint to be sent to Congress. I'm waiting to hear if the DNI is going to say they're considering prosecuting the person who made the false complaint. I suspect he will not and the liar will walk.

What you're bitching about is essentially that the complaint wasn't released IMMEDIATELY and prior to the IG investigating it.

Which has me wondering how you feel about protecting sources, methods, and ongoing investigations?

WH To Release Document Showing Intel Community Watchdog Found Whistleblower Had ‘Political Bias’ For Opponent Of Trump

poor WRONG ELEMENT, will be kicked in CUNT again
 
Back
Top