Whistleblower

[beezzz]

EXCLUSIVE: Former Ukrainian Secret Service Official Leaks Info on How Ukraine Funded Clinton Campaign with Stolen IMF Money https://thegatewaypundit.com/2019/0...unded-clinton-campaign-with-stolen-imf-money/

 

[Carnal_Flower]

That's a matter of dispute. There are currently NO LAWS for filing a complaint against POTUS. No rules about it, no rules AGAINST it. The most appropriate venue is the Intelligence Branch. Should he have gone to Betsy DeVos? Trump is techincally the head of all Intelligence concerns for the United States.

WHat's NOT in dispute are the actions of the DNI: He is required by law to forward an "urgent" complaint to Congress. He BROKE THE LAW by going to the DOJ.

If the matter was acted upon by the IC AG, it's not the DNI's call. The IC AG (a Trump appointee) broke no law forwarding it to DNI. He used his legally defined position to make a judgment of both credible and urgent and followed the ordained process.

https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=688

As an aside, LOL at the Clinton Snowflakes saying POTUS is complete above the law.

You bore me. If you knew what you were talking about you'd know the compliant didn't meet the requirements of the whistleblower regulation IN THE FIRST PLACE. The applicable law confines complaints to “misconduct within the Intelligence Community.” This was a deep state spy who hates the President trying to give Democrats a phony rap to use as a tool in their impeachment efforts to remove him from office.

Nobody in the Intel community has oversight authority over the conversations of the President. Nobody in the Intel Community has the authority to inform the Congress about conversations the President has with foreign leaders. This is an attack on the separation of powers.

The lack of a legal requirement to turn the transcripts over to the Congress aside, the real reluctance to turn them over is the Chairman of the Intel Committee himself, Adam Schiff who regularly has leaked classified information and who's security clearance is in danger. This is what Democrats get for placing a radical partisan domestic enemy in charge of the Intelligence Committee. Everyone in the administration is going to resist trusting him with classified information.

 

[beezzz]

CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin without a hint of irony says he's scandalized by a president using a foreign power to investigate a private citizen for political gain:


"Could anyone even conceive of a president of the United States doing something like this?! Yes, Obama in 2016.

 

[bigsly]

Here’s a “new revelation” in this article: the whistleblower complaint is based on hearsay. From the article: “The whistleblower didn’t have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN.”[/url]

— Brit Hume (@brithume) September 21, 2019

The whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower's concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work, and those details have played a role in the administration's determination that the complaint didn't fit the reporting requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law, the official said.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/20/politics/donald-trump-whistleblower/index.html

Her millionth stab at crying wolf about Trump totally strikes out again.

Poor Charlie "Aglaopheme" Brown.

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/GleamingUnrulyAgouti-size_restricted.gif

 

[bigsly]

Funniest thing about this is Biden'll end up taking the dive on Ukraine, not Trump.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Cite in the Whistleblower Laws they must have first hand exposure to the questionable acts or the complaint won't be accepted. Waiting.

We have an IG, who knows more about this than you. He determined the complaint was legal, valid, credible, and urgent.

And trying to stop the complaint from coming forth does not invalidate it; hence, no "crying wolf." "Crying wolf" would be if the read out was produced and reviewed and there was found no wrongdoing by the Prez.

Since POTUS and DOJ are trying to block it from coming out, we can't make a determination on that yet. That's called claiming a victory prematurely.

Again, LOL at Deplorable two faced degenerate hypocrisy.

Her millionth stab at crying wolf about Trump totally strikes out again.

Poor Charlie "Aglaopheme" Brown.

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/GleamingUnrulyAgouti-size_restricted.gif

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Cite in the Whistleblower Laws they must have first hand exposure to the questionable acts or the complaint won't be accepted. Waiting.

We have an IG, who knows more about this than you. He determined the complaint was legal, valid, credible, and urgent.

And trying to stop the complaint from coming forth does not invalidate it; hence, no "crying wolf." "Crying wolf" would be if the read out was produced and reviewed and there was found no wrongdoing by the Prez.

Since POTUS and DOJ are trying to block it from coming out, we can't make a determination on that yet. That's called claiming a victory prematurely.

Again, LOL at Deplorable two faced degenerate hypocrisy.

His quadrillionth poke at being a curmudgeonly grouse over people highlighting Cheeto's fuckery flames out again.

Poor Charlie "Eyer 15.0" Brown.

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/GleamingUnrulyAgouti-size_restricted.gif

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

 

[bigsly]

And trying to stop the complaint from coming forth does not invalidate it; hence, no "crying wolf." "Crying wolf" would be if the read out was produced and reviewed and there was found no wrongdoing by the Prez.

"crying wolf" intentionally/directly referenced Charlie "Aglaopheme" Brown, not the whistlepoofer. Try to keep up, dumbfuck.

 

[Wrong Element]

Her millionth stab at crying wolf about Trump totally strikes out again.

Which is why these concerns go to the Inspector General first. I notice you left that part out, but I guess you couldn't read further with your face wedged between Trump's massive sagging ass cheeks.

 

[beezzz]

Which is why these concerns go to the Inspector General first. I notice you left that part out, but I guess you couldn't read further with your face wedged between Trump's massive sagging ass cheeks.

you didnt seem to care what the IG said about Comey et all

I wonder why!

 

[beezzz]

"I said, 'You're not getting the billion.' I'm going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: 'I'm leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money,'" - Joe Biden, 2018

somehow

this

musta

escaped

your

attention

I WONDER..................WHY!!!!!!

 

[bigsly]

Which is why these concerns go to the Inspector General first. I notice you left that part out, but I guess you couldn't read further with your face wedged between Trump's massive sagging ass cheeks.

You either need to insert a comma after "massive", or simply use massively, shortbus.

 

[beezzz]

Regarding the whole Trump and Biden and Ukraine kerfuffle

Did you notice whats missing?

All we hear is Trump, Trump and Trump, impeachment and illegal and the "horrible" things he did


But there is a big dog in this issue and it isnt barking

Do you what that is?

Are you smart enough to figure out what the dog is NOT BARKING ABOUT?






the focus has all be on Turmp...for obvious reasons

the media and DUMZ just want to get him




what no one has said is

But Biden and Son did nothing wrong! There is nothing to investigate! Trump is just lying! Its fake news!

Did you notice, No one has said that!

Why? Cause the charges are all true! They are protecting Biden!....

So why not investigate?

WE KNOW WHY!


Often times, whats left unsaid, is more important then what is said!

 

[Kantarii]

Biden is their only “electable” candidate. If you cut the head off a snake, well, you get the picture.

 

[DawnODay]

CNN is working to cover its own fake news story about the whistleblower that they believe heard President Donald Trump ask the Ukrainian president to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.

In a story that CNN published on the controversy on Saturday it admitted that the whistleblower did not hear anything.

“The whistleblower didn’t have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN,” CNN said....

That is a mega change from the story that the whistleblower heard the president ask for the Ukraine to investigate Biden....

The news comes after the Ukraine Foreign Minister said that President Trump did not do what the media has accused him of.

The foreign minister of the Ukraine has torpedoed the Democrat idea that President Donald Trump pressured the Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.

“I know what the conversation was about and I think there was no pressure,” Foreign Minister Vadym Prystaiko said in an interview with the Hromadske media outlet.​

C. Sabia, Ukraine Hoax Done, CNN Admits Whistleblower Did Not Hear Anything, Federalist Papers (Sep. 21, 2019) (emphasis added).

 

[bellisarius]

CNN is working to cover its own fake news story about the whistleblower that they believe heard President Donald Trump ask the Ukrainian president to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.

In a story that CNN published on the controversy on Saturday it admitted that the whistleblower did not hear anything.

“The whistleblower didn’t have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN,” CNN said....

That is a mega change from the story that the whistleblower heard the president ask for the Ukraine to investigate Biden....

The news comes after the Ukraine Foreign Minister said that President Trump did not do what the media has accused him of.

The foreign minister of the Ukraine has torpedoed the Democrat idea that President Donald Trump pressured the Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.

“I know what the conversation was about and I think there was no pressure,” Foreign Minister Vadym Prystaiko said in an interview with the Hromadske media outlet.​

C. Sabia, Ukraine Hoax Done, CNN Admits Whistleblower Did Not Hear Anything, Federalist Papers (Sep. 21, 2019) (emphasis added).

It doesn't matter DoD. It's all about the seriousness of the charge and the fact that the democrats have adopted a new legal philosophy, "Guilty Until Proven Innocent."

It's funny is a pathetic sort of way to watch them elbow each other out of the way to get in front of the camera's and yell, "Impeachment!"

 

[Aglaopheme]

From the orange’s mouth.


Trump Acknowledges Discussing Biden in Call With Ukrainian Leader

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/22/us/politics/trump-ukraine-biden.html

While Mr. Trump defended his July phone call with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine as perfectly appropriate, he confirmed that Mr. Biden came up during the discussion and that he accused the former vice president of corruption tied to his son Hunter’s business activities in that former Soviet republic.

“The conversation I had was largely congratulatory, with largely corruption, all of the corruption taking place and largely the fact that we don’t want our people like Vice President Biden and his son creating to the corruption already in the Ukraine,” Mr. Trump told reporters before leaving for a trip to Texas and Ohio.

Trump says he know what pressure looks like and that wasn’t pressure. Maybe if he’s asked nine times during one phone call?

 

[Biggs_Darklighter]

This time for sure!!

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Then release the transcripts and prove it.

Also, I thought CNN was fake news*

*Except when it says what you want to hear, then it's a reputable news source.

CNN is working to cover its own fake news story about the whistleblower that they believe heard President Donald Trump ask the Ukrainian president to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.

In a story that CNN published on the controversy on Saturday it admitted that the whistleblower did not hear anything.

“The whistleblower didn’t have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN,” CNN said....

That is a mega change from the story that the whistleblower heard the president ask for the Ukraine to investigate Biden....

The news comes after the Ukraine Foreign Minister said that President Trump did not do what the media has accused him of.

The foreign minister of the Ukraine has torpedoed the Democrat idea that President Donald Trump pressured the Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.

“I know what the conversation was about and I think there was no pressure,” Foreign Minister Vadym Prystaiko said in an interview with the Hromadske media outlet.​

C. Sabia, Ukraine Hoax Done, CNN Admits Whistleblower Did Not Hear Anything, Federalist Papers (Sep. 21, 2019) (emphasis added).

 

[Aglaopheme]

I’m sure notAJ is pleased that notinternettoughguy incel is stealing his line.

 

[RobDownSouth]

CNN is working to cover its own fake news story about the whistleblower that they believe heard President Donald Trump ask the Ukrainian president to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.

In a story that CNN published on the controversy on Saturday it admitted that the whistleblower did not hear anything.

“The whistleblower didn’t have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN,” CNN said....

That is a mega change from the story that the whistleblower heard the president ask for the Ukraine to investigate Biden....

The news comes after the Ukraine Foreign Minister said that President Trump did not do what the media has accused him of.

The foreign minister of the Ukraine has torpedoed the Democrat idea that President Donald Trump pressured the Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.

“I know what the conversation was about and I think there was no pressure,” Foreign Minister Vadym Prystaiko said in an interview with the Hromadske media outlet.​

C. Sabia, Ukraine Hoax Done, CNN Admits Whistleblower Did Not Hear Anything, Federalist Papers (Sep. 21, 2019) (emphasis added).

Oh look.
Tertiary RWCJer finally located an editorial that confirms her political bias.

And the editorialist is a former pro rassler, so he speaks with authority.

 

[Lancedalot]

I’m sure notAJ is pleased that notinternettoughguy incel is stealing his line.

Sexist bitch say what?

 

[Aglaopheme]

Look at the mini man mimicking an even more mini, mouthy man.

 

[Conager]

Oh look.
Tertiary RWCJer finally located an editorial that confirms her political bias.

And the editorialist is a former pro rassler, so he speaks with authority.

This news is not an " rditorial."

They are directly quoting CNN:

"The whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower's concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work,"

Article here, since your Google is broken: https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/09/20/politics/donald-trump-whistleblower/index.html

CNN is walking this back. There was no first-hand knowledge. There is therefore no "whistleblowing."

 

[Aglaopheme]

This news is not an " rditorial."

They are directly quoting CNN:

"The whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower's concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work,"

Article here, since your Google is broken: https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/09/20/politics/donald-trump-whistleblower/index.html

CNN is walking this back. There was no first-hand knowledge. There is therefore no "whistleblowing."

“An official briefed on the matter”


“They were just trying out a new cloak for 'unnamed sources,"

https://media.giphy.com/media/8G44PoelzaXXa/giphy.gif