Bolton & Trump fought bitterly about Trump's Camp David Taliban scandal

Whoah.

Double post. Six question marks.

This thread is triggering nicely. :)
 
Trump’s Taliban invite is one of the most shameful moments of his presidency

Marc Thiessen writes a twice-weekly column for The Post on foreign and domestic policy. He is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and the former chief speechwriter for President George W. Bush. He is a Fox News contributor.

Even the biggest RW Trump Ass Kissing Dotard on the Planet is disgusted at the Idiot's Actions


These are murderous terrorists with American blood on their hands. It is an outrage that Obama freed them. But for Trump to even consider allowing leaders of a designated terrorist organization to set foot in Camp David is worse than an outrage; it is an insult to all those who died on 9/11 and the American troops who gave their lives fighting them in Afghanistan.

It was only the Taliban’s brutality — launching a suicide attack that killed an American service member on the eve of the Camp David summit — that prevented this debacle from unfolding. After the attack, Trump canceled the summit and tweeted, “What kind of people would kill so many in order to seemingly strengthen their bargaining position?” Terrorists, Mr. President — that’s who.
rump’s defenders say this would have been no different from his diplomacy with Kim Jong Un, or his offer to meet with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani. Yes, it is. First, Kim and Rouhani are heads of government. Taliban leaders are terrorists. They claim to be the heads of a state — the “Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.” Hosting them at Camp David grants them undeserved legitimacy.

Second, in the cases of North Korea and Iran, Trump is acting from a position of strength. He has imposed crippling sanctions on both regimes. With the Taliban, he’s negotiating from a position of weakness. He wants to get out of Afghanistan, and the Taliban knows it. A peace deal would not be a victory for the United States; it would be a victory for the Taliban.
 
"A New York Times analysis of 21 top White House and cabinet positions back to President Bill Clinton’s first term shows how unusual the Trump administration’s upheaval was through the first 14 months of a presidency. Nine of these positions had turned over at least once during the Trump administration, compared with three at the same point of the Clinton administration, two under President Barack Obama and one under President George W. Bush."

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...and-resignations-in-trump-administration.html

Worst. Boss. Ever.

Who hasn't been fired or quit?

Insane.
 
Meme seen today:

"If Obama had invited the Taliban to Camp David, Fox News would have shit enough bricks to build the whole wall." :cool:
 
Meme seen today:

"If Obama had invited the Taliban to Camp David, Fox News would have shit enough bricks to build the whole wall." :cool:

Spot on. But the Trumpettes here won't admit the hypocrisy of this sort of shit.
 
I don't get it.

If they truly don't care about this, all they have to do is not post and let your thread die.

https://media.giphy.com/media/8w3lZzyU55LcqMUKk1/giphy.gif

Being triggered every time Cheeto takes another L in his ongoing shitshow of a presidency is a hell of a drug! :D

Pointing and laughing at Rory or you is not being "triggered," no matter how much you need an iWin or how often Rory trolls for the attention that gives his life meaning.

Nobody wins the internet but each and every time you feel the need to point out a "win" for your "team" or keep score for your such meaningless victories you lose.

Rory's sole talents are his careful monitoring of his newsfeed in an effort to be first to post on an event or topic of the day, and the penchant for trolling by his disingenuous frame of whatever is likely to be discussed here, or on any message board.

No ratios of views, post counts, or responses generated should be taken to mean anything of any consequence regarding Rory's popularity, fans, detractors, or benefit to the forum. It's a thread, it serves as nothing more than a place for others to participate with him or anyone else that posts.

If Rory were not so maniacal about starting threads that he hopes some minor controversy will ensue within, the very same topics would be brought forward by someone and the ensuing discussion would be much the same except for those that take a moment to reframe Rory's position or to point and laugh at the poor man's version of Busybody.
 
Back
Top