Damn, she Justa did it again. Still nothing to see.

[Mtnmike]

so happy thursday.
today is a pair from the fredericks of hollywood $3 sale

http://i.imgur.com/gioiImRm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/GcxEoxPm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/880dc6cm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rhM3a8cm.jpg

and also a pointless ramble.

So the question of if I had ever tried to compute how much cum has been spilled because of my threads on Lit was raised.

Indeed I had not, but I now will attempt, and bring you along on the thought process
Given facts, I have been on lit 2 years. the average male ejaculates between 1.25 and 5ml per session, (I will go with 3.125ml as the average since I do not have detailed demographics breakdowns of lit)
the number of times men ejaculate per month varies greatly on age, however 10.075 times per month would be an average across the adult male age range.
the number of sex sessions a male has per year also varies greatly with age, but an average of 40.5 times per year across the adult male age demographic.

Now, where things get real tough, determining how many members lit members actually use lit threads as masturbation material, how many actually use what was provided in lit threads as masturbation material, how many view my thread, how many might consider it, or any of the top 200 threads, to be masturbation worthy material, etc etc. the best estimate I can provide based on men porn viewing habits, the amount of porn sites looked at on average, coupled with ejaculatory rates outside of sex from above, is I estimate my thread to provide a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per interested viewer per year.

So 0.134 times per year per male viewer means approximately 1 man will jack off once this year because of something I share, for every 8 who visit this year. that seems reasonable, I think

taking view counts, determining likelihood of unique viewers, subtracting the 3% of viewers who have stated no sexual interest in a prior poll, that means something on one my threads has been masturbation fodder 77,980 times in the past 2 years. WAIT WHAT.
NO, NO, that can't possibly be correct, it is just way, way, way too high. That would mean approximately 64.375 gallons of cum in 2 years because of my threads. That is absurd.

I believe the problem to be in quantifying viewers, unique viewers, using the view counts and estimating how many views were by people who would remotely consider anything here masturbation worthy.

hum, what can I do instead, I guess it may be more apt to assume that there is no such things as a lurker who would ever consider jacking off to anything they are lurking on (yeah, I know, shush.)
749 people have interacted with me on my threads. 3% have 0 sexual interest towards me, but the rest could. At a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per year for those who might, that would mean my threads have resulted in 194.7 masturbatory experiences over the past 2 years.
Now that seems reasonable. I could totally believe that over the past 2 years two random men in this big wide lit world jack off each week thinking about or looking at something shared here.
so, that is 1.28 pints of cum in 2 years is my answer.

Really though I think the true answer would fall, between 1.28 pints to 64.375 gallons, dependent on the belief in validity of view counters and thoughts on the concept of whether lurkers actually ever jack off to threads on lit. I am still going with the low guesstimate as the other is just disturbing.


anyway, aren't you glad a_guy asked that question. I thought it was entertaining.

3.00 what a steal. They should use your photos, they'd sell out in less than a hour !!!!!!

 

[dtige24]

so happy thursday.
today is a pair from the fredericks of hollywood $3 sale

http://i.imgur.com/gioiImRm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/GcxEoxPm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/880dc6cm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rhM3a8cm.jpg

and also a pointless ramble.

So the question of if I had ever tried to compute how much cum has been spilled because of my threads on Lit was raised.

Indeed I had not, but I now will attempt, and bring you along on the thought process
Given facts, I have been on lit 2 years. the average male ejaculates between 1.25 and 5ml per session, (I will go with 3.125ml as the average since I do not have detailed demographics breakdowns of lit)
the number of times men ejaculate per month varies greatly on age, however 10.075 times per month would be an average across the adult male age range.
the number of sex sessions a male has per year also varies greatly with age, but an average of 40.5 times per year across the adult male age demographic.

Now, where things get real tough, determining how many members lit members actually use lit threads as masturbation material, how many actually use what was provided in lit threads as masturbation material, how many view my thread, how many might consider it, or any of the top 200 threads, to be masturbation worthy material, etc etc. the best estimate I can provide based on men porn viewing habits, the amount of porn sites looked at on average, coupled with ejaculatory rates outside of sex from above, is I estimate my thread to provide a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per interested viewer per year.

So 0.134 times per year per male viewer means approximately 1 man will jack off once this year because of something I share, for every 8 who visit this year. that seems reasonable, I think

taking view counts, determining likelihood of unique viewers, subtracting the 3% of viewers who have stated no sexual interest in a prior poll, that means something on one my threads has been masturbation fodder 77,980 times in the past 2 years. WAIT WHAT.
NO, NO, that can't possibly be correct, it is just way, way, way too high. That would mean approximately 64.375 gallons of cum in 2 years because of my threads. That is absurd.

I believe the problem to be in quantifying viewers, unique viewers, using the view counts and estimating how many views were by people who would remotely consider anything here masturbation worthy.

hum, what can I do instead, I guess it may be more apt to assume that there is no such things as a lurker who would ever consider jacking off to anything they are lurking on (yeah, I know, shush.)
749 people have interacted with me on my threads. 3% have 0 sexual interest towards me, but the rest could. At a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per year for those who might, that would mean my threads have resulted in 194.7 masturbatory experiences over the past 2 years.
Now that seems reasonable. I could totally believe that over the past 2 years two random men in this big wide lit world jack off each week thinking about or looking at something shared here.
so, that is 1.28 pints of cum in 2 years is my answer.

Really though I think the true answer would fall, between 1.28 pints to 64.375 gallons, dependent on the belief in validity of view counters and thoughts on the concept of whether lurkers actually ever jack off to threads on lit. I am still going with the low guesstimate as the other is just disturbing.


anyway, aren't you glad a_guy asked that question. I thought it was entertaining.

You talking nerdy makes your pictures hotter if that's even possible.
Titty Attack for the Win Again!
Also to increase the accuracy of your assumptions you could always create a a poll asking how many people have masturbated to your thread.

 

[MrSilence]

Is it weird that you just made math fun?

 

[iaabanag]

Well, you are an IT girl, so some tech stuff with titties

lol, it just seems so insane, it is mind boggling


ok


thank you


feel free



haha, maybe, maybe. well I suspect the slut fair probably has no shortage of naked men. I still recommend alcohol as a method for luring the slut fairy. kind of like teeth for the tooth fairy.



I am sure we could, any requests for the theme (besides titties)


thank you



don't think so, but they are all weird so who knows



awwww, that is such a shame. maybe the slut fairy can help you with that too. (handling breasts that is, as for the memory, I am afraid that that is a losing battle)



haha. boy scout motto, always be prepared....or some shit.

 

[chanticleer]

Just going to add some details of my cum contributions to your threads. I'm a single guy with no fwbs or anything like that, so all of my ejaculations are based on porn viewing. Usually I ejaculate once a day to porn, but sometimes when I'm more horny than normal it can go up to two times or on rare occasions three times a day. I suppose I'm a porn addict!

Usually I start my porn viewing sessions by looking at your threads. So looking at your pics gets me warmed up a bit. I then proceed to visit my other favorite places to go, and that will be that. So I get started with you and get aroused, but usually my orgasms will be from looking elsewhere, not because I don't love your threads, but because there's also other porn I really like. HOWEVER, every few weeks I will feel a strong desire to gawk at your pictures in particular, and I will spend a jackoff session looking at only your pics. I really enjoy edging to your pics on those occasions and enjoying your lovely pictures as much as I can before I have a relieving orgasm. And sometimes after a session of focusing on your pics I want to binge on you a bit and might have another session focusing on you the next day. So I go through phases where I focus on your pics more than other porn. I haven't bothered to count how many times I have ejaculated to your pics but it is a lot. You may or may not recall a few months ago I went on a trip and stayed in a hotel for a few nights. While I was mostly out of my hotel, practically all my waking time in the hotel room I was enjoying your pics, and I had two or three orgasms over your pics each night. I made sure to tell you that in your thread, haha.

I'm not exactly sure how long I've been reading your threads. I could probably search my comments to find out; I've mostly commented on your threads and only a handful of other threads. I think I first found your first thread when it was about halfway through or thereabouts. I can't remember exactly when I found it. I remember I found a gif of you dancing in another thread (complete with epic bouncing tits) and I was blown away, and I've been reading your threads ever since. It feels like I've been following your threads for awhile now although I rarely comment. I estimate that I probably ejaculate to your pics at least several times a month, and I've been reading your threads for at least a year and a half if not more.

Do you think that I masturbate to you too much or should I keep at it? I think that this conversation is making me want to enjoy another Justa binge so I will most likely cum to your pics tonight!

 

[TANSTAAFL58]

so happy thursday.
today is a pair from the fredericks of hollywood $3 sale

http://i.imgur.com/gioiImRm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/GcxEoxPm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/880dc6cm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rhM3a8cm.jpg

and also a pointless ramble.

So the question of if I had ever tried to compute how much cum has been spilled because of my threads on Lit was raised.

Indeed I had not, but I now will attempt, and bring you along on the thought process
Given facts, I have been on lit 2 years. the average male ejaculates between 1.25 and 5ml per session, (I will go with 3.125ml as the average since I do not have detailed demographics breakdowns of lit)
the number of times men ejaculate per month varies greatly on age, however 10.075 times per month would be an average across the adult male age range.
the number of sex sessions a male has per year also varies greatly with age, but an average of 40.5 times per year across the adult male age demographic.

Now, where things get real tough, determining how many members lit members actually use lit threads as masturbation material, how many actually use what was provided in lit threads as masturbation material, how many view my thread, how many might consider it, or any of the top 200 threads, to be masturbation worthy material, etc etc. the best estimate I can provide based on men porn viewing habits, the amount of porn sites looked at on average, coupled with ejaculatory rates outside of sex from above, is I estimate my thread to provide a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per interested viewer per year.

So 0.134 times per year per male viewer means approximately 1 man will jack off once this year because of something I share, for every 8 who visit this year. that seems reasonable, I think

taking view counts, determining likelihood of unique viewers, subtracting the 3% of viewers who have stated no sexual interest in a prior poll, that means something on one my threads has been masturbation fodder 77,980 times in the past 2 years. WAIT WHAT.
NO, NO, that can't possibly be correct, it is just way, way, way too high. That would mean approximately 64.375 gallons of cum in 2 years because of my threads. That is absurd.

I believe the problem to be in quantifying viewers, unique viewers, using the view counts and estimating how many views were by people who would remotely consider anything here masturbation worthy.

hum, what can I do instead, I guess it may be more apt to assume that there is no such things as a lurker who would ever consider jacking off to anything they are lurking on (yeah, I know, shush.)
749 people have interacted with me on my threads. 3% have 0 sexual interest towards me, but the rest could. At a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per year for those who might, that would mean my threads have resulted in 194.7 masturbatory experiences over the past 2 years.
Now that seems reasonable. I could totally believe that over the past 2 years two random men in this big wide lit world jack off each week thinking about or looking at something shared here.
so, that is 1.28 pints of cum in 2 years is my answer.

Really though I think the true answer would fall, between 1.28 pints to 64.375 gallons, dependent on the belief in validity of view counters and thoughts on the concept of whether lurkers actually ever jack off to threads on lit. I am still going with the low guesstimate as the other is just disturbing.


anyway, aren't you glad a_guy asked that question. I thought it was entertaining.

First: Frederick's of Hollywood never looked so good!

Now, Engineer to Engineer, your assumptions may be off a bit.

First, Lit members are more likley skewed to the high end of any data regarding sex. Call it "The Horniness Number", like Mach Number. This will factor in the fact that anyone looking at your threads is there because of a degree of looking for sexy pictures, and the fact that they are already on a sex site. I estimate a 25% increase over the general population, so H=1.25 must be factored in to your calculation.

Your view-to-comment ration is about 42. Now 42 of course id the ultimate answer to life, the Universe and everything. I think the Universe is telling you to have a bias to the high end of the data in this case. The explanation being you can't know how many views are repeats from the same person. I would estimate at least 20%, so multiply in another 1.2.

Finally there is the "Chronic Masturbators" factor, that's gonna add another 40%, based on empirical evidence, C=1.4.

That essentially doubles your estimates. Although I would apply that on a diminishing scale staring at the low end, now 1.56 pints and becoming 1 at the high end.

Of course, assuming the same density as water (spunk seems to be neutrally buoyant, based on field research in the lake and bath tub), 64 US Gallons is about 512 pounds or about a quarter ton. That just sounds better...

 

[Todger65]

Love your cheapo thong, looks good.

To prove your calculation I will have to keep a calibrated storage jar available for collections

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

LMAO...or you could open a semen restaurant

haha. I am not all that great of a cook to begin with, not sure if semen would help.

So the question of if I had ever tried to compute how much cum has been spilled because of my threads on Lit was raised.

I just pictured myself falling into a vat of that come, I think I better practice my back stroke, It is known that some men lap up cream pies, they might consider it paradise, although the thought of it means I may have difficulty keeping my last meal down.

haha. yeah, I have nothing besides laughter

I appreciated the multi-variable statistics in determining your estimates. I guess it also depends upon unique views vs. multiple views. And of course, while some may have been viewing for 2 years, others are new to your thread (sorry - I was on a Lit hiatus - I didn’t know!). And the hypothesis that Lit viewers are “average” males (i.e. avg number of ejaculations per year) could be skewed since the average Lit member may view more adult material (than average). I’m certainly willing to do my part.
That being said, I calculate the amount to be......A lot.

Excuse me while I go re-examine your photos.

yes, I tried going into my thread via a different device and incognito and the view count did not increase, thus I factored that in to my thought process (my meeting was exceptionally boring).

but yes, maybe I need to question the thought of basing my jorpmpy on statistics of average males.

and hahaha.

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

Fredricks of Hollywood should pay you and your ass for making their panties look better.

well thanks. though I think they prefer a more modely type

As always Justa, you are sexy, beautiful and desirable as ever. Truly a woman I have fantasized about on more than one occasion.
Hate to throw more thoughts into your well thought out ramble, but what about someone like me who has a few times spilled his seed using your thread... and other times spilled it fantasizing about you and the pictures/clips you've shared? Not necessarily while perusing the thread.

well thank you. and yes, it is very difficult to create a formula for an accurate estimate.

Money well spent!

Okay, that's pretty unsettling when you think of all the trees that were made into tissues to clean up after! Ban tissues! Use washcloths! Save the planet on spurt at a time.

I though so.

And fuck, I am hurting the environment and causing the slaughter of trees. I had never considered that

3.00 what a steal. They should use your photos, they'd sell out in less than a hour !!!!!!

they had free shipping too. I am not spending money, I am saving it.

You talking nerdy makes your pictures hotter if that's even possible.
Titty Attack for the Win Again!
Also to increase the accuracy of your assumptions you could always create a a poll asking how many people have masturbated to your thread.

well thanks. and last poll on my last thread I could not delete. so maybe as I get closer to 5000

Is it weird that you just made math fun?

you should see my lessons on calculating titty volume based on calculating the volume of a hemisphere.

Well, you are an IT girl, so some tech stuff with titties

haha. but it is really hard for more to not have the guys around me.

Just going to add some details of my cum contributions to your threads. I'm a single guy with no fwbs or anything like that, so all of my ejaculations are based on porn viewing. Usually I ejaculate once a day to porn, but sometimes when I'm more horny than normal it can go up to two times or on rare occasions three times a day. I suppose I'm a porn addict!

Usually I start my porn viewing sessions by looking at your threads. So looking at your pics gets me warmed up a bit. I then proceed to visit my other favorite places to go, and that will be that. So I get started with you and get aroused, but usually my orgasms will be from looking elsewhere, not because I don't love your threads, but because there's also other porn I really like. HOWEVER, every few weeks I will feel a strong desire to gawk at your pictures in particular, and I will spend a jackoff session looking at only your pics. I really enjoy edging to your pics on those occasions and enjoying your lovely pictures as much as I can before I have a relieving orgasm. And sometimes after a session of focusing on your pics I want to binge on you a bit and might have another session focusing on you the next day. So I go through phases where I focus on your pics more than other porn. I haven't bothered to count how many times I have ejaculated to your pics but it is a lot. You may or may not recall a few months ago I went on a trip and stayed in a hotel for a few nights. While I was mostly out of my hotel, practically all my waking time in the hotel room I was enjoying your pics, and I had two or three orgasms over your pics each night. I made sure to tell you that in your thread, haha.

I'm not exactly sure how long I've been reading your threads. I could probably search my comments to find out; I've mostly commented on your threads and only a handful of other threads. I think I first found your first thread when it was about halfway through or thereabouts. I can't remember exactly when I found it. I remember I found a gif of you dancing in another thread (complete with epic bouncing tits) and I was blown away, and I've been reading your threads ever since. It feels like I've been following your threads for awhile now although I rarely comment. I estimate that I probably ejaculate to your pics at least several times a month, and I've been reading your threads for at least a year and a half if not more.

Do you think that I masturbate to you too much or should I keep at it? I think that this conversation is making me want to enjoy another Justa binge so I will most likely cum to your pics tonight!

ah yes the multitab jacker, another who is very difficult to quantify. and a multitab user who is actually reading it too. that is rare, I think.
I am glad you enjoy the thread. enough for hotel entertainment too. it is quite rare for me to be in a hotel anymore. I am kind of jealous.

yeah, don't overthink the jacking, just enjoy it. unless overthinking is part of the enjoyment of course.

First: Frederick's of Hollywood never looked so good!

Now, Engineer to Engineer, your assumptions may be off a bit.

First, Lit members are more likley skewed to the high end of any data regarding sex. Call it "The Horniness Number", like Mach Number. This will factor in the fact that anyone looking at your threads is there because of a degree of looking for sexy pictures, and the fact that they are already on a sex site. I estimate a 25% increase over the general population, so H=1.25 must be factored in to your calculation.

Your view-to-comment ration is about 42. Now 42 of course id the ultimate answer to life, the Universe and everything. I think the Universe is telling you to have a bias to the high end of the data in this case. The explanation being you can't know how many views are repeats from the same person. I would estimate at least 20%, so multiply in another 1.2.

Finally there is the "Chronic Masturbators" factor, that's gonna add another 40%, based on empirical evidence, C=1.4.

That essentially doubles your estimates. Although I would apply that on a diminishing scale staring at the low end, now 1.56 pints and becoming 1 at the high end.

Of course, assuming the same density as water (spunk seems to be neutrally buoyant, based on field research in the lake and bath tub), 64 US Gallons is about 512 pounds or about a quarter ton. That just sounds better...

yes yes, I probably should have gone to the high end of survey results. Though not everyone looking here is doing so because of the pictures. A few people just do because I am fucking hilarious. survey says 3%.

a quarter ton, that really does sound worse.

Love your cheapo thong, looks good.

To prove your calculation I will have to keep a calibrated storage jar available for collections

thank you. and haha, that is probably unnecessary. it will just have to be one of those things that the world will never know, like if Jimmy Hoffa is somewhere in my garage.

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

well happy friday. and yeah, fuck it, I am a total slacker

last weeks fishnet
http://i.imgur.com/0oKMtRim.jpg

yesterdays thong
http://i.imgur.com/ixIdbfLm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/HJFPESKm.jpg

 

[EctoJohn]

well thanks. though I think they prefer a more modely type

Well they do have models for specific things, such as hand models.
You could EASILY be an ass model.

 

[shark968]

Still loving the fishnet..... and the other goodies.

 

[Siddhh]

well happy friday. and yeah, fuck it, I am a total slacker

last weeks fishnet
http://i.imgur.com/0oKMtRim.jpg

yesterdays thong
http://i.imgur.com/ixIdbfLm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/HJFPESKm.jpg

Damm !! Those titts

 

[RjThoughts]

well happy friday. and yeah, fuck it, I am a total slacker

Well, you did use a metric shit ton of brain cells yesterday nerding on Lit, number crunching!

 

[tallladiesman]

well happy friday. and yeah, fuck it, I am a total slacker

last weeks fishnet
http://i.imgur.com/0oKMtRim.jpg

yesterdays thong
http://i.imgur.com/ixIdbfLm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/HJFPESKm.jpg

Titty attack wins again
Beautiful lady

 

[19jimbo99]

well happy friday. and yeah, fuck it, I am a total slacker

last weeks fishnet
http://i.imgur.com/0oKMtRim.jpg

yesterdays thong
http://i.imgur.com/ixIdbfLm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/HJFPESKm.jpg

Slacker Friday works for me...
As for your seman, just say I gave at the office....

 

[wilderness]

Love that fishnet. You look fabulous!

 

[Vetis]

You and netting were made for one another. You so need more of that. Great stuff.

 

[CanadianM]

Really enjoyed your mathematics calculations. I am sure you underestimate the volume of cum you have encouraged by your pics and vids... and I am always glad to help out in the interest of science!!! Have a great weekend....

 

[draconus_infernus]

well happy friday. and yeah, fuck it, I am a total slacker

last weeks fishnet
http://i.imgur.com/0oKMtRim.jpg

yesterdays thong
http://i.imgur.com/ixIdbfLm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/HJFPESKm.jpg

Slacking off never looked so good.

 

[Todger65]

well happy friday. and yeah, fuck it, I am a total slacker

last weeks fishnet
http://i.imgur.com/0oKMtRim.jpg

yesterdays thong
http://i.imgur.com/ixIdbfLm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/HJFPESKm.jpg

Everyone gets days like that. I have one seven days a week.

 

[TANSTAAFL58]

well happy friday. and yeah, fuck it, I am a total slacker

last weeks fishnet
http://i.imgur.com/0oKMtRim.jpg

yesterdays thongy!
http://i.imgur.com/ixIdbfLm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/HJFPESKm.jpg

I love the angle on that middle picture. If these are slacker shots, slack away!

 

[AlliaPotestas]

so happy thursday.
today is a pair from the fredericks of hollywood $3 sale

http://i.imgur.com/gioiImRm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/GcxEoxPm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/880dc6cm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rhM3a8cm.jpg

and also a pointless ramble.

So the question of if I had ever tried to compute how much cum has been spilled because of my threads on Lit was raised.

Indeed I had not, but I now will attempt, and bring you along on the thought process
Given facts, I have been on lit 2 years. the average male ejaculates between 1.25 and 5ml per session, (I will go with 3.125ml as the average since I do not have detailed demographics breakdowns of lit)
the number of times men ejaculate per month varies greatly on age, however 10.075 times per month would be an average across the adult male age range.
the number of sex sessions a male has per year also varies greatly with age, but an average of 40.5 times per year across the adult male age demographic.

Now, where things get real tough, determining how many members lit members actually use lit threads as masturbation material, how many actually use what was provided in lit threads as masturbation material, how many view my thread, how many might consider it, or any of the top 200 threads, to be masturbation worthy material, etc etc. the best estimate I can provide based on men porn viewing habits, the amount of porn sites looked at on average, coupled with ejaculatory rates outside of sex from above, is I estimate my thread to provide a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per interested viewer per year.

So 0.134 times per year per male viewer means approximately 1 man will jack off once this year because of something I share, for every 8 who visit this year. that seems reasonable, I think

taking view counts, determining likelihood of unique viewers, subtracting the 3% of viewers who have stated no sexual interest in a prior poll, that means something on one my threads has been masturbation fodder 77,980 times in the past 2 years. WAIT WHAT.
NO, NO, that can't possibly be correct, it is just way, way, way too high. That would mean approximately 64.375 gallons of cum in 2 years because of my threads. That is absurd.

I believe the problem to be in quantifying viewers, unique viewers, using the view counts and estimating how many views were by people who would remotely consider anything here masturbation worthy.

hum, what can I do instead, I guess it may be more apt to assume that there is no such things as a lurker who would ever consider jacking off to anything they are lurking on (yeah, I know, shush.)
749 people have interacted with me on my threads. 3% have 0 sexual interest towards me, but the rest could. At a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per year for those who might, that would mean my threads have resulted in 194.7 masturbatory experiences over the past 2 years.
Now that seems reasonable. I could totally believe that over the past 2 years two random men in this big wide lit world jack off each week thinking about or looking at something shared here.
so, that is 1.28 pints of cum in 2 years is my answer.

Really though I think the true answer would fall, between 1.28 pints to 64.375 gallons, dependent on the belief in validity of view counters and thoughts on the concept of whether lurkers actually ever jack off to threads on lit. I am still going with the low guesstimate as the other is just disturbing.


anyway, aren't you glad a_guy asked that question. I thought it was entertaining.

Well now you’ve got me thinking... my volume would be a lot lower... for one thing a number of my regulars are very open about the fact they don’t visit for a wank... and that was before I started posting tearful videos which let’s be frank, is a whole new level of kink...

There might be a bit though... I need to give it some thought...

Gorgeous knickers,

 

[Mscott9004]

so happy thursday.
today is a pair from the fredericks of hollywood $3 sale

http://i.imgur.com/gioiImRm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/GcxEoxPm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/880dc6cm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rhM3a8cm.jpg

and also a pointless ramble.

So the question of if I had ever tried to compute how much cum has been spilled because of my threads on Lit was raised.

Indeed I had not, but I now will attempt, and bring you along on the thought process
Given facts, I have been on lit 2 years. the average male ejaculates between 1.25 and 5ml per session, (I will go with 3.125ml as the average since I do not have detailed demographics breakdowns of lit)
the number of times men ejaculate per month varies greatly on age, however 10.075 times per month would be an average across the adult male age range.
the number of sex sessions a male has per year also varies greatly with age, but an average of 40.5 times per year across the adult male age demographic.

Now, where things get real tough, determining how many members lit members actually use lit threads as masturbation material, how many actually use what was provided in lit threads as masturbation material, how many view my thread, how many might consider it, or any of the top 200 threads, to be masturbation worthy material, etc etc. the best estimate I can provide based on men porn viewing habits, the amount of porn sites looked at on average, coupled with ejaculatory rates outside of sex from above, is I estimate my thread to provide a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per interested viewer per year.

So 0.134 times per year per male viewer means approximately 1 man will jack off once this year because of something I share, for every 8 who visit this year. that seems reasonable, I think

taking view counts, determining likelihood of unique viewers, subtracting the 3% of viewers who have stated no sexual interest in a prior poll, that means something on one my threads has been masturbation fodder 77,980 times in the past 2 years. WAIT WHAT.
NO, NO, that can't possibly be correct, it is just way, way, way too high. That would mean approximately 64.375 gallons of cum in 2 years because of my threads. That is absurd.

I believe the problem to be in quantifying viewers, unique viewers, using the view counts and estimating how many views were by people who would remotely consider anything here masturbation worthy.

hum, what can I do instead, I guess it may be more apt to assume that there is no such things as a lurker who would ever consider jacking off to anything they are lurking on (yeah, I know, shush.)
749 people have interacted with me on my threads. 3% have 0 sexual interest towards me, but the rest could. At a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per year for those who might, that would mean my threads have resulted in 194.7 masturbatory experiences over the past 2 years.
Now that seems reasonable. I could totally believe that over the past 2 years two random men in this big wide lit world jack off each week thinking about or looking at something shared here.
so, that is 1.28 pints of cum in 2 years is my answer.

Really though I think the true answer would fall, between 1.28 pints to 64.375 gallons, dependent on the belief in validity of view counters and thoughts on the concept of whether lurkers actually ever jack off to threads on lit. I am still going with the low guesstimate as the other is just disturbing.


anyway, aren't you glad a_guy asked that question. I thought it was entertaining.

LOL, you are an amazing woman! The pictures are beautiful! Thank you for sharing the pictures and your thoughts. It keeps me coming back. Thanks again.

 

[Johnny_B993]

so what is up with me today?

Well, last night we did take the "rocket launcher" to cub scouts, had the boys make their own rockets (decorating and rolling construction paper) and launch them. was going good until one landed on the roof. So then I declared him first place winner, that worked. we did then get a second place as all the kids then tried to land on the roof lol.

My kid asked to change his costume request. this time he wants to be a frilled shark. ugh. Then he spotted a $300 adult costume he likes. He actually found he likes most in the Creature Reacher line, but sorry, no kid, best I found was $150 and nope, not for one night and 10 sizes too big. I will say it is amusing to me though. My kid has historically been a planner, so he would tell me what he wanted to be next year once we got home from halloween events the prior year, so I have been very spoiled. This is the first time he has done the wishy washy.

He also inquired how may days left until my birthday. Wonder what he is planning. I am actually thinking about his as well. We have like no kid places near us. No Mcdonald's with playlands, no chuck-e-cheese, but right by my house a laser tag place opened. Wondering if he might like a laser tag party or if it would be too old for 6 and 7 year olds, and/or if the implication of weapons is a problem? also wondering if an injury or death waiver freaks parents out. They have the place built like cities and with hunting camps, tree stands, sniper towers, and hiding spots in the woods. However, nothing is stationed more than 12 feet high I would say, so I don't think much more risk than a slide really.

And yeah, that pretty much sums up my past 24 hours. well other than typing this meeting during a departmental meeting, and similar to the project manager running the meeting, I am questioning the competency of my department. I finished my part of the project for my state, last month, because the project was due to be completed last month. yet today, half the people seem to not even know what they are supposed to be doing. I would be concerned if I was him. People rerequested information he sent and the beginning of last month, over and over again. He actually just ended the meeting, exasperated, with "go read the emails and complete it" after checking on the first 3 locations who all had no clue about anything. The worst part is this is the at least 5th meeting on this project, meaning not only have they ignored all the emails for over a month, but they attended multiple meetings (I saw them on) and still had no clue. I don't understand. I surf lit on my meetings and still know what is happening. Some men, just can't handle the multitasking.

anyway happy tuesday. here is a pair of titty pictures from work today

http://i.imgur.com/KRL8XLcm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/xmCg29Om.jpg

Cube boob is always appreciated. I'll second the earlier comment about video if you could safely manage one.