Damn, she Justa did it again. Still nothing to see.

[EndlessNameless]

Damn slut fairy. So unreliable. But what have you tried placing in bed for her as bribes? Fairies don't work for free.

Well, she is a slut so maybe she's busy slutting it up and all. I sleep naked, so isn't that a good enough bribe?

 

[iaabanag]

Love the workplace titties can we get a workplace titty video anytime soon

so what is up with me today?

Well, last night we did take the "rocket launcher" to cub scouts, had the boys make their own rockets (decorating and rolling construction paper) and launch them. was going good until one landed on the roof. So then I declared him first place winner, that worked. we did then get a second place as all the kids then tried to land on the roof lol.

My kid asked to change his costume request. this time he wants to be a frilled shark. ugh. Then he spotted a $300 adult costume he likes. He actually found he likes most in the Creature Reacher line, but sorry, no kid, best I found was $150 and nope, not for one night and 10 sizes too big. I will say it is amusing to me though. My kid has historically been a planner, so he would tell me what he wanted to be next year once we got home from halloween events the prior year, so I have been very spoiled. This is the first time he has done the wishy washy.

He also inquired how may days left until my birthday. Wonder what he is planning. I am actually thinking about his as well. We have like no kid places near us. No Mcdonald's with playlands, no chuck-e-cheese, but right by my house a laser tag place opened. Wondering if he might like a laser tag party or if it would be too old for 6 and 7 year olds, and/or if the implication of weapons is a problem? also wondering if an injury or death waiver freaks parents out. They have the place built like cities and with hunting camps, tree stands, sniper towers, and hiding spots in the woods. However, nothing is stationed more than 12 feet high I would say, so I don't think much more risk than a slide really.

And yeah, that pretty much sums up my past 24 hours. well other than typing this meeting during a departmental meeting, and similar to the project manager running the meeting, I am questioning the competency of my department. I finished my part of the project for my state, last month, because the project was due to be completed last month. yet today, half the people seem to not even know what they are supposed to be doing. I would be concerned if I was him. People rerequested information he sent and the beginning of last month, over and over again. He actually just ended the meeting, exasperated, with "go read the emails and complete it" after checking on the first 3 locations who all had no clue about anything. The worst part is this is the at least 5th meeting on this project, meaning not only have they ignored all the emails for over a month, but they attended multiple meetings (I saw them on) and still had no clue. I don't understand. I surf lit on my meetings and still know what is happening. Some men, just can't handle the multitasking.

anyway happy tuesday. here is a pair of titty pictures from work today

http://i.imgur.com/KRL8XLcm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/xmCg29Om.jpg

 

[scotluvsoral]

so my house is over run by little humans today. They started arriving right before I left. My school district is unique. When there are things that they think should be holidays, but aren't, it seems they make them "teacher planning days". so like if spring break doesn't fall to cover Good Friday, Good Friday will be a "teacher planning day", if for some reason veterans day isn't a holiday, like last year it wasn't, it becomes a teacher planning day. Same with MLK, Presidents, etc. the Friday before labor day and memorial day are often planning days. Ash Wednesday too. sometimes st patricks day. 1st monday of daylight savings time changes (this year it is a professional development day, which I think is AKA we don't want to deal with you dropping your kids off at the wrong time because you are dumb day). the entire week of thanksgiving that isn't a holiday, yup planning days. christmas holiday, well students always return on the 8th, and days that didn't make the holiday ie the week of new years such as the 6th and 7th this year, are planning days. I think they are trying to cover Orthodox Christmas too. I guess it could all be a coincidence, but I really think they sit down and go ok we have this many holidays and this many planning days, when do we not want to deal with the kids?

Anyway, that means that kids in my area have off September 11th. However, most adults work, and it is known that hubby stays home with kid on these days, so he often gets a call or text from others who can't get them off. those we now he kids multiplying. there is this one single mom though that often shows up super late. like last time was almost 9 o'clock. I will so be side eyeing her if that happens today too. Look I get it, if you don't have to go pick up your kid by a specific set time like on a school day, being a little slack about it, but come on that is way past slack.

Anyway. I feel I should share something, so here is my ass
http://i.imgur.com/4iMn6fEm.jpg

Damn cute ass too!

 

[ohverbatum7]

my house is over run by little humans today.

Are you sure there is no aliens that have slipped through the net?

 

[ohverbatum7]

I am sure you have handled many. (Breasts that is).

Sadly not enough, and I have a failing memory.

 

[ohverbatum7]

They have the place built like cities and with hunting camps, tree stands, sniper towers, and hiding spots in the woods. However, nothing is stationed more than 12 feet high I would say, so I don't think much more risk than a slide really.

Preparing the kids for Armageddon are you

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

A previous company I worked for thought that one didn't need to have IT experience to be an IT manager. The manager we had lasted 6 months and then they let him go because he didn't understand IT.

Boggles the mind. It really does.

lol, it just seems so insane, it is mind boggling

Show more bum.

ok

What a beautiful moon to start my evening off wonderfully!

thank you

Wow, just going to gaze for a bit

feel free

Well, she is a slut so maybe she's busy slutting it up and all. I sleep naked, so isn't that a good enough bribe?

haha, maybe, maybe. well I suspect the slut fair probably has no shortage of naked men. I still recommend alcohol as a method for luring the slut fairy. kind of like teeth for the tooth fairy.

Love the workplace titties can we get a workplace titty video anytime soon

I am sure we could, any requests for the theme (besides titties)

Damn cute ass too!

thank you

my house is over run by little humans today.

Are you sure there is no aliens that have slipped through the net?

don't think so, but they are all weird so who knows

I am sure you have handled many. (Breasts that is).

Sadly not enough, and I have a failing memory.

awwww, that is such a shame. maybe the slut fairy can help you with that too. (handling breasts that is, as for the memory, I am afraid that that is a losing battle)

They have the place built like cities and with hunting camps, tree stands, sniper towers, and hiding spots in the woods. However, nothing is stationed more than 12 feet high I would say, so I don't think much more risk than a slide really.

Preparing the kids for Armageddon are you

haha. boy scout motto, always be prepared....or some shit.

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

so happy thursday.
today is a pair from the fredericks of hollywood $3 sale

http://i.imgur.com/gioiImRm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/GcxEoxPm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/880dc6cm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rhM3a8cm.jpg

and also a pointless ramble.

So the question of if I had ever tried to compute how much cum has been spilled because of my threads on Lit was raised.

Indeed I had not, but I now will attempt, and bring you along on the thought process
Given facts, I have been on lit 2 years. the average male ejaculates between 1.25 and 5ml per session, (I will go with 3.125ml as the average since I do not have detailed demographics breakdowns of lit)
the number of times men ejaculate per month varies greatly on age, however 10.075 times per month would be an average across the adult male age range.
the number of sex sessions a male has per year also varies greatly with age, but an average of 40.5 times per year across the adult male age demographic.

Now, where things get real tough, determining how many members lit members actually use lit threads as masturbation material, how many actually use what was provided in lit threads as masturbation material, how many view my thread, how many might consider it, or any of the top 200 threads, to be masturbation worthy material, etc etc. the best estimate I can provide based on men porn viewing habits, the amount of porn sites looked at on average, coupled with ejaculatory rates outside of sex from above, is I estimate my thread to provide a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per interested viewer per year.

So 0.134 times per year per male viewer means approximately 1 man will jack off once this year because of something I share, for every 8 who visit this year. that seems reasonable, I think

taking view counts, determining likelihood of unique viewers, subtracting the 3% of viewers who have stated no sexual interest in a prior poll, that means something on one my threads has been masturbation fodder 77,980 times in the past 2 years. WAIT WHAT.
NO, NO, that can't possibly be correct, it is just way, way, way too high. That would mean approximately 64.375 gallons of cum in 2 years because of my threads. That is absurd.

I believe the problem to be in quantifying viewers, unique viewers, using the view counts and estimating how many views were by people who would remotely consider anything here masturbation worthy.

hum, what can I do instead, I guess it may be more apt to assume that there is no such things as a lurker who would ever consider jacking off to anything they are lurking on (yeah, I know, shush.)
749 people have interacted with me on my threads. 3% have 0 sexual interest towards me, but the rest could. At a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per year for those who might, that would mean my threads have resulted in 194.7 masturbatory experiences over the past 2 years.
Now that seems reasonable. I could totally believe that over the past 2 years two random men in this big wide lit world jack off each week thinking about or looking at something shared here.
so, that is 1.28 pints of cum in 2 years is my answer.

Really though I think the true answer would fall, between 1.28 pints to 64.375 gallons, dependent on the belief in validity of view counters and thoughts on the concept of whether lurkers actually ever jack off to threads on lit. I am still going with the low guesstimate as the other is just disturbing.


anyway, aren't you glad a_guy asked that question. I thought it was entertaining.

 

[scotluvsoral]

so happy thursday.
today is a pair from the fredericks of hollywood $3 sale

http://i.imgur.com/gioiImRm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/GcxEoxPm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/880dc6cm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rhM3a8cm.jpg

and also a pointless ramble.

So the question of if I had ever tried to compute how much cum has been spilled because of my threads on Lit was raised.

Indeed I had not, but I now will attempt, and bring you along on the thought process
Given facts, I have been on lit 2 years. the average male ejaculates between 1.25 and 5ml per session, (I will go with 3.125ml as the average since I do not have detailed demographics breakdowns of lit)
the number of times men ejaculate per month varies greatly on age, however 10.075 times per month would be an average across the adult male age range.
the number of sex sessions a male has per year also varies greatly with age, but an average of 40.5 times per year across the adult male age demographic.

Now, where things get real tough, determining how many members lit members actually use lit threads as masturbation material, how many actually use what was provided in lit threads as masturbation material, how many view my thread, how many might consider it, or any of the top 200 threads, to be masturbation worthy material, etc etc. the best estimate I can provide based on men porn viewing habits, the amount of porn sites looked at on average, coupled with ejaculatory rates outside of sex from above, is I estimate my thread to provide a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per interested viewer per year.

So 0.134 times per year per male viewer means approximately 1 man will jack off once this year because of something I share, for every 8 who visit this year. that seems reasonable, I think

taking view counts, determining likelihood of unique viewers, subtracting the 3% of viewers who have stated no sexual interest in a prior poll, that means something on one my threads has been masturbation fodder 77,980 times in the past 2 years. WAIT WHAT.
NO, NO, that can't possibly be correct, it is just way, way, way too high. That would mean approximately 64.375 gallons of cum in 2 years because of my threads. That is absurd.

I believe the problem to be in quantifying viewers, unique viewers, using the view counts and estimating how many views were by people who would remotely consider anything here masturbation worthy.

hum, what can I do instead, I guess it may be more apt to assume that there is no such things as a lurker who would ever consider jacking off to anything they are lurking on (yeah, I know, shush.)
749 people have interacted with me on my threads. 3% have 0 sexual interest towards me, but the rest could. At a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per year for those who might, that would mean my threads have resulted in 194.7 masturbatory experiences over the past 2 years.
Now that seems reasonable. I could totally believe that over the past 2 years two random men in this big wide lit world jack off each week thinking about or looking at something shared here.
so, that is 1.28 pints of cum in 2 years is my answer.

Really though I think the true answer would fall, between 1.28 pints to 64.375 gallons, dependent on the belief in validity of view counters and thoughts on the concept of whether lurkers actually ever jack off to threads on lit. I am still going with the low guesstimate as the other is just disturbing.


anyway, aren't you glad a_guy asked that question. I thought it was entertaining.

FOFLMSAO OMG, that is funny, Justa!!! For the record I suspect it is WAYYYYYY more than 1.28 pints of cum BTW...you have a sweet bottom! Just saying

 

[DrDarkChocolate]

so happy thursday.
today is a pair from the fredericks of hollywood $3 sale

http://i.imgur.com/gioiImRm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/GcxEoxPm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/880dc6cm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rhM3a8cm.jpg

and also a pointless ramble.

So the question of if I had ever tried to compute how much cum has been spilled because of my threads on Lit was raised.

Indeed I had not, but I now will attempt, and bring you along on the thought process
Given facts, I have been on lit 2 years. the average male ejaculates between 1.25 and 5ml per session, (I will go with 3.125ml as the average since I do not have detailed demographics breakdowns of lit)
the number of times men ejaculate per month varies greatly on age, however 10.075 times per month would be an average across the adult male age range.
the number of sex sessions a male has per year also varies greatly with age, but an average of 40.5 times per year across the adult male age demographic.

Now, where things get real tough, determining how many members lit members actually use lit threads as masturbation material, how many actually use what was provided in lit threads as masturbation material, how many view my thread, how many might consider it, or any of the top 200 threads, to be masturbation worthy material, etc etc. the best estimate I can provide based on men porn viewing habits, the amount of porn sites looked at on average, coupled with ejaculatory rates outside of sex from above, is I estimate my thread to provide a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per interested viewer per year.

So 0.134 times per year per male viewer means approximately 1 man will jack off once this year because of something I share, for every 8 who visit this year. that seems reasonable, I think

taking view counts, determining likelihood of unique viewers, subtracting the 3% of viewers who have stated no sexual interest in a prior poll, that means something on one my threads has been masturbation fodder 77,980 times in the past 2 years. WAIT WHAT.
NO, NO, that can't possibly be correct, it is just way, way, way too high. That would mean approximately 64.375 gallons of cum in 2 years because of my threads. That is absurd.

I believe the problem to be in quantifying viewers, unique viewers, using the view counts and estimating how many views were by people who would remotely consider anything here masturbation worthy.

hum, what can I do instead, I guess it may be more apt to assume that there is no such things as a lurker who would ever consider jacking off to anything they are lurking on (yeah, I know, shush.)
749 people have interacted with me on my threads. 3% have 0 sexual interest towards me, but the rest could. At a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per year for those who might, that would mean my threads have resulted in 194.7 masturbatory experiences over the past 2 years.
Now that seems reasonable. I could totally believe that over the past 2 years two random men in this big wide lit world jack off each week thinking about or looking at something shared here.
so, that is 1.28 pints of cum in 2 years is my answer.

Really though I think the true answer would fall, between 1.28 pints to 64.375 gallons, dependent on the belief in validity of view counters and thoughts on the concept of whether lurkers actually ever jack off to threads on lit. I am still going with the low guesstimate as the other is just disturbing.


anyway, aren't you glad a_guy asked that question. I thought it was entertaining.

Since I discovered your thread a month ago and subsequently found the index of all your pictures, I have personally cum to your photos over 30 times. With an average ejac volume at 4 ml. So my personal contribution is around 120 ml.

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

FOFLMSAO OMG, that is funny, Justa!!! For the record I suspect it is WAYYYYYY more than 1.28 pints of cum BTW...you have a sweet bottom! Just saying

lol. yeah, this is what I do during conference calls lol. but it is quite entertaining and soothing.

I still stand by it. 749 litsters have interacted with me on my thread, this means 726.53 members here on lit who might consider jacking off to what I post. at a rate of 0.134 jack offs per interactive litster per year that is 97.35 jack offs per year, so 194.7 times someone has jacked off related to my time on my lit threads. At 3.125ml per time, that is 608.47 ml, hence I stand by my 1.28 pints

and thank you for finding my ass sweet.

Since I discovered your thread a month ago and subsequently found the index of all your pictures, I have personally cum to your photos over 30 times. With an average ejac volume at 4 ml. So my personal contribution is around 120 ml.

Well now, you had never interacted with me before, and at 30 times, according to my jack off rate per member per year calculation(now known as jor) that accounts for an estimate of just one year and 240 male participants. that isn't even accounting for trying to throw off my ml per jo volume.

So you are a lurker who is saying hi just to screw with my logic problem. really.

I assume you have read enough to know that I am joking. You are welcome to throw off my pointless rambling. I welcome it.

So Hi, Welcome, Glad you are enjoying my oversharing

 

[smithbill1970]

so happy thursday.
today is a pair from the fredericks of hollywood $3 sale

http://i.imgur.com/gioiImRm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/GcxEoxPm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/880dc6cm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rhM3a8cm.jpg

and also a pointless ramble.

So the question of if I had ever tried to compute how much cum has been spilled because of my threads on Lit was raised.

Indeed I had not, but I now will attempt, and bring you along on the thought process
Given facts, I have been on lit 2 years. the average male ejaculates between 1.25 and 5ml per session, (I will go with 3.125ml as the average since I do not have detailed demographics breakdowns of lit)
the number of times men ejaculate per month varies greatly on age, however 10.075 times per month would be an average across the adult male age range.
the number of sex sessions a male has per year also varies greatly with age, but an average of 40.5 times per year across the adult male age demographic.

Now, where things get real tough, determining how many members lit members actually use lit threads as masturbation material, how many actually use what was provided in lit threads as masturbation material, how many view my thread, how many might consider it, or any of the top 200 threads, to be masturbation worthy material, etc etc. the best estimate I can provide based on men porn viewing habits, the amount of porn sites looked at on average, coupled with ejaculatory rates outside of sex from above, is I estimate my thread to provide a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per interested viewer per year.

So 0.134 times per year per male viewer means approximately 1 man will jack off once this year because of something I share, for every 8 who visit this year. that seems reasonable, I think

taking view counts, determining likelihood of unique viewers, subtracting the 3% of viewers who have stated no sexual interest in a prior poll, that means something on one my threads has been masturbation fodder 77,980 times in the past 2 years. WAIT WHAT.
NO, NO, that can't possibly be correct, it is just way, way, way too high. That would mean approximately 64.375 gallons of cum in 2 years because of my threads. That is absurd.

I believe the problem to be in quantifying viewers, unique viewers, using the view counts and estimating how many views were by people who would remotely consider anything here masturbation worthy.

hum, what can I do instead, I guess it may be more apt to assume that there is no such things as a lurker who would ever consider jacking off to anything they are lurking on (yeah, I know, shush.)
749 people have interacted with me on my threads. 3% have 0 sexual interest towards me, but the rest could. At a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per year for those who might, that would mean my threads have resulted in 194.7 masturbatory experiences over the past 2 years.
Now that seems reasonable. I could totally believe that over the past 2 years two random men in this big wide lit world jack off each week thinking about or looking at something shared here.
so, that is 1.28 pints of cum in 2 years is my answer.

Really though I think the true answer would fall, between 1.28 pints to 64.375 gallons, dependent on the belief in validity of view counters and thoughts on the concept of whether lurkers actually ever jack off to threads on lit. I am still going with the low guesstimate as the other is just disturbing.


anyway, aren't you glad a_guy asked that question. I thought it was entertaining.

But you must also take into account the repeat visitors, looking only at unique visitors leaves off a large number of potential masturbatory visits. I for one have used your thoughtfully provided artistry as masturbatory fodder on several occasions this year and I only found this thread a couple of months ago.

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

Very sexy thong picture. I only use your Pictures for my masturbation material especially your mom panties pictures they get me Very! Hard!!!

Well thank you. and thank you again for liking my regular daily wear panties. I am glad they make you hard.

though, now you are throwing off my jor of .134 per member per year. And I came to this number with thought. if the average man cums 10.075 per month, but is only having sex 40.5 times per year that means he is jacking off 80.4 times per year. the average man who belongs to an adult site, belongs to 6 adult sites. thus assuming time is equal distribution, he is then jacking off 13.4 times per year. one can likely predict it will be one of the most recent 200 active threads. However those are generally a mix of erotic items or people arguing, so 1 in 100 chance of one of those 13.4 times being related to something posted here. Thus my jorpmpy rate of 0.134. And now you are saying you are not distributing you jacking equally among 100 threads and 6 sites. While your statement does make me smile, it does not bode well for my logic problem and guesstimate

 

[hotoldrguy]

so happy thursday.
today is a pair from the fredericks of hollywood $3 sale

http://i.imgur.com/gioiImRm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/GcxEoxPm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/880dc6cm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rhM3a8cm.jpg

and also a pointless ramble.

So the question of if I had ever tried to compute how much cum has been spilled because of my threads on Lit was raised.

Indeed I had not, but I now will attempt, and bring you along on the thought process
Given facts, I have been on lit 2 years. the average male ejaculates between 1.25 and 5ml per session, (I will go with 3.125ml as the average since I do not have detailed demographics breakdowns of lit)
the number of times men ejaculate per month varies greatly on age, however 10.075 times per month would be an average across the adult male age range.
the number of sex sessions a male has per year also varies greatly with age, but an average of 40.5 times per year across the adult male age demographic.

Now, where things get real tough, determining how many members lit members actually use lit threads as masturbation material, how many actually use what was provided in lit threads as masturbation material, how many view my thread, how many might consider it, or any of the top 200 threads, to be masturbation worthy material, etc etc. the best estimate I can provide based on men porn viewing habits, the amount of porn sites looked at on average, coupled with ejaculatory rates outside of sex from above, is I estimate my thread to provide a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per interested viewer per year.

So 0.134 times per year per male viewer means approximately 1 man will jack off once this year because of something I share, for every 8 who visit this year. that seems reasonable, I think

taking view counts, determining likelihood of unique viewers, subtracting the 3% of viewers who have stated no sexual interest in a prior poll, that means something on one my threads has been masturbation fodder 77,980 times in the past 2 years. WAIT WHAT.
NO, NO, that can't possibly be correct, it is just way, way, way too high. That would mean approximately 64.375 gallons of cum in 2 years because of my threads. That is absurd.

I believe the problem to be in quantifying viewers, unique viewers, using the view counts and estimating how many views were by people who would remotely consider anything here masturbation worthy.

hum, what can I do instead, I guess it may be more apt to assume that there is no such things as a lurker who would ever consider jacking off to anything they are lurking on (yeah, I know, shush.)
749 people have interacted with me on my threads. 3% have 0 sexual interest towards me, but the rest could. At a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per year for those who might, that would mean my threads have resulted in 194.7 masturbatory experiences over the past 2 years.
Now that seems reasonable. I could totally believe that over the past 2 years two random men in this big wide lit world jack off each week thinking about or looking at something shared here.
so, that is 1.28 pints of cum in 2 years is my answer.

Really though I think the true answer would fall, between 1.28 pints to 64.375 gallons, dependent on the belief in validity of view counters and thoughts on the concept of whether lurkers actually ever jack off to threads on lit. I am still going with the low guesstimate as the other is just disturbing.


anyway, aren't you glad a_guy asked that question. I thought it was entertaining.

After we all look at these picks, I believe numbers and quantities will increase. I have also heard that cum is good for the skin so if you could actually have all of the cum from your threads sent to you @64 gallons and by cutting it with 50% cold cream....you could sell it and rake in some good money.

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

But you must also take into account the repeat visitors, looking only at unique visitors leaves off a large number of potential masturbatory visits. I for one have used your thoughtfully provided artistry as masturbatory fodder on several occasions this year and I only found this thread a couple of months ago.

you are indeed correct. even given repeat visitors, I still concluded they likely split their jack off time between 6 adult sites and 100 threads while here. So my assumption was given that vast amounts of porn, even with repeat visitors, the odds are so low, as they look at a lot of porn.

throwing in a statistically significant preference between that vast amounts of porn will make this a very difficult problem to quantify. who would have thought estimating the amount of cum spilled because of my oversharing hobby would be such a difficult undertaking?

ok, actually I did, my intention was to first calculate a number assuming no preference between the viewers, then subtract those who interact and create a more likely jorpmpy rate for those who do interact, but my calculation was so high just based on a likelihood of 362,780 unique viewers with no preference that I decided to not even go there haha.

but I am glad you enjoy.

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

After we all look at these picks, I believe numbers and quantities will increase. I have also heard that cum is good for the skin so if you could actually have all of the cum from your threads sent to you @64 gallons and by cutting it with 50% cold cream....you could sell it and rake in some good money.

haha, maybe they shall, and now cold cream with cum recipes shall be my next google search. Because, well, just a 50/50 mix with nothing else seems, oh I don't know, not creative enough as a product, ya know

 

[hotoldrguy]

haha, maybe they shall, and now cold cream with cum recipes shall be my next google search. Because, well, just a 50/50 mix with nothing else seems, oh I don't know, not creative enough as a product, ya know

Indeed, but I am sure you can find a way to spice it up some more

 

[hotoldrguy]

hmmm...looks like this is already on the market

https://www.medicaldaily.com/extraordinary-things-you-can-do-sperm-242190

 

[Justadesperatewifeandmom]

hmmm...looks like this is already on the market

https://www.medicaldaily.com/extraordinary-things-you-can-do-sperm-242190

and now I have the perfect gift for my bored mom friends for christmas.

the book, not the semen

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/p/na...hzgUQ5xtqwyuPZHcOxHelgbI5-CWSPiEaAsQnEALw_wcB

 

[hotoldrguy]

and now I have the perfect gift for my bored mom friends for christmas.

the book, not the semen

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/p/na...hzgUQ5xtqwyuPZHcOxHelgbI5-CWSPiEaAsQnEALw_wcB

LMAO...or you could open a semen restaurant

 

[ohverbatum7]

So the question of if I had ever tried to compute how much cum has been spilled because of my threads on Lit was raised.

I just pictured myself falling into a vat of that come, I think I better practice my back stroke, It is known that some men lap up cream pies, they might consider it paradise, although the thought of it means I may have difficulty keeping my last meal down.

 

[clark_kent]

I appreciated the multi-variable statistics in determining your estimates. I guess it also depends upon unique views vs. multiple views. And of course, while some may have been viewing for 2 years, others are new to your thread (sorry - I was on a Lit hiatus - I didn’t know!). And the hypothesis that Lit viewers are “average” males (i.e. avg number of ejaculations per year) could be skewed since the average Lit member may view more adult material (than average). I’m certainly willing to do my part.
That being said, I calculate the amount to be......A lot.

Excuse me while I go re-examine your photos.

 

[EctoJohn]

Fredricks of Hollywood should pay you and your ass for making their panties look better.

 

[Shyguy1369]

so happy thursday.
today is a pair from the fredericks of hollywood $3 sale

http://i.imgur.com/gioiImRm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/GcxEoxPm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/880dc6cm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rhM3a8cm.jpg

and also a pointless ramble.

So the question of if I had ever tried to compute how much cum has been spilled because of my threads on Lit was raised.

Indeed I had not, but I now will attempt, and bring you along on the thought process
Given facts, I have been on lit 2 years. the average male ejaculates between 1.25 and 5ml per session, (I will go with 3.125ml as the average since I do not have detailed demographics breakdowns of lit)
the number of times men ejaculate per month varies greatly on age, however 10.075 times per month would be an average across the adult male age range.
the number of sex sessions a male has per year also varies greatly with age, but an average of 40.5 times per year across the adult male age demographic.

Now, where things get real tough, determining how many members lit members actually use lit threads as masturbation material, how many actually use what was provided in lit threads as masturbation material, how many view my thread, how many might consider it, or any of the top 200 threads, to be masturbation worthy material, etc etc. the best estimate I can provide based on men porn viewing habits, the amount of porn sites looked at on average, coupled with ejaculatory rates outside of sex from above, is I estimate my thread to provide a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per interested viewer per year.

So 0.134 times per year per male viewer means approximately 1 man will jack off once this year because of something I share, for every 8 who visit this year. that seems reasonable, I think

taking view counts, determining likelihood of unique viewers, subtracting the 3% of viewers who have stated no sexual interest in a prior poll, that means something on one my threads has been masturbation fodder 77,980 times in the past 2 years. WAIT WHAT.
NO, NO, that can't possibly be correct, it is just way, way, way too high. That would mean approximately 64.375 gallons of cum in 2 years because of my threads. That is absurd.

I believe the problem to be in quantifying viewers, unique viewers, using the view counts and estimating how many views were by people who would remotely consider anything here masturbation worthy.

hum, what can I do instead, I guess it may be more apt to assume that there is no such things as a lurker who would ever consider jacking off to anything they are lurking on (yeah, I know, shush.)
749 people have interacted with me on my threads. 3% have 0 sexual interest towards me, but the rest could. At a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per year for those who might, that would mean my threads have resulted in 194.7 masturbatory experiences over the past 2 years.
Now that seems reasonable. I could totally believe that over the past 2 years two random men in this big wide lit world jack off each week thinking about or looking at something shared here.
so, that is 1.28 pints of cum in 2 years is my answer.

Really though I think the true answer would fall, between 1.28 pints to 64.375 gallons, dependent on the belief in validity of view counters and thoughts on the concept of whether lurkers actually ever jack off to threads on lit. I am still going with the low guesstimate as the other is just disturbing.


anyway, aren't you glad a_guy asked that question. I thought it was entertaining.

As always Justa, you are sexy, beautiful and desirable as ever. Truly a woman I have fantasized about on more than one occasion.
Hate to throw more thoughts into your well thought out ramble, but what about someone like me who has a few times spilled his seed using your thread... and other times spilled it fantasizing about you and the pictures/clips you've shared? Not necessarily while perusing the thread.

 

[wilderness]

so happy thursday.
today is a pair from the fredericks of hollywood $3 sale

http://i.imgur.com/gioiImRm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/GcxEoxPm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/880dc6cm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rhM3a8cm.jpg

and also a pointless ramble.

So the question of if I had ever tried to compute how much cum has been spilled because of my threads on Lit was raised.

Indeed I had not, but I now will attempt, and bring you along on the thought process
Given facts, I have been on lit 2 years. the average male ejaculates between 1.25 and 5ml per session, (I will go with 3.125ml as the average since I do not have detailed demographics breakdowns of lit)
the number of times men ejaculate per month varies greatly on age, however 10.075 times per month would be an average across the adult male age range.
the number of sex sessions a male has per year also varies greatly with age, but an average of 40.5 times per year across the adult male age demographic.

Now, where things get real tough, determining how many members lit members actually use lit threads as masturbation material, how many actually use what was provided in lit threads as masturbation material, how many view my thread, how many might consider it, or any of the top 200 threads, to be masturbation worthy material, etc etc. the best estimate I can provide based on men porn viewing habits, the amount of porn sites looked at on average, coupled with ejaculatory rates outside of sex from above, is I estimate my thread to provide a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per interested viewer per year.

So 0.134 times per year per male viewer means approximately 1 man will jack off once this year because of something I share, for every 8 who visit this year. that seems reasonable, I think

taking view counts, determining likelihood of unique viewers, subtracting the 3% of viewers who have stated no sexual interest in a prior poll, that means something on one my threads has been masturbation fodder 77,980 times in the past 2 years. WAIT WHAT.
NO, NO, that can't possibly be correct, it is just way, way, way too high. That would mean approximately 64.375 gallons of cum in 2 years because of my threads. That is absurd.

I believe the problem to be in quantifying viewers, unique viewers, using the view counts and estimating how many views were by people who would remotely consider anything here masturbation worthy.

hum, what can I do instead, I guess it may be more apt to assume that there is no such things as a lurker who would ever consider jacking off to anything they are lurking on (yeah, I know, shush.)
749 people have interacted with me on my threads. 3% have 0 sexual interest towards me, but the rest could. At a masturbation rate of 0.134 times per year for those who might, that would mean my threads have resulted in 194.7 masturbatory experiences over the past 2 years.
Now that seems reasonable. I could totally believe that over the past 2 years two random men in this big wide lit world jack off each week thinking about or looking at something shared here.
so, that is 1.28 pints of cum in 2 years is my answer.

Really though I think the true answer would fall, between 1.28 pints to 64.375 gallons, dependent on the belief in validity of view counters and thoughts on the concept of whether lurkers actually ever jack off to threads on lit. I am still going with the low guesstimate as the other is just disturbing.


anyway, aren't you glad a_guy asked that question. I thought it was entertaining.

Money well spent!

Okay, that's pretty unsettling when you think of all the trees that were made into tissues to clean up after! Ban tissues! Use washcloths! Save the planet on spurt at a time.