The new faces of the neo-fascist & racist Democratic Party!

[magicalmoments]

I see trump has started using caps in his tweets.
Always a sign that the tweeter/texter has lost it, reverting to caps.

 

[Dumpington]

magicalmoments writes: "I see trump has started using caps in his tweets. Always a sign that the tweeter/texter has lost it, reverting to caps."

If only Robert Mueller had known about that, perhaps he could have added it to his report - you know, to give the Democratic in the U.S. House & Senate something more with which to attack the Trump presidency! I mean, isn't "reverting to caps" an impeachable offense somewhere? Perhaps it's even racist!

Meanwhile, magicalmoments, - I know I've already said this - but seeing your name will forever remind me of a song that came out just over fifty years ago! That was a time when a LOT of great songs were recorded! That particular song peaked at #6 on the American charts!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKfASw6qoag - ("This Magic Moment" - by Jay and the Americans - runs 3:02)

 

[YDB95]

YDB95 writes: "You are one person. One tragically misguided, misinformed, racist person."

And here we go again - anybody who points out that Elijah Cummings' 7th U.S. Congressional District in Maryland is a rat-&-rodent infested sh*thole must now be labelled a racist, right?

No, and that's not what I said.

And anybody who thinks that Maxine Waters is weird must be a racist, as well!

Nope. I don't agree with everything she's ever said either.

"But be that as it may, the Japanese-American internment camps were concentration camps."

So... what you're NOW saying is that Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is simply arguing that President Trump is a LOT like President Franklin Roosevelt? That's an interesting take that I hadn't actually heard before now.

Cute, but no. I will, though, say those camps were probably the worst thing FDR ever did and there's no excuse for any president who followed him to do anything like the same.

Of course, FDR forced legal Japanese-American citizens (who hadn't violated ANY American laws) to sell their homes & businesses before then being placed in camps. I honestly haven't heard of ANY legal American citizens of hispanic descent being forced to sell their homes and/or businesses before then being forcibly relocated to immigration detention centers!

That's because you clearly only get your news from right wing propaganda sources. Now, what you're describing hasn't been happening systematically like it was done to the Japanese Americans, but some US citizens have been swept up and thrown in the cages. And there is no excuse for that.

"As I've said before, that's exactly how Hitler started."

It's far worse than you think - Adolf Hitler also owned a dog whose name began with the letter B - (he called her "Blondi") - Bill Clinton had a dog (named "Buddy") - Barack Obama had a dog (named "Bo") - this is EXACTLY how Hitler got started!

Wow...as disgusting as your attitude is, I might have at least said you weren't trivialising the Holocaust. I stand corrected.

 

[Dumpington]

YDB95 writes: "Cute, but no. I will, though, say those camps were probably the worst thing FDR ever did and there's no excuse for any president who followed him to do anything like the same."

I will fully agree with you that FDR had no business rounding-up legal American citizens, forcing them to part with their businesses & belongings, and then shipping them off to camps in the U.S. interior for the duration of the war. That was INEXCUSABLE! But what if tens of thousands of people had illegally crossed into the United States, and President Roosevelt (under U.S. immigration law) had detained them in border detention facilities? Would you have supported that? I would have.

"That's because you clearly only get your news from right wing propaganda sources."

I get my news from the SAME sources where you get your news, YDB95 - that is, assuming you don't get your news watching CNN & MSNBC. If President Roosevelt had had to deal with pro-Japanese or pro-Nazi "Sanctuary Cities" during the Second World War, whom would you support? FDR, or those cities allowing Hitler's agents to circulate freely without fear of arrest?

"Wow...as disgusting as your attitude is, I might have at least said you weren't trivialising the Holocaust. I stand corrected."

Oh, lighten up! The liberal Trump-haters are ALWAYS making absurd comparisons between Hitler's Nazis & supporters of this president! I point out one silly (but true) comparison involving Hitler's dog with Bill & Barack and you're all horrified? Get real!

 

[My I]

YDB95 writes: "Cute, but no. I will, though, say those camps were probably the worst thing FDR ever did and there's no excuse for any president who followed him to do anything like the same."

I will fully agree with you that FDR had no business rounding-up legal American citizens, forcing them to part with their businesses & belongings, and then shipping them off to camps in the U.S. interior for the duration of the war. That was INEXCUSABLE! But what if tens of thousands of people had illegally crossed into the United States, and President Roosevelt (under U.S. immigration law) had detained them in border detention facilities? Would you have supported that? I would have.

"That's because you clearly only get your news from right wing propaganda sources."

I get my news from the SAME sources where you get your news, YDB95 - that is, assuming you don't get your news watching CNN & MSNBC. If President Roosevelt had had to deal with pro-Japanese or pro-Nazi "Sanctuary Cities" during the Second World War, whom would you support? FDR, or those cities allowing Hitler's agents to circulate freely without fear of arrest?

"Wow...as disgusting as your attitude is, I might have at least said you weren't trivialising the Holocaust. I stand corrected."

Oh, lighten up! The liberal Trump-haters are ALWAYS making absurd comparisons between Hitler's Nazis & supporters of this president! I point out one silly (but true) comparison involving Hitler's dog with Bill & Barack and you're all horrified? Get real!

Point out that a Liberal is wrong and they will blow a fucking gasket every single time.

 

[icanhelp1]

I miss the good-old-days when anytime a GOP scandal popped up or a skeleton fell out of a closet, their standard go-to always was: "That was just a youthful indiscretion."

I'm surprised they didn't try to resurrect that one for 45 to explain away Stormy since he hadn't quite hit drawing Social Security age yet.

.

No reason to explain away Stormy, 45 wasn't a politician then, what he did was his own business. But amazed how Teddy boy got away with manslaughter in the CHAPPAQUIDDICK scandal, wielded a pretty big shovel to bury that one. Selective scandals and selective outrage, your constant blathering and selective bias really leave your credibility questionable. Ah those good ole days!

 

[icanhelp1]

I see trump has started using caps in his tweets.
Always a sign that the tweeter/texter has lost it, reverting to caps.

Always a sign? Really? I thought caps was used as a means to accentuate a point or shouting. Never seen anything in the urban dictionary that defines caps as 'losing it'. More intellectual dishonesty from the left. Like anyone gives a shit what you think.

 

[JKendallDane]

No reason to explain away Stormy, 45 wasn't a politician then, what he did was his own business.

Well, yeah, except for him openly talking about running in 1987 and 1988.

And except for him actually putting himself on the ballot in California in 2000.

And except for him making public statements about running in 2003 and 2004.

And except for him yet again making noises about getting into the 2012 contest before he put on a show of officially announcing he wouldn't a full 18 months before the election.

So while 45 may have not been an elected politician, he most certainly had been playing the game and actively lusting after the Oval Office for thirty years. Therefore, anything and everything he did during that time period is the business of the voters...Stormy included.

.

 

[magicalmoments]

It's amusing. Some clown above stating that trump wasn't a politician back when he was actively sexually abusing women and involved in all sorts of dubious business practices.
FFS.
He's not a politician now!
He's the same user and abuser he's always been and demonstrating that he is as inept and corrupt at running a country as he is at running a business.

 

[icanhelp1]

Well, yeah, except for him openly talking about running in 1987 and 1988.

And except for him actually putting himself on the ballot in California in 2000.

And except for him making public statements about running in 2003 and 2004.

And except for him yet again making noises about getting into the 2012 contest before he put on a show of officially announcing he wouldn't a full 18 months before the election.

So while 45 may have not been an elected politician, he most certainly had been playing the game and actively lusting after the Oval Office for thirty years. Therefore, anything and everything he did during that time period is the business of the voters...Stormy included.

.

What a line of shit. false moral equivalency. When your in a leadership position, elected to represent the people and you're morally corrupt, it's just laughable on it's face equating someone who aspires to hold elected office to someone who actually holds the office

John F Kennedy/president/ cheated on his wife with Marilyn Monroe WHILE in office.

Robert F Kennedy/64th U.S AG/ cheated on his wife with Marilyn Monroe while holding the position.

Ted Kennedy/ U.S. senator/ manslaughter, leaving the scene of a personal injury accident, failure to report a personal injury accident.

Bill Clinton, governor and AG AR/ Travelgate, Nannygate, Whitewater/ rape allegations Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones " sexual harassment.

Bill Clinton/president/ Monica Lewinsky /sexual misconduct among other allegations. Impeached but not removed.

The reform party never went anywhere, if you want to consider that being a politician I'll give you that.

Spare me your virtue signalling, fucking hypocrite. We all understand your TDS, You need to lock up with Magicalmoments and share prescriptions with each other to keep your delusional disorders in check.

 

[icanhelp1]

It's amusing. Some clown above stating that trump wasn't a politician back when he was actively sexually abusing women and involved in all sorts of dubious business practices.
FFS.
He's not a politician now!
He's the same user and abuser he's always been and demonstrating that he is as inept and corrupt at running a country as he is at running a business.

If he's not one now then by that ridiculous rationalization he wasn't one back then. Don't forget your meds it's for your own good.

 

[Dumpington]

My I writes: "Point out that a Liberal is wrong and they will blow a fucking gasket every single time."

Trump Derangement Syndrome is a terrible thing!

icanhelp1 points out (to JKendallDane): "Selective scandals and selective outrage, your constant blathering and selective bias really leave your credibility questionable."

Yes, I have noticed that, as well!

JKendallDane writes: "So while 45 may have not been an elected politician..."

"Not an elected politician" - so WHY then did Hillary Clinton concede on November 9, 2016 - if, as you say, Trump wasn't elected?

magicalmoments writes (about President Trump): "He's not a politician now!"

A politician (like Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton) says those things that he or she believes will win them votes - whereas Donald Trump is more of a STATESMAN, who does those things that he (or she) believes will benefit the United States.

icanhelp1 adds: "Ted Kennedy/ U.S. senator/ manslaughter, leaving the scene of a personal injury accident, failure to report a personal injury accident."

Modern liberal Democrats don't like talking about their party's revered "Lion of the Senate" when it comes to his role in the death of Mary Jo Kopechne fifty years ago on Chappaquiddick Island, as it makes them all look like hypocrites who will condone murder if it means more political power for their side.

 

[dan_c00000]

Point out that a Liberal is wrong and they will blow a fucking gasket every single time.

Really? Remember when I made you rage quit? Remember when I triggered you so hard you created at least 10 different alts, including one where you pretended to be a woman?

Man you racist snowflakes are so easy to upset.

 

[Dumpington]

dan_c00000 writes: "Really? Remember when I made you rage quit? Remember when I triggered you so hard you created at least 10 different alts, including one where you pretended to be a woman?"

"Including one where you pretended to be a woman?" - I believe that you're now talking about TRANSGENDERED Americans, Dan, who currently make-up the backbone of today's Democratic Party, along with illegal immigrants! Transgendered Democrats prefer flying the gay/rainbow flag instead of the U.S. flag (which modern Dems & Colin Kaepernick consider to be a symbol of racism!)

"Man you racist snowflakes are so easy to upset."

I, for one, LOVE reading your posts, Dan! Yes, snowflakes are VERY easy to upset, as they tend to suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome, and if you think it's bad today, just wait until November of 2020! Perhaps Joe Biden will end up writing three different books explaining why he lost (just like Hillary did!)

 

[JKendallDane]

JKendallDane writes: "So while 45 may have not been an elected politician..."

"Not an elected politician" - so WHY then did Hillary Clinton concede on November 9, 2016 - if, as you say, Trump wasn't elected?

Need a favor from ya, Dump.

Would you please confirm whether your problem is with reading comprehension and the concept of contextualization...or is it that you just intentionally ignore everything in a post that you can't use as an attack point?

If you bother to read my original post instead of cherry picking from it, even you should be able to see I was addressing 45 as acting every bit AS a politician for decades before he pulled off being an "elected" one.

.

 

[YDB95]

Need a favor from ya, Dump.

Would you please confirm whether your problem is with reading comprehension and the concept of contextualization...or is it that you just intentionally ignore everything in a post that you can't use as an attack point?

It's both. Anyone who's been here any too long can tell you that. But what would you expect of someone who calls Mr. Grab-em-by-the-Pussy a "statesman"?

 

[Dumpington]

JKendallDane writes: "Need a favor from ya, Dump."

And I'm always glad to help you, J-Kendall! Ask away, my friend!

"Would you please confirm whether your problem is with reading comprehension and the concept of contextualization...or is it that you just intentionally ignore everything in a post that you can't use as an attack point?"

No, I have no problem with reading comprehension or contextualization. Perhaps the problem could be the nature of your post? On occasion, I have been addressed with hostile statements disguised as questions, which are difficult to take seriously.

"If you bother to read my original post instead of cherry picking from it, even you should be able to see I was addressing 45 as acting every bit AS a politician for decades before he pulled off being an "elected" one."

Being a politician and continually running for public office does NOT automatically make for a better president, J-Kendall! Our nation's 17th-president, Andrew Johnson, was first elected a town alderman, then the mayor of Greeneville, and then a Tennessee state representative, and after that a Tennessee state senator! In 1842, Johnson was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives, and then in 1852 the Governor of Tennessee! In 1858 he was elected as a U.S. Senator, and then in 1864 he was elected Vice President of the United States! That's eight different offices that he successfully ran for and won, but he's STILL best remembered for being IMPEACHED in 1868.

Donald Trump has run for public office a total of ONE TIME in his life, and that was for the presidency of the United States! He is NOT a career politician like practically everybody else is in Washington, D.C.

YDB95 writes: "But what would you expect of someone who calls Mr. Grab-em-by-the-Pussy a "statesman"?"

What a TERRIBLE thing for billionaire celebrity Donald Trump to have said in front of a live microphone! WHY didn't the Democratic Party candidate (Hillary Clinton) use it against him in the 2016 presidential campaign? Oh yeah... she DID... and she STILL lost!

 

[jp55665566]

A politician is someone who continually runs for political office. President Trump is not a politician. Joe Biden is a quintessential "politician"; and it is not a complimentary term.

 

[YDB95]

YDB95 writes: "But what would you expect of someone who calls Mr. Grab-em-by-the-Pussy a "statesman"?"

What a TERRIBLE thing for billionaire celebrity Donald Trump to have said in front of a live microphone! WHY didn't the Democratic Party candidate (Hillary Clinton) use it against him in the 2016 presidential campaign? Oh yeah... she DID...

Why on earth shouldn't she have? It was an incredibly unstatesmanlike thing to say.

 

[dan_c00000]

A politician is someone who continually runs for political office. President Trump is not a politician.

Let's see Trump has talked about running for office since...1987.

He also talked about running for president in 1980 and 1984. In 2013 Trump talked about running for Governor of New York.

And his idiot son talked about running for Mayor of New York City in 2016.

His idiot daughter/love interest daughter thinks she wants to run for President too.

So there you go 30 plus years of "not being a politician" and two moronic children who think they can be just like Daddy. You ring wing racists sure are easy to fool.

 

[Dumpington]

jp55665566 writes: "A politician is someone who continually runs for political office. President Trump is not a politician. Joe Biden is a quintessential "politician"; and it is not a complimentary term."

Exactly right! Joe Biden only says what he thinks other people want to hear, regardless of whether or not he believes it. President Trump, on the other hand, says exactly what he's thinking! There's nothing whatsoever phony about him! THIS is why he won!

YDB95 writes: "Why on earth shouldn't she have? It was an incredibly unstatesmanlike thing to say."

Yes, Trump said it - and yes, the Democrats hammered him repeatedly on that audio-clip in the days leading up to election day - and no, it did them no good! Trump STILL won the presidency! It failed to bring him down, didn't it?

dan_c00000 writes: "Let's see Trump has talked about running for office since...1987."

Yes, Dan - a wealthy celebrity TALKS about maybe someday running for public office - I repeat: a guy TALKS about someday maybe running for office! No, talking about possibly running does NOT make one a politician!

"You ring wing racists sure are easy to fool."

No, Dan - you don't know what a racist is. You believe that anybody who cuts you off in traffic is a racist. You believe that anybody who doesn't cheer for the same football team that you cheer for is a racist. You argue that anybody not flying the gay/rainbow flag is a racist. You think that flying the U.S. flag means that you support slavery! And yes, you also believe that Hitler built Auschwitz to detain those Jews trying to illegally sneak into Nazi Germany!

 

[YDB95]

Exactly right! Joe Biden only says what he thinks other people want to hear, regardless of whether or not he believes it. President Trump, on the other hand, says exactly what he's thinking! There's nothing whatsoever phony about him! THIS is why he won!

Sadly, that's probably right. If there's one thing we've all learned in the past three years, it's that there's still a hell of a lot more racism out there than most of us white progressives wanted to believe. Our bad.

YDB95 writes: "Why on earth shouldn't she have? It was an incredibly unstatesmanlike thing to say."

Yes, Trump said it - and yes, the Democrats hammered him repeatedly on that audio-clip in the days leading up to election day - and no, it did them no good! Trump STILL won the presidency! It failed to bring him down, didn't it?

In no way does that excuse what he said. That it didn't stop him from winning reflects very, very poorly on us as a country, too.

dan_c00000 writes: "Let's see Trump has talked about running for office since...1987."

Yes, Dan - a wealthy celebrity TALKS about maybe someday running for public office - I repeat: a guy TALKS about someday maybe running for office! No, talking about possibly running does NOT make one a politician!

Oh, sure it does. Politicians talk about running for various offices and then decide not to all the time. Especially with the presidency. Not to mention he only became a celebrity through years of sheer self-aggrandization. Which is another thing politicians often do.

No, Dan - you don't know what a racist is. You believe that anybody who cuts you off in traffic is a racist. You believe that anybody who doesn't cheer for the same football team that you cheer for is a racist. You argue that anybody not flying the gay/rainbow flag is a racist. You think that flying the U.S. flag means that you support slavery! And yes, you also believe that Hitler built Auschwitz to detain those Jews trying to illegally sneak into Nazi Germany!

The only person here who has ever said any of those things is you, Dump.

 

[Dumpington]

YDB95 writes: "If there's one thing we've all learned in the past three years, it's that there's still a hell of a lot more racism out there than most of us white progressives wanted to believe. Our bad."

Bernie Sanders has the right idea. In the state of Vermont, the senator runs for office as a SOCIALIST! The very words "Democratic Party" evoke slavery, succession, segregation, Jim Crow laws, and the Ku Kux Klan! That party needs to disband and come up with a new, less offensive name!

"In no way does that excuse what he said. That it didn't stop him from winning reflects very, very poorly on us as a country, too."

The Clinton campaign did the right thing in hammering Trump on his poor choice of words, and I'm sure it cost him millions of women's votes who might have otherwise supported him in 2016! But was it enough to cost him the presidency? Apparently not.

"Especially with the presidency. Not to mention he only became a celebrity through years of sheer self-aggrandization. Which is another thing politicians often do. "

If becoming president someday was Donald Trump's plan right from the very beginning, then you'd have to admit that he pursued a brilliant strategy that was far more successful than any political observers ever expected it to be!

 

[YDB95]

Bernie Sanders has the right idea. In the state of Vermont, the senator runs for office as a SOCIALIST! The very words "Democratic Party" evoke slavery, succession, segregation, Jim Crow laws, and the Ku Kux Klan!

Certainly to people like you it does.

"In no way does that excuse what he said. That it didn't stop him from winning reflects very, very poorly on us as a country, too."

The Clinton campaign did the right thing in hammering Trump on his poor choice of words, and I'm sure it cost him millions of women's votes who might have otherwise supported him in 2016! But was it enough to cost him the presidency? Apparently not.

Which is neither here nor there in terms of what a disgusting thing it was to say, or what it says about the man.

"Especially with the presidency. Not to mention he only became a celebrity through years of sheer self-aggrandization. Which is another thing politicians often do. "

If becoming president someday was Donald Trump's plan right from the very beginning, then you'd have to admit that he pursued a brilliant strategy that was far more successful than any political observers ever expected it to be!

I suppose so. But it doesn't mesh very well with your claim that he's not a politician.

 

[Dumpington]

YDB95 writes: "Certainly to people like you it does."

You're an intelligent guy, YDB95 - let's you & I take a little quiz together:

1) Which political party represented pretty much 100% of America's slaveowners back in 1960?

2) Did ANY Lincoln (Republican) states secede from the Union in 1861?

3) Which political-party dominated the segregationist American south in the 100-years following the U.S. Civil War?

4) Which political party enforced a century of Jim Crow Laws in southern states for nearly a century?

5) Before Antifa came along, what violent hate-filled organization was the militant arm of the Democratic Party for 100-years?

The ANSWERS to the above five-questions will appear in RED below - (NO PEEKING)!

"Which is neither here nor there in terms of what a disgusting thing it was to say, or what it says about the man."

Yes, "grab 'em by the pussy" was most definitely a disgusting thing to say, and it no doubt cost Donald Trump millions of women's votes (as it should have) - only I think that we can both agree: not enough votes to keep him from being elected president in November of 2016!

"But it doesn't mesh very well with your claim that he's not a politician."

I believe that most politicans are always running for office, YDB95 - Donald Trump didn't want a political career, and he only turned to politics when he thought he needed to do something to turn this nation around (e.g. Make America Great Again!)

QUIZ ANSWERS: 1) Democratic Party --- 2) NO --- 3) Democratic Party --- 4) Democratic Party --- 5) the Ku Kux Klan

In conclusion: it's high time the liberals here in the United States REJECTED their racist past and change the name of their Democratic Party to something more respectable (and less associated with white supremacy!)