theault_b
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 13, 2012
- Posts
- 518
Our offices have been flooded with reports of abuse of the REPORT BUTTON on various posts and specific posters. While it is always preferable to immediately report any obvious violations, it becomes clear that not all pushes of the REPORT BUTTON are authentic rules infractions. Instead, these FALSE REPORTS seem oft times to be house of cards "this seems like X", or... long seeded grudge fucks exercised in LIT-anger. Not all content that triggers is REPORTABLE. Less you just... feel like it.
A topical - and for our purposes, let's assume entirely fictional... example amongst the many recent...
Consider - as pure Academics:
Ok. That's a bit of a loaded potato. Let's just suggest for our purposes that A REPORT BUTTON Push was done either in error or for what turns out to be malicious, fallacious intent...
SHOULD THERE BE ACCOUNTABILITY FOR PUSHING THE REPORT BUTTON?
Should there be sanction for FALSE ACCUSATION via the REPORT BUTTON?
*** ~ BETTER YET: ~ ***
REPORT SOMEONE? Have the balls to EXPLAIN your rationale HERE in this THREAD.
Should you tenacious and courageous warriors not... Reap Your Deserved Laurels... before the very peers you act so to... protect?....
The MODERATORS show no such moral obligation to explain their oft fallacious actions. BANNED : Without Reason Given - BANNED : Without so much as Warning Given - is the new, safe "cheap assed spice" play.
They could - for Academic Purpose -
EXPLAIN THEIR BANNING rationale HERE too?
To keep it all kosher, understood... ACCOUNTABLE. Keep all the Chicken Heads happily on the up and up?
[ Yeah, I know. You don't feel any obligation to be accountable to anyone here either.
- ACCOUNTABILITY IS FOR SUCKERS, SUCKERS ]
You're right. PUSH THAT BUTTON. Push it often #SqueakyWheels #KillMyTormentors4Me
A topical - and for our purposes, let's assume entirely fictional... example amongst the many recent...
Consider - as pure Academics:
A POSTER (call it: LUK Luk luk) is reported by ANOTHER POSTER (call it: Q q connie) for representing a pic that Q q connie suspected was A THIRD POSTER (let's call that one: BB - whoever that might have been). A FOURTH POSTER confirms that this picture was not and bore no resemblance to BB. Nonetheless, LUK Luk luk gets 86'd for a REPORT that was fallacious. The MODERATOR acted on the REPORT even though the REPORT WAS with but a little information clearly FALSE.
Ok. That's a bit of a loaded potato. Let's just suggest for our purposes that A REPORT BUTTON Push was done either in error or for what turns out to be malicious, fallacious intent...
SHOULD THERE BE ACCOUNTABILITY FOR PUSHING THE REPORT BUTTON?
Should there be sanction for FALSE ACCUSATION via the REPORT BUTTON?
*** ~ BETTER YET: ~ ***
REPORT SOMEONE? Have the balls to EXPLAIN your rationale HERE in this THREAD.
Should you tenacious and courageous warriors not... Reap Your Deserved Laurels... before the very peers you act so to... protect?....
The MODERATORS show no such moral obligation to explain their oft fallacious actions. BANNED : Without Reason Given - BANNED : Without so much as Warning Given - is the new, safe "cheap assed spice" play.
They could - for Academic Purpose -
EXPLAIN THEIR BANNING rationale HERE too?
To keep it all kosher, understood... ACCOUNTABLE. Keep all the Chicken Heads happily on the up and up?
[ Yeah, I know. You don't feel any obligation to be accountable to anyone here either.
- ACCOUNTABILITY IS FOR SUCKERS, SUCKERS ]
You're right. PUSH THAT BUTTON. Push it often #SqueakyWheels #KillMyTormentors4Me
