Know the language of incel, neo-Nazi wannabes: "degenerate"

I wasn’t making fun of you.

You should have. That was prime ribbing opportunity.

I'm getting sick and fucking tired of people not making fun of me around here. I can just say whatever the hell I want now?

I can mix up countries and wars and whatever the fuck I want? Really?
 
Good for her I guess. I have no context for this because in the post above you were talking about a random Swedish chick.

I'm an American. I only know like three things about swedes:

1:Chocolate
2: Bank
3: Heavy Metal

Also I think Stockholm is in Sweden so do they kidnap people? Is that a thing they do?

Either way what you're talking about and pretending is a good thing is called "Colorblind racism" but I'm too wore out to explain to you why you're being transparently assholish right now.

Edit: Wait! 4: Mountains

You are such a ditz. The NATIVE chick that you INSISTED can not be native, despite looking (southwest) native, sounding native, and self-identifying as a native because she did not volunteer to me her tribal affiliation and provide to me her tribal enrollment number. Both of which, in a series of highly improbable events along with seeing her obviously native father on a snapchat session I have since seen.

Look up the tribe, browse, read, and laugh your ass off when you see why this is hillarious.
 
Last edited:
You are such a ditz. The NATIVE chick that you INSISTED can not be native, despite looking (douthwest) native, self-identifying as a native because she did not volunteer to me her tribal affiliation and provide to me her tribal enrollment number. Both of which, in a series of highly improbable events along with seeing her obviously native father on a snapchat session I have since seen.

Look up the tribe, browse, read, and laugh your ass off when you see why this is hillarious.

Hey Que!
 
When I was young, they were known by their government name, the Yuma. Relayed to the Papago, now T'ohono Odom as well as both tribes of Pimas, the Maricopas, the Cocopau, etc.

Here maybe a link to the Deutsche will fir STEM will help. . . .
 
Don't @me in this shit.

And again with the 'fag'. Y'all are on some middle school shit. I get the irony you were going for but now I gotta look like an ass and kill the joke or I look like an ass for not calling you out.

You Caught me in a 22 and I'm pissy about it.

I thought you guys used fag like in an empowering way like how blacks started using nigga.

My intention wasn't to insult the drag queen (better?) solely based on her sexual preferences.
 
You are such a ditz. The NATIVE chick that you INSISTED can not be native, despite looking (douthwest) native, self-identifying as a native because she did not volunteer to me her tribal affiliation and provide to me her tribal enrollment number. Both of which, in a series of highly improbable events along with seeing her obviously native father on a snapchat session I have since seen.

Look up the tribe, browse, read, and laugh your ass off when you see why this is hillarious.

What native gives you their I d number? That is akin to their ssi number. Who would even as for it?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101 View Post
Why does NBC consider this to be newsworthy?

Because she was a state government clerk.


There's no mention of her employment in the news article. And why would someone's employment make any difference? :eek:
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101 View Post
Why does NBC consider this to be newsworthy?




There's no mention of her employment in the news article. And why would someone's employment make any difference? :eek:

It only matters when one is trying to make a story where there is bs.
 
Don't @me in this shit.

And again with the 'fag'. Y'all are on some middle school shit. I get the irony you were going for but now I gotta look like an ass and kill the joke or I look like an ass for not calling you out.

You Caught me in a 22 and I'm pissy about it.

Or, you know,...

...you could point out to him that all of the various and sundry members of the not very cohesive LGBT community with their wide spectrum of gender identity, gender presentation, and completely separate and distinct from that their individual sexual orientation on the wide spectrum from gay to bi to het to ace don't particularly have anything in particular that any two people would always have in common. That it's more a loose and fractious alliance between marginalized peoples not a society of "faggots." <sic>

You know, like you know something about it, give a shit, and are interested in calling out demeaning stereotypes.

In the alternative, you could always not respond, and not quote an obvious troll, and deprive him of oxygen. Which is a simple option.

Pretending any of it is offered in a good natured way is really not an option if you want to maintain any sense of personal integrity on the issue.
 
https://www.foxnews.com/us/gun-toti...emmett-till-memorial-may-face-federal-charges

Quote:
Three fraternity brothers at the University of Mississippi have been suspended — and are possibly facing federal charges — for taking a photo in front of a bullet-riddled sign honoring slain civil rights icon Emmett Till while holding a shotgun and AR-15 semi-automatic rifle.

"Ahm heah today to honoah mah Paw, who put these bullet holes in this heah sign."

Unless they did the shooting, which would be vandalism, how is this against the law? It's "not very nice" but it's certainly not illegal to take a photograph.
 
Or, you know,...

...you could point out to him that all of the various and sundry members of the not very cohesive LGBT community with their wide spectrum of gender identity, gender presentation, and completely separate and distinct from that their individual sexual orientation on the wide spectrum from gay to bi to het to ace don't particularly have anything in particular that any two people would always have in common. That it's more a loose and fractious alliance between marginalized peoples not a society of "faggots." <sic>

You know, like you know something about it, give a shit, and are interested in calling out demeaning stereotypes.

In the alternative, you could always not respond, and not quote an obvious troll, and deprive him of oxygen. Which is a simple option.

Pretending any of it is offered in a good natured way is really not an option if you want to maintain any sense of personal integrity on the issue.
Take your own advice and do the same with lace and matt, girlfriend.

Im positive I can find you hurling homo slurs too, butt boi.

Stop shaming candi into playing your drama drag queen games.
 
What native gives you their I d number? That is akin to their ssi number. Who would even as for it?
It is indeed exactly analogous to a SS#

As it happens, she was sitting in my car sheltering from the 108° temperature outside a UPS store (do I need to include which location?) using her iPad to scan some documents as she prepared to have UPS fax the requests to the tribe out of town for tribal assistance for food, power and housing subsidy.

On one, there was a block for household members. In her case, just her and her daughter, the percentage of tribal ancestry and a spot for the tribal enrollment number. She listed herself at1/4 and her daughter as "unenrolled." The recently arrested boyfriend would not have appeared because he is not on the lease, not supposed to he there and, I assume, not native. (That's nothing but an assumption on my part though because he could very well be part native to my general eye, he looks Hispanic, but non-native. these things are a continuum. It depends entirely on how much conquistador blood. If some guy looks Mexican sounds Mexican grew up in the hills somewhere in Mexico where he and his community identify as indigenous people I'm certainly not going to argue with them. But apparently candy would.)

Literally every single anecdote that I ever relate on the general board there's some a****** in this case candy that wants to dispute something that I would never even have thought would be subject to dispute when I began relating the anecdote.

"Hey, I say a great looking 65 mustang at a light today."

"BULLSHIT! How could you POSSIBLY know it was a '65? Are you a cop?? Do you have a direct line to the motor vehicle division to run the license plate and registration? Did you email the VIN to process and find out? Did you get out of your car and ask the dude what year hisvcar was and what year the car identifies as???!?"

"Uh, no. The body lines says it was a 65 or 66. The honeycomb grill identifies it as a 64/12 to 65 model year mustang."

"Bullshit! How could you see the grill from behind him?"

"I never said where I was in relation to the car, but since you asked, I'll explain in perfectly understandable detail. It was ahead of me in the left (of three) lanes as we slowed for the light. He ended up third car back, I ended up second behind a Ford truck pulling a trailer of about 1974 vintage, so as I slid past him I admire the entire car from Stern to stem and ended up with him behind me to my left with his nose at my left rear quarter approximately nose approximately 18 inches foward of my rear bumper."

"Bullshit! If he's behind you why would you be looking at his grill instead of the light to see when it's going to change ti green?"

"I have a rearview mirror."

"AHA!, Here is a rational wiki citation showing clearly the blindspot a car would have with the orientation you describe and it clearly shows the majority of that car in your blindspot."

"I glanced over as I pulled farther ahead of him as the light turned green and the traffic began to flow."

"You are such a LIAR!! You just said that the 1974 Ford truck was pulling a trailer. By the way, how could you possibly know the truck was a 1974? Are you a cop?? Do you have a direct line to the motor vehicle division to run the license plate and registration? Did you email the VIN to process and find out? Did you get out of your car and ask the dude what year the car was and what year the car identifies as???!?"

"Ok, taking your objections one st a time:

A) the trailer was empty.

B) it was likely a big-block truck, and there were flames painted down the side and rims of a modern lightening.

C) I never said it WAS a 1974; I was quite specific in expressing my uncertainty of the exact vintage when I said, (verbatim quote) 'of about 1974 vintage' to make it clear I was estimating in Hope's of avoiding exactly this pedantic argument.

D) can we dispense with or table the argument on the of the mustang befor we move on to the myriad of queries you will, no doubt have regarding the completely unrelated to the discussion at hand truck?"

"Even if that was all true you can't possibly identify that grill as the mustang fades in you mirror, because the image gets SMALLER rather than LARGER!"

"I have 20/15 vision, last I checked."

"Citation required for your assessment of your visual acuity. Are you am optometrist? ....."

Arguing on this board is like wipin' your butt with a hoop. It is endless -Steve Thayer

"Who is Steve Thayer and why would you type all of that?"

"He us an author, and you asked."

"That's an awful lot of words to deflect from the FACT that you can't possibly know what year mustang that was.

"I just explained why I, in fact, could and did identify the year."

"It was TL;DR."

I just write it, I can't make you read it, much less comprehend it."

"You are obviously BUTTHURT to spend that much time covering your obvious lies."

"Ok, look. The year of the mustang wasn't that important. It would still be a sighting of a nice-looking early Mustang whether it was a 65 or 66 there's no way that it's a 67 or later and I'm not about to get into why that is."

"Nice backpedal!"

<scene>
 
Last edited:
It is indeed exactly analogous to a SS#

As it happens, she was sitting in my car sheltering from the 108° temperature outside a UPS store (do I need to include which location?) using her iPad to scan some documents as she prepared to have UPS fax the requests to the tribe out of town for tribal assistance for food, power and housing subsidy.

On one, there was a block for household members. In her case, just her and her daughter, the percentage of tribal ancestry and a spot for the tribal enrollment number. She listed herself at1/4 and her daughter as "unenrolled." The recently arrested boyfriend would not have appeared because he is not on the lease, not supposed to he there and, I assume, not native. (That's nothing but an assumption on my part though because he could very well be part native to my general eye, he looks Hispanic, but non-native. these things are a continuum. It depends entirely on how much conquistador blood. If some guy looks Mexican sounds Mexican grew up in the hills somewhere in Mexico where he and his community identify as indigenous people I'm certainly not going to argue with them. But apparently candy would.)

Literally every single anecdote that I ever relate on the general board there's some a****** in this case candy that wants to dispute something that I would never even have thought would be subject to dispute when I began relating the anecdote.

"Hey, I say a great looking 65 mustang at a light today."

"BULLSHIT! How could you POSSIBLY know it was a '65? Are you a cop?? Do you have a direct line to the motor vehicle division to run the license plate and registration? Did you email the VIN to process and find out? Did you get out of your car and ask the dude what year hisvcar was and what year the car identifies as???!?"

"Uh, no. The body lines says it was a 65 or 66. The honeycomb grill identifies it as a 64/12 to 65 model year mustang."

"Bullshit! How could you see the grill from behind him?"

"I never said where I was in relation to the car, but since you asked, I'll explain in perfectly understandable detail. It was ahead of me in the left (of three) lanes as we slowed for the light. He ended up third car back, I ended up second behind a Ford truck pulling a trailer of about 1974 vintage, so as I slid past him I admire the entire car from Stern to stem and ended up with him behind me to my left with his nose at my left rear quarter approximately nose approximately 18 inches foward of my rear bumper."

"Bullshit! If he's behind you why would you be looking at his grill instead of the light to see when it's going to change ti green?"

"I have a rearview mirror."

"AHA!, Here is a rational wiki citation showing clearly the blindspot a car would have with the orientation you describe and it clearly shows the majority of that car in your blindspot."

"I glanced over as I pulled farther ahead of him as the light turned green and the traffic began to flow."

"You are such a LIAR!! You just said that the 1974 Ford truck was pulling a trailer. By the way, how could you possibly know the truck was a 1974? Are you a cop?? Do you have a direct line to the motor vehicle division to run the license plate and registration? Did you email the VIN to process and find out? Did you get out of your car and ask the dude what year the car was and what year the car identifies as???!?"

"Ok, taking your objections one st a time:

A) the trailer was empty.

B) it was likely a big-block truck, and there were flames painted down the side and rims of a modern lightening.

C) I never said it WAS a 1974; I was quite specific in expressing my uncertainty of the exact vintage when I said, (verbatim quote) 'of about 1974 vintage' to make it clear I was estimating in Hope's of avoiding exactly this pedantic argument.

D) can we dispense with or table the argument on the of the mustang befor we move on to the myriad of queries you will, no doubt have regarding the completely unrelated to the discussion at hand truck?"

"Even if that was all true you can't possibly identify that grill as the mustang fades in you mirror, because the image gets SMALLER rather than LARGER!"

"I have 20/15 vision, last I checked."

"Citation required for your assessment of your visual acuity. Are you am optometrist? ....."



"Who is Steve Thayer and why would you type all of that?"

"He us an author, and you asked."

"That's an awful lot of words to deflect from the FACT that you can't possibly know what year mustang that was.

"I just explained why I, in fact, could and did identify the year."

"It was TL;DR."

I just write it, I can't make you read it, much less comprehend it."

"You are obviously BUTTHURT to spend that much time covering your obvious lies."

"Ok, look. The year of the mustang wasn't that important. It would still be a sighting of a nice-looking early Mustang whether it was a 65 or 66 there's no way that it's a 67 or later and I'm not about to get into why that is."

"Nice backpedal!"

<scene>

Tl;dr.
 
Take your own advice and do the same with lace and matt, girlfriend.

Im positive I can find you hurling homo slurs too, butt boi.

Stop shaming candi into playing your drama drag queen games.

Nobody answered you in your last reply.

"Butt" here you go homo... Trolling.

Getting any traction sniffing candi's ass?

LAWLZ!
 
Should probably do a countdown until Chad arrives.

PRE dicktable for the angry inches.
 
See, just because you are black, and stupid does not mean anything about the next black guy I meet.

A)it isn't my job to decry his use of the word, any more than it is Rory's job to decry your use of the equally offensive and racist phrase, "white privilege."

B) in that case calling someone who is not black (I assume) the n-word is weird, but hardly racist. He uses it as a highly effective thirst trap for all of you actual racists that use the term racist as a weapon to nuke conversation about topics that you claim exclusive purview over. I too, refuse to cede that ground to you just because your melanin content is higher than mine, I just choose to be more direct and clear about why I reject your racist ideology and why I quite justifiably find it offensive.

C) that's pretty weak-sauce. I can point directly to your own racist beliefs, including the racist idea that black people cannot be racist because of imaginary systemic racism be keeping them down, affirmative action (an actual thing) doesn't exist, and statistics about blacks mean what your brand of racists want them to mean about the individuals in that demographic and not what the other brand of racists day they mean with the exact same correlating "evidence."

There is nothing "shitty" about my whiteness, racist, and 8f you had any personal integrity and enough objectivity to look at all of the myriad of individual factors that are the totality of our completely individual accrual of advantages and deficits given to each of by the accident of circumstances whether that be a genetic endowment or a trust fund one, their is no inherent deterrent to a happy, successful, productive life encoded in your non-shitty blackness.

Part of the problem is you and a lot of other people are looking for correlation through the wrong end of the telescope. There is definitely a correlation between race and poverty. There's a really easy solution to that. Don't be poor, and that problem goes away in a generation.

I've been as poor as you can possibly get twice in my life now and I'm not currently poor.. I don't plan to be poor ever again. Having said that personal choices that I have made the last month or two have run a deficit. If I keep that up I'll be poor for the third time. Which is why I'm reversing course. Money isn't any harder than calorie and exercise ratios to figure. It's arithmstic.

What a load of utter bullshit. BB is as racist as they come and all of you right wing idiots eat up his racist tourettes because you can just smile and nod your head and not have to say it.

It's comical that all of your arguments are reduced to either IKYARBWAI, Whataboutaboutism, or false equivalencies to try and defend your racism or failed ideology or the pathetic behavior of the moron-in-chief.

Oh, and "white privilege" isn't as bad as the n-word. It's not even close and you know that.

Gaslighting only works if you allow it to.
 
What a load of utter bullshit. BB is as racist as they come and all of you right wing idiots eat up his racist tourettes because you can just smile and nod your head and not have to say it.

It's comical that all of your arguments are reduced to either IKYARBWAI, Whataboutaboutism, or false equivalencies to try and defend your racism or failed ideology or the pathetic behavior of the moron-in-chief.

Oh, and "white privilege" isn't as bad as the n-word. It's not even close and you know that.

Gaslighting only works if you allow it to.

In real life BB is probably about as racist as you or anyone else. He's making fun of those who follow him. It's how he gets his kicks.
The real racists are the ones who aren't so obvious or at least don't think they are so obvious. Quite a few are on the other side of the ideological aisle.
 
In real life BB is probably about as racist as you or anyone else. He's making fun of those who follow him. It's how he gets his kicks.
The real racists are the ones who aren't so obvious or at least don't think they are so obvious. Quite a few are on the other side of the ideological aisle.

BB never leaves the house so his racism is "tempered". Q-#### sees many minorities on a daily basis (well, when he actually works) and looks down on the people that he is paid to help.
 
Back
Top