Very substantial evidence' Trump is 'guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors'

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/07/21/po...mp-guilty-high-crimes-misdemeanors/index.html

"We have to ... let Mueller present those facts to the American people, and then see where we go from there, because the administration must be held accountable," Nadler, whose committee would lead impeachment proceedings, said on "Fox News Sunday."

The link demonstrates how dishonest CNN is. It says:

Democrats are deeply divided on whether to pursue an impeachment inquiry, and Mueller's public testimony may provide an opportunity for the party to unify and decide whether impeachment proceedings should go forward or not. More than 80 House Democrats have called for starting an impeachment inquiry into the President -- the first step in a lengthy process, but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Nadler have so far resisted the pressure to open an inquiry.

This is true enough, but what CNN fails to say is that most Democrats are opposed to the action. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/17/hou...eachment-despite-nancy-pelosi-opposition.html
 
Last edited:
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/07/21/po...mp-guilty-high-crimes-misdemeanors/index.html

"We have to ... let Mueller present those facts to the American people, and then see where we go from there, because the administration must be held accountable," Nadler, whose committee would lead impeachment proceedings, said on "Fox News Sunday."

Nadler has been saying that for a couple of years how is this news?

Nadler never produces any evidence. He also previously said Mueller's report would back him up. It did not. He now says Mueller's testimony will back him up. Mueller himself has already said that he has no relevant information, not contained in the report.

You should head over to Aglo's "Let's instaban all the multi-banned thread." Be a good place to gloat about how you finally figured out how to get back in, and how this is totally different than everything you have said about people coming back after being banned for far less than your multitude of infractions.
 
Last edited:
Nadler has been saying that for a couple of years hiwbis this news?

Nadler never produces any evidence. He also said Mueller's report would back him up. It did not. He now says Mueller's testimony will back him up. Mueller himself has already says he has no relevant information not contained in the report.

You should head over to Aglo's "Let's instaban all the multi-banned thread." Be a good place to gloat about how you finally figured out how to get back in, and how this us totally different 5han everything you have said about people coming back after being banned for far less than your multitude of infractions.

Please rephrase that in the form of a language.
 
Nadler has been saying that for a couple of years hiwbis this news?

Nadler never produces any evidence. He also said Mueller's report would back him up. It did not. He now says Mueller's testimony will back him up. Mueller himself has already says he has no relevant information not contained in the report.

You should head over to Aglo's "Let's instaban all the multi-banned thread." Be a good place to gloat about how you finally figured out how to get back in, and how this us totally different 5han everything you have said about people coming back after being banned for far less than your multitude of infractions.

Nadler is strictly shooting off his mouth. He has no evidence and not even any specific charges. He is doing a Joe McCarthy - accusations with no proof.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/nadler-trump-impeachment-fox-news-sunday
 
Last edited:
And the True Believers are lapping it up.

You just cannot pull the rug out from under them.
When the public testimony does not produce the indictment,
Jerry will continue to bloviate to his crowd, "Well, wait until you see what we were told...


... IN PRIVATE!"
 
Yeah this is pretty much bullshit wishful thinking. Not gonna get anything new and nothing is going to come from it. Let it go, Elsa.
 
I hope the message remains 'Obstruction and the Four Sopranos' all the way to the election.

Accompanied by the 24-bagpipe band...
 
I’m waiting for Mueller to testify. If he’s smart, he won’t deviate from the report at all.

If he's smart he won't say anything except:

A. The answer to that question is contained in the report I submitted to the AG under the law.

or

B. I respectfully assert my 5th Amendment Rights and decline to answer that question.



I have 1 question for him that no one will ask.


After you learned that the Steele Dossier was fabricated and unverified; did you investigate anyone in the DOJ for stating under penalty of perjury that it was true and verified as part of the effort by the DOJ to obtain a FISA warrant?
 
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/07/21/po...mp-guilty-high-crimes-misdemeanors/index.html

"We have to ... let Mueller present those facts to the American people, and then see where we go from there, because the administration must be held accountable," Nadler, whose committee would lead impeachment proceedings, said on "Fox News Sunday."

This did not age well.

When that fell completely flat, they literally pivoted from Russia, Russia, Russia to Ukraine the very next day.

What will they gin up on Wednesday ,the day after Trump is acquitted?
 
Back
Top