AOC "concentration camps" she should be impeached

[icanhelp1]

there you have it. right smack in the face.

So you consider MS-13 in the same light as illegal migrants. Do yo really think you're pulling the wool over anyone's eyes. Trump's statement animals= MS-13 has been repeated a thousand times on all media platforms. You're nothing more than an ANTIFA wantobe. Nothing you post has any credibility.

 

[icanhelp1]

1. Obama's 21 day maximum detention vs. Trump's "indefinite" detention, which BotnaziBoy already gook-splained away
2. Parents not separated from children under Obama except under "extreme" circumstances (i.e. parent(s) observed beating children). Trump's policy claims separation is "required", with punitive action the ultimate goal.
3. Detainees provided with sanitary items such as soap and toothbrushes under Obama. Purposely denied them under Trump.
4. Resident aliens not detained under Obama. "Accidently" detained under Trump.
5. Camps moved away from public scrutiny under Trump, to military bases where the public and drones/helicopters are prohibited (Fort Sill, OK).

The bottom line: If you support Donald Trump, you are supporting concentration camps.

LMFAO

 

[Que]

Appeals to authority aren't necessarily fallacious, Queef. If I want to understand quantum theory, I am totally correct to interrogate a theoretical physicist. It would be fallacious, however, if I chose to interrogate a sports announcer with no demonstrable physics knowledge.

You are saying there are 300!!! SCHOLARS more qualified than the SCHOLARS who actually operate the holocaust museum because the NUMBER of "SCHOLARS" somehow outweighs the credentials of the SCHOLARS that actually run the holocaust museum.

Which makes it a fallacious appeal to authority, chumley.

The "textbook definition" as you love to say.

You are relying strictly on their authority to pronounce for your side not the substance of what they have to say.

To give you another example candi is appealing to his expertise as an accountant to try to explain how poor people from other countries magically contribute more to society than poor people that are born here. When it's not true. Because accounting.

Phrodeau claims an appeal to authority because "climate scientists" which is not an actual thing say he is right. It doesn't matter how many grant-seeking members of the scientific vommunity who choose to call themselves climate scientists and toss nifty buzzwords into their grant applications for studies so that they can get funding agree with him... it doesn't make him right he has to be right on the actual merits of the argument without aappealing to authority. As do you.

But none of you have.

 

[von_Bismarck]

You are saying there are 300!!! SCHOLARS more qualified than the SCHOLARS who actually operate the holocaust museum because the NUMBER of "SCHOLARS" somehow outweighs the credentials of the SCHOLARS that actually run the holocaust museum.

Which makes it a fallacious appeal to authority, chumley.

I said nothing of the sort. Try reading my post again. More slowly, if need be.

 

[Que]

I said nothing of the sort. Try reading my post again. More slowly, if need be.

What is your point then that 300 Scholars disagree with ithe much more esteemable opinion of the Holocaust Museum? Other than the number of them what is your point?

You found some Jewish "scholats" that agrees with you. Congratulations they overwhelmingly vote democratic. They overwhelmingly hate Trump.

Can you point me to any letters from this esteemed group of 300 Scholars condemning these concentration camps under Obama?

Didn't think so.

 

[von_Bismarck]

What is your point then that 300 Scholars disagree with ithe much more esteemable opinion of the Holocaust Museum? Other than the number of them what is your point?

You found some Jewish "scholats" that agrees with you. Congratulations they overwhelmingly vote democratic. They overwhelmingly hate Trump.

Can you point me to any letters from this esteemed group of 300 Scholars condemning these concentration camps under Obama?

Didn't think so.

Address your complaint to Rob, dipshit. I'm talking about appeals to authority in general.

 

[RobDownSouth]

I said nothing of the sort. Try reading my post again. More slowly, if need be.

At this point, #AscriptionAgain is all he has left.

His "Concentration Camps=Death Camps therefore INVALID! INVALID, DAMMIT!" didn't get much traction, and I countered his sniffy little "but but teh Holocaust Museum!" whine with a list of experts who publicly disagreed, so now we're left with ascription and pouting. We'll soon move on to Phase III, where Queew and/or Botnazi Socialist will declare "victory".

 

[BotanyBoy]

At this point, #AscriptionAgain is all he has left.

His "Concentration Camps=Death Camps therefore INVALID! INVALID, DAMMIT!" didn't get much traction, and I countered his sniffy little "but but teh Holocaust Museum!" whine with a list of experts who publicly disagreed, so now we're left with ascription and pouting. We'll soon move on to Phase III, where Queew and/or Botnazi Socialist will declare "victory".

Poor Rob, ascription and lies in name calling is all he's got.

 

[von_Bismarck]

You are saying there are 300!!! SCHOLARS more qualified than the SCHOLARS who actually operate the holocaust museum because the NUMBER of "SCHOLARS" somehow outweighs the credentials of the SCHOLARS that actually run the holocaust museum.

Which makes it a fallacious appeal to authority, chumley.

The "textbook definition" as you love to say.

You are relying strictly on their authority to pronounce for your side not the substance of what they have to say.

To give you another example candi is appealing to his expertise as an accountant to try to explain how poor people from other countries magically contribute more to society than poor people that are born here. When it's not true. Because accounting.

Phrodeau claims an appeal to authority because "climate scientists" which is not an actual thing say he is right. It doesn't matter how many grant-seeking members of the scientific vommunity who choose to call themselves climate scientists and toss nifty buzzwords into their grant applications for studies so that they can get funding agree with him... it doesn't make him right he has to be right on the actual merits of the argument without aappealing to authority. As do you.

But none of you have.

Climate scientists most certainly are real people, numbskull. And whether or not one has to argue on the "actual merits" of an argument is contextual. It isn't reasonable, for example, for each person taking an interest in climate systems to reconstruct the science. Most people have neither the means nor the expertise; you certainly don't. This is why we appeal to expert witnesses. In this case, climate scientists.

 

[icanhelp1]

Poor Rob, ascription and lies in name calling is all he's got.

Bi Golly! I think nobbydownunder is having a meltdown. Wonder how he would do in one of his concentration camps?

 

[Que]

Address your complaint to Rob, dipshit. I'm talking about appeals to authority in general.

Sorry, my mistake. I didn't realize that *you* as sock-puppet had stepped in (as per usual) to provide cover for *Rob*. It felt like a continuation of the discussion, what with me arguing with what seemed like exactly the same person and all. I really did not notice this time.

I wasn't talking about appeals to authority "in general" I was talking about *Rob'* appeal to authority which was in fact fallacious, for the reasons I stated and as I'm sure *you* can agree.

 

[Que]

Climate scientists most certainly are real people, numbskull. And whether or not one has to argue on the "actual merits" of an argument is contextual. It isn't reasonable, for example, for each person taking an interest in climate systems to reconstruct the science. Most people have neither the means nor the expertise; you certainly don't. This is why we appeal to expert witnesses. In this case, climate scientists.

Where did I say that people calling themselves "climate scientists" (which really is not an actual thing) are not people?

 

[von_Bismarck]

Where did I say that people calling themselves "climate scientists" (which really is not an actual thing) are not people?

"climate scientists" which is not an actual thing

Perhaps you meant to say "climate science is not an actual thing." (It is, however.)

 

[Que]

Bi Golly! I think nobbydownunder is having a meltdown. Wonder how he would do in one of his concentration camps?

Don't be too hard on the halfwit, I pushed him to it. Just this morning when I pointed out that he's been sending Von Bismarck to harass Watt and Company and Watts thread without ever showing up as Rob and that Von Bismarck and Rob don't interact so like a little dancing monkey he has to find a reason to have the two of them interact now.

Give it a week or so and Rob and Von Bismarck will go back to pretending that they live in different sandboxes but just throw sand at the same people.

It really is why I am at the top of Rob's list because I was the first one to bust him on multiple occasions using alts which he claims he never does. He gets a perverse sense of power out of supposedly pulling one over on the board by having the board think that that's not him when it is. He considers himself what he calls the board puppet master and that's his self-imposed identity. He thinks that he does this well.

 

[Que]

Perhaps you meant to say "climate science is not an actual thing." (It is, however.)

The science of what climate is or is not doing is a thing. The title of climate scientists is entirely made up. The branch of science known as climate science is entirely made up.

ALL of your so-called experts are some other kind of scientist first else they have no business even investigating climate science. They are physicists meteorologist chemists botanist biologists.

The ones that aren't any good at any of those things call themselves climate scientists and compile various studies to prove something.

There's no reason to have an entire identified branch of science to answer one question which is to what degree is man's presence on the earth affecting our climate now and on an ongoing basis into the future?

Other questions of science stand on their own merit they don't have to have a nice little catch phrase and an agreed-upon liturgy and punishment for non-believers.

I know of no other branch of science where so-called scientists have gotten together to specifically to distort, create, or fudge data and or discuss how to couch their findings or in many cases their lack of finfings in a way that will be accepted by outsiders.

Actual scientists can withstand and welcome scrutiny.

 

[Que]

Perhaps you meant to say "climate science is not an actual thing." (It is, however.)

This really is your day for fallacies isn't it? Are you going to have Rob come bail you out on this one?

You know there are people who refer to themselves as elves, fairies, or visitors from Zeldon?

That doesn't make elves, a real thing.

I can say, "Elves are not an actual thing" Me saying that, "Elves are not an actual thing," foesn't mean that people that call themselves elves are not people.

Which is what you said.

 

[von_Bismarck]

The science of what climate is or is not doing is a thing. The title of climate scientists is entirely made up. The branch of science known as climate science is entirely made up.

ALL of your so-called experts are some other kind of scientist first else they have no business even investigating climate science. They are physicists meteorologist chemists botanist biologists.

The ones that aren't any good at any of those things call themselves climate scientists and compile various studies to prove something.

There's no reason to have an entire identified branch of science to answer one question which is to what degree is man's presence on the earth affecting our climate now and on an ongoing basis into the future?

Other questions of science stand on their own merit they don't have to have a nice little catch phrase and an agreed-upon liturgy and punishment for non-believers.

I know of no other branch of science where so-called scientists have gotten together to specifically to distort, create, or fudge data and or discuss how to couch their findings or in many cases their lack of finfings in a way that will be accepted by outsiders.

Actual scientists can withstand and welcome scrutiny.

This really is your day for fallacies isn't it? Are you going to have Rob come bail you out on this one?

You know there are people who refer to themselves as elves, fairies, or visitors from Zeldon?

That doesn't make elves, a real thing.

I can say, "Elves are not an actual thing" Me saying that, "Elves are not an actual thing," foesn't mean that people that call themselves elves are not people.

Which is what you said.

Sleep it off, Tweak, and next time think twice about mixing Adderall and meth.

 

[cowslinger64]

Sleep it off, Tweak, and next time think twice about mixing Adderall and meth.

Hey now, even though queball is a drain on the taxpayers of Arizona, his wages are no longer stagnant, but RISING.. as such, he's probably in a top percent of earners driving a taxi.

So, there is that.

 

[von_Bismarck]

Hey now, even though queball is a drain on the taxpayers of Arizona, his wages are no longer stagnant, but RISING.. as such, he's probably in a top percent of earners driving a taxi.

So, there is that.

We can hope that Queef will #bebest. But I just can't bring myself to engage someone who compares climate scientists to elves and fairies.

 

[butters]

Sleep it off, Tweak, and next time think twice about mixing Adderall and meth.

his reasoning is fucked.

and it makes me laugh how the twats here denying climate change or the contributions of man towards an accelerated climate change think anyone with more than half a brain will decide "ooh! let's listen to these faceless numbnuts on a lit-erotic site rather than the collective knowledge of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide who understand what's happening out there in the real world.

 

[cowslinger64]

We can hope that Queef will #bebest. But I just can't bring myself to engage someone who compares climate scientists to elves and fairies.

He's toeing the company line... if the orange trainwreck says it's so.. it's SO.

 

[CandiCame]

Climate scientists most certainly are real people, numbskull. And whether or not one has to argue on the "actual merits" of an argument is contextual. It isn't reasonable, for example, for each person taking an interest in climate systems to reconstruct the science. Most people have neither the means nor the expertise; you certainly don't. This is why we appeal to expert witnesses. In this case, climate scientists.

I did a vanity search and found this little gem.

Sweet lord Jesus.

For the record, I never once mentioned I had any kind of expertise. I actually said over and over that this was some real elementary level shit that one should not have to be an expert to understand, did the math right there in the post, and linked all my sources.

Also, they're fucking concentration camps. There shouldn't be any argument on that. They concentrated a bunch of people in camps.

 

[CandiCame]

Hey now, even though queball is a drain on the taxpayers of Arizona, his wages are no longer stagnant, but RISING.. as such, he's probably in a top percent of earners driving a taxi.

So, there is that.

Que lives in Arizona? Maybe the heat's getting to him.

 

[someoneyouknow]

Except it's not a fact rob, they are definitively not concentration camps.

No amount of TDS rage will change that.

https://66.media.tumblr.com/87c18eabf4ae53c2216b80f9dc5fc793/tumblr_ptzt0bMfXN1rbam90o1_500.jpg

 

[bluekitty69]

Isn't peddling stupidity an impeachable crime?

If only it was that easy!...