Ban all of the previously and repeatedly banned posters. Especially the perma-banned

Should all banned posters be immediately banned upon their return to lit?


  • Total voters
    43
This last post above is, as far as Laurel&Friends is enough to get me banned.


I mentioned, after all, under-age sex.

When you are a conservative, context matters not...

Wait... You're not a Libertarian anymore?
 
The beauty of AJ is that he can't help but out himself, and now that he's outed himself this alt will be banned and he'll be here next week with a new alt denying that he's AJ.


Conclusion- Cuntstomach and the Banners are masochists, doomed to lose.

( you could play policeman in the loserlounge )
 
Wait is that dude arguing that he SHOULD be able to post that shit?

A million years ago, when I was a stupid teenager, I used to use colloquialisms like, "turn 6" and "because I'm 12" meaning, "This person/I is/am being immature" and I was warned to quit doing that because the rules on this are that tight.

Like of COURSE you can't post actual underage content.

Edit: And for the record, I did quit doing that. Because even thought I thought it was a bit much, it ain't my site so I had to play by the rules. Notice how I've never bitched about it? I just changed my behavior to comply with the rules?

Why the fuck is that difficult for these people?
 
so?
since this merry go round has turned...
- ever so entertainingly -
into a bunch of folks
flicking lit matches at one another...

was there ever really a point to it
other than just that?

is there a list somewhere?
is there a roll call of the....

ones here
who "should not be here'?

is there a rap sheet?
the aliases?
outstanding warrants?

asking for...
a friend
who's mostly lazy,
bored and.... um....
"new" here?
 
so?
since this merry go round has turned...
- ever so entertainingly -
into a bunch of folks
flicking lit matches at one another...

was there ever really a point to it
other than just that?

is there a list somewhere?
is there a roll call of the....

ones here
who "should not be here'?

is there a rap sheet?
the aliases?
outstanding warrants?

asking for...
a friend
who's mostly lazy,
bored and.... um....
"new" here?

I also want tea and receipts because I live for that kind of drama but I wasn't gonna be the first one to ask for them because I didn't wanna be the greedy little goblin, but I am gonna second this motion.

Edit: Also to clarify, I'm not new, just forgetful and stupid. I know about one of them, because somebody walked me through it but I don't remember who the poster was, the one who doxxed somebody and threatened bodily harm to their family. I remember that one.
 
Oh, the selective memory of the oft banned rule breaker.



I believe the last one, or perhaps it was the one prior the last, even had ol’ AJ doubting Laurel would, or could, swing the hammer, due to his ‘value’ to the General Board.

Then BAM!, down came the hammer on his ridiculous sense of self-importance.


Silly twat, whining ever since.
 
Are you new to the days of
our lives?

Conservatives have long been
a target of

the harpies and the
faux men who dance to their harps...





[member since 1999]
 
Conclusion- Cuntstomach and the Banners are masochists, doomed to lose.

( you could play policeman in the loserlounge )

He's also a very slimey person.

He writes it down when he reports people, so you know when he does or he doesn't.

I notice how (despite their differences) both R and L posters often come together to report or tell off sleazeballs far worse than ProfGavin.
THOSE are the people who could put the site at real risk.

Did you Ever see Spidey telling them off or reporting them?
He might well have, but I haven't seen him.
 
Ok yeah, if one of your kids also enters the ring I'm throwing in the towel. I've never met any of your kids, but I am terrified by proxy.

NO ONE KNOWS! He wouldn't tell anybody. He just tweeted out like, "Ima whoop Tom Cruise's ass" and then the dude who does the booking for the UFC was like, "we got a ring open!" and so far Cruise ain't said shit but I just googled it and it looks like the UFC chick HAS talked to Cruise it's just not public.

But he flat out won't tell anybody why. No one knows what the beef is.

https://www.maxim.com/entertainment/ufc-dana-white-confirms-fight-justin-bieber-tom-cruise-2019-6

https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/10/entertainment/justin-bieber-tom-cruise-fight/index.html

Is my crippling lack of sanity my biggest flaw?
Yes, you're just too damn whappy. Though you'd probably look prettiest in the crown.

Don't be too scared. He's built, but the nasty gene runs in the female line and (except for me) they're all like 5 foot tall :D

Cruise would win. I'd pay to watch.
I know what you're trying to do here. :rolleyes:
Everyone saw them, it was an almost constant battle with him and a few posters about it, at one point. "Why do you keep reporting only us every time we quote and have a go at Rob?"

Didn't you see them too, WrongElement?
It would be disingenious of you to say No.

I didn't see them. That's why I'm asking.
I skim most threads I post in, because I'm impatient and I post whilst distracted.
 
I roll them off ignore just for this thread.



Feel free to ask dishrag why they were perma-banned.

That was actually kinda funny. Hashtag must've gone through a couple dozen accounts in a matter of a week. No loving spam, either. Just wholesale deletion of accounts.

Laurel wasn't playing around.
 
He's also a very slimey person.

He writes it down when he reports people, so you know when he does or he doesn't.

I notice how (despite their differences) both R and L posters often come together to report or tell off sleazeballs far worse than ProfGavin.
THOSE are the people who could put the site at real risk.

Did you Ever see Spidey telling them off or reporting them?
He might well have, but I haven't seen him.

Not a chance.


He is WOKE!


[i.e. He will never get laid; too deferential...]
 
I also want tea and receipts because I live for that kind of drama but I wasn't gonna be the first one to ask for them because I didn't wanna be the greedy little goblin, but I am gonna second this motion.

Edit: Also to clarify, I'm not new, just forgetful and stupid. I know about one of them, because somebody walked me through it but I don't remember who the poster was, the one who doxxed somebody and threatened bodily harm to their family. I remember that one.

You're thinking of Ishmeal. He threatened people, got banned, begged his way back on the board, threatened people again, got banned, came back as "Dontbackdown", got banned, and is now back as "bellasarius".
 
You're thinking of Ishmeal. He threatened people, got banned, begged his way back on the board, threatened people again, got banned, came back as "Dontbackdown", got banned, and is now back as "bellasarius".

Interesting attempt at re-writing your own history.
Do you really think that, no matter how biased, Liberals can't figure you out?
I bet they secretly frown.

How come you, the person who keeps his finger++ on the 'report' button, never reported ProfGavin or similar sleazeballs?

Most other Leftists -Aglaorag included- did.
 
Interesting attempt at re-writing your own history.
Do you really think that, no matter how biased, Liberals can't figure you out?
I bet they secretly frown.

How come you, the person who keeps his finger++ on the 'report' button, never reported ProfGavin or similar sleazeballs?

Most other Leftists -Aglaorag included- did.

That's not my history, it's Ish's. How would you even know? You weren't on the board when it happened.
 
I don't have the patience to read through all of this. But some of you need to step away from the internets and go outside.

beautiful day here.
 
That's not my history, it's Ish's. How would you even know? You weren't on the board when it happened.

I notice that you didn't comment on or disprove my rhetorical question.

About the fact that almost nobody saw you report sleazeballs like Prof Gavin,
despite your claims that you keep reporting political posters "to protect the site".
 
I don't have the patience to read through all of this. But some of you need to step away from the internets and go outside.

beautiful day here.

It's shitty and cold where I am at the moment, so you're stuck with me.
 
I notice that you didn't comment on or disprove my rhetorical question.

About the fact that almost nobody saw you report sleazeballs like Prof Gavin,
despite your claims that you keep reporting political posters "to protect the site".

I've never claimed anything like that.
 
And we get back to the original question...



Has anybody on the Left ever been banned?


I asked this of Laurel, in regards to TDS, and her response was,
I didn't see it, nobody reported it, so it's no big deal that he
accused you of adopting a daughter to have underage sex with...



On the other hand, I posted an actual news story about pedophilia
and was immediately banned.

So the point is, like so much of social media, conservative voices "need not apply."



If either of you two clowns can point out a single "liberal" who got banned, then I will fulsomely apologize to you.

You weren't "immediately banned" (here' the January thread), you were banned a month later when you did the same thing again.
 
You weren't "immediately banned" (here' the January thread), you were banned a month later when you did the same thing again.

Honestly, Rob.
Don't feel singled out by me and SC, that wasn't our primary intent.

For me at least it's all in the past you were an asshole I was an asshole, our behaviors have changed since then.

Blame Aglao and Spidey for making up shit and re-writing history.
I wouldn't have brought up your name if it wasn't for that.
 
The concept of wanting anyone band seems strange to me. I think a lot of things posted here and a lot of things in all aspects of life are crazy. But I don't want to live in a world where a person or group of people decides who can and can not speak. That can sound great until the pendulum swings back and shuts your mouth. We all have the power to read or not read anything we want. The power to ban and to block is already in our own minds. So, why want a third party to your banning and blocking for you?
so you think laurel & manu, who provide a free-to-use site for you to read, post & interact with others on, should have no rules whatsoever? when someone gets banned and returns to repeat the same rule-breaks they got banned for, that's like you inviting visitors into your home and then they shit on your nice carpet... you toss them out the door, they come in the side door and do the exact same thing. why do you have an issue with the site-owners having their few rules in place? don't like the rules? you can always leave, go to another free site with a lot more restrictions on posting-content or to any number of pay-to-use venues.

You weren't "immediately banned" (here' the January thread), you were banned a month later when you did the same thing again.
quelle surprise.. liars gonna lie
 
Back
Top