Ban all of the previously and repeatedly banned posters. Especially the perma-banned

[beew]

Reading quotes defies the purpose of Iggy. Unless the response to said quote is particularly intriguing, I'd guess that most people skip past them the same way I do, though I could be wrong.

An example. Let's say forum rules forbid you to ever say "Though I could be wrong."



So Sgt reports my post. But when asked: "Why didn't you report dolf too?" he says: "Because I have dolf on iggy."

Does that make any sense to you?

 

[CandiCame]

You quoted Beew so now I gotta ask how the hell she read that poll and got 'conservative'. There's nothing about political party affiliation in the poll anywhere.

Edit: Also why is she confused that it's easier to report something you see over something you don't? Of course it's easier to report people you don't have on ignore.

The sheer dumbassery.

Why is everybody else still talking to this dick?

 

[beew]

Malicious thread bumping for the specific purpose of driving certain subjects off the front page is against the posted rules. That was sort of a Karen Kraft specialty; rarely done by anyone else before or since.

But if someone is constantly bumping the porn threads because they are posting porn ... I mean, that's not really off topic. I think almost all the porn thread starters are not major participants in the GB outside those threads, so they're easy enough to put on Ignore if they are really so bothersome.

That wasn't the point of my post, nor of those who had a go at Hairy Palms.

Nobody wanted him banned, they just wanted to talk some sense and extract a bit of curtesy from him - to stop burrying other voices by bumping 25 porn threads in one go. To space them out through the day, at least,

 

[InsightRiot]

It’s the site’s rules, not mine.

You are proposing new rules, right? Or is perma-banning a site rule that isn't being enforced?

If the later is true, then perhaps you should #walkaway in protest.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

You are proposing new rules, right? Or is perma-banning a site rule that isn't being enforced?

If the later is true, then perhaps you should #walkaway in protest.

I haven't seen anyone propose new rules and a ban is still a ban and is enforced.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

You quoted Beew so now I gotta ask how the hell she read that poll and got 'conservative'. There's nothing about political party affiliation in the poll anywhere.

Edit: Also why is she confused that it's easier to report something you see over something you don't? Of course it's easier to report people you don't have on ignore.

The sheer dumbassery.

Why is everybody else still talking to this dick?

Like I said and as empirically evidenced in this thread, they're in The Age of Schmucks.

No endgame with this one, though. Think about the whys of these yappy nimrods too much and it's gonna drive you batty like

https://media3.giphy.com/media/YmsrJ7AsmdtLO/giphy.gif

 

[dolf]

Why can't I be the ruler of the millennials? I mean I think our current king is Daniel Radcliffe, but I am absolutely willing to challenge him to a Right By Combat. Even if I lose horribly he'll be cool about it.

Edit: Not related to anything but did y'all hear about Bieber wanting to whoop Tom Cruise's ass? That is buckwild to me. Cruise would whoop his ass up one side of that ring and down the other. Like he's little but he has the power of lizard Jesus on his side. That motherfucker is crazy. You don't fight somebody that crazy.

Because you're crazy and your brain is falling out? Also, I want my youngest to have the crown. He's the perfect teenage mix of moody and moral, and Radcliffe would be pulp.

Why is Pop's least lovable toddler pissed at the cultist?

An example. Let's say forum rules forbid you to ever say "Though I could be wrong."



So Sgt reports my post. But when asked: "Why didn't you report dolf too?" he says: "Because I have dolf on iggy."

Does that make any sense to you?

Use the search function, provide a link, and I'll concede your point.

 

[Aglaopheme]

You quoted Beew so now I gotta ask how the hell she read that poll and got 'conservative'. There's nothing about political party affiliation in the poll anywhere.

Edit: Also why is she confused that it's easier to report something you see over something you don't? Of course it's easier to report people you don't have on ignore.

The sheer dumbassery.

Why is everybody else still talking to this dick?

I roll them off ignore just for this thread.

You are proposing new rules, right? Or is perma-banning a site rule that isn't being enforced?

If the later is true, then perhaps you should #walkaway in protest.

Feel free to ask dishrag why they were perma-banned.

 

[Luk]

You have a "relationship" with Laurelle?"

Is that why she quietly removes your bannable posts without censure? You don't seem like a very good friend, frankly.

Please link to one of those alleged posts.

 

[beew]

I haven't seen anyone propose new rules and a ban is still a ban and is enforced.

Here ya go.
Not only the way you obsess about reporting only conservative posters, but the way you take pride in snitching. Nobody else does.

But also figures of speech are typically lost on you.
Her sarcasm just flew right over your head, didn't it?

It's so surreal, you might be a performance alt.

 

[oralaccents]

Build that wall!

 

[CandiCame]

Because you're crazy and your brain is falling out? Also, I want my youngest to have the crown. He's the perfect teenage mix of moody and moral, and Radcliffe would be pulp.

Why is Pop's least lovable toddler pissed at the cultist?



Use the search function, provide a link, and I'll concede your point.

Ok yeah, if one of your kids also enters the ring I'm throwing in the towel. I've never met any of your kids, but I am terrified by proxy.

NO ONE KNOWS! He wouldn't tell anybody. He just tweeted out like, "Ima whoop Tom Cruise's ass" and then the dude who does the booking for the UFC was like, "we got a ring open!" and so far Cruise ain't said shit but I just googled it and it looks like the UFC chick HAS talked to Cruise it's just not public.

But he flat out won't tell anybody why. No one knows what the beef is.

https://www.maxim.com/entertainment/ufc-dana-white-confirms-fight-justin-bieber-tom-cruise-2019-6

https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/10/entertainment/justin-bieber-tom-cruise-fight/index.html

Is my crippling lack of sanity my biggest flaw?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Here ya go.
Not only the way you obsess about reporting only conservative posters, but the way you take pride in snitching. Nobody else does.

But also figures of speech are typically lost on you.
Her sarcasm just flew right over your head, didn't it?

It's so surreal, you might be a performance alt.

That's not what I asked you for. It looks like you're just making stuff up. I still can't imagine why you're in this thread and making stuff up.

 

[beew]

Use the search function, provide a link, and I'll concede your point.

I know what you're trying to do here.
Everyone saw them, it was an almost constant battle with him and a few posters about it, at one point. "Why do you keep reporting only us every time we quote and have a go at Rob?"

Didn't you see them too, WrongElement?
It would be disingenious of you to say No.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

I know what you're trying to do here.
Everyone saw them, it was an almost constant battle with him and a few posters about it, at one point. "Why do you keep reporting only us every time we quote and have a go at Rob?"

Didn't you see them too, WrongElement?
It would be disingenious of you to say No.

At this point, even you have to admit this was all a figment of your imagination.

 

[SpeareChucker]

Sure, KO got banned. Came back, got banned again.


Can you name even one conservative who got banned for their politics rather than for repeatedly breaking rules?

And we get back to the original question...



Has anybody on the Left ever been banned?


I asked this of Laurel, in regards to TDS, and her response was,
I didn't see it, nobody reported it, so it's no big deal that he
accused you of adopting a daughter to have underage sex with...



On the other hand, I posted an actual news story about pedophilia
and was immediately banned.

So the point is, like so much of social media, conservative voices "need not apply."



If either of you two clowns can point out a single "liberal" who got banned, then I will fulsomely apologize to you.

 

[SpeareChucker]

This last post above is, as far as Laurel&Friends is enough to get me banned.


I mentioned, after all, under-age sex.

When you are a conservative, context matters not...

 

[IrezumiKiss]

On the other hand, I posted an actual news story about pedophilia
and was immediately banned.

See...you go and do this bullshit in the light of your current whine and cheese pity party, which begs the question...why the fuck did you deny being AJ for so long when everyone knew it? Ish is the only one out of this bunch of grapes who never really bothered hiding his comeback.

Rhetorical at this point, but who knows, maybe you'll find the marbles in your sack to own up to it.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

And we get back to the original question...



Has anybody on the Left ever been banned?


I asked this of Laurel, in regards to TDS, and her response was,
I didn't see it, nobody reported it, so it's no big deal that he
accused you of adopting a daughter to have underage sex with...



On the other hand, I posted an actual news story about pedophilia
and was immediately banned.

So the point is, like so much of social media, conservative voices "need not apply."



If either of you two clowns can point out a single "liberal" who got banned, then I will fulsomely apologize to you.

That question has already been answered. As someone else pointed out, you weren't banned for your politics, you were banned because you repeatedly broke the forum guidelines after being warned. To be clear by repeatedly I mean that you had been banned, then violated the banning to return and continue to break the guidelines.

Years later you're still refusing to accept responsibility for your choices.

 

[beew]

At this point, even you have to admit this was all a figment of your imagination.

Yes, I'm obviously lying you can't possibly be, cause such a paragon of integrity.

Dude. You're one of the most dishonest posters on Lit.
Hiding under the "I'm defending Laurel and this site" mantra.
When you only focused on less of a handful of posters, while overlooking other reportable shit. And the way you used to twist people's comments, to vilify them.

It's funny how you yourself fell for your social persona.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

See...you go and do this bullshit in the light of your current whine and cheese pity party, which begs the question...why the fuck did you deny being AJ for so long when everyone knew it? Ish is the only one out of this bunch of grapes who never really bothered hiding his comeback.

Rhetorical at this point, but who knows, maybe you'll find the marbles in your sack to own up to it.

This!

https://media2.giphy.com/media/xT5LMqPBclx4HKdZXG/200.webp?cid=790b76115d1a257a466a746c6b79cd57&rid=200.webp

The beauty of AJ is that he can't help but out himself, and now that he's outed himself this alt will be banned and he'll be here next week with a new alt denying that he's AJ.

 

[Shadwell36]

I hope, for AJ’s sake, that beew pipes down and has a nap or something. Maybe try and use the Search function.


Otherwise, nobody will even notice AJ trying to play the victim.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Yes, I'm obviously lying you can't possibly be, cause such a paragon of integrity.

Dude. You're one of the most dishonest posters on Lit.
Hiding under the "I'm defending Laurel and this site" mantra.
When you only focused on less of a handful of posters, while overlooking other reportable shit. And the way you used to twist people's comments, to vilify them.

It's funny how you yourself fell for your social persona.

I'm not the dishonest one here. You made something up, got called out for it and suddenly everyone else is the bad guy.

 

[Dribble]

That's all you can come up with?

You have to admit: "the most stupid poster on the GB" outwitted y'all cool kids in this thread.

In your dreams

 

[SpeareChucker]

*chuckle*


The clarion call of the bully: "he/she is crying 'victim!'"