Justadesperatewifeandmom
digital demi-god
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2017
- Posts
- 27,597
Is that how it would look riding me? Lmao![]()
probably, but sometimes hitting you in the face
They can take turns.![]()
haha, well taking turns is a good compromise
I embrace the titty attack. Bounce em around and smother me. Can you shake your ass out of a thong like that?
haha, and I don't think so. I think the thong just gets swallowed by my ass.
thank youMesmerizing
I agree that some shapes are similar and can morph from one to another. Based on my limited observations, the pear/bell seems to be the most common for women of a certain age. I don't see the hourglass or inverted triangle or whatever you would call thin women (stick-shaped?) as often.
Some men of a certain age seem to have what I guess would be called the apple shape. Of course, that is the shape doctors say is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease.
The issue of disappointing someone reminds me of how much of a sexual advantage women have over men. Women never have to worry if the equipment will work or for how long. Women never have to worry that they will "be done" before everyone is ready. Women, if they chose to do so, could have sex repeatedly or with multiple people at once.
It also reminds me of a line from Two And A Half Men. When asked what his best sexual move was, the reply was "One pump and an apology".
well hourglass is really rare actually, about 5 or 6% of women. the equality of it with the skinny waist just isn't common. but yes, over the past 40 years, the average person weighs 25 pounds more than they would have back then so you don't see as many of the thin column shape either.
This is a good and bad thing. Obesity rates have more than tripled here, which is obviously a huge problem as 35% of the population is at a weight that drastically increases health risks, but it has also increased the percentage of chubby, and we have learned about many health advantages to those, males included but most especially women. Clocking in at a chubby bmi of 27 compared to say a perfect 23 appears to be increasing life expectancy, long term fertility, and decreases pregnancy risk factors while not increasing ones they previous thought it did. And that is now 40% off the population. of course, the issue is it is such a delicate line.
but yeah the apple shape is the least healthy body build they say. my work brings in people then pays us to take a health screen, then pays us again if we pass it. one of the measurements the do is waist measurement. It used to be women had to come in 32 or under. I am still side eyeing them for failing me on waist measurement when I was pregnant lol. They have actually upped women to 35 now. 32 wasn't exactly tough, but didn't leave a lot of room, especially since they don't touch you when measuring you, so I like the 35 better. The rest of the areas aren't a concern.
as to sexual performance, I think women have worries too. to do the fake porn acting or not, to try to look pretty or do the job right. vaginal dryness, pain, deciding whether to try to ignore pain yada yada. Sure, problems are more obviously impactful with men for men, but really what is bad sex for a man? um she looks bored, she falls asleep, it just isn't that exciting lol. When a women refers to bad sex, she generally means pain, that she most likely covered, or hard coercion, so that kind of needs to factor in to your advantage equation. So yeah, there is still worry for women, just different.
good line though