The Isolated Blurt Thread II

25 men. All 25 yes votes were men. I find that... interesting.

These 25 men (and the one woman who signed it into law) just gave more rights to rapists and molesters than to their victims.

it's depressing. the moreso because that woman has put her ambitions of overturning roe v wade ahead of the safety and wellbeing of any female of child-bearing age.
 
it's depressing. the moreso because that woman has put her ambitions of overturning roe v wade ahead of the safety and wellbeing of any female of child-bearing age.

Religious zealotry is bad. And we all know how much religion respects women.
 
wonder how many of those guys who are all for this bill going into effect will be happy if their sexual partners refuse to have sex with them in case they get pregnant.... seems fair; after all, a condom can split, birth control may fail for other reasons, and the woman might not want to carry a baby so there you have it. a woman has the right to tell them no sex but has to carry the resulting pregnancy if it's forced upon them with violence and/or coercion, incestuously or not.

well fuck that. women get to decide when and with whom they have sex on an equal footing with men

this bill forces thinking back 50 years to when men got to determine when a woman was allowed to have sex and how much she'd be shunned and ostracised if she went against convention and ''got herself pregnant''.

do modern women, even those republican ones, REALLY want to be in a position of having to throw their daughters out on the street if they get pregnant as a teen or out of wedlock? do they want to have to take on the care of an infant so their child might go on to finish her education, when they've busy work-lives, themselves? is it just acceptable if the babies are looked after by staff (wallets depending) or is it a return of shipping out the pregnant girl to an 'auntie' till she has the baby and then returns after a suitably-timed 'vacation' as if nothing had happened? are women simply going to return to the old days of backstreet abortions? i don't see it happening; i hope i'm right. too many women of today have made their own choices for too long to allow this to happen, and too many decided to opt for abortion themselves for all manner of reasons to be so judgmental of other women in difficult situations.

edit: adding, i am also well-aware that this bill affects women of a wide age-range, not just teen mothers. is the state going to provide medically for the baby born with severe complications, mentally or physically? :mad:

I'm taken aback that so many American men are anti-abortion.

I mean, back home they would go like: "Halleluya! Now I can fuck around as much as I please, without the responsibility if something happens."
And some abortions happen because either the guy is dead-beat and refuses to take responsibility, or they both struggle financially or have career aspirations.

I would be interested in finding out the demographics of those men who are pro-choice. My guess is that they are part of Elite not working class, and they are also driven by national concerns like the huge drop in natality rates in the West.
 
I suspect there are a few politicians who will be going without sex, and many more women with new hand guns and conceal carry permits.
 
banning abortion? seems more balanced (and just as stupid) to legislate that all males need to have a vasectomy once they've fathered 2 children and enforced birth control (line up for your registered birth control shots, gents) from the age of 16.

don't want to see women decide to have abortions, you'd damned well better make sure you don't impregnate any.
 
banning abortion? seems more balanced (and just as stupid) to legislate that all males need to have a vasectomy once they've fathered 2 children and enforced birth control (line up for your registered birth control shots, gents) from the age of 16.

don't want to see women decide to have abortions, you'd damned well better make sure you don't impregnate any.
..
And on the other side, states that mandate women's right to choose should be financially responsible for the children they are forced to bring to term until their majority.
 
Every sperm is sacred.
I don't see them outlawing male masturbation these days.

No CC Permit required in my state.
Good!

Said no woman ever :D :D
Exactly!

banning abortion? seems more balanced (and just as stupid) to legislate that all males need to have a vasectomy once they've fathered 2 children and enforced birth control (line up for your registered birth control shots, gents) from the age of 16.

don't want to see women decide to have abortions, you'd damned well better make sure you don't impregnate any.
I was thinking more of every man does sperm bank deposits and then gets snipped.

..
And on the other side, states that mandate women's right to choose should be financially responsible for the children they are forced to bring to term until their majority.
Bring back orphanages in every city?
 
Back
Top