von_Bismarck
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2003
- Posts
- 6,587
I'm just here to watch Que get bitch slapped. *popcorn*
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The yield has been moving towards inversion for weeks. Any bond investor with a pulse is aware of this movement. It was not just yesterday. Now really, shut up and stay in your lane.
I'm just here to watch Que get bitch slapped. *popcorn*
Yet, YOU remarked on it only yesterday when that meme was in every financial news feed just yesterday. What a coincidence, poser.
You claim to be a sophisticated, self-directed investor of high net worth who, "retired at 52" yet your allocation is one of a geriatric. Why is that, poser?
Stay in *your* lane, poser and quit cribbing Poser Zumi's antiquated jive blackcent, ?
Not that you’d have any personal experience, but there comes a time when preservation of capital is more important than accelerated growth of capital. Not to mention the long term bull market in bonds which has been very good to the non-greedy investor. Again, you don’t need to know these things because you’ve accumulated so little.
Of course you are right. If advising geriatrics.
You claim to be relatively young and are sitting on billions there's no reason why a sizable percentage of that would not be allocated to growth.
We aren't talking about my current Financial circumstances and the reasons that I need to sit on the sidelines with actual cash, we are talking about your own trumpeted expertise and your own disclosure about your ridiculously timid allocation. No competent advisor would advise a relatively young investor sitting on a huge pile of money as you claim to be as conservative as you claim to be. Not to mention the fact that the idea that bonds are somehow a Refuge from risk is pretty laughable. You don't go into bonds to preserve capital. You go to into bonds to reduce volatility, poser.
It's perfectly fine if you're a complete pussy and can't sleep at night because you might lose a third of your massive pile of wealth but if you don't want to have anything in the stock market that's your business. But don't pretend that you're some hot shit investment guru, when literally all that you know about it is what you've experienced from your pasta cresting and what you read in your financial news feed. Just quit pretending. Nobody buys it.
*I like "pasta cresting" too well to correct it to "past investing."
I'm just here to watch Que get bitch slapped. *popcorn*
Let’s see.
I did not say I was relatively young.
Bond investments are not “actual cash.”
I never trumpeted expertise.
Refuge from risk is the same thing as reduced volatility.
“All I know about is what I’ve experienced?” Okay.
“Nobody buys it?” So, you and who else?
Your Asperger brain along with whatever drugs you’re currrently taking make you seem borderline insane. As I said, stay in your lane and hope Slinger doesn’t ever take up your challenge.
Also you are an idiot. Reducing volatility is not the same thing as preserving capital, when your exposure to loss of capital in bonds is still up to 100% of your capital.
.
If you knew what you were talking about, you would never suggest I “calculated a yield curve for an entire market.” One merely looks at two data points and knows the curve is inverted.
But you’re the idiot. Who called me timid because I’m in an investment where I can lose 100% of my capital? Make up your mind ya fuckin’ phony. And if you ever see him, ask Bill Gross if you can make serious money in the bond market.
So...
...to ask the question again...
...why have Republicans stopped bragging about the stock market?
![]()
According to one estimate, the U.S. has lost $5 trillion in stock market returns as a result of the con artist's trade war:
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trade-wars-cost-us-stock-market-5-trillion-so-far-estimates-deutsche-bank-2019-05-31?mod=mw_theo_homepage
According to one estimate, the U.S. has lost $5 trillion in stock market returns as a result of the con artist's trade war:
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trade-wars-cost-us-stock-market-5-trillion-so-far-estimates-deutsche-bank-2019-05-31?mod=mw_theo_homepage
Mmm mmm mmm.
Johnny one-note.
I should query you every time you come on to gloat that it dropped a point or two about the reason.
... I won't bother this time because the reason the market reacted this particular time is so well-known and so well-publicized that even adre the poser could answer that question.
So what do you think.. should adre move his vast fortune into gold to protect his capital from the dangers of the obviously-going-to-crash Trump economy?