Trump is finally...

When they can't actually argue their point they result to ascription and name calling, which is really all Rob can do.

They don't have a point to argue. Which is why they slur, deflect, and move the goalposts so much.
 
When they can't actually argue their point they result to ascription and name calling, which is really all Rob can do.





ROBBY BOY has to have several alts. There CAN'T BE this many assholes with the same lackluster point of view or the lack of any coherent logic on this site.
 
They don't have a point to argue. Which is why they slur, deflect, and move the goalposts so much.

They don’t care how far they have to move the goal posts either like the other day when the death penalty was used to argue/contradict being pro-life.
 
ROBBY BOY has to have several alts. There CAN'T BE this many assholes with the same lackluster point of view or the lack of any coherent logic on this site.

I’ve said that before. It’s either that or this site attracts a lot people who watch CNN or NBC.
 
Hey ignoramus, I know the facts. The USS Cole was al-qaeda not Iran or Syria.
Funny how it was established Iran sponsored the attacks, regardless of who actually carried them out.

What does cyber have anything to do with either.
It has to do with you denying what intelligence agencies have established.

Why are you asking about attacking Russia? No one was talking about Russia. I was merely using that as an example of your head up your ass "knowledge". The discussion was about "no country would attack US forces" BS.
But you'd know that if you could read with any sort of comprehension.
"This is what you ignorant asshole do, twist thing to deflect from your intellectual inadequacy."
 
ROBBY BOY has to have several alts. There CAN'T BE this many assholes with the same lackluster point of view or the lack of any coherent logic on this site.

Honestly, Rob just wants someone to talk to him or show him attention even if he has to create multiple alts to do it. I don’t bother reading, much less replying to anything he has to say. If you watch long enough you’ll see few people actually converse with him. Prime example: just skim through the pages of this thread and see how many times someone acknowledge him.
 
Funny how it was established Iran sponsored the attacks, regardless of who actually carried them out.

It has to do with you denying what intelligence agencies have established.

Why are you asking about attacking Russia? No one was talking about Russia. I was merely using that as an example of your head up your ass "knowledge". The discussion was about "no country would attack US forces" BS.
But you'd know that if you could read with any sort of comprehension.
"This is what you ignorant asshole do, twist thing to deflect from your intellectual inadequacy."

See? Slur, deflect, and move the goalposts...

I like how a-a tries to support the intelligence agencies. The same intelligence agencies which said they had proof that Iraq had WMD's. The same agencies which are now pointing fingers at each other about who is responsible for promoting the FAKE NEWS about Trump conspiring with Russia.

Not a good recent track record of competency.
 
So you reduce your argument to the fact that you don't like the particular WORDS that were used?
The claim, which you obviously don't get, was that it would be perfectly fine if a Democratic CnC said the same thing to a survivor.
A completely baseless and patently false claim.

Demand the specific to disprove the greater behavior pattern....yea that's not going to work.
Of course it won't, never said it would.

You made a very specific claim about a very specific statement. That the only reason people care is because it was Trump who said it.
You can't back up your claim with anything other that generalities. So it's obvious you were just posting your typical BS.
 
The claim, which you obviously don't get, was that it would be perfectly fine if a Democratic CnC said the same thing to a survivor.
A completely baseless and patently false claim.

Of course it won't, never said it would.

I got it. What you aren't getting, because poutrage, is that the WORDS are irrelevant to what you are trying to prove.

You're whining about the words someone said to someone else and trying to make those words into a controversy to prove that the speaker "is a meanie".

Grow the fuck up.
 
You made a very specific claim about a very specific statement.

Based on the very observable behavior patter of 'It's only bad when a white guy does it, and extra bad when Trump does it.' from the same group of people who are soooooooooooo outraged about how Trump speaks of a fallen HERO!!!

But turn around and praise Omar for shit talking fallen heroes and call anyone who says she's wrong a racist white supremacist NAZI~!!


Different words, same behavior.....partisanship and racism. SUuuuuper progressive :D
 
Funny how it was established Iran sponsored the attacks, regardless of who actually carried them out.

It has to do with you denying what intelligence agencies have established.

Why are you asking about attacking Russia? No one was talking about Russia. I was merely using that as an example of your head up your ass "knowledge". The discussion was about "no country would attack US forces" BS.
But you'd know that if you could read with any sort of comprehension.
"This is what you ignorant asshole do, twist thing to deflect from your intellectual inadequacy."

The USS Cole was a terrorist attack which Al-Qaeda took responsibility for. Al-Qaeda does not like to share their deadly deeds. The U.S. courts held Sudan liable monetarily. You must get your facts from msnbc. What was stated by you originally was a country attacking the U.S. and you brought up terrorist organizations
( marine barracks and the Cole ) which are not countries. Your fucking conversations are convoluted and you don't know what the fuck your talking about.
 
You really should read a thread fully before you jump in and make an ass of yourself.

As I said

I didn't "jump in" to make an ass of myself...

I freely admit that I am an Ass. Or didn't you get the memo? Perhaps because you didn't bother to read the thread?
 
The USS Cole was a terrorist attack which Al-Qaeda took responsibility for. Al-Qaeda does not like to share their deadly deeds. The U.S. courts held Sudan liable monetarily. You must get your facts from msnbc. What was stated by you originally was a country attacking the U.S. and you brought up terrorist organizations
( marine barracks and the Cole ) which are not countries. Your fucking conversations are convoluted and you don't know what the fuck your talking about.

a-a never did. It's all about "orange man bad".
 
Good to know you're fine with Ilhan Omar's "all about the Benjamins" comment.

Holy ascription bubba....the ONLY people who've openly been ok with and defended those comments are the antisemitic left.

The "WOKE" narrative: The only reason the anyone could possibly be against that or her other antisemitic comments/associations is because she's a strong black Muslim woman and they are all Nazi scum!!


I got it. What you aren't getting, because poutrage, is that the WORDS are irrelevant to what you are trying to prove.

You're whining about the words someone said to someone else and trying to make those words into a controversy to prove that the speaker "is a meanie".

Grow the fuck up.

It's all about the outrage at Trump......not about the content of the words or behavior or the speakers.

Like I said, it's TDS.
 
Last edited:
The USS Cole was a terrorist attack which Al-Qaeda took responsibility for. Al-Qaeda does not like to share their deadly deeds. The U.S. courts held Sudan liable monetarily. You must get your facts from msnbc. What was stated by you originally was a country attacking the U.S. and you brought up terrorist organizations
( marine barracks and the Cole ) which are not countries. Your fucking conversations are convoluted and you don't know what the fuck your talking about.

About_Average should be happy he found someone to talk about the USS Cole with him. 😎
 
I hope they primary her in the next election... And the fuckers in Congress keep defending her. Why is that?

She's anti-Trump and their TDS forces them to adhere to the mantra that anyone who is anti-Trump is a "good person".

In Charlottesville, the belief that there were "good people" on both sides is wrong and racist. In Congress, the same ideology is woke.
 
I hope they primary her in the next election... And the fuckers in Congress keep defending her. Why is that?

Because most of the (D)'s in congress loathe the USA as much as she does.


And she likely is, most Minnisotans I've come across so far are pretty revolted by her behavior, but she does come from a district that hates Minnesota and the USA as much as she does.
 
Back
Top